Rambam telling us his sources and concealing them

Hakdama to Shomne Prakim

Please support our beis medrash

https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=SMGXBETTK3Z94

make a monthly membership

https://yitzchoklowy.com/membership-account/membership-levels/

Transcript

Official transcript:

Kind: captions

Language: en

then<00:00:03.040> we’re<00:00:03.240> up<00:00:03.399> to<00:00:03.600> doing<00:00:04.000> this<00:00:04.400> we’re<00:00:04.600> up<00:00:04.720> to

then we’re up to doing this we’re up to

this

thing<00:00:07.520> uh<00:00:08.000> last<00:00:08.160> time<00:00:08.320> we<00:00:08.440> did<00:00:08.559> a<00:00:08.719> whole<00:00:09.080> spiel

thing uh last time we did a whole spiel

about<00:00:09.719> the<00:00:09.920> credit<00:00:10.759> and<00:00:10.920> taking<00:00:11.320> credit<00:00:11.639> and

about the credit and taking credit and

not<00:00:11.960> taking

credit<00:00:17.560> but<00:00:17.760> my<00:00:17.920> basic<00:00:18.240> thing<00:00:18.439> is<00:00:18.600> like<00:00:18.760> this

credit but my basic thing is like this

so<00:00:19.039> let’s<00:00:19.279> read<00:00:19.600> this<00:00:19.880> last<00:00:20.199> chapter<00:00:20.920> last

so let’s read this last chapter last

piece<00:00:21.840> again<00:00:22.320> from<00:00:23.080> VI<00:00:24.080> and<00:00:24.359> then<00:00:25.119> I<00:00:25.240> have<00:00:25.400> a

piece again from VI and then I have a

different<00:00:26.400> stle<00:00:26.760> to<00:00:27.199> learn<00:00:28.199> which<00:00:28.400> is<00:00:28.599> going

different stle to learn which is going

to<00:00:28.960> connect<00:00:29.279> to<00:00:29.480> this<00:00:29.960> I<00:00:30.039> don’t<00:00:30.119> know<00:00:30.240> if<00:00:30.359> it’s

to connect to this I don’t know if it’s

really<00:00:30.880> connected<00:00:31.279> to<00:00:31.480> this<00:00:31.800> but<00:00:32.640> this<00:00:33.600> uh

really connected to this but this uh

English

stage<00:00:36.840> but<00:00:37.000> at<00:00:37.079> least<00:00:37.239> I<00:00:37.320> want<00:00:37.480> to<00:00:37.600> connect<00:00:37.840> it

stage but at least I want to connect it

it<00:00:40.640> seems<00:00:40.920> to<00:00:41.039> be

it seems to be

important<00:00:43.239> it’s<00:00:43.440> like<00:00:44.120> this<00:00:45.120> right<00:00:45.280> so<00:00:45.520> so<00:00:45.680> the

important it’s like this right so so the

said<00:00:46.360> that<00:00:46.480> he’s<00:00:46.680> going<00:00:46.800> to<00:00:46.920> give<00:00:47.039> his<00:00:47.199> a

said that he’s going to give his a

preface<00:00:48.199> to<00:00:49.440> P<00:00:50.440> which<00:00:50.559> is<00:00:50.760> important<00:00:51.120> in<00:00:51.199> order

preface to P which is important in order

to<00:00:51.520> become<00:00:51.719> a

to become a

prophet<00:00:53.480> one<00:00:53.640> of<00:00:53.760> the<00:00:53.840> things<00:00:54.079> you<00:00:54.160> have<00:00:54.280> to

prophet one of the things you have to

have<00:00:54.520> is<00:00:54.680> good<00:00:54.840> M<00:00:55.320> so<00:00:55.480> therefore<00:00:55.719> you<00:00:55.840> have<00:00:55.960> to

have is good M so therefore you have to

have<00:00:56.440> you<00:00:56.520> have<00:00:56.640> to<00:00:56.719> know<00:00:56.879> how<00:00:57.039> they<00:00:57.640> work<00:00:58.640> we

have you have to know how they work we

discussed<00:00:59.239> a<00:00:59.320> little<00:00:59.480> bit<00:00:59.640> how<00:00:59.800> they

discussed a little bit how they

there’s<00:01:00.600> a<00:01:00.760> knowledge<00:01:01.199> to<00:01:01.719> that<00:01:02.719> I’m<00:01:02.879> going<00:01:02.960> to

there’s a knowledge to that I’m going to

understand<00:01:03.480> that<00:01:03.600> a<00:01:03.680> little<00:01:03.920> B<00:01:04.119> more<00:01:04.320> today

understand that a little B more today

hopefully<00:01:05.640> what<00:01:05.760> the<00:01:05.960> Practical<00:01:06.280> knowledge

hopefully what the Practical knowledge

of<00:01:06.760> there<00:01:06.880> is<00:01:07.040> a<00:01:07.560> yeah<00:01:08.119> where<00:01:08.479> some<00:01:08.720> sort<00:01:08.920> of

of there is a yeah where some sort of

like<00:01:10.320> reason<00:01:10.840> to<00:01:11.000> be<00:01:11.159> known<00:01:11.640> that’s<00:01:11.840> going<00:01:11.920> to

like reason to be known that’s going to

help<00:01:12.280> you<00:01:12.759> although<00:01:13.040> it’s<00:01:13.200> not<00:01:13.479> about<00:01:13.720> knowing

help you although it’s not about knowing

the<00:01:14.360> true<00:01:15.360> ethics<00:01:15.799> That’s<00:01:16.000> The<00:01:16.159> Prophecy<00:01:16.600> part

the true ethics That’s The Prophecy part

in<00:01:17.479> order<00:01:17.680> to<00:01:17.799> know<00:01:17.920> the<00:01:18.040> truth<00:01:18.280> you’ve<00:01:18.439> got<00:01:18.560> to

in order to know the truth you’ve got to

got<00:01:19.400> good<00:01:19.680> ethics<00:01:20.280> but<00:01:21.040> it’s<00:01:21.159> not<00:01:21.400> the<00:01:21.520> same

got good ethics but it’s not the same

thing

right

and<00:01:27.759> and<00:01:27.920> so<00:01:28.200> and<00:01:28.320> that’s<00:01:28.479> what<00:01:28.640> p<00:01:29.119> is<00:01:29.240> about

and and so and that’s what p is about

that’s<00:01:29.640> like<00:01:29.799> his<00:01:29.920> his<00:01:30.079> identification<00:01:30.960> very

that’s like his his identification very

important<00:01:31.640> one<00:01:31.759> of<00:01:31.920> his<00:01:32.520> identifications<00:01:33.520> the

important one of his identifications the

subject<00:01:34.040> of<00:01:34.240> P<00:01:34.680> or<00:01:34.799> in<00:01:35.399> general<00:01:36.399> kazali<00:01:36.880> and

subject of P or in general kazali and

kaz’s<00:01:37.799> um<00:01:38.799> muser<00:01:39.320> is<00:01:39.960> basically<00:01:40.960> about

kaz’s um muser is basically about

this<00:01:44.399> ethics<00:01:45.399> right<00:01:45.920> what<00:01:46.040> we<00:01:46.159> call<00:01:46.399> ethics

this ethics right what we call ethics

the<00:01:47.960> Practical

the Practical

ethics<00:01:51.079> and<00:01:52.079> therefore<00:01:52.360> we<00:01:52.479> have<00:01:52.600> to<00:01:52.719> give<00:01:52.840> a

ethics and therefore we have to give a

preface<00:01:53.560> okay<00:01:53.880> that’s<00:01:54.159> that’s<00:01:54.360> that’s<00:01:54.520> until

preface okay that’s that’s that’s until

here<00:01:55.000> and<00:01:55.119> then<00:01:55.280> he<00:01:55.360> says<00:01:55.600> like<00:01:55.759> this

here and then he says like this

oh<00:01:58.280> there

oh there

and<00:02:00.360> then<00:02:00.439> it<00:02:00.560> says<00:02:00.759> like<00:02:00.960> this<00:02:01.960> okay<00:02:02.159> that’s

and then it says like this okay that’s

in<00:02:02.399> the<00:02:02.560> second<00:02:02.840> line<00:02:03.079> of<00:02:03.200> the<00:02:03.320> third

in the second line of the third

paragraph<00:02:04.000> on<00:02:04.079> the<00:02:04.240> first<00:02:04.640> page<00:02:05.640> and<00:02:05.960> if<00:02:06.079> I

paragraph on the first page and if I

would<00:02:06.320> have<00:02:06.439> been<00:02:06.560> making<00:02:06.759> the<00:02:06.880> paragraphs<00:02:07.399> I

would have been making the paragraphs I

would<00:02:07.600> have<00:02:07.880> cut<00:02:08.039> it<00:02:08.280> paragraph<00:02:08.800> here<00:02:09.200> maybe

would have cut it paragraph here maybe

if<00:02:09.679> you<00:02:09.840> find<00:02:10.119> over<00:02:10.319> there<00:02:10.479> the<00:02:10.560> other<00:02:10.759> guy

if you find over there the other guy

maybe<00:02:11.200> do<00:02:11.360> it<00:02:11.520> that<00:02:11.760> way<00:02:12.760> I<00:02:12.840> don’t<00:02:13.040> know<00:02:13.200> if<00:02:13.319> we

maybe do it that way I don’t know if we

can<00:02:13.640> find<00:02:13.959> it<00:02:14.480> but<00:02:15.760> maybe<00:02:16.760> you’re

good

um<00:02:23.680> give<00:02:23.800> me<00:02:23.959> see<00:02:24.120> if<00:02:24.200> I<00:02:24.319> could<00:02:24.480> time

um give me see if I could time

it<00:02:27.680> and<00:02:28.680> on<00:02:29.160> sit<00:02:29.440> on<00:02:29.680> V

um<00:02:41.800> yeah<00:02:41.920> he<00:02:42.080> also<00:02:42.280> put<00:02:42.400> it<00:02:42.560> like<00:02:42.720> this<00:02:42.840> don’t

um yeah he also put it like this don’t

ask<00:02:43.200> me<00:02:43.480> why<00:02:44.239> okay<00:02:44.720> I<00:02:44.800> think<00:02:45.000> they<00:02:45.800> they’re<00:02:45.959> all

ask me why okay I think they they’re all

copying<00:02:46.519> each<00:02:46.640> other

copying each other

okay<00:02:49.800> so<00:02:50.080> like

okay so like

this<00:02:52.200> um<00:02:52.640> anyways<00:02:53.000> it<00:02:53.120> says<00:02:53.319> like<00:02:53.440> this<00:02:53.599> the

this um anyways it says like this the

things<00:02:53.879> that<00:02:54.000> I’m<00:02:54.120> going<00:02:54.280> to<00:02:54.400> tell<00:02:54.560> you<00:02:54.800> here

things that I’m going to tell you here

right<00:02:56.560> in<00:02:56.760> the<00:02:57.000> chapters<00:02:57.440> and<00:02:57.599> in<00:02:57.760> the

right in the chapters and in the

parish<00:02:59.640> I<00:02:59.800> are<00:02:59.920> not<00:03:00.080> things<00:03:00.239> that<00:03:00.360> I<00:03:00.480> made<00:03:00.720> up

parish I are not things that I made up

right<00:03:02.560> I<00:03:02.680> didn’t<00:03:02.920> make<00:03:03.040> them<00:03:03.200> up<00:03:03.319> for<00:03:04.000> myself

right I didn’t make them up for myself

or<00:03:06.280> I’m<00:03:06.400> not<00:03:06.519> sure<00:03:06.760> we<00:03:06.959> discussed<00:03:07.360> this<00:03:07.519> what

or I’m not sure we discussed this what

it<00:03:07.720> means<00:03:08.040> to<00:03:08.200> make<00:03:08.400> up<00:03:08.680> things<00:03:09.159> but<00:03:09.400> they’re

it means to make up things but they’re

not<00:03:09.799> things<00:03:10.000> that<00:03:10.159> I<00:03:10.280> was<00:03:10.560> mades<00:03:11.159> that’s<00:03:11.360> his

not things that I was mades that’s his

language<00:03:12.519> or<00:03:13.000> things<00:03:13.239> that<00:03:13.440> I<00:03:13.959> invented<00:03:14.480> that

language or things that I invented that

I<00:03:14.840> like<00:03:15.000> sort<00:03:15.159> of<00:03:15.440> originated<00:03:16.080> with<00:03:16.599> me<00:03:17.599> but

I like sort of originated with me but

what<00:03:17.959> are

what are

they<00:03:21.120> they<00:03:21.239> are

they they are

things<00:03:23.599> uh<00:03:23.799> their<00:03:24.040> compil<00:03:24.640> are<00:03:24.799> compilation

things uh their compil are compilation

things<00:03:25.760> right<00:03:26.200> Milat<00:03:27.200> and

things right Milat and

you<00:03:29.239> and<00:03:29.840> so<00:03:30.040> it’s<00:03:30.200> basically<00:03:30.519> not<00:03:30.680> me<00:03:30.959> but<00:03:31.439> me

you and so it’s basically not me but me

compiling<00:03:33.000> which<00:03:33.159> is<00:03:33.560> yes<00:03:33.879> me<00:03:34.400> in<00:03:34.560> some<00:03:34.799> way

compiling which is yes me in some way

but<00:03:35.840> not<00:03:36.080> me<00:03:36.400> in<00:03:36.519> the<00:03:36.680> sense<00:03:36.920> of<00:03:37.159> the<00:03:37.480> content

but not me in the sense of the content

like<00:03:38.200> the<00:03:38.480> main<00:03:38.879> ideas<00:03:39.239> or<00:03:39.799> the<00:03:40.799> act<00:03:41.319> real

like the main ideas or the act real

content<00:03:41.920> of<00:03:42.040> the<00:03:42.120> ideas<00:03:42.400> is<00:03:42.519> not<00:03:42.720> something

content of the ideas is not something

that<00:03:43.120> I<00:03:43.239> made<00:03:43.480> up<00:03:43.799> although<00:03:44.319> he<00:03:44.519> does<00:03:45.120> give

that I made up although he does give

himself<00:03:45.560> a<00:03:45.760> very<00:03:45.959> important<00:03:46.480> thing<00:03:46.760> which<00:03:47.400> is

himself a very important thing which is

uh<00:03:48.560> the<00:03:48.680> compilation<00:03:49.480> which<00:03:50.040> we<00:03:50.159> should<00:03:50.400> not

uh the compilation which we should not

like<00:03:51.519> pretend<00:03:51.879> is<00:03:52.040> a<00:03:52.159> small<00:03:52.360> thing<00:03:52.519> it’s<00:03:52.640> a<00:03:52.799> big

like pretend is a small thing it’s a big

thing<00:03:54.560> I<00:03:54.720> we<00:03:54.840> discussed<00:03:55.200> this<00:03:55.280> a<00:03:55.400> little<00:03:55.560> bit

thing I we discussed this a little bit

we<00:03:56.159> did<00:03:56.439> no<00:03:56.599> we<00:03:56.720> didn’t<00:03:57.439> we<00:03:57.560> discussed<00:03:57.879> it<00:03:58.040> a

we did no we didn’t we discussed it a

little<00:03:58.239> bit<00:03:58.400> more<00:03:58.599> with<00:03:58.799> the<00:03:59.079> with<00:03:59.280> the<00:03:59.879> with

little bit more with the with the with

the<00:04:00.319> m<00:04:01.319> yeah<00:04:01.720> but<00:04:01.879> you<00:04:01.959> can<00:04:02.079> see<00:04:02.280> over<00:04:02.519> there

the m yeah but you can see over there

that<00:04:02.879> compilation<00:04:03.400> is<00:04:03.720> actually<00:04:04.720> entire<00:04:05.640> uh

that compilation is actually entire uh

yeah<00:04:06.519> although<00:04:06.840> it’s<00:04:06.959> not<00:04:07.200> original<00:04:07.959> doesn’t

yeah although it’s not original doesn’t

not<00:04:08.599> giving<00:04:08.920> climing<00:04:09.319> originality<00:04:09.920> for<00:04:10.120> the

not giving climing originality for the

thought<00:04:10.480> it’s<00:04:10.640> not<00:04:10.799> originating<00:04:11.439> thoughts

thought it’s not originating thoughts

which<00:04:12.439> is<00:04:12.599> important<00:04:13.319> to<00:04:13.439> realize<00:04:13.760> that<00:04:13.879> he

which is important to realize that he

doesn’t<00:04:14.239> see<00:04:14.439> himself<00:04:14.720> as<00:04:14.840> an<00:04:14.920> originator<00:04:15.400> of

doesn’t see himself as an originator of

thoughts<00:04:16.479> which<00:04:16.639> means<00:04:16.799> he<00:04:16.919> doesn’t<00:04:17.120> do

thoughts which means he doesn’t do

philosophy<00:04:18.079> ever<00:04:18.959> in<00:04:19.120> his

philosophy ever in his

books<00:04:21.280> um<00:04:21.799> he<00:04:21.919> does<00:04:22.199> do<00:04:22.400> a<00:04:22.520> lot<00:04:22.680> of<00:04:23.479> it’s<00:04:23.800> there

books um he does do a lot of it’s there

is<00:04:24.080> there<00:04:24.199> is<00:04:24.360> something<00:04:24.720> important<00:04:25.199> in<00:04:25.400> in

is there is something important in in

the<00:04:25.639> organization<00:04:26.560> yes<00:04:27.560> okay<00:04:28.199> um

the organization yes okay um

and<00:04:30.720> but<00:04:31.680> he<00:04:31.840> is<00:04:32.039> telling<00:04:32.440> taking<00:04:32.720> it<00:04:32.880> from

and but he is telling taking it from

where<00:04:33.520> from<00:04:34.479> two<00:04:34.759> kinds<00:04:35.039> of<00:04:35.320> two<00:04:35.520> or<00:04:35.720> three

where from two kinds of two or three

different<00:04:36.199> kinds<00:04:36.400> of<00:04:36.520> sources<00:04:37.320> the<00:04:37.440> first

different kinds of sources the first

kind<00:04:38.000> of<00:04:38.160> source<00:04:38.680> is<00:04:39.680> so

kind of source is so

our<00:04:41.880> in<00:04:42.080> three<00:04:42.280> different<00:04:42.560> books<00:04:42.880> that<00:04:43.080> kind

our in three different books that kind

of<00:04:43.400> books<00:04:43.639> they<00:04:43.759> wrote<00:04:44.160> one<00:04:44.320> is<00:04:44.400> known<00:04:44.600> as<00:04:44.759> tal

of books they wrote one is known as tal

the<00:04:45.160> second<00:04:45.400> known<00:04:45.560> as<00:04:45.759> Med<00:04:46.080> and<00:04:46.160> the<00:04:46.280> third

the second known as Med and the third

known<00:04:46.720> as<00:04:46.919> others<00:04:47.600> mcan’s<00:04:48.440> category<00:04:48.960> doesn’t

known as others mcan’s category doesn’t

say<00:04:49.400> who<00:04:49.720> what<00:04:49.840> that<00:04:50.000> means<00:04:51.000> so<00:04:51.199> that’s<00:04:51.680> the

say who what that means so that’s the

and<00:04:52.880> then<00:04:53.199> it’s<00:04:53.320> from<00:04:53.520> the<00:04:53.680> philosophers<00:04:54.320> and

and then it’s from the philosophers and

there’s<00:04:54.600> two<00:04:54.759> kinds<00:04:54.960> of<00:04:55.080> philosophers<00:04:55.600> old

there’s two kinds of philosophers old

ones<00:04:55.919> and<00:04:56.039> new<00:04:56.199> ones<00:04:57.160> and<00:04:57.280> there’s<00:04:57.479> also<00:04:57.720> many

ones and new ones and there’s also many

people<00:04:58.479> who<00:04:58.600> knows<00:04:58.840> who<00:04:59.039> that<00:04:59.160> who<00:04:59.320> those

people who knows who that who those

people<00:05:00.039> are<00:05:01.039> okay<00:05:01.240> and<00:05:01.479> then<00:05:02.479> it<00:05:02.639> says<00:05:03.400> has

people are okay and then it says has

this<00:05:03.840> like<00:05:04.320> uh

slogan<00:05:09.560> hear<00:05:09.800> the<00:05:09.960> truth<00:05:10.280> from<00:05:10.520> whoever<00:05:10.840> said

slogan hear the truth from whoever said

it<00:05:11.680> means<00:05:11.960> like<00:05:12.080> from<00:05:12.280> whoever<00:05:12.800> right<00:05:13.360> from

it means like from whoever right from

whoever<00:05:13.840> said<00:05:14.000> it<00:05:14.240> hear<00:05:14.440> the<00:05:14.600> truth<00:05:15.400> and<00:05:15.720> this

whoever said it hear the truth and this

line<00:05:16.520> is<00:05:16.759> very<00:05:16.960> famous<00:05:17.360> line<00:05:18.759> but<00:05:19.759> actually<00:05:20.080> a

line is very famous line but actually a

lot<00:05:20.400> less<00:05:20.560> clear<00:05:20.880> than<00:05:21.000> it<00:05:21.120> seems<00:05:21.360> to<00:05:21.520> be

lot less clear than it seems to be

because<00:05:23.280> of<00:05:24.039> ifs<00:05:24.440> how<00:05:24.560> it<00:05:25.199> spoke<00:05:26.199> well<00:05:27.039> because

because of ifs how it spoke well because

if<00:05:27.600> it<00:05:27.720> means<00:05:28.039> Al<00:05:28.319> something<00:05:28.520> that’s<00:05:29.360> if<00:05:29.479> it

if it means Al something that’s if it

means<00:05:30.720> that<00:05:30.919> there<00:05:31.199> is<00:05:31.639> a<00:05:32.039> sort<00:05:32.280> of<00:05:32.600> purely

means that there is a sort of purely

rational<00:05:34.240> way<00:05:34.440> of<00:05:34.720> accessing<00:05:35.199> the<00:05:35.479> truth

rational way of accessing the truth

which<00:05:36.680> is<00:05:36.960> not<00:05:37.479> you<00:05:37.680> don’t<00:05:37.880> need<00:05:38.120> any<00:05:39.280> uhas

which is not you don’t need any uhas

right<00:05:40.400> you<00:05:40.520> don’t<00:05:40.639> need<00:05:40.840> any<00:05:41.319> any<00:05:41.880> uh

right you don’t need any any uh

preperatory<00:05:43.680> things<00:05:44.199> knowledge<00:05:44.759> or<00:05:45.759> not

preperatory things knowledge or not

knowledge<00:05:46.440> or<00:05:46.720> like<00:05:47.120> uh<00:05:47.479> agreed<00:05:47.840> upon<00:05:48.160> things

knowledge or like uh agreed upon things

right<00:05:48.840> either<00:05:49.240> opinion<00:05:49.560> or<00:05:49.759> knowledge<00:05:50.479> right

right either opinion or knowledge right

you<00:05:50.800> can’t<00:05:50.919> you<00:05:51.039> have<00:05:51.160> no<00:05:51.319> starting<00:05:51.639> point

you can’t you have no starting point

you’re<00:05:52.000> going<00:05:52.120> to<00:05:52.280> start<00:05:52.880> somehow<00:05:53.199> from<00:05:53.360> the

you’re going to start somehow from the

pure<00:05:54.080> know<00:05:54.319> purely<00:05:54.639> known<00:05:54.960> things<00:05:55.199> and

pure know purely known things and

getting<00:05:55.600> to<00:05:55.759> the<00:05:55.880> purely<00:05:56.160> known<00:05:56.520> things<00:05:57.520> like

getting to the purely known things like

the<00:05:58.360> ideal<00:05:58.720> of<00:05:58.840> a<00:05:58.960> science<00:05:59.360> right<00:05:59.520> the<00:05:59.880> Ideal

the ideal of a science right the Ideal

Signs<00:06:00.520> are<00:06:00.680> supposed<00:06:00.960> to<00:06:01.039> be<00:06:01.240> that<00:06:01.400> way<00:06:02.400> then

Signs are supposed to be that way then

we<00:06:03.000> don’t<00:06:03.160> really<00:06:03.280> need<00:06:03.479> anyone<00:06:03.720> to<00:06:03.840> tell<00:06:04.000> us

we don’t really need anyone to tell us

that<00:06:04.360> that’s<00:06:04.840> obvious<00:06:05.880> right<00:06:06.880> and<00:06:07.520> the<00:06:07.919> the

that that’s obvious right and the the

main<00:06:08.360> problem<00:06:09.160> in<00:06:09.479> in<00:06:09.639> this<00:06:09.840> context<00:06:10.599> that<00:06:10.720> I

main problem in in this context that I

have<00:06:11.039> with<00:06:11.199> that<00:06:11.400> is<00:06:11.520> that<00:06:11.680> that’s<00:06:11.800> not<00:06:11.919> what

have with that is that that’s not what

he’s<00:06:12.199> talking<00:06:12.599> about<00:06:13.599> because<00:06:13.800> he’s<00:06:13.960> saying

he’s talking about because he’s saying

himself<00:06:14.599> that<00:06:14.720> he<00:06:14.840> is<00:06:15.120> taking<00:06:15.479> this<00:06:16.400> compiling

himself that he is taking this compiling

this<00:06:17.160> out<00:06:17.280> of<00:06:17.440> the<00:06:17.560> works<00:06:17.800> of<00:06:17.960> a<00:06:18.120> many<00:06:18.360> people

this out of the works of a many people

he’s<00:06:18.759> not<00:06:18.919> saying<00:06:19.280> well<00:06:19.440> this<00:06:19.560> is<00:06:19.720> just<00:06:19.960> the

he’s not saying well this is just the

pure<00:06:20.560> truth<00:06:20.919> I’ve<00:06:21.120> deduced<00:06:21.639> out<00:06:21.759> of<00:06:21.960> my<00:06:22.160> heart

pure truth I’ve deduced out of my heart

or<00:06:22.560> something<00:06:22.880> like<00:06:23.080> that<00:06:23.599> and<00:06:23.759> every<00:06:24.039> human

or something like that and every human

as<00:06:24.639> a<00:06:24.960> rational<00:06:25.319> being<00:06:25.560> conducive<00:06:26.160> by<00:06:26.280> himself

as a rational being conducive by himself

they<00:06:26.680> doesn’t<00:06:26.919> say<00:06:27.080> that<00:06:27.280> right<00:06:27.880> and<00:06:28.080> this

they doesn’t say that right and this

this<00:06:28.520> slogan<00:06:28.880> actually<00:06:29.080> doesn’t<00:06:29.280> say<00:06:29.440> that

this slogan actually doesn’t say that

right<00:06:29.960> it<00:06:30.080> says<00:06:31.080> listen<00:06:32.080> it’s<00:06:32.360> telling<00:06:32.599> you<00:06:32.720> to

right it says listen it’s telling you to

listen<00:06:33.160> to<00:06:33.400> people<00:06:33.960> it’s<00:06:34.080> not<00:06:34.199> telling<00:06:34.400> you

listen to people it’s not telling you

don’t<00:06:34.639> listen<00:06:34.840> to<00:06:35.000> anyone<00:06:35.280> only<00:06:35.520> listen<00:06:35.759> to

don’t listen to anyone only listen to

whatever<00:06:36.240> you<00:06:36.360> could<00:06:36.520> figure<00:06:36.759> out<00:06:36.960> in<00:06:37.039> your

whatever you could figure out in your

basement<00:06:38.360> it’s<00:06:38.479> saying<00:06:38.680> you<00:06:38.720> should<00:06:38.880> listen

basement it’s saying you should listen

to<00:06:39.199> people<00:06:39.479> you<00:06:39.639> just<00:06:40.160> shouldn’t<00:06:40.479> be<00:06:40.639> worried

to people you just shouldn’t be worried

about<00:06:41.160> who<00:06:41.280> the<00:06:41.440> person<00:06:42.039> is<00:06:43.039> which<00:06:43.160> is<00:06:43.440> almost

about who the person is which is almost

a<00:06:43.800> self-contradictory<00:06:44.840> thing<00:06:45.840> cuz<00:06:46.120> if<00:06:46.400> you

a self-contradictory thing cuz if you

should<00:06:46.680> be<00:06:46.840> listening<00:06:47.120> to<00:06:47.319> people<00:06:47.520> then<00:06:47.639> you

should be listening to people then you

definitely<00:06:48.039> should<00:06:48.280> care<00:06:48.479> who<00:06:48.599> the<00:06:48.759> people

definitely should care who the people

are<00:06:49.759> if<00:06:49.840> you’re<00:06:50.000> doing<00:06:50.319> math<00:06:50.560> and<00:06:50.680> you<00:06:50.759> don’t

are if you’re doing math and you don’t

care<00:06:51.160> it’s<00:06:51.319> just<00:06:51.599> maybe<00:06:51.880> the<00:06:52.000> person<00:06:52.199> is<00:06:52.319> like

care it’s just maybe the person is like

a<00:06:52.520> vessel<00:06:52.960> like<00:06:53.120> some<00:06:53.319> kind<00:06:53.759> of<00:06:54.759> uh<00:06:55.080> how<00:06:55.199> they

a vessel like some kind of uh how they

call<00:06:55.479> a<00:06:55.599> dum<00:06:55.919> pipe<00:06:56.440> and<00:06:56.720> internet<00:06:57.160> language<00:06:57.919> of

call a dum pipe and internet language of

getting<00:06:58.400> like<00:06:58.560> one<00:06:58.720> bited<00:06:59.160> then<00:06:59.639> other<00:06:59.919> then

getting like one bited then other then

okay<00:07:00.440> then<00:07:00.520> it<00:07:00.639> doesn’t<00:07:00.840> matter<00:07:01.000> who<00:07:01.160> the

okay then it doesn’t matter who the

person<00:07:01.599> is<00:07:02.400> but<00:07:02.560> that’s<00:07:02.759> not<00:07:02.919> what<00:07:03.120> this

person is but that’s not what this

saying<00:07:04.039> is<00:07:04.199> even<00:07:04.680> saying<00:07:05.680> right<00:07:06.120> and<00:07:06.240> it<00:07:06.319> seems

saying is even saying right and it seems

to<00:07:06.639> be<00:07:07.120> even<00:07:07.639> even<00:07:07.840> more<00:07:08.080> obvious<00:07:08.440> than<00:07:08.720> that

to be even even more obvious than that

if<00:07:09.680> you<00:07:09.840> read<00:07:10.000> the<00:07:10.160> next<00:07:10.400> line<00:07:10.680> and<00:07:10.879> it’s

if you read the next line and it’s

obvious<00:07:11.479> but<00:07:11.599> even<00:07:11.759> before<00:07:12.000> that<00:07:12.199> obviously

obvious but even before that obviously

the<00:07:12.720> like<00:07:12.840> thing<00:07:13.000> that<00:07:13.120> he’s<00:07:13.280> justifying

the like thing that he’s justifying

himself<00:07:14.080> from<00:07:14.319> is<00:07:14.520> like<00:07:15.160> okay<00:07:15.319> when<00:07:15.440> you<00:07:15.639> say

himself from is like okay when you say

from<00:07:17.000> then<00:07:17.120> people<00:07:17.479> okay<00:07:17.720> nice<00:07:18.039> nice<00:07:18.280> see<00:07:18.440> it

from then people okay nice nice see it

wrot<00:07:19.280> a<00:07:19.400> bunch<00:07:19.800> of<00:07:20.800> tells<00:07:21.160> okay<00:07:21.360> and<00:07:21.520> a<00:07:21.639> bunch

wrot a bunch of tells okay and a bunch

of<00:07:21.960> other<00:07:22.160> people<00:07:22.400> and<00:07:22.680> like<00:07:22.800> who<00:07:22.919> are<00:07:23.080> those

of other people and like who are those

people<00:07:23.639> they’re<00:07:23.919> just<00:07:24.319> pagans<00:07:25.319> and<00:07:25.960> Muslims

people they’re just pagans and Muslims

and<00:07:27.080> I’m<00:07:27.280> like<00:07:27.759> wow<00:07:28.360> what’s<00:07:28.560> going<00:07:28.759> on<00:07:29.039> this

and I’m like wow what’s going on this

I’m<00:07:31.440> then<00:07:31.720> again<00:07:32.199> if<00:07:33.120> those<00:07:33.440> pagans<00:07:33.759> are<00:07:33.919> just

I’m then again if those pagans are just

telling<00:07:34.360> us<00:07:34.599> math<00:07:35.000> like<00:07:35.520> okay<00:07:36.319> but<00:07:36.479> if<00:07:36.599> they’re

telling us math like okay but if they’re

telling<00:07:37.039> us<00:07:37.240> something<00:07:37.560> more<00:07:37.759> substantial

telling us something more substantial

than<00:07:38.479> that<00:07:38.680> and<00:07:38.800> something<00:07:39.039> that<00:07:39.120> we<00:07:39.199> need<00:07:39.319> to

than that and something that we need to

learn<00:07:39.639> from<00:07:39.800> them<00:07:40.039> right<00:07:40.199> we<00:07:40.319> can’t<00:07:40.560> actually

learn from them right we can’t actually

do<00:07:40.879> it

do it

ourself<00:07:44.000> then<00:07:44.560> watch<00:07:45.159> we’re<00:07:45.360> back<00:07:45.560> at<00:07:45.720> the

ourself then watch we’re back at the

question<00:07:46.159> why<00:07:46.280> should<00:07:46.720> look<00:07:46.919> what’s<00:07:47.039> the

question why should look what’s the

reason<00:07:47.360> for<00:07:47.520> doing<00:07:48.240> that

reason for doing that

right<00:07:51.639> um<00:07:52.039> okay<00:07:52.360> that’s<00:07:52.639> that’s<00:07:52.800> the<00:07:52.919> main<00:07:53.159> qu

right um okay that’s that’s the main qu

basic<00:07:53.680> question<00:07:53.960> that<00:07:54.080> we<00:07:54.199> had<00:07:54.360> about<00:07:54.639> this<00:07:55.039> we

basic question that we had about this we

made<00:07:55.440> the<00:07:55.560> question<00:07:55.879> even<00:07:56.440> stronger<00:07:56.759> I<00:07:56.879> think

made the question even stronger I think

we<00:07:57.479> did<00:07:57.840> oh<00:07:58.000> I<00:07:58.080> mean<00:07:58.680> to<00:07:58.800> me<00:07:59.000> the<00:07:59.080> I<00:07:59.159> guess<00:07:59.319> the

we did oh I mean to me the I guess the

the<00:07:59.759> civilizers<00:08:00.440> don’t<00:08:00.639> care<00:08:00.840> about<00:08:01.479> who’s

the civilizers don’t care about who’s

saying<00:08:02.000> it<00:08:02.159> as<00:08:02.280> you<00:08:02.400> hear<00:08:02.599> what<00:08:02.759> they<00:08:02.879> say<00:08:03.680> but

saying it as you hear what they say but

knowing<00:08:05.039> who<00:08:05.199> it<00:08:05.319> is<00:08:05.560> might<00:08:06.039> tell<00:08:06.280> you<00:08:06.440> that

knowing who it is might tell you that

they<00:08:06.680> have<00:08:06.800> more<00:08:06.960> truth<00:08:07.240> confident<00:08:07.680> based<00:08:07.840> on

they have more truth confident based on

consistency<00:08:08.599> or<00:08:08.800> based<00:08:09.000> on<00:08:09.159> something<00:08:09.400> oh

consistency or based on something oh

they<00:08:09.599> have<00:08:09.800> less<00:08:10.120> actually<00:08:10.879> he<00:08:11.039> thinks<00:08:11.240> that

they have less actually he thinks that

it’s<00:08:11.560> going<00:08:12.039> like<00:08:12.400> the<00:08:12.520> word<00:08:12.680> it’s<00:08:12.800> working

it’s going like the word it’s working

here<00:08:13.240> is<00:08:13.360> that<00:08:13.520> if<00:08:13.599> you’ll<00:08:13.759> know<00:08:13.919> who<00:08:14.039> it<00:08:14.120> is

here is that if you’ll know who it is

you’ll<00:08:14.720> take<00:08:14.840> it<00:08:15.000> less

seriously<00:08:18.360> you<00:08:18.520> could<00:08:18.759> have<00:08:19.759> you<00:08:19.840> could<00:08:20.520> have

seriously you could have you could have

and<00:08:21.680> then<00:08:21.759> he<00:08:21.879> could<00:08:22.000> have<00:08:22.120> quoted<00:08:22.440> you<00:08:22.560> know

and then he could have quoted you know

you<00:08:22.960> know<00:08:23.080> it’s<00:08:23.240> weird<00:08:23.840> cuz<00:08:24.000> he’s<00:08:24.159> saying<00:08:24.400> that

you know it’s weird cuz he’s saying that

I’m<00:08:24.639> quoting<00:08:25.039> all<00:08:25.199> kind<00:08:25.360> of<00:08:25.879> Jews<00:08:26.199> and

I’m quoting all kind of Jews and

non-jews<00:08:27.400> basically<00:08:28.400> and<00:08:28.520> he<00:08:28.639> could<00:08:28.759> have

non-jews basically and he could have

said<00:08:29.159> oh

says<00:08:35.159> so<00:08:35.360> then<00:08:35.479> you

says so then you

should

should<00:08:39.719> people<00:08:39.880> like<00:08:40.000> toot<00:08:40.360> in<00:08:40.479> this<00:08:40.599> kind<00:08:40.760> of

context<00:08:44.920> and<00:08:45.040> you’ll<00:08:45.200> notice<00:08:45.600> that<00:08:45.760> he

context and you’ll notice that he

actually<00:08:46.200> quo<00:08:46.600> quoting<00:08:47.160> a<00:08:47.959> apparently<00:08:48.760> Muslim

actually quo quoting a apparently Muslim

aism<00:08:52.040> in<00:08:52.160> order<00:08:52.360> to<00:08:52.560> justify<00:08:53.000> the<00:08:53.720> that<00:08:53.839> he

aism in order to justify the that he

should<00:08:54.440> listen<00:08:54.720> to<00:08:54.920> Muslims<00:08:55.279> he<00:08:55.399> quotes<00:08:55.640> a

should listen to Muslims he quotes a

Muslim<00:08:56.839> that<00:08:57.000> doesn’t<00:08:57.360> work<00:08:58.279> say<00:08:59.279> that<00:08:59.399> they

Muslim that doesn’t work say that they

allowed<00:08:59.760> to<00:08:59.839> listen<00:09:00.000> to<00:09:00.240> go<00:09:00.640> said<00:09:00.920> that<00:09:01.240> the<00:09:01.399> go

allowed to listen to go said that the go

say<00:09:01.839> they<00:09:01.959> should<00:09:02.079> listen<00:09:02.279> to<00:09:02.399> them<00:09:02.560> I<00:09:02.640> mean<00:09:03.000> of

say they should listen to them I mean of

course<00:09:03.279> they<00:09:03.720> said<00:09:04.720> okay<00:09:05.040> obviously<00:09:05.440> they’re

course they said okay obviously they’re

that’s<00:09:06.399> very<00:09:06.600> complicated<00:09:07.600> obviously<00:09:08.000> not

that’s very complicated obviously not

saying<00:09:08.360> this<00:09:08.760> listen<00:09:09.760> I<00:09:09.959> guess<00:09:10.959> out<00:09:11.120> of

saying this listen I guess out of

context<00:09:11.959> right<00:09:12.279> if<00:09:12.440> I<00:09:12.600> if<00:09:12.720> I<00:09:12.800> want<00:09:12.920> to<00:09:13.160> learn

context right if I if I want to learn

from<00:09:13.640> certain<00:09:14.240> people<00:09:15.240> okay<00:09:15.480> how<00:09:15.600> does<00:09:15.760> this

from certain people okay how does this

person<00:09:16.200> think<00:09:16.519> what<00:09:16.640> what<00:09:16.720> have<00:09:16.839> they<00:09:16.959> thought

person think what what have they thought

until<00:09:17.480> now<00:09:18.040> you<00:09:18.160> know<00:09:18.560> oh<00:09:18.680> it<00:09:18.760> would<00:09:18.880> be<00:09:19.000> very

until now you know oh it would be very

cool<00:09:19.320> to<00:09:19.440> learn<00:09:19.640> from<00:09:19.880> people<00:09:20.240> in<00:09:20.320> the<00:09:20.480> sense

cool to learn from people in the sense

of<00:09:20.880> in<00:09:21.079> like<00:09:21.240> an<00:09:21.480> as<00:09:21.560> an<00:09:21.720> ethical<00:09:22.120> imperative

of in like an as an ethical imperative

as<00:09:22.800> like<00:09:23.560> don’t<00:09:24.120> uh<00:09:24.839> to<00:09:25.040> Aid<00:09:25.320> I’m<00:09:25.440> saying

as like don’t uh to Aid I’m saying

unless<00:09:25.880> you<00:09:26.040> think<00:09:26.760> unless<00:09:27.160> you’re<00:09:27.800> you<00:09:27.880> know

unless you think unless you’re you know

well<00:09:28.480> no<00:09:29.040> well<00:09:29.200> no

well no well no

uh<00:09:30.600> if<00:09:30.720> there’s<00:09:30.959> such<00:09:31.120> a<00:09:31.200> thing<00:09:31.320> as<00:09:31.480> truth<00:09:31.720> and

uh if there’s such a thing as truth and

there<00:09:31.959> is<00:09:32.120> such<00:09:32.240> a<00:09:32.360> thing<00:09:32.519> as<00:09:32.640> nontruth<00:09:33.120> like

there is such a thing as nontruth like

if<00:09:33.560> there<00:09:33.640> are<00:09:33.920> bad<00:09:34.120> ideas<00:09:34.440> and<00:09:34.640> good<00:09:34.800> ideas

if there are bad ideas and good ideas

then<00:09:35.720> obviously<00:09:36.160> we<00:09:36.279> should<00:09:37.000> not<00:09:37.399> take<00:09:37.640> any

then obviously we should not take any

anyone’s<00:09:38.360> idea

seriously<00:09:41.760> no<00:09:42.079> but<00:09:42.200> we<00:09:42.279> should<00:09:42.959> we<00:09:43.040> should

seriously no but we should we should

take<00:09:43.360> anyone’s<00:09:43.800> idea<00:09:44.079> seriously<00:09:44.440> we<00:09:44.519> should

take anyone’s idea seriously we should

take<00:09:44.760> the<00:09:44.839> idea<00:09:45.079> seriously<00:09:45.680> right<00:09:46.279> we<00:09:46.440> you

take the idea seriously right we you

find<00:09:46.920> good<00:09:47.079> ideas<00:09:47.920> I

find good ideas I

mean<00:09:50.120> again<00:09:50.959> if<00:09:51.120> we’re<00:09:51.399> using<00:09:51.880> so<00:09:52.120> so<00:09:52.320> so<00:09:52.760> again

mean again if we’re using so so so again

we<00:09:53.079> can<00:09:53.640> talk<00:09:54.000> about<00:09:54.200> two<00:09:54.360> different<00:09:54.600> ways<00:09:54.760> of

we can talk about two different ways of

doing<00:09:55.399> that<00:09:56.079> if<00:09:56.200> you<00:09:56.440> want<00:09:56.720> to<00:09:56.920> use<00:09:57.360> anyone’s

doing that if you want to use anyone’s

well<00:09:58.200> opinions<00:09:58.720> right<00:09:58.839> if<00:09:58.920> you<00:09:59.000> use<00:09:59.120> the

well opinions right if you use the

opinion<00:10:00.279> if<00:10:00.440> you<00:10:00.680> want<00:10:00.920> say<00:10:01.120> you<00:10:01.320> should<00:10:02.040> uh

opinion if you want say you should uh

judge<00:10:02.839> every<00:10:03.399> opinion<00:10:04.399> that<00:10:04.560> comes<00:10:04.800> down<00:10:04.920> to

judge every opinion that comes down to

saying<00:10:05.320> don’t<00:10:05.519> take<00:10:05.680> anyone’s<00:10:06.040> idea

saying don’t take anyone’s idea

seriously<00:10:06.800> right<00:10:06.920> you<00:10:07.040> could<00:10:07.160> use<00:10:07.440> anyone’s

seriously right you could use anyone’s

opinion<00:10:08.160> as<00:10:08.240> a<00:10:08.399> starting<00:10:08.720> point<00:10:08.959> in<00:10:09.079> order<00:10:09.279> to

opinion as a starting point in order to

FR<00:10:09.640> him<00:10:09.800> up<00:10:10.519> in<00:10:10.640> order<00:10:10.880> to<00:10:11.000> say<00:10:11.279> why<00:10:12.040> if<00:10:12.279> or<00:10:12.560> why

FR him up in order to say why if or why

or<00:10:13.040> how<00:10:13.200> he<00:10:13.279> is<00:10:13.480> correct<00:10:14.000> truth<00:10:14.440> so<00:10:14.560> if<00:10:14.600> you’re

or how he is correct truth so if you’re

look<00:10:14.839> at<00:10:14.920> the<00:10:15.440> them<00:10:15.600> then<00:10:15.720> you<00:10:15.800> might<00:10:15.959> want<00:10:16.079> to

look at the them then you might want to

look<00:10:16.959> well<00:10:17.279> in<00:10:17.440> both<00:10:17.640> ways<00:10:17.839> but<00:10:17.920> the<00:10:18.040> point<00:10:18.279> is

look well in both ways but the point is

what<00:10:18.640> that<00:10:18.839> person<00:10:19.079> is<00:10:19.279> giving<00:10:19.519> you<00:10:19.680> is<00:10:19.800> only

what that person is giving you is only

an<00:10:20.160> opinion<00:10:20.959> it’s<00:10:21.120> not<00:10:21.519> anything<00:10:22.079> beyond<00:10:22.760> won

an opinion it’s not anything beyond won

you<00:10:23.560> know<00:10:24.240> that’s<00:10:24.399> your<00:10:24.640> opinion<00:10:25.040> man<00:10:26.160> right

you know that’s your opinion man right

that<00:10:27.360> might<00:10:27.600> be<00:10:27.760> cool<00:10:28.040> to<00:10:28.240> find<00:10:28.480> out

that might be cool to find out

everyone’s<00:10:29.079> opinion<00:10:29.640> people<00:10:29.839> could<00:10:30.000> know<00:10:30.160> the

everyone’s opinion people could know the

truth<00:10:30.880> could<00:10:31.040> people<00:10:31.240> know<00:10:31.360> the<00:10:31.440> truth<00:10:31.760> do<00:10:31.959> am

truth could people know the truth do am

I<00:10:32.200> denying<00:10:32.560> it<00:10:32.839> no<00:10:32.959> I’m<00:10:33.079> saying<00:10:33.440> do<00:10:33.600> the

I denying it no I’m saying do the

statement<00:10:35.240> deny<00:10:35.519> that<00:10:35.639> people<00:10:35.800> could<00:10:35.920> know

statement deny that people could know

the<00:10:36.200> truth<00:10:36.720> no<00:10:36.839> I’m<00:10:36.920> saying<00:10:37.120> that<00:10:37.240> it’s<00:10:37.360> a<00:10:37.480> very

the truth no I’m saying that it’s a very

cool<00:10:37.920> slogan<00:10:38.360> but<00:10:38.480> it<00:10:38.560> doesn’t<00:10:38.800> seem<00:10:38.959> to

cool slogan but it doesn’t seem to

actually<00:10:39.440> help<00:10:39.680> anyone

actually help anyone

ever<00:10:41.800> it’s<00:10:41.959> only

ever it’s only

useful<00:10:44.399> if<00:10:44.519> you<00:10:44.680> already<00:10:44.920> know<00:10:45.120> the<00:10:45.279> truth<00:10:45.480> and

useful if you already know the truth and

you<00:10:45.680> want<00:10:45.760> to<00:10:45.920> tell<00:10:46.079> it<00:10:46.240> say<00:10:46.399> it<00:10:46.480> in<00:10:46.560> the<00:10:46.680> name

you want to tell it say it in the name

of<00:10:46.920> someone<00:10:47.160> I<00:10:47.240> wouldn’t<00:10:47.560> accept<00:10:47.800> it<00:10:47.920> so<00:10:48.000> you

of someone I wouldn’t accept it so you

say<00:10:48.440> well<00:10:49.000> you<00:10:49.079> know<00:10:49.279> what<00:10:49.600> just<00:10:49.720> listen<00:10:49.959> to<00:10:50.079> it

say well you know what just listen to it

because<00:10:50.399> it’s<00:10:50.519> a<00:10:50.639> true<00:10:50.959> but<00:10:51.079> then<00:10:51.160> you<00:10:51.279> might

because it’s a true but then you might

as<00:10:51.560> well<00:10:51.800> say<00:10:52.240> the<00:10:52.399> truth<00:10:52.680> doesn’t<00:10:53.000> care<00:10:53.160> who

as well say the truth doesn’t care who

said<00:10:53.600> it<00:10:54.399> which<00:10:54.560> is<00:10:54.880> not<00:10:55.320> but<00:10:55.480> that’s<00:10:55.720> not<00:10:55.880> what

said it which is not but that’s not what

this<00:10:56.240> is<00:10:56.480> saying

because<00:11:00.920> like<00:11:01.040> I<00:11:01.200> said<00:11:01.399> because<00:11:01.639> this<00:11:01.760> is<00:11:01.959> not

because like I said because this is not

adice<00:11:03.320> not<00:11:03.480> what<00:11:03.639> anyone<00:11:04.200> that<00:11:04.320> says<00:11:04.560> this<00:11:04.720> is

adice not what anyone that says this is

doing

it<00:11:06.720> is<00:11:07.200> doing<00:11:08.200> he<00:11:08.360> not<00:11:08.560> saying<00:11:08.839> well<00:11:09.040> if<00:11:09.120> you

it is doing he not saying well if you

can<00:11:09.399> follow<00:11:09.720> the<00:11:09.839> deduction<00:11:10.600> it<00:11:10.720> doesn’t

can follow the deduction it doesn’t

matter<00:11:11.160> who<00:11:11.320> said<00:11:12.000> it<00:11:13.000> yeah<00:11:13.320> I<00:11:13.399> think<00:11:13.519> it’s

matter who said it yeah I think it’s

just<00:11:13.839> a<00:11:14.560> it’s<00:11:14.680> not<00:11:14.959> I<00:11:15.000> don’t<00:11:15.120> know<00:11:15.200> if<00:11:15.600> it’s<00:11:15.680> a

just a it’s not I don’t know if it’s a

clue<00:11:16.120> it’s<00:11:16.279> not<00:11:16.480> nothing<00:11:16.720> more<00:11:16.920> than<00:11:17.120> that<00:11:17.240> I

clue it’s not nothing more than that I

don’t<00:11:17.480> think<00:11:17.720> a<00:11:17.839> clue<00:11:18.079> what<00:11:18.160> do<00:11:18.200> you<00:11:18.279> mean<00:11:18.440> by<00:11:18.560> a

don’t think a clue what do you mean by a

clue<00:11:18.959> meaning<00:11:19.600> okay<00:11:20.079> if<00:11:20.360> if<00:11:20.440> you<00:11:20.560> want<00:11:20.720> to<00:11:20.839> know

clue meaning okay if if you want to know

the<00:11:21.160> truth<00:11:21.639> listen<00:11:21.920> to<00:11:22.079> people<00:11:22.279> who<00:11:22.480> say<00:11:22.680> it

the truth listen to people who say it

right<00:11:23.560> now<00:11:23.920> who<00:11:24.040> says<00:11:24.279> it<00:11:24.519> you<00:11:24.639> know<00:11:25.000> find

right now who says it you know find

someone<00:11:25.519> who<00:11:25.639> says<00:11:25.839> the<00:11:25.920> truth<00:11:26.200> well<00:11:26.320> nobody

someone who says the truth well nobody

says<00:11:26.920> the

says the

truth<00:11:28.760> in<00:11:28.880> the<00:11:29.000> sense<00:11:29.519> nobody<00:11:29.839> says<00:11:30.120> that<00:11:30.360> no

truth in the sense nobody says that no

nothing<00:11:30.920> is<00:11:31.079> true<00:11:31.279> because<00:11:31.480> of<00:11:31.639> you’re<00:11:31.760> not

nothing is true because of you’re not

saying<00:11:32.000> that<00:11:32.079> the<00:11:32.160> truth<00:11:32.440> belongs<00:11:32.760> to<00:11:32.920> them

saying that the truth belongs to them

I’m<00:11:33.200> saying<00:11:33.399> that<00:11:33.519> they<00:11:33.639> happen<00:11:33.839> to<00:11:34.720> they<00:11:34.800> Happ

I’m saying that they happen to they Happ

so<00:11:35.440> so<00:11:35.560> you<00:11:35.720> have<00:11:35.839> to<00:11:36.079> figure<00:11:36.320> it<00:11:36.440> out<00:11:36.600> for

so so you have to figure it out for

yourself<00:11:37.200> either<00:11:37.399> you<00:11:37.480> have<00:11:37.560> to<00:11:37.600> figure<00:11:37.800> it

yourself either you have to figure it

out<00:11:37.959> for<00:11:38.519> yourself<00:11:39.519> in<00:11:39.680> which<00:11:39.880> case<00:11:40.120> nobody’s

out for yourself in which case nobody’s

useful<00:11:41.040> yeah<00:11:41.120> but<00:11:41.200> let<00:11:41.320> you<00:11:41.519> do<00:11:41.839> no<00:11:42.160> why<00:11:42.399> why

useful yeah but let you do no why why

would<00:11:42.639> people<00:11:42.800> be<00:11:42.920> useful<00:11:43.160> if<00:11:43.720> well<00:11:43.800> you<00:11:43.880> tell

would people be useful if well you tell

me<00:11:44.160> how<00:11:44.320> they<00:11:44.440> would<00:11:44.560> be

me how they would be

useful<00:11:46.399> I<00:11:46.480> don’t<00:11:46.639> know<00:11:46.839> you<00:11:47.000> go<00:11:47.079> to<00:11:47.440> class<00:11:48.440> okay

useful I don’t know you go to class okay

well<00:11:48.800> why<00:11:48.880> don’t<00:11:49.000> you<00:11:49.120> come<00:11:49.240> to<00:11:49.320> my<00:11:49.440> class<00:11:49.639> cuz

well why don’t you come to my class cuz

I<00:11:49.839> know<00:11:50.000> the<00:11:50.079> truth<00:11:50.519> but<00:11:50.639> if<00:11:50.760> you<00:11:50.839> wouldn’t

I know the truth but if you wouldn’t

have<00:11:51.200> known<00:11:51.519> that<00:11:51.959> you<00:11:52.079> shouldn’t<00:11:52.480> come<00:11:52.880> or

have known that you shouldn’t come or

know<00:11:53.440> it’s<00:11:53.680> like<00:11:54.200> say<00:11:54.560> I<00:11:55.519> people<00:11:55.760> do<00:11:56.040> enter

know it’s like say I people do enter

into<00:11:56.560> the<00:11:56.880> circle<00:11:57.880> by<00:11:58.240> I<00:11:58.480> guess<00:11:59.560> illegitimate

into the circle by I guess illegitimate

means<00:12:00.720> right<00:12:01.079> or<00:12:01.320> or<00:12:01.440> something<00:12:01.839> but<00:12:02.000> wait<00:12:02.200> so

means right or or something but wait so

so<00:12:02.639> again<00:12:03.320> that’s<00:12:03.399> what<00:12:03.480> I’m<00:12:03.600> saying<00:12:03.760> so<00:12:03.959> that

so again that’s what I’m saying so that

there’s<00:12:04.480> two<00:12:04.800> like<00:12:05.240> the<00:12:05.360> person<00:12:06.160> makes<00:12:06.320> it

there’s two like the person makes it

true<00:12:06.720> but<00:12:06.839> the<00:12:06.959> person<00:12:07.279> might<00:12:07.600> be<00:12:08.320> might<00:12:08.560> be<00:12:08.720> a

true but the person might be might be a

good<00:12:09.079> mistake<00:12:09.480> from<00:12:09.680> which<00:12:09.800> you<00:12:09.880> can<00:12:10.040> get<00:12:10.160> to

good mistake from which you can get to

the

truth<00:12:12.000> yeah<00:12:12.160> or<00:12:12.279> a<00:12:12.399> reliable<00:12:12.839> mistake<00:12:13.639> okay<00:12:13.760> so

truth yeah or a reliable mistake okay so

thank<00:12:14.079> you<00:12:14.199> very<00:12:14.320> much<00:12:14.480> so<00:12:14.680> that’s<00:12:15.040> like

thank you very much so that’s like

literally<00:12:15.680> the<00:12:16.040> the<00:12:16.160> spirit<00:12:16.399> of<00:12:16.519> what<00:12:16.639> you’re

literally the the spirit of what you’re

saying<00:12:17.000> is<00:12:17.120> the<00:12:17.240> opposite<00:12:17.560> of<00:12:17.720> the<00:12:17.880> spirit

saying is the opposite of the spirit

of<00:12:20.560> because<00:12:20.720> what<00:12:20.839> you’re<00:12:20.959> saying<00:12:21.160> is<00:12:21.320> fr<00:12:21.600> up

of because what you’re saying is fr up

everyone<00:12:22.199> and<00:12:22.399> everyone’s<00:12:22.800> mistakes<00:12:23.199> can<00:12:23.320> be

everyone and everyone’s mistakes can be

a<00:12:23.480> way<00:12:23.639> to<00:12:23.760> the<00:12:23.839> truth<00:12:24.120> but<00:12:24.199> the<00:12:24.320> way<00:12:24.480> to<00:12:24.560> the

a way to the truth but the way to the

truth<00:12:24.920> itself<00:12:25.519> is<00:12:25.920> something<00:12:26.920> separate<00:12:27.320> from

truth itself is something separate from

all<00:12:28.240> the<00:12:28.360> people<00:12:29.639> isn’t<00:12:30.000> there<00:12:30.560> yeah<00:12:31.000> the<00:12:31.399> and

all the people isn’t there yeah the and

I<00:12:31.560> don’t<00:12:31.920> even<00:12:32.920> I<00:12:33.000> don’t<00:12:33.160> even<00:12:33.320> know<00:12:33.440> if<00:12:33.560> i’<00:12:33.800> go

I don’t even I don’t even know if i’ go

that<00:12:34.120> far<00:12:34.320> I<00:12:34.399> think<00:12:34.560> people<00:12:34.760> that<00:12:34.880> know

that far I think people that know

probably<00:12:35.839> know<00:12:35.959> more<00:12:36.199> truth

probably know more truth

right<00:12:39.000> again<00:12:39.920> if<00:12:40.440> I’m<00:12:40.600> going<00:12:40.800> to<00:12:40.959> be<00:12:41.199> figuring

right again if I’m going to be figuring

everything<00:12:41.959> out<00:12:42.160> by<00:12:42.360> myself<00:12:42.839> maybe<00:12:43.079> some

everything out by myself maybe some

people’s<00:12:44.000> opinions<00:12:44.519> might<00:12:44.680> be<00:12:44.839> useful<00:12:45.360> to<00:12:45.519> me

people’s opinions might be useful to me

we<00:12:45.880> have<00:12:46.000> to<00:12:46.160> be<00:12:46.399> we<00:12:46.480> have<00:12:46.600> to<00:12:46.720> have<00:12:46.800> a<00:12:46.920> good<00:12:47.079> way

we have to be we have to have a good way

of<00:12:47.320> saying<00:12:47.600> how<00:12:47.760> they<00:12:47.880> could<00:12:48.000> be<00:12:48.120> useful

of saying how they could be useful

figure<00:12:48.680> out<00:12:48.839> by<00:12:48.959> yourself<00:12:49.320> meaning<00:12:49.639> by<00:12:49.880> by

figure out by yourself meaning by by

deduction<00:12:50.519> of<00:12:50.800> what<00:12:51.399> of<00:12:51.639> just<00:12:51.800> self

deduction of what of just self

originated<00:12:52.959> principles<00:12:53.959> however<00:12:54.360> the<00:12:54.639> pure

originated principles however the pure

truth<00:12:55.120> is<00:12:55.240> supposed<00:12:55.519> to<00:12:55.639> work<00:12:56.160> yeah<00:12:57.160> I’m

truth is supposed to work yeah I’m

saying<00:12:57.639> other<00:12:57.800> people<00:12:58.040> deal<00:12:58.279> in<00:12:58.440> the<00:12:58.639> space

saying other people deal in the space

again<00:13:00.959> if<00:13:01.199> those<00:13:01.360> people<00:13:01.560> are<00:13:01.720> teaching<00:13:02.040> me

again if those people are teaching me

math<00:13:02.600> then<00:13:02.760> we<00:13:02.839> don’t<00:13:03.040> need<00:13:03.279> the<00:13:03.440> statement<00:13:03.839> so

math then we don’t need the statement so

we<00:13:04.120> already<00:13:04.639> denied<00:13:05.240> that<00:13:06.199> side<00:13:06.399> of<00:13:06.600> the

we already denied that side of the

discussion<00:13:08.160> if<00:13:09.160> if<00:13:09.360> when<00:13:09.519> we<00:13:09.720> say<00:13:10.720> mean<00:13:10.959> we

discussion if if when we say mean we

mean<00:13:11.240> to<00:13:11.440> say<00:13:11.800> that<00:13:12.279> if<00:13:12.519> the<00:13:12.680> fact<00:13:12.920> that<00:13:13.160> a<00:13:14.000> evil

mean to say that if the fact that a evil

person<00:13:14.600> is<00:13:14.720> showing<00:13:15.000> you<00:13:15.199> where<00:13:15.440> red<00:13:15.680> light<00:13:16.079> is

person is showing you where red light is

and<00:13:17.320> just<00:13:17.560> pointing<00:13:17.880> to<00:13:17.959> you<00:13:18.040> and<00:13:18.160> now<00:13:18.279> you<00:13:18.360> can

and just pointing to you and now you can

see<00:13:18.600> it<00:13:18.760> yourself<00:13:19.279> for<00:13:19.440> that<00:13:19.560> we<00:13:19.639> don’t<00:13:19.800> need

see it yourself for that we don’t need

no<00:13:20.440> nice

no nice

statements<00:13:23.760> that<00:13:23.880> one<00:13:24.040> is<00:13:24.320> that<00:13:24.399> one<00:13:24.519> is<00:13:24.760> like

statements that one is that one is like

obvious<00:13:26.000> nobody<00:13:26.320> disagrees<00:13:26.760> with<00:13:26.839> it<00:13:26.959> nobody

obvious nobody disagrees with it nobody

ever<00:13:27.360> disagreed<00:13:27.880> with<00:13:28.000> it

ever disagreed with it

right<00:13:30.639> I<00:13:30.720> mean<00:13:31.440> might<00:13:31.639> be<00:13:31.800> some<00:13:32.000> crazy<00:13:32.240> person

right I mean might be some crazy person

somewhere<00:13:32.880> but<00:13:33.000> even<00:13:33.199> that<00:13:33.360> person<00:13:33.560> doesn’t

somewhere but even that person doesn’t

really<00:13:34.079> disagree<00:13:34.519> with<00:13:34.880> it<00:13:35.880> right<00:13:36.040> so<00:13:36.199> that’s

really disagree with it right so that’s

not<00:13:36.519> what<00:13:36.639> it’s<00:13:36.800> talking<00:13:37.160> about<00:13:37.600> right<00:13:38.440> it’s

not what it’s talking about right it’s

talking<00:13:38.880> about<00:13:39.079> listening<00:13:39.440> to<00:13:39.639> humans<00:13:40.040> not

talking about listening to humans not

listening<00:13:40.519> to<00:13:40.680> the<00:13:40.839> knowledge<00:13:41.399> if<00:13:41.480> you<00:13:41.600> would

listening to the knowledge if you would

if<00:13:41.920> you<00:13:42.040> would<00:13:42.240> say<00:13:42.440> I<00:13:42.519> mean<00:13:42.680> it<00:13:42.839> seems<00:13:43.120> to<00:13:43.279> say

if you would say I mean it seems to say

that<00:13:43.600> but<00:13:43.720> it’s<00:13:43.839> not<00:13:44.040> actually<00:13:44.279> saying<00:13:44.600> that

that but it’s not actually saying that

it<00:13:45.600> presents<00:13:45.920> itself<00:13:46.199> as<00:13:46.320> saying<00:13:46.480> that<00:13:46.600> but<00:13:46.720> if

it presents itself as saying that but if

you<00:13:46.880> think<00:13:47.040> for<00:13:47.240> 5<00:13:47.399> seconds<00:13:47.639> you’ll<00:13:47.839> notice

you think for 5 seconds you’ll notice

that<00:13:48.199> it’s<00:13:48.320> not<00:13:48.480> saying<00:13:48.800> that<00:13:49.760> it’s<00:13:49.959> not

that it’s not saying that it’s not

saying<00:13:50.720> truth<00:13:51.040> doesn’t<00:13:51.320> belong<00:13:51.560> to<00:13:51.759> anyone

saying truth doesn’t belong to anyone

and<00:13:52.759> therefore<00:13:53.320> the<00:13:53.440> truth<00:13:53.759> wherever<00:13:54.120> it<00:13:54.519> is

and therefore the truth wherever it is

is<00:13:55.680> true<00:13:56.079> everyone<00:13:56.399> agrees<00:13:56.680> with<00:13:57.160> that<00:13:58.160> what

is true everyone agrees with that what

I’m<00:13:58.480> saying<00:13:58.800> is<00:13:59.160> that<00:13:59.639> things<00:13:59.920> that<00:14:00.040> you<00:14:00.199> do

I’m saying is that things that you do

not<00:14:00.560> know<00:14:00.759> yourself<00:14:01.120> to<00:14:01.199> be

not know yourself to be

true<00:14:03.040> right<00:14:03.519> you<00:14:03.639> should<00:14:03.920> listen<00:14:04.160> to<00:14:04.360> other

true right you should listen to other

people<00:14:06.079> it’s<00:14:06.279> worth<00:14:06.560> listening<00:14:06.880> to<00:14:07.040> other<00:14:07.560> for

people it’s worth listening to other for

other<00:14:08.000> people<00:14:08.240> for<00:14:08.480> them<00:14:09.199> about

other people for them about

them<00:14:12.839> okay<00:14:13.839> that’s<00:14:14.079> necessarily<00:14:14.560> what<00:14:14.639> it’s

them okay that’s necessarily what it’s

saying<00:14:16.000> and<00:14:16.320> it<00:14:16.839> it<00:14:17.040> you<00:14:17.160> could<00:14:17.320> say<00:14:17.560> that<00:14:17.720> in

saying and it it you could say that in

like<00:14:18.120> sort<00:14:18.320> of<00:14:18.480> two<00:14:18.680> different<00:14:18.959> ways<00:14:19.279> you

like sort of two different ways you

could<00:14:19.519> say<00:14:19.680> that<00:14:19.839> in<00:14:19.920> the<00:14:20.079> way<00:14:20.240> of<00:14:20.839> like<00:14:21.839> again

could say that in the way of like again

you<00:14:22.160> could<00:14:22.320> say<00:14:22.639> well<00:14:22.959> every<00:14:23.279> mistake<00:14:23.839> is<00:14:23.920> an

you could say well every mistake is an

opportunity<00:14:24.560> for<00:14:25.160> correction<00:14:26.160> and<00:14:26.320> maybe

opportunity for correction and maybe

certain<00:14:27.079> mistakes<00:14:28.079> have<00:14:28.680> certain

certain mistakes have certain

well<00:14:29.920> the<00:14:30.000> word<00:14:30.160> mistake<00:14:30.440> is<00:14:30.560> really<00:14:30.720> weird

well the word mistake is really weird

but<00:14:31.079> certain<00:14:31.600> opinions<00:14:32.600> unjustified

but certain opinions unjustified

knowledge<00:14:34.240> certain<00:14:35.240> opinions<00:14:36.000> are<00:14:36.720> reveal

knowledge certain opinions are reveal

some<00:14:37.600> aspect<00:14:37.880> of<00:14:38.000> the<00:14:38.120> truth<00:14:38.440> like<00:14:38.639> because

some aspect of the truth like because

someone<00:14:39.160> made<00:14:39.279> a<00:14:39.399> certain<00:14:39.680> mistake<00:14:40.120> that

someone made a certain mistake that

would<00:14:40.519> like<00:14:41.320> wake<00:14:41.560> you<00:14:41.720> up<00:14:41.920> to<00:14:42.079> a<00:14:42.160> certain

would like wake you up to a certain

possibility<00:14:43.120> and<00:14:43.399> somehow<00:14:43.759> would<00:14:44.240> get<00:14:44.399> you

possibility and somehow would get you

closer<00:14:44.880> to<00:14:45.000> the<00:14:45.199> truth<00:14:45.759> right<00:14:46.399> but<00:14:46.519> the

closer to the truth right but the

criteria<00:14:47.040> for<00:14:47.160> truth<00:14:47.399> is<00:14:47.519> not<00:14:47.720> that<00:14:47.920> person

criteria for truth is not that person

it’s<00:14:48.279> just<00:14:48.399> that<00:14:48.560> person<00:14:48.759> is<00:14:48.959> useful<00:14:49.480> does

it’s just that person is useful does

this<00:14:49.759> deny<00:14:50.120> truth<00:14:50.320> being<00:14:50.519> a<00:14:50.639> teachable

this deny truth being a teachable

thing<00:14:53.120> well<00:14:53.240> the<00:14:53.360> truth<00:14:53.600> as<00:14:53.759> such<00:14:53.959> is<00:14:54.040> not<00:14:54.160> a

thing well the truth as such is not a

teachable<00:14:54.639> thing<00:14:54.800> of<00:14:54.920> course

not<00:14:58.680> okay<00:14:59.079> teachable<00:14:59.519> in<00:14:59.600> the<00:14:59.720> sense<00:14:59.959> of<00:15:00.360> the

not okay teachable in the sense of the

knowledge<00:15:01.160> is<00:15:01.279> not<00:15:01.480> something<00:15:01.759> you<00:15:01.959> actually

knowledge is not something you actually

get<00:15:02.440> from<00:15:02.560> a<00:15:02.720> teacher<00:15:03.480> like<00:15:03.920> everyone<00:15:04.240> says

get from a teacher like everyone says

the<00:15:04.839> teacher<00:15:05.240> can<00:15:05.759> make<00:15:06.000> you<00:15:06.199> know<00:15:06.720> and<00:15:06.880> the

the teacher can make you know and the

similar<00:15:07.519> way<00:15:07.680> to<00:15:07.920> like<00:15:08.079> food<00:15:08.320> and<00:15:08.480> not<00:15:08.680> being<00:15:08.920> a

similar way to like food and not being a

servable

thing<00:15:11.320> of<00:15:11.440> course<00:15:11.560> you<00:15:11.639> could<00:15:11.759> serve<00:15:11.920> me<00:15:12.079> Food

thing of course you could serve me Food

Bag<00:15:12.440> got<00:15:12.560> to<00:15:12.680> eat<00:15:12.800> it<00:15:13.279> myself<00:15:14.279> you<00:15:14.360> could<00:15:14.519> serve

Bag got to eat it myself you could serve

me<00:15:14.880> knowledge<00:15:15.160> but<00:15:15.279> I<00:15:15.360> got<00:15:15.440> to<00:15:15.519> know<00:15:15.639> it

me knowledge but I got to know it

myself<00:15:17.720> right<00:15:18.040> so<00:15:18.240> it’s<00:15:18.519> sounds<00:15:18.759> weird<00:15:18.959> when

myself right so it’s sounds weird when

you<00:15:19.120> say<00:15:19.240> it’s<00:15:19.360> not<00:15:19.480> teachable<00:15:19.920> that’s<00:15:20.040> all

you say it’s not teachable that’s all

we’re<00:15:20.360> trying<00:15:20.560> to<00:15:20.839> teach<00:15:21.839> but<00:15:22.000> it<00:15:22.160> doesn’t

we’re trying to teach but it doesn’t

work<00:15:23.279> by<00:15:23.440> being<00:15:23.880> accepted<00:15:24.240> from<00:15:24.399> the<00:15:24.839> teacher

work by being accepted from the teacher

it<00:15:26.000> works<00:15:26.279> by<00:15:26.399> doing<00:15:26.639> the<00:15:26.759> work<00:15:27.040> yourself

it works by doing the work yourself

right<00:15:28.639> but<00:15:28.800> now<00:15:29.160> again<00:15:29.360> when<00:15:29.480> you<00:15:29.560> have

right but now again when you have

already<00:15:29.959> a<00:15:30.079> teacher<00:15:30.759> a<00:15:30.880> teacher<00:15:31.120> is<00:15:31.360> very<00:15:31.720> the

already a teacher a teacher is very the

teach<00:15:32.160> the<00:15:32.279> teacher<00:15:32.680> case<00:15:33.319> is<00:15:33.519> not<00:15:33.720> the<00:15:33.880> case

teach the teacher case is not the case

that<00:15:35.079> is<00:15:35.199> about<00:15:35.399> because<00:15:35.600> someone<00:15:35.800> has<00:15:35.880> a

that is about because someone has a

teacher<00:15:36.560> that’s<00:15:36.959> having<00:15:37.120> a<00:15:37.319> very<00:15:37.519> assuming<00:15:37.839> a

teacher that’s having a very assuming a

very<00:15:38.079> different<00:15:38.279> kind<00:15:38.399> of<00:15:38.519> relationship<00:15:38.920> you

very different kind of relationship you

already<00:15:39.399> think<00:15:39.880> somehow<00:15:40.680> good<00:15:40.880> question<00:15:41.199> how

already think somehow good question how

somehow<00:15:41.959> you<00:15:42.079> think<00:15:42.240> that<00:15:42.360> this<00:15:42.560> guy<00:15:42.720> has<00:15:42.880> the

somehow you think that this guy has the

truth<00:15:43.519> and<00:15:43.600> you<00:15:43.720> want<00:15:43.839> to<00:15:43.959> learn<00:15:44.240> his<00:15:44.360> truth<00:15:44.600> or

truth and you want to learn his truth or

his<00:15:44.959> way<00:15:45.120> to<00:15:45.279> the<00:15:45.440> truth<00:15:46.399> but<00:15:47.399> assuming<00:15:47.759> you

his way to the truth but assuming you

don’t<00:15:48.079> know<00:15:48.279> that<00:15:48.399> this<00:15:48.519> guy<00:15:48.680> has<00:15:48.800> the<00:15:48.920> truth

don’t know that this guy has the truth

right<00:15:49.759> you<00:15:49.839> should<00:15:50.040> listen<00:15:50.279> to

right you should listen to

him

why<00:15:55.920> if<00:15:56.040> you<00:15:56.199> already<00:15:56.399> know<00:15:56.519> that<00:15:56.720> ask<00:15:56.880> the

why if you already know that ask the

truth<00:15:57.160> then<00:15:57.279> we<00:15:57.360> don’t<00:15:57.480> need<00:15:57.639> any<00:15:57.800> statements

truth then we don’t need any statements

only<00:15:59.319> for<00:15:59.600> like<00:15:59.720> the<00:15:59.920> very<00:16:00.120> most<00:16:00.319> banale<00:16:00.680> thing

only for like the very most banale thing

like<00:16:01.079> if<00:16:01.199> they’re<00:16:01.279> are<00:16:01.440> good<00:16:01.560> teachers<00:16:01.880> you

like if they’re are good teachers you

should<00:16:02.079> listen<00:16:02.279> to<00:16:02.399> them<00:16:02.560> no<00:16:02.680> matter<00:16:03.279> what

should listen to them no matter what

their<00:16:03.680> race<00:16:04.000> or<00:16:04.399> religion<00:16:04.800> or<00:16:04.959> whatever<00:16:05.279> it<00:16:05.399> is

their race or religion or whatever it is

okay<00:16:08.680> that’s<00:16:08.800> a<00:16:08.920> very<00:16:09.120> reasonable<00:16:09.519> thing<00:16:09.639> to

okay that’s a very reasonable thing to

say<00:16:09.920> but<00:16:10.079> either<00:16:10.240> it’s<00:16:10.440> obvious<00:16:10.720> or<00:16:10.839> it’s

say but either it’s obvious or it’s

wrong<00:16:12.240> like<00:16:12.480> most<00:16:12.720> interesting

things<00:16:16.360> cuz<00:16:16.800> on<00:16:16.920> the<00:16:17.000> one<00:16:17.120> hand<00:16:17.279> it’s<00:16:17.440> obvious

things cuz on the one hand it’s obvious

like<00:16:18.160> like<00:16:18.319> the<00:16:18.480> math<00:16:19.199> case<00:16:19.480> for<00:16:19.680> example<00:16:20.360> and

like like the math case for example and

the<00:16:20.600> other<00:16:20.839> hand<00:16:21.040> it’s<00:16:21.240> wrong<00:16:21.800> because<00:16:22.079> things

the other hand it’s wrong because things

that<00:16:22.440> are<00:16:22.639> not<00:16:22.959> actually<00:16:23.839> uh<00:16:24.040> provable<00:16:24.759> or<00:16:25.240> and

that are not actually uh provable or and

then<00:16:25.639> this<00:16:25.759> wrun<00:16:26.000> for<00:16:26.160> two<00:16:26.279> different<00:16:26.560> reasons

then this wrun for two different reasons

right<00:16:27.639> and<00:16:28.160> one<00:16:28.680> is

right and one is

that<00:16:30.440> if<00:16:31.120> it’s<00:16:31.839> if<00:16:31.959> we’re<00:16:32.120> meaning<00:16:32.440> to<00:16:32.639> say

that if it’s if we’re meaning to say

that<00:16:33.199> I<00:16:33.399> need<00:16:33.600> to<00:16:33.759> be<00:16:33.880> able<00:16:34.079> to<00:16:34.240> figure<00:16:34.480> out<00:16:34.680> the

that I need to be able to figure out the

truth<00:16:35.000> in<00:16:35.120> other<00:16:35.240> words<00:16:35.440> there’s<00:16:35.639> some

truth in other words there’s some

self-evident<00:16:37.000> or<00:16:37.160> something<00:16:37.440> like<00:16:37.600> that<00:16:38.040> of

self-evident or something like that of

the<00:16:38.319> truth<00:16:38.560> when<00:16:38.680> it’s<00:16:38.880> presented<00:16:39.399> okay<00:16:39.560> let’s

the truth when it’s presented okay let’s

even<00:16:39.959> say<00:16:40.160> that<00:16:40.279> we<00:16:40.399> need<00:16:40.560> that<00:16:40.720> person<00:16:40.920> to

even say that we need that person to

present<00:16:41.279> it<00:16:41.399> for<00:16:41.519> some<00:16:41.720> reason<00:16:41.959> it’s<00:16:42.160> good

present it for some reason it’s good

question<00:16:42.639> why<00:16:42.759> but<00:16:42.880> let’s<00:16:43.040> say<00:16:43.399> but<00:16:43.519> in<00:16:43.639> the

question why but let’s say but in the

end<00:16:44.519> that<00:16:44.959> what<00:16:45.120> the<00:16:45.199> learning<00:16:45.480> is<00:16:45.600> going<00:16:45.759> to

end that what the learning is going to

be<00:16:45.959> happen<00:16:46.199> by<00:16:46.319> me<00:16:46.560> myself<00:16:47.079> right<00:16:47.800> so<00:16:48.040> then<00:16:48.199> I

be happen by me myself right so then I

don’t<00:16:48.600> need<00:16:49.240> my<00:16:49.720> again<00:16:49.920> I<00:16:50.000> might<00:16:50.160> need<00:16:50.319> it<00:16:50.480> as

don’t need my again I might need it as

some<00:16:50.800> sort<00:16:50.959> of<00:16:51.120> like<00:16:51.319> direct<00:16:51.600> practical

some sort of like direct practical

Direction<00:16:52.519> like<00:16:52.800> sometimes<00:16:53.000> you<00:16:53.079> should<00:16:53.240> do

Direction like sometimes you should do

that<00:16:53.519> and<00:16:53.639> not<00:16:53.800> deny<00:16:54.079> yourself<00:16:54.480> that

that and not deny yourself that

opportunity<00:16:55.199> but<00:16:55.319> you<00:16:55.399> will<00:16:55.560> learn<00:16:55.800> from

opportunity but you will learn from

yourself<00:16:56.319> not<00:16:56.440> from<00:16:56.639> that<00:16:57.240> person<00:16:58.240> right<00:16:59.240> and

yourself not from that person right and

the<00:16:59.639> other<00:17:00.639> in<00:17:00.800> the<00:17:00.959> other<00:17:01.240> side<00:17:01.440> of<00:17:02.079> it<00:17:03.079> you

the other in the other side of it you

will<00:17:03.360> be<00:17:03.480> talking<00:17:03.720> about<00:17:03.959> things<00:17:04.199> that<00:17:04.400> are

will be talking about things that are

not<00:17:05.520> so<00:17:05.760> simply

not so simply

true<00:17:07.799> for<00:17:08.039> example

true for example

ethics<00:17:10.160> the<00:17:10.360> Deb<00:17:10.600> of<00:17:10.720> Ethics<00:17:11.000> himself

ethics the Deb of Ethics himself

Aristotle<00:17:11.919> said<00:17:12.439> that<00:17:12.640> do<00:17:12.919> not<00:17:13.160> look<00:17:13.319> for

Aristotle said that do not look for

demonstrative<00:17:14.480> proof<00:17:14.799> in<00:17:15.079> ethics<00:17:15.799> that

demonstrative proof in ethics that

doesn’t<00:17:16.559> exist<00:17:17.559> at<00:17:17.640> least<00:17:17.839> not<00:17:17.959> in<00:17:18.079> the

doesn’t exist at least not in the

details<00:17:18.679> maybe<00:17:19.679> he<00:17:19.839> might<00:17:20.000> think<00:17:20.160> that<00:17:20.280> in

details maybe he might think that in

some<00:17:20.559> general<00:17:20.839> sense<00:17:21.079> it’s<00:17:21.319> possible<00:17:21.679> but

some general sense it’s possible but

okay<00:17:22.240> but<00:17:22.400> at

okay but at

least<00:17:24.959> and<00:17:25.640> right<00:17:26.199> and<00:17:26.400> especially<00:17:26.760> if<00:17:26.880> you

least and right and especially if you

read<00:17:27.360> a<00:17:27.480> book<00:17:27.640> like<00:17:28.439> which<00:17:28.559> doesn’t<00:17:29.000> even

read a book like which doesn’t even

pretend<00:17:29.440> to<00:17:29.600> give<00:17:30.160> arguments<00:17:31.160> it<00:17:31.280> just<00:17:31.440> says

pretend to give arguments it just says

things<00:17:33.120> you<00:17:33.240> just<00:17:33.440> got<00:17:33.520> to<00:17:33.679> believe

him

right<00:17:39.080> so<00:17:39.960> why<00:17:40.120> would<00:17:40.240> you<00:17:40.360> listen<00:17:40.600> to<00:17:40.840> this

right so why would you listen to this

what<00:17:41.760> this<00:17:41.919> person<00:17:42.120> is

what this person is

saying<00:17:44.960> is<00:17:45.080> not<00:17:45.400> at<00:17:45.520> all<00:17:45.720> useful<00:17:46.559> because<00:17:47.559> for

saying is not at all useful because for

one<00:17:47.960> I<00:17:48.039> don’t<00:17:48.240> have<00:17:48.440> the<00:17:48.600> tools<00:17:49.160> to<00:17:49.559> figure<00:17:49.840> out

one I don’t have the tools to figure out

if<00:17:50.160> it’s<00:17:50.400> true<00:17:50.799> and<00:17:50.919> he’s<00:17:51.080> not<00:17:51.200> teaching<00:17:51.559> them

if it’s true and he’s not teaching them

me<00:17:54.200> and<00:17:54.360> secondly<00:17:54.760> it’s<00:17:54.880> not<00:17:55.000> clear<00:17:55.240> that

me and secondly it’s not clear that

there<00:17:55.520> is<00:17:55.640> a<00:17:55.760> demonstrative<00:17:56.440> truth<00:17:57.400> about

there is a demonstrative truth about

these<00:17:57.960> subjects

these subjects

and<00:17:59.799> it<00:17:59.919> seems<00:18:00.080> to<00:18:00.159> be<00:18:00.320> very<00:18:00.559> obvious<00:18:01.120> that<00:18:01.720> the

and it seems to be very obvious that the

kind<00:18:02.080> of<00:18:02.320> person<00:18:02.600> you<00:18:02.799> are<00:18:03.559> will<00:18:03.799> determine

kind of person you are will determine

the<00:18:04.360> kind<00:18:04.520> of<00:18:04.679> Ethics<00:18:05.000> you

teach<00:18:10.919> at<00:18:11.080> least<00:18:11.400> assuming<00:18:11.720> that<00:18:11.840> there<00:18:11.960> isn’t

teach at least assuming that there isn’t

some<00:18:12.360> ideal<00:18:12.760> ethics<00:18:13.080> that<00:18:13.159> can<00:18:13.280> be<00:18:13.400> taught

some ideal ethics that can be taught

like<00:18:13.840> math<00:18:14.440> which<00:18:14.600> we’re<00:18:15.240> assuming<00:18:16.240> and

like math which we’re assuming and

therefore<00:18:17.640> before<00:18:17.880> I<00:18:18.000> learn<00:18:18.280> from<00:18:18.440> someone<00:18:18.760> I

therefore before I learn from someone I

should<00:18:19.000> not<00:18:19.159> listen<00:18:19.360> to<00:18:19.520> M<00:18:20.240> definitely<00:18:20.559> not<00:18:20.720> in

should not listen to M definitely not in

I<00:18:21.640> should<00:18:21.799> listen<00:18:22.280> from<00:18:22.480> good<00:18:22.679> people<00:18:23.080> maybe

I should listen from good people maybe

you<00:18:23.600> could<00:18:23.720> say<00:18:23.919> something<00:18:24.200> like<00:18:24.400> that<00:18:24.880> you

you could say something like that you

should<00:18:25.159> listen<00:18:25.360> to<00:18:25.480> All<00:18:25.679> Good<00:18:25.840> People<00:18:26.039> but<00:18:26.159> not

should listen to All Good People but not

to<00:18:26.760> anyone<00:18:27.760> so<00:18:27.960> now<00:18:28.120> we’ve<00:18:28.280> inserted<00:18:28.559> a

to anyone so now we’ve inserted a

important<00:18:29.159> criteria<00:18:29.720> that<00:18:29.840> you<00:18:29.919> should<00:18:30.120> you

important criteria that you should you

could<00:18:30.360> learn<00:18:30.559> from<00:18:30.720> a<00:18:30.880> MIM<00:18:31.200> but<00:18:31.320> has<00:18:31.440> to<00:18:31.520> be<00:18:31.600> a

could learn from a MIM but has to be a

good

person<00:18:34.880> and<00:18:35.159> we<00:18:35.280> have<00:18:35.400> to<00:18:35.480> show<00:18:35.720> us<00:18:36.280> nobody

person and we have to show us nobody

showed<00:18:36.760> us<00:18:37.240> these<00:18:37.400> people<00:18:37.679> that<00:18:37.960> he<00:18:38.080> is<00:18:38.320> being

showed us these people that he is being

maled<00:18:39.000> from<00:18:39.080> our<00:18:39.280> good

people<00:18:42.880> that’s<00:18:43.000> what<00:18:43.159> the<00:18:43.240> book<00:18:43.400> is<00:18:43.480> here<00:18:43.640> to

people that’s what the book is here to

teach

us<00:18:45.760> is<00:18:45.880> it<00:18:46.120> give<00:18:46.240> us<00:18:46.559> criteria<00:18:47.559> IA<00:18:47.880> but<00:18:48.000> that’s

us is it give us criteria IA but that’s

backwards<00:18:49.080> right<00:18:49.520> there’s<00:18:49.640> the<00:18:49.760> loop<00:18:50.039> here

backwards right there’s the loop here

that’s<00:18:50.360> a<00:18:50.520> problem<00:18:50.880> there’s<00:18:51.000> a<00:18:51.120> basic<00:18:51.360> problem

that’s a problem there’s a basic problem

that’s<00:18:51.720> a<00:18:51.840> different<00:18:52.039> problem<00:18:52.320> just<00:18:52.440> saying

that’s a different problem just saying

that<00:18:54.280> there’s<00:18:54.400> a<00:18:54.559> very<00:18:54.679> big<00:18:54.840> riddle<00:18:55.120> in<00:18:55.240> what

that there’s a very big riddle in what

the<00:18:55.480> ra<00:18:55.760> is<00:18:55.919> playing<00:18:56.200> what<00:18:56.360> game<00:18:56.559> he’s<00:18:56.720> playing

the ra is playing what game he’s playing

here<00:18:57.400> the<00:18:57.520> only<00:18:57.720> way<00:18:57.880> I<00:18:57.960> think<00:18:58.120> you<00:18:58.200> could<00:18:58.360> make

here the only way I think you could make

consistent<00:19:00.400> uh<00:19:00.919> preliminarily<00:19:01.919> is<00:19:02.480> by<00:19:02.679> saying

consistent uh preliminarily is by saying

that<00:19:03.159> of<00:19:03.320> course<00:19:03.679> m<00:19:04.080> m<00:19:04.559> something<00:19:04.799> that

that of course m m something that

himself<00:19:05.720> did<00:19:06.440> so<00:19:06.799> since<00:19:07.039> he<00:19:07.240> did<00:19:07.559> study<00:19:07.960> the

himself did so since he did study the

sources<00:19:08.480> or<00:19:08.679> the<00:19:08.960> causes<00:19:09.360> for<00:19:09.559> these<00:19:09.760> things

sources or the causes for these things

being<00:19:10.200> true<00:19:10.840> the<00:19:11.480> reasons<00:19:12.480> he’s<00:19:12.760> of<00:19:12.880> course

being true the reasons he’s of course

telling<00:19:13.320> it<00:19:13.440> to<00:19:13.559> us<00:19:13.679> in<00:19:13.760> a<00:19:13.880> dogmatic<00:19:14.440> way<00:19:15.080> but

telling it to us in a dogmatic way but

he’s<00:19:15.400> telling<00:19:15.880> us<00:19:16.520> don’t<00:19:16.840> worry<00:19:17.200> about<00:19:17.520> me

he’s telling us don’t worry about me

stealing<00:19:18.320> it<00:19:18.480> from<00:19:18.720> some<00:19:19.000> people<00:19:19.280> you<00:19:19.400> might

stealing it from some people you might

think<00:19:19.760> are<00:19:20.000> bad<00:19:20.200> people<00:19:20.559> because<00:19:20.760> they’re<00:19:20.919> not

think are bad people because they’re not

bad<00:19:21.280> people<00:19:21.480> and<00:19:21.720> I<00:19:21.840> know<00:19:22.159> that<00:19:22.600> but<00:19:22.799> meanwhile

bad people and I know that but meanwhile

you<00:19:23.240> got<00:19:23.360> to<00:19:23.480> rely<00:19:23.760> on

you got to rely on

me<00:19:25.559> that’s<00:19:25.799> like<00:19:25.960> sort<00:19:26.120> of<00:19:26.280> the<00:19:26.360> way<00:19:26.480> you<00:19:26.600> can

me that’s like sort of the way you can

make<00:19:26.880> it<00:19:27.440> coherent<00:19:28.440> just<00:19:28.919> somewhat

make it coherent just somewhat

paradoxical<00:19:30.080> right<00:19:30.840> it’s<00:19:31.039> paradoxical<00:19:31.720> only

paradoxical right it’s paradoxical only

in<00:19:32.559> the<00:19:32.760> sense<00:19:33.080> of<00:19:33.320> not<00:19:33.559> justifying<00:19:34.200> itself<00:19:34.559> in

in the sense of not justifying itself in

other<00:19:34.799> words<00:19:35.200> he<00:19:35.320> didn’t<00:19:35.640> justify<00:19:36.039> himself<00:19:36.360> to

other words he didn’t justify himself to

us<00:19:36.760> as<00:19:36.880> a<00:19:37.000> teacher<00:19:37.440> but<00:19:37.559> he<00:19:37.720> assumes

us as a teacher but he assumes

everything<00:19:38.559> that<00:19:38.679> ra<00:19:38.919> wrotes<00:19:39.120> and<00:19:39.400> basically

everything that ra wrotes and basically

everything<00:19:40.000> anyone<00:19:40.480> not<00:19:40.679> everyone<00:19:41.080> but

everything anyone not everyone but

anything<00:19:41.720> for<00:19:41.960> anything<00:19:42.159> that<00:19:42.320> ra<00:19:42.600> writes<00:19:43.200> he

anything for anything that ra writes he

writes<00:19:43.600> from<00:19:43.880> POS<00:19:44.200> from<00:19:44.840> from<00:19:45.000> a<00:19:45.159> position<00:19:45.400> of

writes from POS from from a position of

authority<00:19:47.000> he<00:19:47.159> already<00:19:47.840> the<00:19:48.000> the<00:19:48.120> work<00:19:48.400> of

authority he already the the work of

telling<00:19:49.480> us<00:19:49.679> why<00:19:49.840> to<00:19:49.960> read<00:19:50.159> his<00:19:50.400> book<00:19:51.400> uh<00:19:51.559> he

telling us why to read his book uh he

assumes<00:19:52.120> someone<00:19:52.360> else<00:19:52.520> has<00:19:52.720> done<00:19:52.919> for

assumes someone else has done for

him<00:19:54.840> it’s<00:19:55.120> actually<00:19:55.320> a<00:19:55.400> very<00:19:55.600> interesting

him it’s actually a very interesting

fact<00:19:56.240> but<00:19:56.320> it’s<00:19:56.440> a<00:19:56.640> fact<00:19:57.200> he<00:19:57.360> he<00:19:57.480> knows<00:19:57.720> about

fact but it’s a fact he he knows about

that<00:19:58.039> when<00:19:58.159> he<00:19:58.280> writes<00:19:58.760> cuz<00:19:58.880> he<00:19:59.080> doesn’t<00:19:59.440> write

that when he writes cuz he doesn’t write

to<00:20:00.840> he<00:20:00.960> doesn’t<00:20:01.200> write<00:20:01.400> to<00:20:01.559> people<00:20:01.760> as<00:20:01.919> equals

to he doesn’t write to people as equals

maybe<00:20:02.840> in<00:20:03.000> some<00:20:03.240> places<00:20:03.520> in<00:20:03.760> M<00:20:04.520> but<00:20:04.919> in<00:20:05.080> general

maybe in some places in M but in general

he<00:20:05.600> writes<00:20:05.840> as<00:20:06.000> the<00:20:06.080> one<00:20:06.240> that<00:20:06.320> knows<00:20:06.600> that

he writes as the one that knows that

telling<00:20:07.480> the<00:20:07.559> one<00:20:07.720> that<00:20:07.840> doesn’t<00:20:08.080> know<00:20:08.600> and<00:20:08.720> he

telling the one that doesn’t know and he

even<00:20:09.000> allows<00:20:09.320> himself<00:20:09.640> all<00:20:09.880> the<00:20:10.000> rhetorical

even allows himself all the rhetorical

tricks<00:20:11.120> most<00:20:11.280> of<00:20:11.400> the<00:20:11.559> time<00:20:11.760> you<00:20:11.880> know<00:20:12.080> to<00:20:12.320> to

tricks most of the time you know to to

get<00:20:12.600> you<00:20:12.760> to<00:20:13.039> close<00:20:13.240> to<00:20:13.400> the<00:20:13.520> truth<00:20:13.880> by<00:20:14.039> ways

get you to close to the truth by ways

that<00:20:14.320> are<00:20:14.440> not<00:20:14.559> entirely<00:20:15.400> true<00:20:16.559> um<00:20:17.559> so

that are not entirely true um so

obviously<00:20:18.280> he<00:20:18.440> assumes<00:20:18.919> that<00:20:19.080> he<00:20:19.240> already<00:20:19.559> has

obviously he assumes that he already has

the<00:20:19.840> authority<00:20:20.240> to<00:20:20.440> teach<00:20:21.200> and<00:20:21.320> he<00:20:21.400> doesn’t

the authority to teach and he doesn’t

have<00:20:21.799> to<00:20:21.919> only<00:20:22.320> prove<00:20:22.679> things<00:20:22.880> to

have to only prove things to

us<00:20:24.919> but<00:20:25.240> then<00:20:25.400> if<00:20:25.480> he’s<00:20:25.679> doing<00:20:26.080> that<00:20:26.280> so<00:20:26.480> then

us but then if he’s doing that so then

this<00:20:26.880> is<00:20:27.039> also<00:20:27.360> part<00:20:27.520> of<00:20:27.679> that<00:20:27.880> games<00:20:28.240> like<00:20:28.480> if

this is also part of that games like if

if<00:20:28.760> someone<00:20:28.960> ask<00:20:29.159> me<00:20:29.760> oh<00:20:29.840> you’re<00:20:29.960> according<00:20:30.240> to

if someone ask me oh you’re according to

arist<00:20:31.200> don’t

worry<00:20:35.480> but<00:20:35.720> really<00:20:36.000> what’s<00:20:36.200> going<00:20:36.360> on<00:20:36.480> is<00:20:36.760> just

worry but really what’s going on is just

everyone<00:20:37.320> is<00:20:37.480> just<00:20:37.600> believing<00:20:37.919> the<00:20:38.159> r<00:20:39.159> the

everyone is just believing the r the

whole<00:20:39.520> from<00:20:39.919> beginning<00:20:40.200> to<00:20:40.360> end<00:20:40.559> and<00:20:40.679> of

whole from beginning to end and of

course<00:20:40.919> the<00:20:41.039> ra<00:20:41.320> himself<00:20:41.760> yeah<00:20:42.200> we<00:20:42.320> have<00:20:42.880> and

course the ra himself yeah we have and

some<00:20:43.360> like<00:20:43.480> there<00:20:43.600> are<00:20:43.799> some<00:20:43.960> discussions<00:20:44.320> in

some like there are some discussions in

the<00:20:44.520> book<00:20:44.760> itself<00:20:45.200> like<00:20:45.600> do<00:20:45.760> I<00:20:45.960> accept<00:20:46.280> AR’s

the book itself like do I accept AR’s

opinion<00:20:47.000> on<00:20:47.080> this<00:20:47.200> do<00:20:47.280> I<00:20:47.400> accept<00:20:47.600> K’s<00:20:47.960> opinion

opinion on this do I accept K’s opinion

on<00:20:48.360> this<00:20:48.880> and<00:20:49.000> of<00:20:49.120> course<00:20:49.320> he’s<00:20:49.480> the<00:20:49.559> one<00:20:49.679> doing

on this and of course he’s the one doing

the<00:20:50.039> judging<00:20:50.840> so<00:20:51.080> yes<00:20:51.440> him<00:20:51.679> himself<00:20:52.120> is<00:20:52.440> is<00:20:52.679> is

the judging so yes him himself is is is

really<00:20:53.440> a<00:20:53.559> sort<00:20:53.760> of<00:20:53.960> objective<00:20:54.400> judge<00:20:54.799> but<00:20:54.960> the

really a sort of objective judge but the

person<00:20:55.440> reading<00:20:55.760> it<00:20:56.480> gains<00:20:56.840> nothing

person reading it gains nothing

basically<00:20:57.480> out<00:20:57.600> of<00:20:58.640> besides<00:20:59.000> for<00:20:59.799> uh<00:21:00.000> like<00:21:00.320> you

basically out of besides for uh like you

should<00:21:00.640> read<00:21:00.840> this

book<00:21:07.159> okay<00:21:08.159> let<00:21:08.240> me<00:21:08.440> let<00:21:08.520> me<00:21:08.760> let<00:21:08.880> me<00:21:09.280> um<00:21:09.960> let<00:21:10.039> me

book okay let me let me let me um let me

finish<00:21:10.559> the<00:21:10.880> sentence<00:21:11.279> and<00:21:11.480> we’ll<00:21:11.840> try<00:21:12.039> to

finish the sentence and we’ll try to

solve<00:21:12.880> the<00:21:13.000> some<00:21:13.159> of<00:21:13.360> the<00:21:13.760> spal<00:21:14.760> or<00:21:14.880> at<00:21:15.000> least

solve the some of the spal or at least

talk<00:21:15.360> about<00:21:15.600> it<00:21:16.600> then<00:21:16.760> it<00:21:16.880> says<00:21:17.120> like<00:21:17.320> this<00:21:18.279> uh

talk about it then it says like this uh

sometimes<00:21:21.159> sometimes<00:21:21.400> I<00:21:21.600> quote<00:21:21.919> an

sometimes sometimes I quote an

entire<00:21:23.799> uh<00:21:23.960> paragraph<00:21:24.400> it<00:21:24.480> says<00:21:24.720> me<00:21:25.480> it<00:21:25.559> means

entire uh paragraph it says me it means

something<00:21:25.960> like<00:21:26.120> entire<00:21:26.520> paragraphs<00:21:27.520> because

something like entire paragraphs because

there<00:21:27.799> are<00:21:27.960> entire<00:21:28.200> paragraph<00:21:28.799> in<00:21:28.919> this<00:21:29.080> book

there are entire paragraph in this book

that<00:21:29.360> are<00:21:29.720> basically<00:21:30.440> uh<00:21:31.039> quoted<00:21:31.400> from

that are basically uh quoted from

others<00:21:33.600> and<00:21:33.720> it’s<00:21:33.840> a<00:21:33.960> language<00:21:34.240> of<00:21:34.360> a<00:21:34.480> famous

others and it’s a language of a famous

book<00:21:36.159> I<00:21:36.240> don’t<00:21:36.320> know<00:21:36.799> first<00:21:37.039> means<00:21:37.240> famous<00:21:37.559> it

book I don’t know first means famous it

means<00:21:37.880> something<00:21:38.159> like<00:21:38.320> well<00:21:38.520> known<00:21:38.880> or<00:21:39.880> uh

means something like well known or uh

published<00:21:40.559> like<00:21:40.679> something<00:21:41.000> that<00:21:41.200> I<00:21:41.400> you<00:21:41.520> know

published like something that I you know

if<00:21:42.000> you<00:21:42.320> if<00:21:42.440> you<00:21:42.720> well<00:21:42.960> read<00:21:43.279> you’ll<00:21:43.640> recognize

if you if you well read you’ll recognize

what<00:21:44.200> I’m<00:21:44.320> saying<00:21:45.200> and<00:21:45.279> there’s<00:21:45.480> nothing

what I’m saying and there’s nothing

wrong<00:21:45.880> with<00:21:46.039> that

wrong with that

call<00:21:48.520> so<00:21:48.679> he<00:21:48.840> doesn’t<00:21:49.520> uh<00:21:49.760> doesn’t<00:21:50.000> hold<00:21:50.200> of<00:21:50.360> M

call so he doesn’t uh doesn’t hold of M

plagiarism<00:21:51.279> standards<00:21:52.159> people<00:21:52.400> have<00:21:52.640> done

plagiarism standards people have done

the<00:21:53.000> work<00:21:53.480> and<00:21:54.159> like<00:21:54.279> shown<00:21:54.760> entire<00:21:55.400> entire

the work and like shown entire entire

paragraphs<00:21:56.320> of<00:21:56.559> shim<00:21:57.360> which<00:21:57.480> are<00:21:57.640> lifted<00:21:58.000> from

paragraphs of shim which are lifted from

alred<00:21:58.600> ab’s<00:21:58.919> work<00:21:59.400> the<00:22:00.240> what’s<00:22:00.400> it<00:22:00.600> called<00:22:01.120> the

alred ab’s work the what’s it called the

Pol<00:22:01.880> something<00:22:02.559> political<00:22:03.679> something<00:22:04.679> what

Pol something political something what

it’s

called<00:22:07.120> anyways<00:22:08.000> uh<00:22:08.360> which<00:22:08.480> is<00:22:08.640> sort<00:22:08.799> of<00:22:08.960> has<00:22:09.080> a

called anyways uh which is sort of has a

similar<00:22:09.760> goal<00:22:09.960> to<00:22:10.120> this<00:22:10.320> book

similar goal to this book

so<00:22:12.240> but<00:22:12.400> he<00:22:12.760> really<00:22:13.000> explicitly<00:22:13.400> said<00:22:13.559> that

so but he really explicitly said that

he’s<00:22:13.799> doing<00:22:14.080> that<00:22:14.200> he<00:22:14.279> didn’t<00:22:14.559> say<00:22:14.679> from<00:22:14.840> who

he’s doing that he didn’t say from who

is<00:22:15.080> doing<00:22:15.240> it<00:22:15.400> but<00:22:15.480> he<00:22:15.559> said<00:22:15.760> CL<00:22:16.120> is<00:22:16.200> doing<00:22:16.400> it

is doing it but he said CL is doing it

and<00:22:16.600> he<00:22:16.679> said<00:22:16.799> there’s<00:22:16.960> nothing<00:22:17.279> wrong<00:22:17.840> why

and he said there’s nothing wrong why

not<00:22:18.880> so<00:22:19.120> listen<00:22:19.400> they<00:22:19.480> say<00:22:19.720> like<00:22:19.880> this<00:22:20.039> so<00:22:20.279> what

not so listen they say like this so what

could<00:22:20.559> be<00:22:20.760> wrong<00:22:21.400> it<00:22:21.559> could<00:22:21.679> be<00:22:21.840> wrong<00:22:22.400> if<00:22:23.120> you

could be wrong it could be wrong if you

would<00:22:23.440> be<00:22:23.600> doing<00:22:23.960> this<00:22:24.200> to<00:22:24.360> fool<00:22:24.760> someone

would be doing this to fool someone

right<00:22:25.360> if<00:22:25.440> you<00:22:25.559> would<00:22:25.720> like<00:22:25.880> be<00:22:26.039> taking<00:22:26.320> credit

right if you would like be taking credit

that<00:22:27.039> is<00:22:27.159> not<00:22:27.320> yours<00:22:27.600> he<00:22:27.679> says<00:22:27.840> I’m<00:22:27.960> not<00:22:28.080> doing

that is not yours he says I’m not doing

that

right<00:22:32.559> I’m<00:22:32.679> not<00:22:32.799> stealing<00:22:33.240> I’m<00:22:33.360> not

right I’m not stealing I’m not

plagiarizing<00:22:34.200> in<00:22:34.279> the<00:22:34.360> sense<00:22:34.520> of<00:22:34.679> taking

plagiarizing in the sense of taking

credit<00:22:35.640> for<00:22:35.880> some<00:22:36.320> work<00:22:36.559> that<00:22:36.720> someone<00:22:36.919> else

credit for some work that someone else

did<00:22:37.720> CU<00:22:37.880> I<00:22:37.960> already<00:22:38.279> admit<00:22:38.559> it<00:22:39.000> I<00:22:39.120> told<00:22:39.320> you

did CU I already admit it I told you

this<00:22:39.799> is<00:22:40.240> a<00:22:40.440> compilation<00:22:41.039> this<00:22:41.159> is<00:22:41.320> an<00:22:41.880> an

this is a compilation this is an an

anthology<00:22:42.720> this<00:22:42.799> is<00:22:42.960> not<00:22:43.279> my<00:22:43.440> original

anthology this is not my original

work<00:22:45.559> okay<00:22:45.840> well<00:22:46.000> then<00:22:46.120> I<00:22:46.240> have<00:22:46.320> a<00:22:46.480> question

work okay well then I have a question

for<00:22:46.799> you<00:22:46.960> why<00:22:47.080> don’t<00:22:47.240> you<00:22:47.400> just

say<00:22:50.679> so<00:22:50.919> here<00:22:51.159> he<00:22:51.240> has<00:22:51.360> a<00:22:51.440> very<00:22:51.600> interesting

say so here he has a very interesting

answer<00:22:52.799> he<00:22:52.919> said<00:22:53.120> like<00:22:53.320> this<00:22:54.279> one<00:22:54.559> that<00:22:54.840> what

answer he said like this one that what

although<00:22:55.679> is<00:22:55.919> like<00:22:56.120> he’s<00:22:56.880> he<00:22:57.039> assuming<00:22:57.320> that

although is like he’s he assuming that

I’m<00:22:57.600> had<00:22:57.720> this<00:22:57.880> question<00:22:58.080> he<00:22:58.159> said<00:22:58.640> I<00:22:58.720> don’t<00:22:58.960> do

I’m had this question he said I don’t do

this<00:22:59.279> I

this I

don’t<00:23:00.919> says<00:23:01.159> number<00:23:01.360> one<00:23:01.520> that’s<00:23:01.679> a<00:23:01.799> waste<00:23:02.000> of

ink<00:23:05.679> why<00:23:06.080> he<00:23:06.240> really<00:23:06.520> believes<00:23:06.799> this<00:23:06.960> by<00:23:07.080> the

ink why he really believes this by the

way<00:23:07.279> this<00:23:07.400> is<00:23:07.480> not<00:23:07.600> just<00:23:07.760> an<00:23:07.960> excuse<00:23:08.279> he<00:23:08.400> really

way this is not just an excuse he really

believes<00:23:08.919> this<00:23:09.520> and<00:23:09.600> the<00:23:09.760> reason<00:23:10.080> is<00:23:10.760> because

believes this and the reason is because

you<00:23:12.000> gain<00:23:12.240> no<00:23:12.440> Knowledge<00:23:12.799> from<00:23:12.919> knowing<00:23:13.240> who

you gain no Knowledge from knowing who

said

it<00:23:15.520> right<00:23:16.159> assuming<00:23:17.159> work<00:23:17.480> whichever<00:23:17.840> level

it right assuming work whichever level

it<00:23:18.240> work<00:23:18.840> these<00:23:19.000> things<00:23:19.159> are<00:23:19.360> true<00:23:19.840> and<00:23:20.000> just

it work these things are true and just

quoting<00:23:20.640> all<00:23:20.799> the<00:23:21.520> time

quoting all the time

is<00:23:24.440> it<00:23:24.559> just<00:23:24.679> makes<00:23:24.840> the<00:23:25.000> work<00:23:25.240> longer<00:23:26.240> and

is it just makes the work longer and

doesn’t<00:23:27.559> doesn’t<00:23:27.960> any<00:23:28.159> use

doesn’t doesn’t any use

again<00:23:29.679> the<00:23:29.760> only<00:23:29.960> use<00:23:30.159> it<00:23:30.320> might<00:23:30.640> would<00:23:30.760> have

again the only use it might would have

had<00:23:31.120> is<00:23:31.279> like<00:23:31.400> to<00:23:31.880> disavow<00:23:32.400> his<00:23:32.520> own<00:23:32.679> credit

had is like to disavow his own credit

and<00:23:33.080> he<00:23:33.159> can<00:23:33.279> do<00:23:33.400> that<00:23:33.480> in<00:23:33.559> a<00:23:33.679> general<00:23:34.000> way<00:23:34.120> he

and he can do that in a general way he

doesn’t<00:23:34.360> have<00:23:34.480> to<00:23:34.559> do<00:23:34.640> that<00:23:34.720> in<00:23:34.799> a<00:23:35.000> particular

doesn’t have to do that in a particular

way<00:23:36.200> okay<00:23:36.480> of<00:23:36.600> course<00:23:36.760> it<00:23:36.840> could<00:23:36.960> have<00:23:37.080> a<00:23:37.200> use

way okay of course it could have a use

cuz<00:23:37.640> someone<00:23:37.840> wants<00:23:38.000> to<00:23:38.120> look<00:23:38.240> up<00:23:38.360> the

cuz someone wants to look up the

source<00:23:41.279> what<00:23:41.440> about<00:23:41.720> that<00:23:41.840> one<00:23:42.480> Al<00:23:42.799> give

source what about that one Al give

credit<00:23:43.240> of<00:23:43.400> you<00:23:44.039> yeah<00:23:44.159> but<00:23:44.279> they<00:23:44.400> said<00:23:44.600> I’m

credit of you yeah but they said I’m

giving<00:23:44.880> you<00:23:45.000> a<00:23:45.120> general<00:23:45.480> credit<00:23:45.919> like<00:23:46.480> list<00:23:46.679> of

giving you a general credit like list of

credits<00:23:47.720> specific<00:23:48.080> credit<00:23:48.720> like

credits specific credit like

Credit<00:23:51.880> in<00:23:52.200> in<00:23:52.600> and<00:23:52.799> he<00:23:52.919> also<00:23:53.120> does<00:23:53.400> the<00:23:53.520> same

Credit in in and he also does the same

exact<00:23:54.000> thing<00:23:54.240> in<00:23:54.480> in<00:23:54.720> in

exact thing in in in

Mish<00:23:57.400> and<00:23:57.559> he<00:23:57.720> says<00:23:58.720> you<00:23:58.840> know<00:23:59.120> everyone

Mish and he says you know everyone

before<00:23:59.760> him<00:23:59.880> he<00:24:00.039> wrote

before him he wrote

books<00:24:02.120> and<00:24:02.240> so<00:24:02.400> on<00:24:02.799> and<00:24:02.919> I’m<00:24:03.080> just<00:24:03.240> giving<00:24:03.440> you

books and so on and I’m just giving you

the<00:24:03.919> results<00:24:04.279> of<00:24:04.440> their<00:24:04.640> discussions<00:24:05.120> without

the results of their discussions without

saying<00:24:06.159> names<00:24:07.159> and<00:24:07.520> then<00:24:07.640> he<00:24:07.760> says<00:24:08.000> yeah<00:24:08.159> okay

saying names and then he says yeah okay

I<00:24:08.400> will<00:24:08.559> tell<00:24:08.679> you<00:24:08.799> all<00:24:08.919> of<00:24:09.039> their<00:24:09.200> names<00:24:09.440> so<00:24:09.600> in

I will tell you all of their names so in

the<00:24:09.799> beginning<00:24:10.120> of<00:24:10.360> M<00:24:11.080> I<00:24:11.159> mean<00:24:11.320> more<00:24:11.520> like<00:24:11.640> in

the beginning of M I mean more like in

the<00:24:11.880> beginning<00:24:12.240> of<00:24:12.919> he<00:24:13.039> sort<00:24:13.200> of<00:24:13.400> does<00:24:13.559> that

the beginning of he sort of does that

beginning<00:24:14.000> of<00:24:14.600> even<00:24:14.760> more<00:24:14.880> in<00:24:14.960> the<00:24:15.080> beginning

beginning of even more in the beginning

of<00:24:16.279> like<00:24:16.520> here’s<00:24:16.640> a

of like here’s a

list<00:24:18.679> now<00:24:18.840> everything<00:24:19.080> is<00:24:19.200> from<00:24:19.799> there

list now everything is from there

without<00:24:21.120> like<00:24:21.240> describing<00:24:21.840> specific<00:24:22.400> m<00:24:22.600> is

without like describing specific m is

the<00:24:22.880> specific

the specific

people<00:24:25.039> um<00:24:25.679> that<00:24:25.799> is<00:24:26.039> actually<00:24:26.320> a<00:24:26.440> very<00:24:26.679> like

people um that is actually a very like

and<00:24:27.080> some<00:24:27.200> people<00:24:27.399> say<00:24:27.520> okay<00:24:27.679> that’s<00:24:27.840> like<00:24:27.919> a

and some people say okay that’s like a

patent

like<00:24:32.000> this<00:24:32.080> is<00:24:32.159> a<00:24:32.320> list<00:24:32.480> of<00:24:32.600> all<00:24:32.720> the<00:24:32.799> names<00:24:33.039> and

like this is a list of all the names and

this<00:24:33.279> is<00:24:33.480> all<00:24:33.600> the<00:24:33.760> things<00:24:34.039> and<00:24:34.200> you<00:24:34.320> could

this is all the things and you could

figure<00:24:34.720> it<00:24:34.799> out<00:24:34.960> you<00:24:35.039> don’t<00:24:35.200> have<00:24:35.320> to

figure it out you don’t have to

specifically<00:24:36.799> but<00:24:37.000> probably<00:24:37.360> the<00:24:37.480> real

specifically but probably the real

answer<00:24:37.960> is<00:24:38.080> not<00:24:38.279> that<00:24:38.399> he<00:24:38.559> like<00:24:38.720> thinks

answer is not that he like thinks

that<00:24:40.960> like<00:24:41.080> that<00:24:41.240> it’s<00:24:41.440> think<00:24:42.080> he’s<00:24:42.320> that<00:24:42.440> he’s

that like that it’s think he’s that he’s

weighing<00:24:43.159> the<00:24:43.919> the<00:24:44.080> cost<00:24:44.279> and<00:24:44.440> benefits<00:24:44.760> of

weighing the the cost and benefits of

doing<00:24:45.240> that<00:24:45.520> right<00:24:46.200> so<00:24:46.440> of<00:24:46.559> course<00:24:47.159> even<00:24:47.399> to

doing that right so of course even to

this<00:24:47.760> day<00:24:47.919> there<00:24:48.039> is<00:24:48.159> a<00:24:48.399> cost<00:24:48.760> to<00:24:49.399> like<00:24:49.679> having

this day there is a cost to like having

detailed<00:24:50.320> footnotes<00:24:51.080> and<00:24:51.200> the<00:24:51.360> cost<00:24:51.559> is<00:24:51.679> that

detailed footnotes and the cost is that

it<00:24:51.880> becomes<00:24:52.159> hard<00:24:52.399> to

read<00:24:55.919> and<00:24:56.320> Raam<00:24:56.840> says<00:24:57.120> that<00:24:57.240> he<00:24:57.480> values<00:24:58.080> the

read and Raam says that he values the

Clarity<00:24:59.200> of<00:24:59.399> reading<00:25:00.240> which<00:25:00.360> is<00:25:00.520> like<00:25:00.640> his

Clarity of reading which is like his

work<00:25:01.080> the<00:25:01.200> compilation<00:25:01.880> the<00:25:02.279> organization

work the compilation the organization

over<00:25:03.760> the<00:25:04.080> precis<00:25:04.760> Precision<00:25:05.320> of<00:25:06.240> uh

over the precis Precision of uh

ascribing<00:25:06.960> to<00:25:07.120> his

ascribing to his

sources<00:25:09.000> I<00:25:09.080> think<00:25:09.240> that<00:25:09.360> that’s<00:25:09.520> true

sources I think that that’s true

nowadays<00:25:10.159> also<00:25:10.480> again<00:25:10.679> there’s<00:25:10.960> like<00:25:11.120> worse

nowadays also again there’s like worse

and<00:25:11.480> better<00:25:11.679> ways<00:25:11.840> of<00:25:11.960> doing<00:25:12.200> that<00:25:12.399> but

and better ways of doing that but

sometimes<00:25:13.240> someone<00:25:13.480> writes<00:25:13.679> a<00:25:13.760> book<00:25:13.960> that’s

sometimes someone writes a book that’s

just<00:25:14.240> like<00:25:14.480> quotations<00:25:15.000> and<00:25:15.240> keeps<00:25:15.440> on<00:25:16.039> like<00:25:16.200> I

just like quotations and keeps on like I

don’t<00:25:16.440> care<00:25:16.640> who<00:25:16.760> said<00:25:17.000> just<00:25:17.200> give<00:25:17.320> me<00:25:17.440> the

don’t care who said just give me the

idea<00:25:19.279> and<00:25:19.399> if<00:25:19.520> you<00:25:19.600> want<00:25:19.760> me<00:25:20.039> you<00:25:20.120> could<00:25:20.240> do

idea and if you want me you could do

like<00:25:20.480> a<00:25:20.559> further<00:25:20.880> reading<00:25:21.200> you<00:25:21.279> know<00:25:21.520> if<00:25:21.600> you

like a further reading you know if you

want<00:25:22.080> you<00:25:22.200> want<00:25:22.360> to<00:25:22.520> find<00:25:22.679> out<00:25:22.840> more<00:25:23.000> about

want you want to find out more about

this<00:25:23.399> look<00:25:24.080> and<00:25:24.200> he<00:25:24.320> sort<00:25:24.480> of<00:25:24.640> does<00:25:24.880> that<00:25:25.120> okay

this look and he sort of does that okay

now<00:25:27.120> that’s<00:25:27.440> to<00:25:27.600> answer<00:25:27.880> the<00:25:28.000> problem<00:25:28.440> of<00:25:28.559> like

now that’s to answer the problem of like

credit<00:25:30.120> it’s<00:25:30.279> a<00:25:30.440> waste<00:25:30.640> of<00:25:30.880> time<00:25:31.760> but<00:25:31.919> more

credit it’s a waste of time but more

than<00:25:32.240> that<00:25:32.360> there’s<00:25:32.520> a<00:25:32.720> problem<00:25:33.320> also<00:25:34.320> there’s

than that there’s a problem also there’s

also<00:25:35.080> a<00:25:35.600> like<00:25:35.880> a<00:25:36.000> real<00:25:36.279> negative<00:25:37.159> which<00:25:37.279> would

also a like a real negative which would

have<00:25:37.520> happened

have happened

that<00:25:39.919> and<00:25:40.080> this<00:25:40.159> is<00:25:40.279> like<00:25:40.399> the<00:25:40.559> real<00:25:40.799> argument

that and this is like the real argument

which<00:25:42.440> I<00:25:42.520> think<00:25:42.640> is<00:25:42.720> trying<00:25:42.960> to<00:25:43.120> answer<00:25:43.399> to

which I think is trying to answer to

because<00:25:44.120> he’s<00:25:44.279> writing<00:25:44.520> everything

backwards<00:25:49.200> there<00:25:49.279> are<00:25:49.440> some<00:25:49.640> dumb

backwards there are some dumb

people<00:25:51.799> and<00:25:51.960> dum<00:25:52.159> dum<00:25:52.440> people<00:25:52.960> if<00:25:53.120> I<00:25:53.200> would<00:25:53.399> do

people and dum dum people if I would do

this<00:25:53.799> correct<00:25:54.080> way<00:25:54.200> so<00:25:54.440> like<00:25:54.640> you<00:25:54.720> know<00:25:54.919> what

this correct way so like you know what

maybe<00:25:56.000> it<00:25:56.080> would<00:25:56.200> be<00:25:56.320> correct<00:25:56.600> to<00:25:56.760> say<00:25:56.960> Omar

maybe it would be correct to say Omar

Omar<00:25:58.399> alab<00:25:59.000> and<00:25:59.159> so<00:25:59.279> on<00:26:00.279> but<00:26:00.840> if<00:26:00.960> I<00:26:01.039> would<00:26:01.240> do

Omar alab and so on but if I would do

that<00:26:01.760> I<00:26:01.840> would<00:26:02.120> make<00:26:02.840> I<00:26:02.960> would<00:26:03.240> not<00:26:03.440> be<00:26:03.559> doing

that I would make I would not be doing

my<00:26:03.960> job<00:26:04.200> well<00:26:04.880> why<00:26:05.279> not<00:26:06.279> because<00:26:06.440> there<00:26:06.520> are

my job well why not because there are

some<00:26:06.799> stupid

some stupid

people<00:26:09.559> and<00:26:09.799> those

people and those

people<00:26:12.640> people<00:26:12.919> without<00:26:13.200> good<00:26:13.399> judgment<00:26:13.760> that

people people without good judgment that

says<00:26:14.120> there<00:26:15.039> those<00:26:15.240> people<00:26:15.559> when<00:26:15.919> when

says there those people when when

reading<00:26:16.480> this<00:26:16.840> they<00:26:16.919> would<00:26:17.120> think<00:26:17.320> that<00:26:17.440> that

reading this they would think that that

means<00:26:17.840> that<00:26:18.039> what<00:26:18.120> I’m<00:26:18.279> saying<00:26:18.520> is<00:26:18.600> a<00:26:18.840> bad<00:26:19.200> is

means that what I’m saying is a bad is

bad<00:26:20.399> or<00:26:20.679> evil<00:26:21.360> and<00:26:21.480> what<00:26:21.600> would<00:26:21.760> they<00:26:22.159> say<00:26:23.159> they

bad or evil and what would they say they

would<00:26:23.440> say<00:26:23.640> like<00:26:23.840> this

this<00:26:28.520> is<00:26:28.640> a<00:26:28.760> very<00:26:28.919> important<00:26:29.200> language

this is a very important language

because<00:26:29.679> he’s

because he’s

saying<00:26:31.440> let<00:26:31.640> let’s<00:26:31.760> say<00:26:31.880> I<00:26:31.960> would<00:26:32.120> write<00:26:32.240> a

saying let let’s say I would write a

book<00:26:32.480> and<00:26:32.559> I<00:26:32.600> would<00:26:32.720> say<00:26:32.880> something<00:26:33.039> that

book and I would say something that

sounds<00:26:33.399> reasonable<00:26:33.799> to<00:26:33.880> a<00:26:34.000> normal<00:26:34.360> person<00:26:34.720> you

sounds reasonable to a normal person you

know<00:26:35.080> it’s<00:26:35.240> good<00:26:35.360> to<00:26:35.480> be<00:26:35.640> in<00:26:35.840> the<00:26:36.440> in<00:26:36.559> the

know it’s good to be in the in the

middle<00:26:37.080> way<00:26:37.440> of<00:26:37.640> most<00:26:38.000> Midas<00:26:38.399> and<00:26:38.559> something

middle way of most Midas and something

like<00:26:39.039> that<00:26:39.640> someone<00:26:39.919> would<00:26:40.039> read<00:26:40.200> it<00:26:40.279> and<00:26:40.399> say

like that someone would read it and say

okay<00:26:40.880> sounds<00:26:41.240> good<00:26:42.159> but<00:26:42.279> then<00:26:42.399> if<00:26:42.520> I<00:26:42.640> would

okay sounds good but then if I would

preface<00:26:43.120> it<00:26:43.279> by<00:26:43.480> saying<00:26:44.200> Aristotle<00:26:45.000> said<00:26:46.000> that

preface it by saying Aristotle said that

you<00:26:46.200> should<00:26:46.360> choose<00:26:46.600> the<00:26:46.679> middle<00:26:47.120> path<00:26:47.600> in

you should choose the middle path in

general<00:26:49.440> then<00:26:49.640> someone<00:26:49.919> will<00:26:50.080> say<00:26:50.320> wait<00:26:50.559> I’ve

general then someone will say wait I’ve

heard<00:26:50.880> that<00:26:51.039> this<00:26:51.240> Aristotle<00:26:51.919> guy<00:26:53.360> once<00:26:54.360> or

heard that this Aristotle guy once or

something<00:26:54.760> like

something like

that<00:26:56.720> and

that and

therefore<00:26:59.080> I<00:26:59.159> know<00:26:59.320> that<00:26:59.440> it<00:26:59.559> sounds

therefore I know that it sounds

reasonable<00:27:01.159> but<00:27:01.320> there’s<00:27:01.640> something<00:27:02.279> hidden

reasonable but there’s something hidden

that’s<00:27:03.120> wrong<00:27:03.399> about<00:27:04.159> this<00:27:05.159> and<00:27:05.279> I<00:27:05.399> know<00:27:05.600> that

that’s wrong about this and I know that

I<00:27:06.000> can<00:27:06.240> only<00:27:07.159> act<00:27:07.399> as<00:27:07.559> the<00:27:07.679> surface<00:27:08.000> level

I can only act as the surface level

meaning<00:27:08.640> I<00:27:08.679> don’t<00:27:08.919> know<00:27:09.080> what<00:27:09.200> is<00:27:09.399> wrong<00:27:09.640> with

meaning I don’t know what is wrong with

this<00:27:10.919> but<00:27:11.080> I<00:27:11.200> do<00:27:11.440> know<00:27:11.880> by<00:27:12.039> virtue<00:27:12.320> of<00:27:12.440> knowing

this but I do know by virtue of knowing

who<00:27:12.840> it<00:27:13.000> is<00:27:13.279> that<00:27:13.440> there’s<00:27:13.679> must<00:27:13.880> be<00:27:14.200> something

who it is that there’s must be something

wrong<00:27:15.200> just<00:27:15.399> like<00:27:15.520> when<00:27:15.640> I<00:27:15.760> read<00:27:15.919> something

wrong just like when I read something

from<00:27:17.600> or<00:27:17.760> from<00:27:17.919> the<00:27:18.360> and<00:27:18.440> I<00:27:18.559> believe<00:27:18.880> that

from or from the and I believe that

sometimes<00:27:19.480> I<00:27:19.720> only<00:27:19.919> get<00:27:20.080> at<00:27:20.200> the<00:27:20.320> surface<00:27:20.640> of

sometimes I only get at the surface of

it<00:27:20.880> but<00:27:21.039> I<00:27:21.120> think<00:27:21.360> there’s<00:27:21.600> something<00:27:22.200> under

it but I think there’s something under

the<00:27:22.600> surface<00:27:23.000> something<00:27:23.559> what’s<00:27:23.760> called

the surface something what’s called

prute<00:27:25.039> internal<00:27:26.039> and<00:27:26.159> that’s<00:27:26.360> the<00:27:27.279> the<00:27:27.399> word

prute internal and that’s the the word

that<00:27:27.600> he’s<00:27:27.720> using<00:27:27.960> here<00:27:28.240> something<00:27:29.039> internal

that he’s using here something internal

that<00:27:30.159> is<00:27:30.279> deeper<00:27:30.640> that<00:27:30.760> is<00:27:30.880> more<00:27:31.039> true<00:27:31.880> that

that is deeper that is more true that

that’s<00:27:32.559> not<00:27:32.720> on<00:27:32.880> the<00:27:33.200> surface<00:27:34.200> and<00:27:34.360> just

that’s not on the surface and just

because<00:27:34.679> of<00:27:34.799> the<00:27:34.919> trust<00:27:35.200> or<00:27:35.360> the<00:27:35.440> belief<00:27:35.720> that

because of the trust or the belief that

you<00:27:35.919> have<00:27:36.080> in<00:27:36.320> the<00:27:36.720> in<00:27:36.840> the<00:27:37.000> writer<00:27:37.679> the<00:27:37.799> same

you have in the in the writer the same

thing<00:27:38.240> work<00:27:38.399> works<00:27:38.640> the<00:27:38.720> opposite<00:27:39.039> way<00:27:39.200> where

thing work works the opposite way where

people<00:27:39.679> that<00:27:39.840> don’t<00:27:40.159> believe<00:27:40.399> in<00:27:40.559> the<00:27:40.720> writer

people that don’t believe in the writer

or<00:27:41.399> in<00:27:41.519> the<00:27:41.760> person<00:27:42.000> saying<00:27:42.320> it<00:27:42.840> they<00:27:43.080> assume

or in the person saying it they assume

that<00:27:43.640> there’s<00:27:43.840> something

that there’s something

evil

internally<00:27:49.519> what<00:27:49.760> might<00:27:49.960> that<00:27:50.120> mean<00:27:50.360> that

internally what might that mean that

could<00:27:50.640> mean<00:27:50.799> a<00:27:50.880> lot<00:27:51.000> of

could mean a lot of

things<00:27:52.880> and<00:27:53.120> since<00:27:53.399> I’m<00:27:53.519> not<00:27:53.679> a<00:27:54.039> good<00:27:54.240> judge

things and since I’m not a good judge

again<00:27:54.880> if<00:27:55.039> I<00:27:55.120> would<00:27:55.279> be<00:27:55.480> this<00:27:55.640> ideal<00:27:56.000> judge<00:27:56.240> of

again if I would be this ideal judge of

the<00:27:56.480> ideal<00:27:56.799> science<00:27:57.159> I<00:27:57.240> don’t<00:27:57.440> care<00:27:57.720> CU<00:27:57.840> figure

the ideal science I don’t care CU figure

out<00:27:58.360> myself<00:27:58.640> and<00:27:58.760> I<00:27:58.880> only<00:27:59.039> believe<00:27:59.279> anyways

out myself and I only believe anyways

what<00:27:59.760> is<00:27:59.880> correct<00:28:00.159> to<00:28:00.320> me<00:28:01.159> but<00:28:01.279> since<00:28:01.519> I’m<00:28:01.679> not

what is correct to me but since I’m not

that<00:28:02.919> since<00:28:03.159> I’m<00:28:03.320> just<00:28:03.440> a<00:28:03.600> simple<00:28:03.919> man<00:28:04.720> so<00:28:05.000> I

that since I’m just a simple man so I

only<00:28:05.399> believe<00:28:05.640> I<00:28:05.720> only<00:28:05.960> read<00:28:06.240> things<00:28:06.880> that<00:28:07.279> I

only believe I only read things that I

can<00:28:07.640> trust<00:28:08.120> don’t<00:28:09.039> have<00:28:09.320> like<00:28:09.880> some<00:28:10.880> hidden<00:28:11.640> or

can trust don’t have like some hidden or

some

tricky<00:28:13.720> evil<00:28:14.000> meaning

in<00:28:17.720> now<00:28:18.159> that<00:28:18.480> the<00:28:18.559> people<00:28:18.760> that<00:28:18.880> say<00:28:19.080> this<00:28:19.240> are

in now that the people that say this are

dumb<00:28:20.480> I<00:28:20.559> have<00:28:20.679> no<00:28:20.799> idea<00:28:21.000> why<00:28:21.120> they’re<00:28:21.240> dumb

dumb I have no idea why they’re dumb

they<00:28:21.519> seem<00:28:21.640> to<00:28:21.720> be<00:28:21.799> saying<00:28:21.960> something<00:28:22.279> very

they seem to be saying something very

rational<00:28:22.880> to<00:28:23.000> me<00:28:23.640> then<00:28:23.760> I’m<00:28:24.000> call<00:28:24.159> them<00:28:24.320> dumb

rational to me then I’m call them dumb

people<00:28:25.720> or<00:28:25.960> people<00:28:26.200> without<00:28:26.519> judgment<00:28:27.279> it’s

people or people without judgment it’s

not<00:28:27.559> clear<00:28:27.720> how<00:28:27.840> you<00:28:28.399> he

says<00:28:31.559> and<00:28:31.679> some<00:28:31.880> of<00:28:32.240> people<00:28:33.240> translated<00:28:33.760> this

says and some of people translated this

word<00:28:34.039> as<00:28:34.240> no<00:28:34.760> judgment<00:28:35.760> if<00:28:35.880> it<00:28:35.960> was<00:28:36.120> say<00:28:36.279> no

word as no judgment if it was say no

judgment<00:28:36.760> then<00:28:36.840> it<00:28:36.960> make<00:28:37.120> sense<00:28:37.440> it’s<00:28:37.559> like

judgment then it make sense it’s like

someone<00:28:37.840> that<00:28:37.960> doesn’t<00:28:38.120> have<00:28:38.240> his<00:28:38.360> own

someone that doesn’t have his own

judgment<00:28:39.600> but<00:28:39.720> if<00:28:39.840> he’s<00:28:40.000> calling<00:28:40.240> them<00:28:40.360> aid

judgment but if he’s calling them aid

person<00:28:41.440> and<00:28:41.600> that<00:28:41.840> person<00:28:42.080> might<00:28:42.240> be<00:28:42.760> right

person and that person might be right

was<00:28:43.880> doing<00:28:44.080> get<00:28:44.240> so<00:28:44.519> he’s<00:28:44.679> relying<00:28:44.960> on

was doing get so he’s relying on

judgment<00:28:45.760> but<00:28:45.919> otherwise<00:28:46.240> he<00:28:46.360> might<00:28:46.519> be<00:28:46.679> right

judgment but otherwise he might be right

if<00:28:47.000> it’s<00:28:47.360> according<00:28:47.600> to<00:28:47.720> this<00:28:48.000> translation

if it’s according to this translation

sounds<00:28:49.279> to<00:28:49.399> me<00:28:49.519> that<00:28:49.640> he’s<00:28:49.799> saying<00:28:50.080> a<00:28:50.240> very<00:28:50.480> not

sounds to me that he’s saying a very not

nice<00:28:50.919> word<00:28:51.120> about<00:28:51.279> a<00:28:51.399> person<00:28:51.600> that<00:28:51.720> is

nice word about a person that is

actually<00:28:52.720> right<00:28:53.720> he’s<00:28:53.919> right<00:28:54.080> in<00:28:54.200> what

actually right he’s right in what

sense<00:28:55.880> in<00:28:56.000> the<00:28:56.120> sense<00:28:56.320> that<00:28:56.559> if<00:28:56.640> you<00:28:56.799> do<00:28:57.039> not

sense in the sense that if you do not

have<00:28:58.399> a<00:28:58.559> way<00:28:58.720> of<00:28:58.880> judging<00:28:59.880> statements<00:29:00.399> by

have a way of judging statements by

Aristotle<00:29:01.320> and<00:29:01.440> figuring<00:29:01.799> out<00:29:01.960> if<00:29:02.039> they’re

Aristotle and figuring out if they’re

correct<00:29:02.679> although<00:29:03.000> on<00:29:03.120> the<00:29:03.200> surface<00:29:03.519> they

correct although on the surface they

sound<00:29:04.159> sound<00:29:04.480> nice<00:29:05.039> so<00:29:05.200> you’re<00:29:05.440> normal<00:29:05.720> you’re

sound sound nice so you’re normal you’re

a<00:29:05.919> good<00:29:06.159> guy<00:29:06.360> right<00:29:06.720> your<00:29:07.720> in<00:29:07.799> the<00:29:07.880> sense<00:29:08.039> of

a good guy right your in the sense of

just<00:29:08.240> being<00:29:08.480> good<00:29:08.640> mid<00:29:09.039> right<00:29:09.399> why<00:29:09.519> would<00:29:09.679> you

just being good mid right why would you

listen<00:29:10.000> to<00:29:10.120> someone<00:29:10.480> say<00:29:10.679> something<00:29:10.960> sounds

listen to someone say something sounds

reasonable<00:29:12.399> listen<00:29:12.679> to<00:29:12.840> him<00:29:13.679> but<00:29:13.799> since<00:29:14.000> I’m<00:29:14.159> a

reasonable listen to him but since I’m a

simple<00:29:14.640> fellow<00:29:15.640> I<00:29:15.720> have<00:29:15.880> not<00:29:16.000> studied

simple fellow I have not studied

philosophy<00:29:17.399> often<00:29:17.679> I<00:29:17.880> some<00:29:18.039> people<00:29:18.279> say

philosophy often I some people say

something<00:29:18.799> and<00:29:18.919> then<00:29:19.039> if<00:29:19.120> you<00:29:19.240> follow<00:29:19.559> through

something and then if you follow through

all<00:29:20.039> the<00:29:20.240> conclusions<00:29:20.720> from<00:29:20.919> it<00:29:21.120> and<00:29:21.279> all<00:29:21.480> the

all the conclusions from it and all the

all<00:29:22.279> the<00:29:22.399> things<00:29:22.559> it’s<00:29:22.720> based<00:29:23.000> on<00:29:23.240> all<00:29:23.360> the

all the things it’s based on all the

things<00:29:23.600> that<00:29:23.760> come<00:29:23.880> out<00:29:24.000> of<00:29:24.200> that<00:29:24.840> you’ll

things that come out of that you’ll

Discover<00:29:25.960> It<00:29:26.120> leading<00:29:26.440> to<00:29:26.600> some<00:29:26.880> very<00:29:27.120> very

Discover It leading to some very very

bad<00:29:27.559> conclusion

bad conclusion

so<00:29:29.360> therefore<00:29:29.679> I<00:29:29.799> just<00:29:29.960> make<00:29:30.120> a<00:29:30.240> blanket<00:29:30.640> rule

so therefore I just make a blanket rule

I<00:29:30.919> don’t<00:29:31.159> listen<00:29:31.440> to<00:29:31.640> people<00:29:32.120> who<00:29:32.320> I<00:29:32.440> don’t

I don’t listen to people who I don’t

have<00:29:33.039> already<00:29:33.399> trust<00:29:33.919> in<00:29:34.919> that’s<00:29:35.039> a<00:29:35.240> very<00:29:35.440> good

have already trust in that’s a very good

rule<00:29:36.640> this<00:29:36.760> is<00:29:37.000> actually<00:29:37.320> what<00:29:37.600> like<00:29:38.000> if<00:29:38.080> you

rule this is actually what like if you

think<00:29:38.440> about<00:29:38.640> it<00:29:38.799> this<00:29:38.880> is<00:29:39.039> actually<00:29:39.240> what

think about it this is actually what

everyone<00:29:39.600> else<00:29:39.799> says<00:29:40.399> people<00:29:40.640> very<00:29:40.840> often

everyone else says people very often

like<00:29:41.480> to<00:29:42.480> we<00:29:42.640> didn’t<00:29:42.880> told<00:29:43.159> this<00:29:43.360> last<00:29:43.519> time

like to we didn’t told this last time

the<00:29:44.000> people<00:29:44.240> very<00:29:44.399> often<00:29:44.640> like<00:29:44.880> to<00:29:45.000> say<00:29:45.640> like

the people very often like to say like

rational<00:29:48.640> and<00:29:49.640> people<00:29:50.039> they’re

rational and people they’re

anti-rational<00:29:50.919> because<00:29:51.039> they

say<00:29:54.559> but<00:29:54.799> not<00:29:55.000> from<00:29:55.200> whoever<00:29:55.559> but<00:29:55.799> from<00:29:56.240> the

say but not from whoever but from the

one<00:29:56.919> right<00:29:58.240> and<00:29:58.679> then<00:29:58.840> you’re<00:29:59.000> like<00:29:59.240> those<00:29:59.399> are

one right and then you’re like those are

people<00:29:59.720> that<00:29:59.880> crazy<00:30:00.200> cuz<00:30:00.320> they<00:30:00.399> don’t<00:30:00.519> believe

people that crazy cuz they don’t believe

in<00:30:00.799> the<00:30:00.880> truth<00:30:01.120> they<00:30:01.200> only<00:30:01.360> believe<00:30:01.559> in

in the truth they only believe in

Authority<00:30:03.159> but<00:30:03.279> then<00:30:03.399> if<00:30:03.480> you<00:30:03.880> actually<00:30:04.080> talk

Authority but then if you actually talk

those<00:30:04.640> people<00:30:05.279> and<00:30:05.399> you’ll<00:30:05.600> ask<00:30:05.760> them<00:30:06.000> okay<00:30:06.200> so

those people and you’ll ask them okay so

you<00:30:06.480> think<00:30:06.640> that<00:30:06.760> the<00:30:06.919> truth<00:30:07.640> Things<00:30:07.919> become

you think that the truth Things become

true<00:30:08.440> because<00:30:08.640> of<00:30:08.760> who<00:30:08.919> says

true because of who says

them<00:30:11.440> most<00:30:11.679> people<00:30:11.880> will<00:30:12.039> say<00:30:12.200> of<00:30:12.320> course<00:30:12.600> not

them most people will say of course not

of<00:30:13.159> course

of course

ideally<00:30:15.399> in<00:30:15.640> in<00:30:15.919> the<00:30:16.039> way<00:30:16.240> things<00:30:16.640> themselves

ideally in in the way things themselves

are<00:30:17.200> things<00:30:17.360> are<00:30:17.519> true<00:30:17.720> because<00:30:17.919> of<00:30:18.039> they’re

are things are true because of they’re

true<00:30:19.159> and<00:30:19.360> even<00:30:19.640> ideally<00:30:20.080> if<00:30:20.200> I<00:30:20.320> would<00:30:20.600> have

true and even ideally if I would have

the<00:30:21.600> discernment<00:30:22.240> if<00:30:22.320> I<00:30:22.399> would<00:30:22.480> have<00:30:22.600> the

the discernment if I would have the

Judgment<00:30:23.080> if<00:30:23.159> I<00:30:23.279> would<00:30:23.519> know<00:30:23.799> how<00:30:24.039> things<00:30:24.200> work

Judgment if I would know how things work

from<00:30:24.640> like<00:30:24.799> first<00:30:25.039> principles<00:30:25.559> I<00:30:25.640> could

from like first principles I could

figure<00:30:26.039> everything<00:30:26.279> out<00:30:26.440> I<00:30:26.559> could<00:30:26.679> listen<00:30:26.880> to

figure everything out I could listen to

anyone<00:30:27.640> and<00:30:27.760> the<00:30:28.039> even<00:30:28.200> tell<00:30:28.399> you<00:30:28.480> know<00:30:28.600> that

anyone and the even tell you know that

was<00:30:29.080> like<00:30:29.200> that<00:30:29.320> so<00:30:29.440> therefore<00:30:29.679> he<00:30:29.760> was

was like that so therefore he was

allowed<00:30:30.159> to<00:30:30.960> but<00:30:31.120> us<00:30:31.360> normal<00:30:31.720> people<00:30:32.120> we’re

allowed to but us normal people we’re

not<00:30:32.480> like<00:30:32.679> that<00:30:32.840> we<00:30:32.960> have<00:30:33.159> no<00:30:33.320> idea<00:30:33.600> how<00:30:34.039> things

not like that we have no idea how things

work<00:30:35.279> so<00:30:35.600> we<00:30:35.720> have<00:30:35.880> to<00:30:36.039> make<00:30:36.320> a<00:30:36.559> we<00:30:36.679> have<00:30:36.799> to

work so we have to make a we have to

sort<00:30:37.519> of<00:30:37.640> rely<00:30:37.919> on<00:30:38.039> faith<00:30:38.240> but<00:30:38.360> we<00:30:38.440> have<00:30:38.559> to

sort of rely on faith but we have to

like<00:30:38.840> rely<00:30:39.120> on<00:30:39.679> people<00:30:40.000> we

trust<00:30:43.200> and<00:30:43.360> that’s<00:30:43.679> extremely<00:30:44.159> reasonable

trust and that’s extremely reasonable

thing<00:30:44.679> to<00:30:44.840> say<00:30:45.720> problematic<00:30:46.399> because<00:30:46.640> how<00:30:46.720> do

thing to say problematic because how do

you<00:30:46.840> know<00:30:47.000> to<00:30:47.080> trust<00:30:47.440> yeah<00:30:47.559> it’s<00:30:47.720> problematic

you know to trust yeah it’s problematic

cuz<00:30:48.320> you<00:30:48.440> have<00:30:48.640> I’m<00:30:48.840> agree<00:30:49.760> I<00:30:49.880> agree<00:30:50.120> that

cuz you have I’m agree I agree that

there’s<00:30:50.360> a<00:30:50.519> problem<00:30:50.760> with<00:30:50.919> that<00:30:51.720> but<00:30:52.240> it<00:30:52.440> seems

there’s a problem with that but it seems

to<00:30:53.120> me<00:30:53.600> I<00:30:53.679> mean<00:30:53.840> it’s<00:30:54.039> actually<00:30:54.399> there’s<00:30:54.600> no

to me I mean it’s actually there’s no

way<00:30:54.840> out<00:30:54.960> of<00:30:55.120> this<00:30:55.279> number<00:30:55.519> one<00:30:55.840> like<00:30:56.000> we<00:30:56.120> do

way out of this number one like we do

this<00:30:56.399> all<00:30:56.519> the<00:30:56.679> time<00:30:57.279> and<00:30:57.519> probably<00:30:58.120> people

this all the time and probably people

will<00:30:58.480> say<00:30:58.720> something

will say something

like<00:31:01.080> it’s<00:31:01.240> easier<00:31:01.519> to<00:31:01.639> figure<00:31:01.880> out<00:31:02.039> who<00:31:02.159> to

like it’s easier to figure out who to

trust<00:31:02.600> it’s<00:31:02.799> not<00:31:03.120> I<00:31:03.200> don’t<00:31:03.360> know<00:31:03.480> if<00:31:03.639> it<00:31:03.760> is<00:31:04.240> but

trust it’s not I don’t know if it is but

people<00:31:04.760> would<00:31:05.320> seem<00:31:05.519> to<00:31:05.679> think<00:31:05.840> that<00:31:05.960> it’s

people would seem to think that it’s

easy<00:31:06.279> to<00:31:06.399> figure<00:31:06.559> out<00:31:06.679> who<00:31:06.799> they<00:31:06.919> trust<00:31:07.159> and<00:31:07.279> to

easy to figure out who they trust and to

figure<00:31:07.559> out<00:31:07.720> things<00:31:07.840> in<00:31:08.679> themselves<00:31:09.679> is<00:31:09.840> that

figure out things in themselves is that

true<00:31:10.480> I<00:31:10.559> don’t<00:31:10.799> know<00:31:11.799> you<00:31:11.919> know<00:31:12.639> it<00:31:12.799> also<00:31:13.080> casts

true I don’t know you know it also casts

you<00:31:13.799> I<00:31:13.880> think<00:31:14.000> it’s<00:31:14.120> sort<00:31:14.279> of<00:31:14.440> true<00:31:14.679> I<00:31:14.760> mean

you I think it’s sort of true I mean

unless<00:31:15.240> at<00:31:15.360> least<00:31:15.519> if<00:31:15.639> you

unless at least if you

rely<00:31:18.000> yeah<00:31:18.120> it’s<00:31:18.360> more<00:31:18.600> accessible<00:31:19.120> well<00:31:19.240> the

rely yeah it’s more accessible well the

question<00:31:19.519> is<00:31:19.639> if<00:31:19.720> you’re<00:31:19.840> a<00:31:19.919> dumb<00:31:20.159> person<00:31:20.399> then

question is if you’re a dumb person then

you<00:31:20.600> have<00:31:20.760> no<00:31:20.880> way<00:31:21.000> of<00:31:21.120> judging<00:31:21.440> who’s<00:31:21.679> the

you have no way of judging who’s the

good<00:31:22.039> doctor<00:31:22.960> but<00:31:23.080> it<00:31:23.159> turns<00:31:23.399> out<00:31:23.559> that<00:31:23.720> most

good doctor but it turns out that most

people<00:31:24.159> do<00:31:24.320> a<00:31:24.440> pretty<00:31:24.679> good<00:31:24.840> job<00:31:25.000> at<00:31:25.159> finding

people do a pretty good job at finding

uh<00:31:25.919> more<00:31:26.080> or<00:31:26.240> less<00:31:26.440> reasonable<00:31:26.919> doctors

uh more or less reasonable doctors

it’s<00:31:29.519> actually<00:31:29.760> the<00:31:29.919> people<00:31:30.240> that<00:31:30.440> judge

it’s actually the people that judge

things<00:31:30.919> for<00:31:31.200> themselves<00:31:31.559> that<00:31:31.720> make<00:31:31.960> more

things for themselves that make more

mistakes

usually<00:31:34.679> in<00:31:34.840> general<00:31:35.200> and<00:31:35.320> the<00:31:35.399> way<00:31:35.519> the<00:31:35.600> world

usually in general and the way the world

Works

no<00:31:40.200> for<00:31:40.399> the<00:31:40.519> most<00:31:40.720> part<00:31:40.960> well<00:31:41.080> you<00:31:41.200> could<00:31:41.320> say

no for the most part well you could say

well<00:31:41.559> you’re<00:31:41.720> trusting<00:31:42.080> The<00:31:42.320> Establishment

well you’re trusting The Establishment

or<00:31:43.360> something<00:31:43.639> like<00:31:43.880> that

or something like that

but<00:31:46.840> but<00:31:46.960> that’s<00:31:47.159> what<00:31:47.399> the<00:31:47.559> best<00:31:47.760> you’ve

got<00:31:53.039> at<00:31:53.200> least<00:31:53.360> you<00:31:53.480> know<00:31:53.639> you<00:31:53.760> have<00:31:53.840> a

got at least you know you have a

overtime<00:31:54.360> window<00:31:54.639> like<00:31:54.760> you’re<00:31:54.960> bounded<00:31:55.360> and

overtime window like you’re bounded and

how<00:31:56.880> if<00:31:57.159> you<00:31:57.279> rely<00:31:57.600> it<00:31:57.880> neily<00:31:58.360> then<00:31:58.480> you<00:31:58.639> only

how if you rely it neily then you only

have<00:31:59.159> trust<00:31:59.559> right<00:31:59.760> nobody’s<00:32:00.039> saying<00:32:00.240> you

have trust right nobody’s saying you

shouldn’t<00:32:00.799> if<00:32:00.880> you’re<00:32:01.000> a<00:32:01.080> smart<00:32:01.360> person<00:32:01.559> you

shouldn’t if you’re a smart person you

shouldn’t<00:32:01.880> go<00:32:02.000> further<00:32:02.360> I’m<00:32:02.519> talking<00:32:02.760> about

shouldn’t go further I’m talking about

someone<00:32:03.200> that<00:32:03.360> acknowledges<00:32:03.840> that<00:32:03.960> he’s<00:32:04.120> not

someone that acknowledges that he’s not

smart<00:32:05.080> or<00:32:05.240> that<00:32:05.360> he’s<00:32:05.480> not<00:32:05.600> smart<00:32:05.880> in<00:32:05.960> a

smart or that he’s not smart in a

certain<00:32:06.399> discipline<00:32:06.799> or<00:32:06.919> a<00:32:07.000> certain<00:32:07.279> area

certain discipline or a certain area

right<00:32:08.559> right<00:32:08.919> okay

right right okay

uh<00:32:11.519> and<00:32:11.679> for<00:32:11.880> example<00:32:12.360> and<00:32:12.760> by<00:32:12.840> the<00:32:12.919> way<00:32:13.039> the

uh and for example and by the way the

himself<00:32:13.559> says<00:32:13.760> this<00:32:13.919> this<00:32:14.039> is<00:32:14.120> not<00:32:14.279> something

himself says this this is not something

that<00:32:14.639> I’m<00:32:14.799> saying<00:32:15.399> that<00:32:15.639> that<00:32:15.880> crazy<00:32:16.200> people

that I’m saying that that crazy people

what<00:32:16.679> it<00:32:16.760> says<00:32:17.600> I’m<00:32:17.720> thinking<00:32:18.159> now<00:32:18.279> we

what it says I’m thinking now we

shouldn’t<00:32:18.600> translate<00:32:18.960> it<00:32:19.080> that<00:32:19.200> way<00:32:19.360> because

shouldn’t translate it that way because

be<00:32:19.760> bad<00:32:19.960> people<00:32:20.120> with<00:32:20.240> no<00:32:20.440> judgment<00:32:21.080> d<00:32:21.440> himself

be bad people with no judgment d himself

wrot<00:32:24.279> and<00:32:24.360> he<00:32:24.440> said<00:32:24.639> that<00:32:25.480> to<00:32:25.600> read<00:32:25.840> arguments

wrot and he said that to read arguments

that<00:32:26.399> go<00:32:26.559> against<00:32:26.799> the

that go against the

and<00:32:28.760> everyone’s<00:32:29.120> like<00:32:29.399> well<00:32:29.880> we<00:32:30.120> you<00:32:30.240> forgot

and everyone’s like well we you forgot

that<00:32:30.639> you’re<00:32:30.960> rationalist<00:32:31.600> Mr<00:32:31.919> ra<00:32:32.880> didn’t<00:32:33.159> you

that you’re rationalist Mr ra didn’t you

tell<00:32:33.600> us<00:32:33.840> that<00:32:34.000> we<00:32:34.159> everyone<00:32:34.440> should<00:32:34.639> do<00:32:34.840> I

tell us that we everyone should do I

mean<00:32:35.639> you<00:32:35.880> you<00:32:36.120> just<00:32:36.240> told<00:32:36.440> us<00:32:36.639> like<00:32:36.799> a<00:32:36.880> few

mean you you just told us like a few

chapters<00:32:37.399> ago<00:32:37.600> that<00:32:37.720> we<00:32:37.799> should<00:32:37.919> all<00:32:38.200> discover

chapters ago that we should all discover

that<00:32:38.519> there’s<00:32:38.679> a<00:32:38.880> God<00:32:39.519> and<00:32:39.679> how<00:32:39.880> we<00:32:40.120> ever<00:32:40.279> do

that there’s a God and how we ever do

that<00:32:40.840> without<00:32:41.120> considering<00:32:41.840> arguments<00:32:42.840> and

that without considering arguments and

of<00:32:43.120> course<00:32:43.279> he<00:32:43.399> should<00:32:43.720> and<00:32:43.919> he<00:32:44.080> actually<00:32:44.320> says

of course he should and he actually says

the<00:32:44.760> answer<00:32:45.519> right<00:32:45.639> in<00:32:45.880> the<00:32:46.200> right<00:32:46.320> in<00:32:46.440> the

the answer right in the right in the

page<00:32:49.000> and<00:32:49.120> he<00:32:49.240> says<00:32:49.600> because<00:32:50.120> most<00:32:50.519> people<00:32:51.000> do

page and he says because most people do

not<00:32:51.799> know<00:32:52.799> logic<00:32:53.720> he<00:32:54.080> said<00:32:55.080> it<00:32:55.159> means<00:32:55.519> logic<00:32:56.279> or

not know logic he said it means logic or

maybe<00:32:56.799> like<00:32:57.000> basic<00:32:57.279> metaphysics

maybe like basic metaphysics

and<00:32:58.880> most<00:32:59.080> people<00:32:59.320> don’t<00:32:59.600> know<00:32:59.799> how<00:33:00.080> thought

and most people don’t know how thought

works<00:33:00.799> so<00:33:00.960> they<00:33:01.080> don’t<00:33:01.240> have<00:33:01.360> the<00:33:01.480> tools<00:33:01.840> so

works so they don’t have the tools so

they<00:33:02.440> they’re<00:33:02.760> probably<00:33:03.320> just<00:33:03.480> going<00:33:03.600> to<00:33:03.760> make

they they’re probably just going to make

themselves<00:33:04.360> more<00:33:04.600> confused<00:33:05.159> by<00:33:06.120> so-call

themselves more confused by so-call

thinking<00:33:06.880> for<00:33:07.120> themselves<00:33:07.320> they’re<00:33:07.399> not

thinking for themselves they’re not

really<00:33:07.639> thinking<00:33:07.840> for<00:33:08.080> themselves<00:33:08.320> because

really thinking for themselves because

they<00:33:08.519> don’t<00:33:08.639> know<00:33:08.720> what<00:33:08.840> thinking<00:33:09.120> means<00:33:09.799> but

they don’t know what thinking means but

they’re<00:33:10.960> for<00:33:11.159> thems<00:33:11.799> without<00:33:12.080> thinking<00:33:12.960> so

they’re for thems without thinking so

you<00:33:13.279> might<00:33:13.480> as<00:33:13.600> well<00:33:14.000> just<00:33:14.320> he<00:33:14.440> doesn’t<00:33:14.720> really

you might as well just he doesn’t really

say<00:33:15.080> this<00:33:15.279> but<00:33:15.399> he<00:33:15.519> says<00:33:15.840> for<00:33:16.080> those<00:33:16.279> people<00:33:17.080> we

say this but he says for those people we

I’m<00:33:17.399> telling<00:33:18.200> them<00:33:19.200> don’t<00:33:19.399> read<00:33:19.679> those<00:33:19.880> books

I’m telling them don’t read those books

and<00:33:20.799> if<00:33:21.000> you<00:33:21.240> ask<00:33:21.519> okay<00:33:21.679> so<00:33:21.880> why<00:33:21.960> would<00:33:22.120> those

and if you ask okay so why would those

people<00:33:22.399> listen<00:33:22.639> to<00:33:23.039> you<00:33:24.039> the<00:33:24.159> answer<00:33:24.320> is<00:33:24.440> like

people listen to you the answer is like

what<00:33:24.679> I<00:33:24.760> said<00:33:24.960> before<00:33:25.360> that<00:33:25.880> we’re<00:33:26.039> we’re

what I said before that we’re we’re

already<00:33:26.399> in<00:33:26.559> that<00:33:26.720> world<00:33:28.080> this<00:33:28.240> book<00:33:28.399> is

already in that world this book is

written<00:33:28.760> by<00:33:28.840> someone<00:33:29.039> who<00:33:29.159> assumes<00:33:29.440> that

written by someone who assumes that

people<00:33:29.720> listen<00:33:29.960> to<00:33:30.320> him<00:33:31.320> he’s<00:33:31.480> not<00:33:31.600> here<00:33:31.720> to

people listen to him he’s not here to

justify<00:33:32.320> why<00:33:32.440> you<00:33:32.519> should<00:33:32.679> listen<00:33:32.919> to<00:33:33.240> him

justify why you should listen to him

like<00:33:34.399> it<00:33:34.679> it<00:33:34.760> seems<00:33:34.960> to<00:33:35.080> work<00:33:35.840> people<00:33:36.000> say<00:33:36.480> says

like it it seems to work people say says

he<00:33:36.720> not<00:33:36.840> allowed<00:33:37.080> to<00:33:37.279> they<00:33:37.399> just<00:33:37.480> listen<00:33:37.760> to

he not allowed to they just listen to

him<00:33:37.960> so<00:33:38.080> obviously<00:33:38.399> he<00:33:38.519> was<00:33:38.799> he<00:33:38.880> wasn’t<00:33:39.159> even

him so obviously he was he wasn’t even

incorrect<00:33:39.880> in<00:33:40.120> that<00:33:40.639> judgment<00:33:41.039> that<00:33:41.120> he’s

incorrect in that judgment that he’s

writing<00:33:41.679> from<00:33:41.840> a<00:33:41.960> place<00:33:42.120> of<00:33:42.679> authority<00:33:43.679> and<00:33:43.840> of

writing from a place of authority and of

course<00:33:44.080> the<00:33:44.200> moment<00:33:44.399> you<00:33:44.519> don’t<00:33:44.760> you<00:33:44.840> don’t

course the moment you don’t you don’t

accept<00:33:45.279> that<00:33:45.399> Authority<00:33:45.760> you<00:33:45.880> can’t<00:33:46.080> say<00:33:46.279> that

accept that Authority you can’t say that

because<00:33:46.600> it’s<00:33:46.760> useless<00:33:47.120> like<00:33:47.200> it’s<00:33:47.279> a<00:33:47.360> waste

because it’s useless like it’s a waste

of<00:33:47.679> time<00:33:47.840> like<00:33:47.960> well<00:33:48.039> I<00:33:48.120> shouldn’t<00:33:48.279> I<00:33:48.440> listen

of time like well I shouldn’t I listen

to<00:33:48.639> you<00:33:48.760> of<00:33:48.880> course<00:33:49.399> okay<00:33:49.600> then<00:33:49.679> you<00:33:49.799> have<00:33:49.880> to

to you of course okay then you have to

use<00:33:50.120> arguments<00:33:51.000> but<00:33:51.159> then<00:33:51.399> we<00:33:51.559> we’re<00:33:51.679> going<00:33:51.799> to

use arguments but then we we’re going to

really<00:33:52.039> have<00:33:52.120> to<00:33:52.240> go<00:33:52.360> the<00:33:52.480> long<00:33:52.720> way<00:33:52.880> which<00:33:53.039> is

really have to go the long way which is

explain<00:33:53.600> what<00:33:53.760> arguments<00:33:54.279> are<00:33:54.600> and<00:33:54.880> how<00:33:55.039> they

explain what arguments are and how they

work<00:33:56.080> you’re<00:33:56.200> not<00:33:56.320> going<00:33:56.399> to<00:33:56.440> have<00:33:56.559> any<00:33:56.679> other

work you’re not going to have any other

choice<00:33:57.279> but<00:33:57.399> the<00:33:57.480> point<00:33:58.000> is<00:33:58.960> that<00:33:59.159> R<00:33:59.440> himself

choice but the point is that R himself

agrees<00:34:00.120> that<00:34:00.240> someone<00:34:00.519> that<00:34:00.720> doesn’t<00:34:01.000> know

agrees that someone that doesn’t know

how<00:34:01.440> to<00:34:02.000> apply<00:34:02.320> his<00:34:02.480> own

how to apply his own

judgment<00:34:05.080> is<00:34:05.279> going<00:34:05.480> to<00:34:05.559> be<00:34:05.679> better<00:34:06.159> accepting

judgment is going to be better accepting

someone<00:34:06.679> else’s<00:34:07.039> judgment<00:34:07.559> and<00:34:07.760> yes<00:34:07.919> he’s

someone else’s judgment and yes he’s

going<00:34:08.240> to<00:34:08.359> have<00:34:08.480> to<00:34:08.599> use<00:34:08.800> his<00:34:08.960> own<00:34:09.440> bad

going to have to use his own bad

judgment<00:34:10.520> for<00:34:10.800> finding<00:34:11.280> the<00:34:11.480> person<00:34:12.280> who<00:34:12.480> has

judgment for finding the person who has

good<00:34:12.919> judgment<00:34:13.520> and<00:34:13.919> sometimes<00:34:14.119> this<00:34:14.240> works

good judgment and sometimes this works

sometimes<00:34:14.919> not<00:34:15.119> and<00:34:15.280> this<00:34:15.359> is<00:34:15.599> why<00:34:16.599> it’s

sometimes not and this is why it’s

important<00:34:17.079> for<00:34:17.240> the<00:34:17.399> people<00:34:17.599> with<00:34:17.800> good

important for the people with good

judgment<00:34:18.440> and<00:34:18.560> the<00:34:18.679> people<00:34:18.879> that<00:34:19.040> know<00:34:19.440> to

judgment and the people that know to

become<00:34:20.639> the<00:34:20.760> philosopher

become the philosopher

Kings<00:34:23.079> right<00:34:23.440> in<00:34:23.560> order<00:34:23.760> to<00:34:23.879> make<00:34:24.000> sure<00:34:24.159> that

Kings right in order to make sure that

everyone<00:34:24.480> else<00:34:24.679> has<00:34:24.839> at<00:34:24.919> least<00:34:25.119> good<00:34:25.320> opinions

everyone else has at least good opinions

even<00:34:26.520> if<00:34:26.639> they<00:34:26.760> can’t<00:34:27.000> have<00:34:27.119> knowledge

even if they can’t have knowledge

that’s<00:34:28.599> was<00:34:28.919> the<00:34:29.079> whole<00:34:29.399> idea<00:34:29.639> of<00:34:29.760> the<00:34:30.200> that’s

that’s was the whole idea of the that’s

why<00:34:30.480> we<00:34:30.760> have<00:34:31.760> Society<00:34:32.280> I<00:34:32.359> mean<00:34:33.200> yeah<00:34:33.440> and<00:34:33.560> of

why we have Society I mean yeah and of

course<00:34:33.879> if<00:34:33.960> you’re<00:34:34.159> stuck<00:34:34.440> in<00:34:34.560> a<00:34:34.720> in<00:34:34.839> a<00:34:35.240> bad

course if you’re stuck in a in a bad

Society<00:34:35.919> where<00:34:36.079> there’s<00:34:36.240> a<00:34:36.440> bad<00:34:36.800> King<00:34:37.639> then

Society where there’s a bad King then

you’re<00:34:38.079> basically<00:34:38.359> going<00:34:38.480> to<00:34:38.560> have<00:34:38.960> wrong

you’re basically going to have wrong

opinions<00:34:39.520> and<00:34:39.720> that’s<00:34:39.960> why<00:34:40.480> we<00:34:40.639> have<00:34:40.760> to<00:34:40.839> do

opinions and that’s why we have to do

Jihad<00:34:41.760> against<00:34:42.079> you

Jihad against you

anyways<00:34:44.399> this<00:34:44.639> don’t<00:34:44.839> R<00:34:45.159> I<00:34:45.240> didn’t<00:34:45.399> make<00:34:45.520> any

anyways this don’t R I didn’t make any

of<00:34:45.800> this

of this

up<00:34:47.639> uh<00:34:47.839> the<00:34:48.000> point

is<00:34:56.879> the<00:34:57.960> of<00:34:58.200> the<00:34:58.400> of

hasem<00:35:03.359> yeah<00:35:03.560> but<00:35:03.680> it<00:35:04.160> okay<00:35:05.160> I’m<00:35:05.240> going<00:35:05.359> to<00:35:05.440> go

hasem yeah but it okay I’m going to go

to<00:35:05.920> the<00:35:06.040> point<00:35:06.240> is<00:35:06.520> he<00:35:06.760> recogniz<00:35:07.240> I’m<00:35:07.320> not

to the point is he recogniz I’m not

saying<00:35:07.640> that’s<00:35:07.760> the<00:35:07.839> solution<00:35:08.160> I’m<00:35:08.240> saying<00:35:08.400> he

saying that’s the solution I’m saying he

recognizes<00:35:09.079> the<00:35:09.320> problem<00:35:09.760> that<00:35:09.880> you<00:35:10.000> can’t

recognizes the problem that you can’t

actually<00:35:10.520> convert<00:35:10.839> the<00:35:10.960> whole<00:35:11.079> world<00:35:11.320> to<00:35:11.440> the

actually convert the whole world to the

truth<00:35:12.560> without<00:35:13.160> fighting<00:35:14.079> sometimes<00:35:15.079> it

truth without fighting sometimes it

might<00:35:15.520> might<00:35:15.680> have<00:35:15.800> been<00:35:15.960> better<00:35:16.200> to<00:35:16.359> do<00:35:16.520> it

might might have been better to do it

without<00:35:17.040> fighting<00:35:17.320> but<00:35:17.520> it’s<00:35:18.520> it’s<00:35:18.599> a<00:35:18.720> real

without fighting but it’s it’s a real

problem<00:35:20.040> that’s<00:35:20.240> if<00:35:20.320> you<00:35:20.400> don’t<00:35:20.520> have<00:35:20.640> an<00:35:20.880> army

problem that’s if you don’t have an army

if<00:35:21.960> you<00:35:22.040> have<00:35:22.160> an<00:35:22.280> army<00:35:22.640> then<00:35:22.720> you<00:35:22.800> should

if you have an army then you should

definitely<00:35:23.400> conquer<00:35:23.760> the<00:35:23.920> city<00:35:24.280> rather<00:35:24.480> than

definitely conquer the city rather than

go<00:35:24.720> to<00:35:24.839> the

go to the

mid<00:35:26.760> um

I<00:35:31.440> mean<00:35:32.320> basically<00:35:33.320> is<00:35:33.440> that<00:35:34.000> person<00:35:35.000> um<00:35:35.320> the

I mean basically is that person um the

is<00:35:36.880> that<00:35:37.520> this<00:35:37.640> is<00:35:37.760> something<00:35:38.000> that<00:35:38.079> he<00:35:38.200> agrees

is that this is something that he agrees

with<00:35:38.880> this<00:35:38.960> is<00:35:39.119> why<00:35:39.240> I<00:35:39.320> don’t<00:35:39.520> think<00:35:39.680> it’s

with this is why I don’t think it’s

correct<00:35:40.119> to<00:35:40.200> say<00:35:40.359> that<00:35:40.520> D<00:35:40.920> is<00:35:41.079> against<00:35:41.359> that

correct to say that D is against that

he’s<00:35:41.640> not<00:35:41.760> against<00:35:42.000> that<00:35:42.119> for<00:35:42.320> most<00:35:43.079> people

he’s not against that for most people

and<00:35:44.240> it’s<00:35:44.440> pretty<00:35:44.640> much<00:35:44.839> explicitly<00:35:45.400> does

and it’s pretty much explicitly does

this<00:35:45.800> for<00:35:45.960> most<00:35:46.680> people<00:35:47.680> um<00:35:47.920> back<00:35:48.040> to<00:35:48.200> where<00:35:48.359> I

this for most people um back to where I

am<00:35:48.960> so<00:35:49.880> but<00:35:50.000> what<00:35:50.119> is<00:35:50.240> his<00:35:50.440> answer<00:35:50.800> to<00:35:50.920> the

am so but what is his answer to the

crown<00:35:51.440> right<00:35:51.680> we<00:35:51.760> don’t<00:35:51.880> know<00:35:52.000> what<00:35:52.119> his

crown right we don’t know what his

answer<00:35:52.560> to<00:35:52.680> the<00:35:52.800> actual<00:35:53.079> question<00:35:53.359> is

answer to the actual question is

right<00:35:55.160> if<00:35:55.319> someone<00:35:56.040> says<00:35:57.040> right<00:35:57.240> he’s<00:35:57.680> we<00:35:57.800> see

right if someone says right he’s we see

his<00:35:58.240> strategy<00:35:58.960> right<00:35:59.079> he’s<00:35:59.240> doing<00:35:59.440> a<00:35:59.880> a<00:36:00.079> tactic

his strategy right he’s doing a a tactic

here<00:36:00.560> he’s<00:36:00.720> saying<00:36:01.319> since<00:36:01.720> many<00:36:02.040> people<00:36:02.520> will

here he’s saying since many people will

and<00:36:03.119> I’m<00:36:03.280> adding<00:36:03.680> rightly<00:36:04.160> he<00:36:04.319> doesn’t<00:36:04.640> he

and I’m adding rightly he doesn’t he

makes<00:36:05.000> it<00:36:05.119> sound<00:36:05.359> like<00:36:05.520> not<00:36:05.760> rightly<00:36:06.520> but<00:36:06.680> I

makes it sound like not rightly but I

think<00:36:07.040> rightly<00:36:07.920> or<00:36:08.040> if<00:36:08.160> you<00:36:08.319> have<00:36:08.440> an<00:36:08.560> argument

think rightly or if you have an argument

why<00:36:09.119> they’re<00:36:09.280> wrong<00:36:09.520> you<00:36:09.680> tell<00:36:09.839> me<00:36:10.119> because<00:36:10.280> I

why they’re wrong you tell me because I

don’t<00:36:10.520> know<00:36:11.000> most<00:36:11.240> people<00:36:11.640> if<00:36:12.640> instead<00:36:12.880> of

don’t know most people if instead of

saying<00:36:13.240> you<00:36:13.319> know<00:36:13.640> that<00:36:14.000> this<00:36:14.079> is<00:36:14.240> the<00:36:14.359> way

saying you know that this is the way

things<00:36:14.720> are<00:36:15.160> mram<00:36:15.880> said<00:36:16.800> or<00:36:17.160> Mr<00:36:17.760> said<00:36:17.880> and<00:36:18.000> he

things are mram said or Mr said and he

told<00:36:18.280> you<00:36:18.440> with<00:36:19.319> that<00:36:19.400> it’s<00:36:19.520> not<00:36:20.359> nobody<00:36:20.640> seems

told you with that it’s not nobody seems

to<00:36:21.280> believe<00:36:21.640> that<00:36:22.359> so<00:36:22.760> so<00:36:22.960> anyways<00:36:23.319> though

to believe that so so anyways though

works<00:36:24.160> if<00:36:24.280> it<00:36:24.400> would<00:36:24.560> be<00:36:24.720> like<00:36:24.839> you<00:36:24.920> know<00:36:25.040> as

works if it would be like you know as

said<00:36:25.680> this<00:36:25.839> and<00:36:26.000> the<00:36:26.119> other<00:36:26.359> guy<00:36:26.520> said<00:36:26.800> that

said this and the other guy said that

and<00:36:27.160> so<00:36:27.319> on<00:36:27.839> many<00:36:28.119> people<00:36:28.560> will<00:36:29.560> it’s<00:36:29.680> just

and so on many people will it’s just

saying<00:36:30.079> that<00:36:30.440> you<00:36:30.640> probably<00:36:30.960> going<00:36:31.160> assume

saying that you probably going assume

that<00:36:31.480> they’re<00:36:31.640> bad<00:36:32.040> people<00:36:33.040> because<00:36:33.200> they’re

that they’re bad people because they’re

not<00:36:33.480> Jewish<00:36:34.240> yes<00:36:34.520> possibly<00:36:35.119> but<00:36:35.560> that<00:36:35.680> also

not Jewish yes possibly but that also

needs<00:36:36.040> to<00:36:36.160> be<00:36:36.319> like<00:36:36.440> shown<00:36:37.079> and<00:36:37.280> and<00:36:37.359> that’s<00:36:37.520> a

needs to be like shown and and that’s a

little<00:36:37.760> a<00:36:37.920> problem<00:36:38.240> because<00:36:38.480> they’re<00:36:38.720> bad

little a problem because they’re bad

people<00:36:39.480> they’re<00:36:39.640> good<00:36:39.839> people<00:36:40.079> by<00:36:40.240> their<00:36:40.359> own

people they’re good people by their own

criteria<00:36:40.920> of<00:36:41.040> being<00:36:41.240> good

criteria of being good

peoplebody<00:36:44.160> everyone<00:36:44.520> I<00:36:44.599> don’t<00:36:44.800> know<00:36:45.119> but

peoplebody everyone I don’t know but

he’s<00:36:45.880> using<00:36:46.160> their<00:36:46.319> criter<00:36:46.720> right<00:36:46.839> it’s<00:36:46.960> even

he’s using their criter right it’s even

worse<00:36:49.839> he’s<00:36:50.040> teaching<00:36:50.359> us<00:36:50.599> how<00:36:50.720> to<00:36:50.839> be<00:36:50.920> a<00:36:51.040> good

worse he’s teaching us how to be a good

person<00:36:52.599> by<00:36:52.760> the<00:36:52.880> lights<00:36:53.319> of<00:36:53.560> Aristotle<00:36:54.160> more

person by the lights of Aristotle more

or<00:36:54.599> less<00:36:55.599> which<00:36:55.720> means<00:36:56.000> first<00:36:56.160> they<00:36:56.280> have<00:36:56.359> to

or less which means first they have to

know<00:36:56.560> arist<00:36:56.920> a<00:36:57.000> good<00:36:57.160> person<00:36:57.720> and<00:36:57.839> then<00:36:57.960> you

know arist a good person and then you

have<00:36:58.160> to<00:36:58.760> bias<00:36:59.200> theory<00:36:59.440> of<00:36:59.560> being<00:36:59.680> a<00:36:59.839> good

have to bias theory of being a good

person<00:37:01.560> and<00:37:01.720> of<00:37:01.880> course<00:37:02.079> if<00:37:02.200> someone<00:37:02.560> says

person and of course if someone says

this<00:37:03.440> sounds<00:37:03.800> good<00:37:04.000> that’s<00:37:04.119> I’m<00:37:04.280> saying<00:37:04.480> even

this sounds good that’s I’m saying even

if<00:37:04.760> it<00:37:04.880> sounds<00:37:05.160> reasonable<00:37:05.599> to<00:37:05.720> you<00:37:05.839> and<00:37:06.200> and

if it sounds reasonable to you and and

even<00:37:06.560> have<00:37:06.680> like<00:37:07.480> to<00:37:07.640> connect<00:37:07.920> to<00:37:08.000> it<00:37:08.119> or

even have like to connect to it or

something<00:37:09.160> about<00:37:09.400> say<00:37:09.640> well<00:37:10.000> if<00:37:10.560> saying

something about say well if saying

clearly<00:37:11.160> if<00:37:11.440> I<00:37:11.520> know<00:37:11.720> that<00:37:11.880> if<00:37:11.960> I<00:37:12.079> would<00:37:12.240> say

clearly if I know that if I would say

that<00:37:12.480> this<00:37:12.599> is<00:37:12.720> rsl’s<00:37:13.240> Theory<00:37:13.839> people<00:37:14.119> would

that this is rsl’s Theory people would

not<00:37:14.640> accept<00:37:14.920> it<00:37:15.240> because<00:37:15.640> of<00:37:15.920> this<00:37:16.440> Uris<00:37:17.040> that

not accept it because of this Uris that

they’re<00:37:17.240> going<00:37:17.440> to<00:37:17.599> apply<00:37:17.920> right<00:37:18.079> maybe<00:37:18.280> it’s

they’re going to apply right maybe it’s

not<00:37:18.480> an<00:37:18.599> argument<00:37:18.960> but<00:37:19.079> this<00:37:19.200> Uris<00:37:19.640> that<00:37:19.720> they

not an argument but this Uris that they

will<00:37:20.000> apply<00:37:20.319> which<00:37:20.480> says<00:37:21.160> people<00:37:21.359> ban<00:37:21.720> people

will apply which says people ban people

or<00:37:22.119> people<00:37:22.319> I<00:37:22.440> don’t<00:37:22.640> know<00:37:22.880> or<00:37:23.480> outside<00:37:23.880> my

or people I don’t know or outside my

circle<00:37:24.520> of<00:37:24.680> trust<00:37:24.960> or<00:37:25.240> however<00:37:25.359> you<00:37:25.440> want<00:37:25.520> to

circle of trust or however you want to

say<00:37:25.839> it<00:37:26.800> sometimes<00:37:27.079> say<00:37:27.319> things<00:37:27.599> that<00:37:27.720> sound

say it sometimes say things that sound

good<00:37:28.319> but<00:37:28.440> are<00:37:28.960> internally

good but are internally

bad<00:37:31.839> and<00:37:32.040> therefore<00:37:32.400> he<00:37:32.480> says<00:37:32.720> like<00:37:32.839> this

bad and therefore he says like this

therefore<00:37:33.640> I’m<00:37:33.720> going<00:37:33.800> to<00:37:33.880> finish<00:37:34.319> therefore

therefore I’m going to finish therefore

I<00:37:34.680> have<00:37:34.960> I<00:37:35.040> have<00:37:35.119> a<00:37:35.240> solution<00:37:35.800> I’m<00:37:35.880> just<00:37:36.000> going

I have I have a solution I’m just going

to<00:37:36.240> lie<00:37:36.480> to<00:37:36.599> you<00:37:37.480> this<00:37:37.599> is<00:37:37.839> amazing<00:37:38.280> thing

to lie to you this is amazing thing

where<00:37:38.640> someone<00:37:39.000> comes<00:37:39.319> and<00:37:39.640> says<00:37:40.560> Al<00:37:41.359> in<00:37:41.520> this

where someone comes and says Al in this

series<00:37:41.880> of<00:37:42.040> classes<00:37:42.359> we’re<00:37:42.480> going<00:37:42.560> to<00:37:42.640> be

series of classes we’re going to be

lying<00:37:43.040> to<00:37:43.200> you<00:37:43.520> and<00:37:43.599> then<00:37:43.720> everyone<00:37:43.960> comes

lying to you and then everyone comes

back<00:37:44.400> the<00:37:44.520> next<00:37:44.720> week<00:37:45.640> and<00:37:45.880> that’s<00:37:46.040> what

back the next week and that’s what

happened<00:37:47.680> well<00:37:47.800> we’re<00:37:47.920> not<00:37:48.000> going<00:37:48.119> to<00:37:48.200> lie

happened well we’re not going to lie

we’re<00:37:48.520> going<00:37:48.599> to<00:37:48.720> omit<00:37:49.119> the<00:37:49.240> full<00:37:49.960> Truth

uh<00:37:54.000> this<00:37:54.079> is<00:37:54.359> why<00:37:54.560> I<00:37:54.760> decided<00:37:55.400> I’ve<00:37:55.520> seen<00:37:55.880> in

uh this is why I decided I’ve seen in

other<00:37:56.119> words<00:37:56.400> I<00:37:56.599> I<00:37:57.640> seems<00:37:57.960> correct<00:37:58.319> to<00:37:58.440> me<00:37:59.040> to

other words I I seems correct to me to

not<00:37:59.440> tell<00:37:59.640> you<00:37:59.800> who<00:37:59.920> it

is<00:38:03.200> in<00:38:03.319> other<00:38:03.480> words<00:38:03.760> why<00:38:03.880> am<00:38:03.960> I<00:38:04.079> doing<00:38:04.280> this

is in other words why am I doing this

for<00:38:04.520> your<00:38:04.640> own<00:38:04.880> good<00:38:05.480> right<00:38:06.079> because<00:38:06.560> I<00:38:06.680> am

for your own good right because I am

very<00:38:07.040> much<00:38:07.240> focused<00:38:07.640> and<00:38:07.800> this<00:38:07.920> is<00:38:08.200> goes<00:38:08.520> back

very much focused and this is goes back

to<00:38:09.440> something<00:38:09.720> that<00:38:09.800> we<00:38:09.920> said<00:38:10.079> in<00:38:10.200> the

to something that we said in the

beginning<00:38:11.760> where<00:38:11.960> everything<00:38:12.280> must<00:38:12.480> be

beginning where everything must be

judged<00:38:13.000> by<00:38:13.119> its<00:38:13.359> goal<00:38:13.680> by<00:38:13.800> its<00:38:13.960> end<00:38:14.200> or<00:38:14.359> by<00:38:14.440> its

judged by its goal by its end or by its

criteria<00:38:15.200> right<00:38:15.599> if<00:38:15.720> someone<00:38:15.960> writes<00:38:16.160> a<00:38:16.280> book

criteria right if someone writes a book

so<00:38:16.680> if<00:38:16.839> the’s<00:38:17.400> goal<00:38:17.599> of<00:38:17.800> this<00:38:17.960> writing<00:38:18.240> this

so if the’s goal of this writing this

book<00:38:18.520> would<00:38:18.640> be<00:38:18.760> to<00:38:18.880> write<00:38:19.040> the<00:38:19.160> most<00:38:19.359> accurate

book would be to write the most accurate

book<00:38:19.880> or<00:38:19.960> to<00:38:20.079> get<00:38:20.200> a<00:38:20.359> PhD<00:38:21.200> then<00:38:21.359> obviously

book or to get a PhD then obviously

shouldn’t<00:38:21.920> have<00:38:22.040> been<00:38:22.200> doing<00:38:22.440> this<00:38:22.720> because

shouldn’t have been doing this because

to<00:38:23.000> get<00:38:23.079> a<00:38:23.200> PhD<00:38:23.560> you’ve<00:38:23.720> got<00:38:23.800> to<00:38:24.359> quote<00:38:24.640> your

to get a PhD you’ve got to quote your

sources<00:38:26.280> and<00:38:26.599> you<00:38:26.720> have<00:38:27.119> they<00:38:27.599> goal<00:38:27.800> of

sources and you have they goal of

writing<00:38:28.200> a<00:38:28.400> doctorate<00:38:28.800> is<00:38:28.920> sort<00:38:29.119> of<00:38:29.280> that

writing a doctorate is sort of that

there<00:38:29.480> should<00:38:29.680> be<00:38:29.880> a<00:38:30.480> a<00:38:30.760> big<00:38:31.000> file<00:38:31.280> of<00:38:31.440> papers

there should be a a big file of papers

in<00:38:31.920> a<00:38:32.040> shelf<00:38:32.400> somewhere<00:38:32.839> which<00:38:32.960> says<00:38:33.200> the

in a shelf somewhere which says the

truth

then<00:38:36.160> obviously<00:38:36.520> you<00:38:36.640> can’t<00:38:36.839> be<00:38:36.960> doing<00:38:37.200> this

then obviously you can’t be doing this

but<00:38:37.520> since<00:38:37.760> his<00:38:37.960> goal<00:38:38.200> is<00:38:38.359> not<00:38:38.599> that<00:38:38.839> his<00:38:39.079> goal

but since his goal is not that his goal

is<00:38:41.160> to<00:38:41.400> help<00:38:41.640> the<00:38:41.760> reader<00:38:42.160> in<00:38:42.280> other<00:38:42.400> words

is to help the reader in other words

make<00:38:42.760> him<00:38:42.880> to<00:38:43.000> a<00:38:43.119> good

make him to a good

person<00:38:44.960> right<00:38:45.680> and<00:38:45.839> he<00:38:46.000> knows<00:38:46.359> that<00:38:46.520> if<00:38:46.599> he’s

person right and he knows that if he’s

going<00:38:47.119> to<00:38:48.119> not<00:38:48.400> accept<00:38:48.640> it<00:38:48.760> he’s<00:38:48.920> not<00:38:49.000> going<00:38:49.119> to

going to not accept it he’s not going to

be<00:38:49.280> a<00:38:49.400> good<00:38:49.599> person<00:38:50.119> so<00:38:50.319> therefore<00:38:50.680> I<00:38:50.760> will

be a good person so therefore I will

just<00:38:51.599> do<00:38:52.200> whatever<00:38:52.560> it<00:38:52.760> takes<00:38:53.200> to<00:38:53.599> make<00:38:53.800> you

just do whatever it takes to make you

accept<00:38:54.319> what<00:38:54.440> I<00:38:54.599> say<00:38:55.160> including<00:38:55.720> omitting<00:38:56.119> the

accept what I say including omitting the

sources

and<00:38:59.839> if<00:38:59.920> you<00:39:00.079> ask<00:39:00.200> me<00:39:00.319> is<00:39:00.400> that<00:39:00.520> a<00:39:00.640> bad<00:39:00.839> thing

and if you ask me is that a bad thing

well<00:39:01.400> it’s<00:39:01.520> a<00:39:01.720> bad<00:39:01.920> thing<00:39:02.839> judged<00:39:03.240> by<00:39:03.440> one<00:39:04.359> by

well it’s a bad thing judged by one by

one<00:39:04.680> criteria<00:39:05.040> at<00:39:05.160> least<00:39:05.520> not<00:39:05.680> a<00:39:05.800> fully<00:39:06.119> good

one criteria at least not a fully good

thing<00:39:06.640> like<00:39:07.359> even<00:39:07.520> though<00:39:07.680> he<00:39:07.800> said<00:39:08.160> well<00:39:08.280> I

thing like even though he said well I

already<00:39:08.599> told<00:39:08.800> you<00:39:09.160> and<00:39:09.319> everything<00:39:09.800> still

already told you and everything still

not<00:39:10.400> not<00:39:10.560> the<00:39:10.720> best<00:39:10.960> thing<00:39:11.480> but<00:39:11.640> it’s<00:39:11.760> the<00:39:11.880> best

not not the best thing but it’s the best

thing<00:39:12.160> for<00:39:12.319> my<00:39:12.520> criteria<00:39:12.920> which<00:39:13.040> is<00:39:13.119> helping

thing for my criteria which is helping

the

Jews<00:39:15.280> and<00:39:15.440> this<00:39:15.520> is<00:39:15.880> the<00:39:16.040> big<00:39:16.200> thing<00:39:16.359> the<00:39:16.760> is

Jews and this is the big thing the is

always<00:39:17.359> only<00:39:17.560> into<00:39:17.839> helping<00:39:18.200> Yen<00:39:19.200> there’s<00:39:19.400> no

always only into helping Yen there’s no

other<00:39:19.720> goal<00:39:19.920> in<00:39:20.040> all<00:39:20.160> of<00:39:20.280> his<00:39:20.400> writings

other goal in all of his writings

therefore<00:39:21.400> that’s<00:39:21.599> the<00:39:21.760> goal<00:39:22.079> that<00:39:22.240> by<00:39:22.400> which

therefore that’s the goal that by which

it<00:39:22.640> should<00:39:22.800> be<00:39:23.240> judged<00:39:24.240> did<00:39:24.400> it<00:39:24.560> help

it should be judged did it help

people<00:39:27.200> that’s<00:39:27.520> that’s<00:39:27.800> what<00:39:27.960> he

says<00:39:36.520> so<00:39:36.800> if<00:39:36.880> you<00:39:37.079> if<00:39:37.160> you<00:39:37.280> just<00:39:37.400> read<00:39:37.599> this<00:39:37.760> all

says so if you if you just read this all

as<00:39:38.119> like<00:39:38.280> strategy<00:39:38.800> how<00:39:38.920> do<00:39:39.000> you<00:39:39.200> how<00:39:39.319> do<00:39:39.400> you

as like strategy how do you how do you

get<00:39:39.839> go<00:39:40.200> ideas<00:39:40.520> into<00:39:40.720> the<00:39:41.400> med<00:39:41.880> which<00:39:41.960> you

get go ideas into the med which you

believe<00:39:42.319> are<00:39:42.440> helpful<00:39:42.839> of

believe are helpful of

course<00:39:45.040> so<00:39:45.240> you<00:39:45.359> should<00:39:45.560> focus<00:39:45.800> on<00:39:45.960> helping

course so you should focus on helping

the<00:39:46.400> people<00:39:46.800> not<00:39:47.000> focus<00:39:47.280> on<00:39:47.400> being<00:39:47.560> smarter

the people not focus on being smarter

than<00:39:48.079> them<00:39:48.240> or<00:39:48.400> anything<00:39:48.720> like<00:39:49.040> that<00:39:50.040> and<00:39:50.280> if

than them or anything like that and if

sometimes<00:39:50.880> that<00:39:51.079> demands<00:39:51.839> to<00:39:52.480> not<00:39:52.680> tell

sometimes that demands to not tell

people<00:39:53.200> where<00:39:53.280> it<00:39:53.400> comes<00:39:53.599> from<00:39:53.800> say<00:39:54.040> don’t

people where it comes from say don’t

tell<00:39:54.280> them<00:39:54.440> where<00:39:54.520> it<00:39:54.640> comes<00:39:54.920> from

tell them where it comes from

and<00:39:57.640> ra<00:39:57.880> didn’t<00:39:58.079> even<00:39:58.240> lie<00:39:58.480> because<00:39:58.599> he<00:39:58.760> like

and ra didn’t even lie because he like

said<00:39:59.160> this<00:39:59.640> and<00:39:59.720> it’s<00:39:59.880> so<00:40:00.079> funny<00:40:00.359> that<00:40:00.480> he<00:40:00.560> said

said this and it’s so funny that he said

it<00:40:00.920> and<00:40:01.079> it<00:40:01.400> didn’t<00:40:02.400> bother

it and it didn’t bother

anyone<00:40:05.480> in<00:40:05.560> other<00:40:05.720> words<00:40:05.920> he’s<00:40:06.040> saying<00:40:06.400> this

anyone in other words he’s saying this

in<00:40:06.800> other<00:40:06.960> words<00:40:07.480> let<00:40:07.640> let’s<00:40:07.839> think<00:40:08.000> for<00:40:08.119> a

in other words let let’s think for a

second<00:40:08.720> in<00:40:08.880> other<00:40:09.079> words<00:40:09.800> this<00:40:10.000> H<00:40:10.520> this<00:40:10.680> little

second in other words this H this little

piece<00:40:12.160> also<00:40:12.480> has<00:40:12.599> a<00:40:13.000> also<00:40:13.240> has<00:40:13.400> a

piece also has a also has a

goal<00:40:15.680> right<00:40:15.839> and<00:40:15.960> its<00:40:16.200> goal<00:40:16.440> doesn’t<00:40:16.720> seem<00:40:17.160> not

goal right and its goal doesn’t seem not

I<00:40:17.359> don’t<00:40:17.720> think<00:40:17.960> the<00:40:18.119> goal<00:40:18.359> is<00:40:18.480> to<00:40:18.640> clear<00:40:18.920> the

I don’t think the goal is to clear the

raam’s<00:40:19.640> Consciousness<00:40:20.640> from<00:40:21.359> conscience

raam’s Consciousness from conscience

right<00:40:21.960> from<00:40:22.240> saying<00:40:22.800> like<00:40:22.920> I<00:40:23.079> lied<00:40:23.520> no<00:40:23.800> I<00:40:23.880> wrote

right from saying like I lied no I wrote

a<00:40:24.400> little<00:40:25.160> a<00:40:25.280> little<00:40:25.480> disclaimer<00:40:25.920> in<00:40:25.960> the

a little a little disclaimer in the

beginning<00:40:26.400> that<00:40:26.640> I’m<00:40:26.920> lying<00:40:27.359> so<00:40:27.480> therefore

beginning that I’m lying so therefore

I’m<00:40:27.800> not

I’m not

lying<00:40:30.400> I<00:40:30.440> mean<00:40:30.640> maybe<00:40:30.920> it’s<00:40:31.079> for<00:40:31.319> that<00:40:32.079> maybe

lying I mean maybe it’s for that maybe

that’s<00:40:32.560> the

point<00:40:35.839> uh<00:40:35.960> I<00:40:36.040> think<00:40:36.200> there<00:40:36.280> are<00:40:36.440> more

points<00:40:42.880> it’s<00:40:43.040> actually<00:40:43.480> very<00:40:43.960> very

points it’s actually very very

interesting<00:40:44.599> how<00:40:44.760> you<00:40:44.839> could<00:40:44.960> tell<00:40:45.160> people

interesting how you could tell people

that<00:40:45.440> you’re<00:40:45.520> going<00:40:45.640> to<00:40:45.720> lie<00:40:45.920> to<00:40:46.079> them<00:40:46.280> and<00:40:46.800> if

that you’re going to lie to them and if

they<00:40:47.119> trust<00:40:47.400> you<00:40:47.560> they’re<00:40:47.720> going<00:40:47.839> to<00:40:47.960> say<00:40:48.200> yeah

they trust you they’re going to say yeah

please<00:40:48.599> lies<00:40:48.880> to<00:40:49.040> me

please<00:40:53.640> but<00:40:53.760> it<00:40:53.920> maybe<00:40:54.160> they’re<00:40:54.400> right

please but it maybe they’re right

because<00:40:55.079> again<00:40:55.440> if<00:40:55.760> it’s<00:40:55.960> in<00:40:56.079> order<00:40:56.319> to<00:40:56.400> make

because again if it’s in order to make

them<00:40:56.760> better<00:40:57.319> to<00:40:57.599> help<00:40:57.880> them<00:40:58.079> some<00:40:58.280> in<00:40:58.400> some

them better to help them some in some

way<00:40:59.760> people<00:40:59.920> don’t<00:41:00.079> trust<00:41:00.319> doctors<00:41:00.680> for<00:41:00.920> that

way people don’t trust doctors for that

yeah<00:41:01.920> people<00:41:02.240> very<00:41:02.440> often<00:41:02.720> say<00:41:03.040> please<00:41:03.280> lie<00:41:03.520> to

yeah people very often say please lie to

me<00:41:03.839> but<00:41:04.000> make<00:41:04.119> sure<00:41:04.240> it’s<00:41:04.359> a<00:41:04.480> good<00:41:04.599> lie<00:41:04.880> like

me but make sure it’s a good lie like

the<00:41:05.400> right<00:41:06.000> line<00:41:06.200> in<00:41:06.319> the<00:41:06.440> right

direction<00:41:11.520> um<00:41:12.520> but<00:41:12.640> I<00:41:12.760> think<00:41:13.480> also<00:41:14.480> probably

direction um but I think also probably

this<00:41:15.200> whole<00:41:15.760> this<00:41:15.960> whole

this whole this whole

um<00:41:18.520> this<00:41:18.640> whole<00:41:18.920> paragraph<00:41:19.640> is<00:41:20.000> also<00:41:20.720> so<00:41:20.920> it

um this whole paragraph is also so it

has<00:41:21.359> that<00:41:21.599> has<00:41:21.880> that<00:41:22.359> has<00:41:22.520> another<00:41:22.839> meaning

has that has that has another meaning

the<00:41:23.680> other<00:41:23.839> meaning<00:41:24.319> is<00:41:25.000> that<00:41:25.160> it<00:41:25.359> is<00:41:25.480> a<00:41:25.640> way

the other meaning is that it is a way

for<00:41:26.040> someone<00:41:26.640> for<00:41:26.880> the<00:41:27.000> like<00:41:27.319> one<00:41:27.520> in<00:41:27.680> 10

for someone for the like one in 10

million<00:41:28.240> people<00:41:28.839> who<00:41:29.040> want<00:41:29.200> to<00:41:29.440> get<00:41:29.599> break<00:41:29.880> out

million people who want to get break out

of<00:41:30.520> being<00:41:31.359> manipulated<00:41:31.920> by<00:41:32.040> Thea<00:41:33.040> to<00:41:33.240> break

out<00:41:39.000> all<00:41:39.119> right<00:41:39.319> that’s

us<00:41:43.319> notied<00:41:43.680> this<00:41:43.800> whole<00:41:44.000> game<00:41:44.240> and<00:41:44.359> we’re<00:41:44.560> like

us notied this whole game and we’re like

okay<00:41:45.359> so<00:41:45.880> how<00:41:46.079> about<00:41:46.440> actually<00:41:46.720> knowing<00:41:47.079> what

okay so how about actually knowing what

you’re<00:41:47.319> telling<00:41:47.760> us<00:41:48.760> right<00:41:48.960> in<00:41:49.079> other<00:41:49.200> words

you’re telling us right in other words

how<00:41:49.640> about<00:41:50.319> taking<00:41:50.640> this<00:41:51.359> M<00:41:51.800> for<00:41:52.040> real

how about taking this M for real

Direction<00:41:53.760> which<00:41:54.000> basically<00:41:54.400> doesn’t<00:41:54.640> mean

Direction which basically doesn’t mean

reading<00:41:55.160> the<00:41:55.319> next<00:41:55.599> chapter<00:41:56.119> I<00:41:56.200> mean<00:41:56.359> it<00:41:56.520> might

reading the next chapter I mean it might

be<00:41:56.800> useful<00:41:57.240> still<00:41:57.800> but<00:41:57.960> it<00:41:58.079> means<00:41:59.040> doing<00:41:59.359> what

be useful still but it means doing what

you

did<00:42:02.200> I<00:42:02.280> think<00:42:02.440> that<00:42:02.640> that’s<00:42:02.839> the<00:42:03.040> real<00:42:03.359> let’s

did I think that that’s the real let’s

esoteric<00:42:05.480> uh<00:42:05.640> meaning<00:42:06.079> of<00:42:06.480> CH<00:42:07.160> paragraphs

esoteric uh meaning of CH paragraphs

this<00:42:09.720> that<00:42:09.880> he<00:42:10.040> always<00:42:10.319> does<00:42:10.599> this<00:42:10.720> and<00:42:10.839> this

this that he always does this and this

is<00:42:11.079> another<00:42:11.359> very<00:42:11.560> important<00:42:12.400> again<00:42:12.640> it’s

is another very important again it’s

still<00:42:13.480> thinking<00:42:13.800> for<00:42:14.040> the<00:42:14.200> on<00:42:14.359> the<00:42:14.880> is<00:42:15.040> still

still thinking for the on the is still

thinking<00:42:15.440> of<00:42:15.599> how<00:42:15.720> to<00:42:15.880> help<00:42:16.160> someone<00:42:17.000> but<00:42:17.160> this

thinking of how to help someone but this

is<00:42:17.440> about<00:42:17.720> helping<00:42:18.240> the<00:42:18.800> elite<00:42:19.200> instead<00:42:19.440> of

is about helping the elite instead of

helping<00:42:20.000> the<00:42:20.359> people<00:42:20.559> that<00:42:20.680> will<00:42:20.839> believe<00:42:21.160> him

helping the people that will believe him

SP<00:42:22.240> people<00:42:22.359> that<00:42:22.480> don’t<00:42:22.640> believe

SP people that don’t believe

him<00:42:24.480> and<00:42:24.680> that’s<00:42:25.000> like<00:42:25.119> an<00:42:25.280> important<00:42:25.599> things

him and that’s like an important things

like<00:42:26.000> you<00:42:26.119> need<00:42:26.280> to

like you need to

um<00:42:28.960> and<00:42:29.119> you<00:42:29.440> say<00:42:30.160> speak<00:42:30.440> of<00:42:30.599> two<00:42:30.800> TOS<00:42:31.720> yeah

um and you say speak of two TOS yeah

there<00:42:32.400> needs<00:42:32.599> to<00:42:32.839> be<00:42:34.160> Praises<00:42:35.160> for<00:42:35.280> doing<00:42:35.520> that

there needs to be Praises for doing that

you<00:42:36.119> need<00:42:36.240> to<00:42:36.359> leave<00:42:36.559> an<00:42:36.720> opening<00:42:37.240> for<00:42:37.520> the

you need to leave an opening for the

smart<00:42:38.440> people<00:42:39.119> always<00:42:40.119> so<00:42:40.359> otherwise<00:42:40.960> they

smart people always so otherwise they

what<00:42:42.160> helps<00:42:42.440> other<00:42:42.680> people<00:42:42.880> ruins

what helps other people ruins

them<00:42:45.119> so<00:42:45.319> and<00:42:45.480> by<00:42:45.640> doing<00:42:46.000> this<00:42:46.280> you<00:42:46.599> both<00:42:46.880> help

them so and by doing this you both help

the<00:42:47.359> other<00:42:47.960> the<00:42:48.680> regular<00:42:49.160> people<00:42:49.520> and<00:42:50.200> without

the other the regular people and without

at<00:42:50.920> least<00:42:51.079> without<00:42:51.319> ruining<00:42:51.720> this

at least without ruining this

money<00:42:53.520> I<00:42:53.559> don’t<00:42:53.720> know<00:42:53.800> if<00:42:53.880> it<00:42:54.000> helps<00:42:54.240> them<00:42:54.359> but

money I don’t know if it helps them but

at<00:42:54.520> least<00:42:54.640> it<00:42:54.720> doesn’t<00:42:54.880> ruin<00:42:55.240> them<00:42:55.520> needs<00:42:55.800> them

at least it doesn’t ruin them needs them

some<00:42:56.240> space

yeah<00:43:00.640> so<00:43:00.880> that’s<00:43:01.119> that’s<00:43:01.280> basically<00:43:01.640> like

yeah so that’s that’s basically like

right<00:43:02.520> I’m<00:43:02.640> going<00:43:02.760> to<00:43:02.920> start<00:43:03.480> what<00:43:03.599> I<00:43:03.680> wanted

right I’m going to start what I wanted

to<00:43:04.119> do<00:43:04.800> I<00:43:04.960> was<00:43:05.359> wanted<00:43:05.640> to<00:43:05.760> connect<00:43:06.040> to<00:43:06.240> this<00:43:06.359> I

to do I was wanted to connect to this I

don’t<00:43:06.559> know<00:43:06.680> if<00:43:06.800> it<00:43:06.960> actually<00:43:07.240> connects<00:43:07.640> but

don’t know if it actually connects but

what<00:43:07.960> I<00:43:08.040> wanted<00:43:08.280> to<00:43:08.440> connect<00:43:08.720> to<00:43:09.319> this

what I wanted to connect to this

is<00:43:12.319> aristal<00:43:12.920> discussion<00:43:13.319> of<00:43:13.440> how<00:43:13.599> to<00:43:13.839> start<00:43:14.480> of

is aristal discussion of how to start of

how<00:43:14.800> to<00:43:14.960> start<00:43:15.160> reading<00:43:15.440> the<00:43:15.640> ethics<00:43:16.240> or<00:43:16.480> how

how to start reading the ethics or how

to<00:43:16.680> start<00:43:16.920> studying<00:43:17.359> the<00:43:17.599> subject<00:43:17.960> called

to start studying the subject called

ethics<00:43:20.800> uh<00:43:20.880> it’s<00:43:21.160> two<00:43:21.319> whole<00:43:21.559> pages<00:43:21.960> here<00:43:22.520> I

ethics uh it’s two whole pages here I

don’t<00:43:22.800> know<00:43:22.960> if<00:43:23.119> we<00:43:23.319> can<00:43:24.319> that<00:43:24.640> but<00:43:24.720> it<00:43:24.800> seems

don’t know if we can that but it seems

to<00:43:25.119> be<00:43:25.359> very<00:43:25.960> uh<00:43:26.160> important

let<00:43:31.040> me<00:43:31.480> see

um<00:43:36.800> should<00:43:36.920> I<00:43:37.079> just<00:43:37.200> read<00:43:37.400> it<00:43:37.559> a<00:43:37.640> little

bit<00:43:49.480> yeah<00:43:49.599> let’s<00:43:49.760> just<00:43:49.880> read<00:43:50.119> it<00:43:50.200> a<00:43:50.319> little<00:43:50.480> bit

bit yeah let’s just read it a little bit

the<00:43:50.960> best

thing<00:43:55.359> okay<00:43:55.520> so<00:43:55.800> this<00:43:55.920> is<00:43:56.160> this<00:43:56.280> is<00:43:56.440> like<00:43:56.640> the

thing okay so this is this is like the

the<00:43:57.480> the<00:43:57.760> the<00:43:57.920> preface<00:43:58.280> to<00:43:58.400> the<00:43:58.599> subjec<00:43:58.880> of

the the the preface to the subjec of

Ethics<00:43:59.440> he<00:43:59.599> already<00:44:00.000> in<00:44:00.119> the<00:44:00.240> previous<00:44:00.559> two

Ethics he already in the previous two

chapters<00:44:01.079> sort<00:44:01.319> of<00:44:01.520> defined<00:44:01.920> the<00:44:02.200> subject

chapters sort of defined the subject

which<00:44:02.800> we’re<00:44:02.920> not<00:44:03.000> going<00:44:03.119> to<00:44:03.240> get<00:44:03.359> into<00:44:03.640> right

which we’re not going to get into right

now<00:44:05.480> we’ll<00:44:05.720> get<00:44:05.839> to<00:44:06.040> it<00:44:06.920> but<00:44:07.160> he’s<00:44:07.319> doing

now we’ll get to it but he’s doing

something<00:44:07.920> like<00:44:08.160> in<00:44:08.280> some<00:44:08.480> way<00:44:08.640> prior<00:44:08.920> to<00:44:09.079> that

something like in some way prior to that

which<00:44:09.400> is<00:44:09.599> talking<00:44:10.280> about<00:44:11.280> who<00:44:11.599> should<00:44:12.359> be<00:44:12.720> the

which is talking about who should be the

student<00:44:13.359> for<00:44:13.559> this<00:44:13.880> course<00:44:14.880> who<00:44:15.040> should

come<00:44:18.839> okay<00:44:19.839> and<00:44:19.920> it<00:44:20.040> says<00:44:20.280> like<00:44:20.520> this

there<00:44:28.559> there’s<00:44:28.760> like<00:44:28.880> these<00:44:29.040> two<00:44:29.240> parts<00:44:29.520> in

there there’s like these two parts in

here<00:44:30.079> you<00:44:30.160> could<00:44:30.319> see<00:44:30.480> the<00:44:30.640> first<00:44:30.920> the<00:44:31.040> two

here you could see the first the two

chapters<00:44:31.640> on<00:44:31.880> the<00:44:32.240> two<00:44:32.720> paragraphs<00:44:33.240> on<00:44:33.480> on

chapters on the two paragraphs on on

this<00:44:33.839> page<00:44:34.040> which<00:44:34.160> is<00:44:34.359> chapter

this page which is chapter

three<00:44:36.400> and<00:44:36.880> they<00:44:37.040> talk<00:44:37.240> about<00:44:37.440> two<00:44:37.559> things

three and they talk about two things

which<00:44:37.839> are<00:44:38.000> very<00:44:38.119> much<00:44:38.280> connected<00:44:38.640> to<00:44:38.800> each

which are very much connected to each

other<00:44:39.559> the<00:44:39.720> first<00:44:40.040> paragraph<00:44:40.520> talks<00:44:41.000> about

other the first paragraph talks about

how<00:44:42.240> and<00:44:42.400> this<00:44:42.520> is<00:44:42.680> the<00:44:42.839> statement<00:44:43.280> that<00:44:43.359> we

how and this is the statement that we

keep<00:44:43.640> on<00:44:44.160> repeating<00:44:45.160> how<00:44:45.960> you<00:44:46.200> speak

keep on repeating how you speak

adequately<00:44:47.520> it<00:44:47.680> is<00:44:48.040> enough<00:44:48.440> right<00:44:48.599> the

adequately it is enough right the

correct<00:44:49.040> way<00:44:49.160> of<00:44:49.280> speaking<00:44:49.599> about<00:44:49.839> every

correct way of speaking about every

subject<00:44:50.680> is<00:44:50.880> to<00:44:51.160> gain<00:44:51.480> the<00:44:52.200> amount<00:44:52.520> of<00:44:52.760> clarity

subject is to gain the amount of clarity

or<00:44:53.760> the<00:44:53.880> amount<00:44:54.079> of<00:44:54.440> precision<00:44:55.440> which<00:44:56.200> belongs

or the amount of precision which belongs

to<00:44:57.040> to<00:44:57.240> that<00:44:57.480> subject<00:44:58.720> right<00:44:59.720> um<00:45:00.280> Precision

to to that subject right um Precision

right

um<00:45:04.440> so<00:45:05.319> uh<00:45:05.559> for<00:45:05.800> example<00:45:06.800> right<00:45:06.960> it’s<00:45:07.119> not<00:45:07.319> here

um so uh for example right it’s not here

in<00:45:07.760> it’s<00:45:07.960> in<00:45:08.599> in<00:45:08.720> the<00:45:08.839> end<00:45:09.000> of<00:45:09.160> the<00:45:09.280> thing<00:45:09.559> it

in it’s in in the end of the thing it

says<00:45:10.599> it<00:45:10.760> belongs<00:45:11.119> to<00:45:11.240> an<00:45:11.400> educated<00:45:11.920> person<00:45:12.240> to

says it belongs to an educated person to

look<00:45:12.599> for<00:45:12.839> just<00:45:13.160> so<00:45:13.319> much<00:45:13.640> Precision<00:45:14.079> in<00:45:14.319> each

look for just so much Precision in each

kind<00:45:14.680> of<00:45:14.839> discour<00:45:15.240> this<00:45:15.319> is<00:45:15.480> the<00:45:15.640> end<00:45:15.880> of<00:45:16.119> the

kind of discour this is the end of the

this<00:45:17.400> paragraph<00:45:18.400> As<00:45:18.559> the<00:45:18.680> nature<00:45:18.920> of<00:45:19.040> the

this paragraph As the nature of the

thing<00:45:19.359> one<00:45:19.520> is<00:45:19.640> concerned<00:45:20.000> with<00:45:20.319> admits<00:45:21.319> this

thing one is concerned with admits this

is<00:45:21.559> how<00:45:21.680> you<00:45:21.839> be<00:45:22.079> how<00:45:22.359> what<00:45:22.480> is<00:45:22.760> belongs<00:45:23.400> part

is how you be how what is belongs part

of<00:45:23.720> being<00:45:23.880> an<00:45:24.040> educated<00:45:24.559> person<00:45:24.880> so<00:45:25.079> one<00:45:25.160> of

of being an educated person so one of

the<00:45:25.440> things<00:45:26.079> and<00:45:26.200> this<00:45:26.280> is<00:45:26.440> by<00:45:26.520> the<00:45:26.599> way<00:45:26.680> this

the things and this is by the way this

is<00:45:27.000> another<00:45:27.520> Weir<00:45:27.800> thing<00:45:28.160> like<00:45:29.119> how<00:45:29.440> how<00:45:29.559> did

is another Weir thing like how how did

he<00:45:29.800> ever<00:45:29.960> get<00:45:30.160> educated<00:45:30.920> by<00:45:31.040> being<00:45:31.240> taught

he ever get educated by being taught

things<00:45:31.760> like

things like

this<00:45:33.599> and<00:45:33.800> why<00:45:33.920> is<00:45:34.119> these<00:45:34.319> things<00:45:34.559> like<00:45:34.720> this

this and why is these things like this

good<00:45:35.160> because<00:45:35.319> educated<00:45:35.760> people<00:45:36.119> act<00:45:36.400> that

good because educated people act that

way<00:45:38.040> okay<00:45:38.640> but<00:45:38.880> educated<00:45:39.440> person<00:45:39.920> is<00:45:40.119> someone

way okay but educated person is someone

that<00:45:41.119> looks<00:45:41.640> to<00:45:41.920> as<00:45:42.440> much<00:45:42.800> precision<00:45:43.400> as<00:45:43.559> the

that looks to as much precision as the

nature<00:45:44.000> of<00:45:44.079> the<00:45:44.240> thing<00:45:44.559> is<00:45:44.760> concerned<00:45:45.160> with

nature of the thing is concerned with

admits<00:45:46.240> for<00:45:47.000> and<00:45:47.280> this<00:45:47.480> like<00:45:47.680> he<00:45:47.800> gives<00:45:48.000> a<00:45:48.240> a

admits for and this like he gives a a

very<00:45:48.520> important<00:45:48.800> famous<00:45:49.119> example<00:45:49.400> for<00:45:49.559> the

very important famous example for the

demand<00:45:50.119> demonstrations<00:45:50.800> from<00:45:51.079> rition<00:45:51.960> seems

demand demonstrations from rition seems

about<00:45:52.720> like<00:45:52.960> accepting<00:45:53.480> probable

about like accepting probable

conclusions<00:45:54.359> from<00:45:54.520> a<00:45:54.880> mathematician<00:45:55.880> right

conclusions from a mathematician right

so<00:45:56.599> if<00:45:56.680> you<00:45:57.040> go<00:45:57.160> to<00:45:57.359> a<00:45:57.800> old-fashioned

so if you go to a old-fashioned

mathematician<00:45:59.880> and<00:46:00.040> you<00:46:00.319> accept<00:46:00.680> when<00:46:00.800> he

mathematician and you accept when he

explains<00:46:01.359> something<00:46:01.520> with<00:46:01.640> a<00:46:01.839> mus<00:46:02.480> or<00:46:02.599> with<00:46:02.720> an

explains something with a mus or with an

analogy<00:46:03.760> or<00:46:03.920> with<00:46:04.119> like<00:46:04.480> something<00:46:04.720> that

analogy or with like something that

makes<00:46:05.040> you<00:46:05.160> feel<00:46:05.359> that<00:46:05.480> he’s<00:46:05.680> correct<00:46:05.960> or

makes you feel that he’s correct or

something<00:46:06.319> like<00:46:06.559> that<00:46:07.400> then<00:46:07.800> he’s<00:46:08.040> absolutely

something like that then he’s absolutely

not<00:46:08.520> doing<00:46:08.720> his<00:46:08.880> job<00:46:09.040> he<00:46:09.119> shouldn’t<00:46:09.440> accept<00:46:09.760> it

not doing his job he shouldn’t accept it

and<00:46:10.800> but<00:46:10.920> it’s<00:46:11.119> just<00:46:11.319> as<00:46:11.559> crazy<00:46:12.280> to<00:46:12.480> go<00:46:12.599> to

and but it’s just as crazy to go to

someone<00:46:13.200> whose<00:46:13.520> job<00:46:13.720> is<00:46:13.839> to<00:46:14.000> teach<00:46:14.240> you

someone whose job is to teach you

rhetoric<00:46:14.960> and<00:46:15.079> rhetoric<00:46:15.760> is<00:46:15.960> defined<00:46:16.280> by

rhetoric and rhetoric is defined by

Aristotle<00:46:16.920> as<00:46:17.119> the<00:46:17.240> art<00:46:17.440> of<00:46:17.839> persuasion<00:46:18.839> right

Aristotle as the art of persuasion right

not<00:46:19.480> the<00:46:19.559> art<00:46:19.760> of<00:46:19.920> truth<00:46:20.359> but<00:46:20.599> things<00:46:20.839> that

not the art of truth but things that

persuade<00:46:21.520> and<00:46:21.680> if<00:46:21.920> you<00:46:22.040> need<00:46:22.160> to<00:46:22.319> use

persuade and if you need to use

emotional<00:46:23.000> arguments<00:46:23.520> and<00:46:23.680> all<00:46:23.839> kinds<00:46:24.000> of

emotional arguments and all kinds of

things<00:46:25.040> like<00:46:25.280> that

things like that

and<00:46:27.599> that<00:46:27.760> will<00:46:28.040> not

and that will not

be<00:46:30.160> uh<00:46:30.440> used<00:46:30.839> demonstrations<00:46:31.720> or<00:46:32.000> proofs<00:46:32.720> the

be uh used demonstrations or proofs the

way<00:46:33.000> mathematician<00:46:33.520> does<00:46:33.760> and<00:46:33.880> if<00:46:33.960> you<00:46:34.119> go<00:46:34.240> to

way mathematician does and if you go to

the<00:46:34.680> person<00:46:35.000> who’s<00:46:35.200> teaching<00:46:35.520> rhetoric<00:46:35.960> or<00:46:36.160> to

the person who’s teaching rhetoric or to

the<00:46:36.520> rhetorician<00:46:37.079> and<00:46:37.200> you<00:46:37.800> ask<00:46:38.040> him<00:46:38.200> for<00:46:38.440> that

the rhetorician and you ask him for that

kind<00:46:38.720> of<00:46:38.880> proof<00:46:39.160> you’re<00:46:39.319> also<00:46:39.480> doing<00:46:39.640> a

kind of proof you’re also doing a

mistake<00:46:42.119> right<00:46:42.359> or<00:46:42.920> the<00:46:43.280> the<00:46:43.559> the<00:46:43.839> the<00:46:44.000> sort<00:46:44.160> of

mistake right or the the the the sort of

image<00:46:44.559> that<00:46:44.680> he’s<00:46:44.800> thinking<00:46:45.119> of<00:46:45.240> in<00:46:45.359> the

image that he’s thinking of in the

beginning<00:46:46.599> is

like<00:46:50.520> different<00:46:50.920> matter<00:46:51.319> different<00:46:51.640> material

like different matter different material

uh<00:46:52.599> can<00:46:52.720> be<00:46:52.880> caught<00:46:53.119> up<00:46:53.319> sort<00:46:53.520> of<00:46:53.640> in<00:46:53.800> different

uh can be caught up sort of in different

ways

right<00:46:56.400> uh<00:46:57.280> like<00:46:57.440> a<00:46:57.760> correctly<00:46:58.720> ripped<00:46:59.079> up

right uh like a correctly ripped up

piece<00:46:59.400> of<00:46:59.559> paper<00:46:59.800> look<00:47:00.000> something<00:47:00.280> like

piece of paper look something like

this<00:47:02.920> that’s<00:47:03.160> the<00:47:03.280> correct<00:47:03.640> way<00:47:03.800> of<00:47:03.920> ripping

this that’s the correct way of ripping

up<00:47:07.319> I<00:47:07.400> don’t<00:47:07.559> have<00:47:07.680> to<00:47:07.760> do<00:47:07.880> it<00:47:07.960> on<00:47:08.119> the<00:47:08.440> lines<00:47:09.440> no

up I don’t have to do it on the lines no

reason<00:47:09.880> to<00:47:10.040> do<00:47:10.359> that<00:47:11.359> doesn’t<00:47:11.960> the<00:47:12.400> underlying

reason to do that doesn’t the underlying

matter<00:47:13.319> doesn’t<00:47:13.800> admit<00:47:14.200> of<00:47:14.599> of<00:47:14.760> doing

matter doesn’t admit of of doing

that<00:47:18.040> but<00:47:18.280> if<00:47:18.400> I<00:47:18.520> want<00:47:18.720> to<00:47:18.960> do<00:47:19.319> like<00:47:19.520> cut<00:47:19.720> a

that but if I want to do like cut a

diamond<00:47:20.280> or<00:47:20.400> something<00:47:20.680> like<00:47:21.200> that<00:47:22.200> the<00:47:22.440> kind

diamond or something like that the kind

of<00:47:22.800> mad<00:47:23.079> thing<00:47:23.280> that<00:47:23.400> it<00:47:23.599> is<00:47:24.240> is<00:47:24.400> going<00:47:24.599> to<00:47:24.760> need

of mad thing that it is is going to need

a<00:47:25.079> lot<00:47:25.200> of<00:47:25.400> precision<00:47:26.000> in<00:47:26.119> order<00:47:26.359> to<00:47:26.440> be

a lot of precision in order to be

correct

so<00:47:29.760> anything<00:47:30.160> coar<00:47:30.480> and<00:47:30.599> there’s<00:47:30.800> some<00:47:31.000> coarse

so anything coar and there’s some coarse

materials<00:47:32.240> and<00:47:32.400> you<00:47:32.640> say<00:47:32.839> well<00:47:33.000> you’re<00:47:33.160> not

materials and you say well you’re not

cutting<00:47:33.599> the<00:47:33.760> pizza<00:47:34.160> as<00:47:34.319> straight<00:47:34.680> as<00:47:34.800> you

cutting the pizza as straight as you

should<00:47:35.319> cut<00:47:35.760> a<00:47:36.079> even<00:47:36.319> a<00:47:36.440> piece<00:47:36.640> of

should cut a even a piece of

paper<00:47:38.400> and<00:47:38.520> that’s<00:47:38.720> just<00:47:38.920> dumb<00:47:39.400> cuz<00:47:39.640> pizzas

paper and that’s just dumb cuz pizzas

unless<00:47:40.880> they’re<00:47:41.040> like<00:47:41.160> really

unless they’re like really

autistic<00:47:43.200> uh<00:47:43.960> pizzas<00:47:44.319> don’t<00:47:44.480> need<00:47:44.640> to<00:47:44.720> be<00:47:44.839> cut

autistic uh pizzas don’t need to be cut

as<00:47:45.160> straight<00:47:45.480> as<00:47:45.680> papers<00:47:46.200> and<00:47:46.359> papers<00:47:46.599> don’t

as straight as papers and papers don’t

need<00:47:46.839> to<00:47:46.920> be<00:47:47.000> cut<00:47:47.240> as<00:47:47.359> straight<00:47:47.720> as<00:47:47.960> you<00:47:48.319> know<00:47:49.319> a

need to be cut as straight as you know a

diamond<00:47:49.880> or<00:47:50.119> something<00:47:50.599> that<00:47:50.760> where<00:47:50.920> it’s

diamond or something that where it’s

even<00:47:51.240> more<00:47:51.440> important<00:47:52.319> not<00:47:52.480> only<00:47:52.680> more

even more important not only more

important<00:47:53.240> it’s<00:47:53.359> also<00:47:53.599> like<00:47:53.760> the<00:47:53.960> kind<00:47:54.160> of

important it’s also like the kind of

thing<00:47:55.800> um

thing um

so<00:47:58.280> and<00:47:58.520> so<00:47:58.680> and<00:47:58.839> that<00:47:59.000> analogy<00:47:59.480> carries<00:47:59.839> over

so and so and that analogy carries over

to<00:48:00.400> like<00:48:00.680> areas<00:48:01.000> of<00:48:01.200> thought<00:48:01.960> areas<00:48:02.400> of<00:48:03.119> uh

to like areas of thought areas of uh

research<00:48:03.880> areas<00:48:04.240> of<00:48:05.079> discussion<00:48:05.760> which<00:48:05.920> we

research areas of discussion which we

call<00:48:06.720> disciplines<00:48:07.720> right<00:48:07.880> if<00:48:07.960> you’re<00:48:08.079> doing

call disciplines right if you’re doing

math<00:48:08.839> then<00:48:09.079> you<00:48:09.160> should<00:48:09.400> always<00:48:09.640> look<00:48:09.839> for<00:48:10.200> the

math then you should always look for the

correct<00:48:10.640> kind<00:48:10.800> of<00:48:10.960> proof<00:48:11.240> even<00:48:11.400> in<00:48:11.599> math<00:48:12.040> noway

correct kind of proof even in math noway

a<00:48:12.599> lot<00:48:12.839> different<00:48:13.040> kinds<00:48:13.240> of<00:48:13.319> math<00:48:13.559> with

a lot different kinds of math with

different<00:48:13.880> levels<00:48:14.119> of<00:48:14.319> proof<00:48:15.319> but<00:48:15.440> if<00:48:15.520> you’re

different levels of proof but if you’re

doing<00:48:15.920> rhetoric<00:48:16.400> then<00:48:16.559> you<00:48:16.640> should<00:48:16.839> look<00:48:17.280> you

doing rhetoric then you should look you

should<00:48:17.559> be<00:48:17.760> happy<00:48:18.079> with<00:48:18.640> rhetorical

proof<00:48:22.359> in<00:48:22.520> the<00:48:22.640> same<00:48:22.880> way<00:48:23.480> uh<00:48:23.720> right<00:48:23.960> people

proof in the same way uh right people

right<00:48:24.680> we<00:48:24.800> know<00:48:24.960> this<00:48:25.079> all<00:48:25.240> the<00:48:25.359> time<00:48:25.680> people

right we know this all the time people

How<00:48:26.280> would<00:48:26.480> how<00:48:26.599> would<00:48:27.000> one<00:48:27.720> I<00:48:27.880> guess<00:48:28.520> the<00:48:28.720> the

How would how would one I guess the the

goodness<00:48:29.160> or<00:48:29.359> truth<00:48:29.599> of<00:48:29.760> those<00:48:30.280> yes<00:48:30.480> very<00:48:30.720> very

goodness or truth of those yes very very

good<00:48:31.079> very<00:48:31.280> good<00:48:31.720> now<00:48:31.880> they<00:48:32.040> not<00:48:32.359> there<00:48:32.559> that

good very good now they not there that

doesn’t<00:48:32.960> mean<00:48:33.119> that<00:48:33.200> there’s<00:48:33.359> no<00:48:33.559> criteria

doesn’t mean that there’s no criteria

see<00:48:34.160> there’s<00:48:34.280> a<00:48:34.359> lot<00:48:34.480> of<00:48:34.640> there’s<00:48:34.760> a<00:48:34.880> lot<00:48:35.000> of

see there’s a lot of there’s a lot of

things<00:48:35.400> between<00:48:36.559> demonstration<00:48:37.559> and<00:48:37.800> nism<00:48:38.800> a

things between demonstration and nism a

lot<00:48:39.160> of<00:48:39.680> things<00:48:40.680> unlike<00:48:41.000> what<00:48:41.160> most<00:48:41.359> people

lot of things unlike what most people

seem<00:48:41.760> to<00:48:41.960> think<00:48:42.960> that<00:48:43.160> if<00:48:43.280> there’s<00:48:43.520> something

seem to think that if there’s something

that<00:48:43.920> can<00:48:44.040> be<00:48:44.160> demonstrated<00:48:44.599> and<00:48:44.720> something

that can be demonstrated and something

that<00:48:45.200> can’t<00:48:45.480> then<00:48:45.760> all<00:48:45.920> those<00:48:46.119> things<00:48:46.280> you<00:48:46.400> can

that can’t then all those things you can

just<00:48:46.599> say<00:48:47.480> whatever<00:48:47.800> you<00:48:47.920> want<00:48:48.280> only<00:48:48.480> you

just say whatever you want only you

can’t<00:48:48.839> say<00:48:49.040> whatever<00:48:49.280> you

want<00:48:52.799> just<00:48:53.040> like<00:48:53.559> if<00:48:53.760> I<00:48:54.000> C<00:48:54.440> right<00:48:54.760> just<00:48:55.000> like

want just like if I C right just like

going<00:48:56.319> back<00:48:56.440> to<00:48:56.559> my<00:48:56.960> to<00:48:57.119> my<00:48:57.319> silly<00:48:57.880> analogy<00:48:58.880> if

going back to my to my silly analogy if

I<00:48:59.200> cut<00:48:59.680> a<00:48:59.880> pizza<00:49:00.200> and<00:49:00.280> I<00:49:00.480> like<00:49:00.920> give<00:49:01.200> myself

I cut a pizza and I like give myself

like<00:49:02.000> I’m<00:49:02.280> I’m<00:49:02.400> here<00:49:02.599> to<00:49:02.920> to<00:49:03.079> cut<00:49:03.280> up<00:49:03.440> my<00:49:03.640> pizza

like I’m I’m here to to cut up my pizza

pie<00:49:04.839> and<00:49:04.960> I’m<00:49:05.079> going<00:49:05.280> to<00:49:05.400> cut<00:49:05.599> it<00:49:05.680> into<00:49:05.920> four

pie and I’m going to cut it into four

pieces<00:49:06.720> and<00:49:06.880> one<00:49:07.040> of<00:49:07.160> the<00:49:07.319> pieces<00:49:07.720> is<00:49:07.839> going<00:49:07.960> to

pieces and one of the pieces is going to

be<00:49:08.240> like<00:49:08.400> 70%<00:49:09.040> of<00:49:09.160> the<00:49:09.280> pizza<00:49:09.640> the<00:49:09.720> other<00:49:09.920> two

be like 70% of the pizza the other two

are<00:49:10.240> going<00:49:10.319> to<00:49:10.640> each<00:49:10.839> have<00:49:11.240> 15%<00:49:12.240> then<00:49:12.400> I<00:49:12.480> did<00:49:12.640> a

are going to each have 15% then I did a

very<00:49:13.040> bad<00:49:13.280> job<00:49:13.480> of<00:49:13.640> dividing<00:49:14.000> the<00:49:14.599> pizza

very bad job of dividing the pizza

although<00:49:16.119> if<00:49:16.280> I<00:49:16.520> cut<00:49:16.720> it<00:49:16.839> in<00:49:16.960> the<00:49:17.400> well<00:49:17.640> that

although if I cut it in the well that

was<00:49:18.319> I<00:49:18.480> I<00:49:18.559> only<00:49:18.720> had<00:49:18.920> it<00:49:19.040> up<00:49:19.160> with<00:49:19.280> three<00:49:19.440> pieces

was I I only had it up with three pieces

anyways<00:49:22.640> although<00:49:22.960> if<00:49:23.079> I<00:49:23.200> got<00:49:23.359> into<00:49:23.599> four

anyways although if I got into four

roughly<00:49:24.319> even<00:49:24.640> pieces<00:49:25.119> but<00:49:25.240> if<00:49:25.319> you<00:49:25.440> measure

roughly even pieces but if you measure

it<00:49:25.920> with<00:49:26.119> some<00:49:26.280> kind<00:49:26.440> of<00:49:26.559> you<00:49:26.680> you<00:49:26.799> know<00:49:26.960> like

it with some kind of you you know like

fancy<00:49:28.240> scale<00:49:28.839> you’ll<00:49:29.079> find<00:49:29.400> out<00:49:29.640> that<00:49:29.839> one

fancy scale you’ll find out that one

person<00:49:30.280> got<00:49:30.520> 10<00:49:31.520> Mill

person got 10 Mill

whatever<00:49:33.880> and<00:49:34.079> grabs<00:49:34.520> more<00:49:34.760> than<00:49:34.880> the<00:49:35.000> other

whatever and grabs more than the other

one<00:49:36.200> anyone<00:49:36.559> that’s<00:49:36.920> make<00:49:37.280> making<00:49:37.520> the

one anyone that’s make making the

argument<00:49:38.040> is<00:49:38.480> crazy<00:49:39.480> right<00:49:39.880> so<00:49:40.079> the<00:49:40.240> fact<00:49:40.520> that

argument is crazy right so the fact that

the<00:49:41.559> fearness<00:49:42.160> of<00:49:42.319> the<00:49:42.440> pizza<00:49:42.760> cing<00:49:43.079> up<00:49:43.359> is<00:49:43.480> not

the fearness of the pizza cing up is not

demonstrable<00:49:45.280> or<00:49:45.440> at<00:49:45.559> least<00:49:45.720> is<00:49:45.880> not<00:49:46.119> precise

demonstrable or at least is not precise

doesn’t<00:49:47.559> allow<00:49:47.920> we<00:49:48.119> to<00:49:48.319> be<00:49:48.920> just<00:49:49.119> anilist<00:49:49.760> and

doesn’t allow we to be just anilist and

doing<00:49:50.240> it<00:49:50.599> oh<00:49:51.160> that<00:49:51.280> is<00:49:51.440> admitting<00:49:51.799> to<00:49:52.000> the

doing it oh that is admitting to the

fact<00:49:52.359> that<00:49:53.000> I<00:49:53.160> guess<00:49:53.440> um<00:49:53.880> um<00:49:54.720> de<00:49:55.160> demonstration

fact that I guess um um de demonstration

was<00:49:56.000> possible<00:49:57.000> when<00:49:57.200> cutting<00:49:57.440> a<00:49:57.559> pizza<00:49:57.880> just

was possible when cutting a pizza just

not<00:49:58.119> the<00:49:58.240> same<00:49:58.400> kind<00:49:58.520> of<00:49:58.640> demonstration<00:49:59.440> you

not the same kind of demonstration you

could<00:49:59.720> say<00:49:59.920> that<00:50:00.119> here<00:50:00.599> that’s<00:50:00.799> why<00:50:01.000> it’s<00:50:01.160> it’s

could say that here that’s why it’s it’s

a<00:50:01.680> analogy<00:50:02.160> I<00:50:02.240> don’t<00:50:02.359> know<00:50:02.559> how<00:50:02.720> well<00:50:03.119> it<00:50:03.640> works

um<00:50:12.880> but<00:50:13.040> I<00:50:13.160> think<00:50:13.520> the<00:50:13.720> the<00:50:13.839> using<00:50:14.079> the<00:50:14.200> word

um but I think the the using the word

like<00:50:14.680> criteria<00:50:15.240> that<00:50:15.359> we<00:50:15.480> were<00:50:15.680> discussing

like criteria that we were discussing

Works<00:50:16.599> a<00:50:16.680> little<00:50:16.920> better<00:50:17.559> in<00:50:17.720> other<00:50:17.920> words<00:50:18.559> I

Works a little better in other words I

could<00:50:18.839> even<00:50:19.079> I<00:50:19.160> could<00:50:19.319> say<00:50:19.599> that<00:50:19.799> the<00:50:20.040> criteria

could even I could say that the criteria

for<00:50:20.880> the<00:50:21.040> fear<00:50:21.400> cutting<00:50:21.720> of<00:50:21.960> pizza<00:50:22.359> is<00:50:22.599> more<00:50:22.720> or

for the fear cutting of pizza is more or

less<00:50:23.079> what<00:50:23.240> everyone<00:50:23.559> agrees<00:50:24.440> to<00:50:24.880> that<00:50:25.040> to<00:50:25.200> be

less what everyone agrees to that to be

but<00:50:26.319> they<00:50:26.440> do<00:50:26.880> only<00:50:27.240> agree<00:50:28.240> within<00:50:28.480> a<00:50:28.680> spe

but they do only agree within a spe

certain<00:50:29.559> limit<00:50:30.559> right<00:50:30.720> so<00:50:31.040> in<00:50:31.160> other<00:50:31.359> words

certain limit right so in other words

it’s<00:50:32.040> objective<00:50:32.760> right<00:50:33.480> the<00:50:34.040> fearness<00:50:34.440> of

it’s objective right the fearness of

cting<00:50:34.799> up<00:50:34.920> a<00:50:35.000> pizza<00:50:35.240> has<00:50:35.359> nothing<00:50:35.559> to<00:50:35.680> do<00:50:35.880> with

cting up a pizza has nothing to do with

what<00:50:36.359> the<00:50:36.640> you<00:50:36.720> know<00:50:36.839> the<00:50:37.000> pizza<00:50:37.319> mint<00:50:37.799> decides

what the you know the pizza mint decides

that<00:50:38.680> you<00:50:38.799> know<00:50:38.920> the<00:50:39.079> correct<00:50:39.359> weight<00:50:39.559> of<00:50:39.680> a

that you know the correct weight of a

pizza<00:50:40.040> is<00:50:40.119> or<00:50:40.280> something<00:50:40.559> like<00:50:40.720> that<00:50:41.559> unlike

pizza is or something like that unlike

like<00:50:42.440> with<00:50:42.680> coins<00:50:43.000> you<00:50:43.119> know<00:50:43.400> where<00:50:43.760> you<00:50:44.000> got

like with coins you know where you got

if<00:50:44.200> you<00:50:44.359> do<00:50:44.520> it<00:50:44.760> like<00:50:44.960> a<00:50:45.480> tiny<00:50:45.720> bit<00:50:45.920> different

if you do it like a tiny bit different

then<00:50:46.319> you<00:50:46.400> end<00:50:46.520> up<00:50:46.640> with<00:50:46.760> a<00:50:46.839> different<00:50:47.240> amount

then you end up with a different amount

of<00:50:48.000> money<00:50:49.000> but<00:50:49.720> that<00:50:49.920> doesn’t<00:50:50.440> and<00:50:50.680> there’s<00:50:50.839> no

of money but that doesn’t and there’s no

Central<00:50:51.319> authority<00:50:51.720> of<00:50:51.880> cutting<00:50:52.160> up<00:50:52.720> pizzas

Central authority of cutting up pizzas

like<00:50:54.040> foundationalism<00:50:54.960> there’s<00:50:55.160> no<00:50:55.400> nobody

like foundationalism there’s no nobody

there’s<00:50:55.920> no<00:50:56.079> like<00:50:56.280> board<00:50:56.839> of<00:50:57.400> you<00:50:57.520> know<00:50:57.680> the<00:50:57.799> UL

there’s no like board of you know the UL

whatever<00:50:58.559> they’re<00:50:58.720> called<00:50:58.920> of<00:50:59.119> pizza<00:50:59.400> cutting

whatever they’re called of pizza cutting

there<00:51:00.200> isn’t<00:51:00.440> such<00:51:00.599> a

there isn’t such a

thing<00:51:02.319> but<00:51:02.960> that<00:51:03.200> doesn’t<00:51:03.480> lead<00:51:03.680> you<00:51:03.839> to<00:51:03.960> the

thing but that doesn’t lead you to the

conclusion<00:51:05.040> that<00:51:06.000> I<00:51:06.079> mean<00:51:06.280> it’s<00:51:06.720> so<00:51:07.200> it<00:51:07.319> sort

conclusion that I mean it’s so it sort

of<00:51:07.720> does<00:51:08.040> the<00:51:08.160> sense<00:51:08.359> of<00:51:08.520> like<00:51:08.680> if<00:51:08.799> I<00:51:08.880> could

of does the sense of like if I could

convince<00:51:09.400> my<00:51:09.559> three<00:51:09.760> friends<00:51:10.079> that<00:51:10.200> I<00:51:10.319> should

convince my three friends that I should

get<00:51:10.799> the<00:51:11.079> whole<00:51:11.280> pizza<00:51:11.640> they<00:51:11.720> should<00:51:11.839> only<00:51:12.040> get

get the whole pizza they should only get

the

crumbs<00:51:13.960> I<00:51:14.079> sort<00:51:14.240> of<00:51:14.400> did<00:51:14.520> it<00:51:14.760> but<00:51:15.000> then<00:51:15.160> I<00:51:15.520> still

crumbs I sort of did it but then I still

didn’t<00:51:16.119> divide<00:51:16.400> it<00:51:16.839> equally<00:51:17.839> I<00:51:18.000> just

didn’t divide it equally I just

convinced<00:51:18.520> them<00:51:18.680> to<00:51:18.839> accept<00:51:19.079> an<00:51:19.200> unequal

convinced them to accept an unequal

Arrangement<00:51:20.880> but<00:51:21.040> the<00:51:21.280> equal<00:51:21.599> Arrangements

Arrangement but the equal Arrangements

an<00:51:22.359> equal<00:51:22.640> because<00:51:22.799> of<00:51:22.920> the<00:51:23.040> standards<00:51:23.359> of

an equal because of the standards of

everybody<00:51:23.880> else<00:51:24.559> sort<00:51:24.760> of<00:51:25.079> yes<00:51:25.440> but<00:51:25.599> that’s

everybody else sort of yes but that’s

that’s<00:51:25.880> a<00:51:26.040> standard<00:51:26.760> that’s<00:51:26.920> still<00:51:27.079> a

that’s a standard that’s still a

standard<00:51:28.280> even<00:51:28.520> though<00:51:28.640> it’s<00:51:28.760> not<00:51:29.440> nothing

standard even though it’s not nothing

it’s<00:51:30.559> a<00:51:30.720> standard<00:51:31.119> because<00:51:31.319> of<00:51:31.599> everyone

it’s a standard because of everyone

else’s<00:51:32.200> standard<00:51:32.680> yes<00:51:33.520> there’s<00:51:33.680> a<00:51:33.880> kind<00:51:34.000> of

else’s standard yes there’s a kind of

equality<00:51:34.880> it<00:51:35.000> really<00:51:35.480> if<00:51:35.559> it’s<00:51:35.720> not<00:51:35.960> precise

equality it really if it’s not precise

or<00:51:36.960> objective<00:51:37.960> in<00:51:38.079> like<00:51:38.240> the<00:51:38.440> most<00:51:39.040> uh

or objective in like the most uh

foundational<00:51:40.040> sense<00:51:40.400> is<00:51:40.480> it<00:51:40.640> is<00:51:40.720> it<00:51:40.839> true

foundational sense is it is it true

because<00:51:41.240> of<00:51:41.480> like<00:51:41.559> a<00:51:41.720> social<00:51:42.000> verification<00:51:42.599> or

because of like a social verification or

is<00:51:42.839> it<00:51:42.960> true<00:51:43.680> because<00:51:44.680> no<00:51:44.799> I<00:51:44.880> don’t<00:51:44.960> think<00:51:45.720> that

is it true because no I don’t think that

are<00:51:46.040> demonstrable<00:51:46.599> at<00:51:46.720> a<00:51:46.839> certain<00:51:47.200> distance

are demonstrable at a certain distance

or<00:51:48.440> at<00:51:48.520> a<00:51:48.720> certain<00:51:49.400> using<00:51:49.720> this<00:51:49.960> using<00:51:50.559> figer

or at a certain using this using figer

criteria<00:51:51.839> of<00:51:52.000> measurement<00:51:52.599> right<00:51:53.000> so<00:51:53.520> whether

criteria of measurement right so whether

or<00:51:53.839> not<00:51:54.280> no<00:51:54.400> so<00:51:54.599> so<00:51:54.839> so<00:51:55.040> he<00:51:55.160> will<00:51:55.440> he<00:51:55.520> will

or not no so so so he will he will

actually<00:51:56.000> end<00:51:56.160> up<00:51:56.240> saying<00:51:56.640> I<00:51:56.760> think<00:51:57.119> he<00:51:57.200> will

actually end up saying I think he will

end<00:51:57.520> up<00:51:57.640> saying<00:51:57.839> something<00:51:58.319> different<00:51:59.319> which

end up saying something different which

is<00:51:59.920> entirely<00:52:00.359> different<00:52:01.280> uh<00:52:01.400> if<00:52:01.480> you<00:52:01.640> read

is entirely different uh if you read

further<00:52:03.119> I<00:52:03.240> think<00:52:03.400> that<00:52:03.480> he<00:52:03.599> ends<00:52:03.760> up<00:52:03.880> saying

further I think that he ends up saying

something<00:52:04.400> like<00:52:04.720> this<00:52:05.240> that<00:52:05.400> we<00:52:05.559> know<00:52:06.200> he<00:52:07.079> ends

something like this that we know he ends

up<00:52:07.480> saying<00:52:07.799> something<00:52:08.319> that<00:52:08.720> we<00:52:09.640> that<00:52:09.799> things

up saying something that we that things

that<00:52:10.240> some<00:52:10.359> things<00:52:10.599> are<00:52:10.760> not<00:52:11.240> demonstrable

that some things are not demonstrable

that<00:52:12.400> only<00:52:12.720> means<00:52:13.000> that<00:52:13.160> we<00:52:13.319> know<00:52:13.559> their

that only means that we know their

effects<00:52:14.119> without<00:52:14.319> knowing<00:52:14.599> their<00:52:15.240> causes<00:52:16.240> but

effects without knowing their causes but

knowing<00:52:16.720> the

knowing the

effects<00:52:18.480> maybe<00:52:18.680> they<00:52:18.799> don’t<00:52:19.040> even<00:52:19.280> have<00:52:19.480> the

effects maybe they don’t even have the

kind<00:52:19.799> of<00:52:19.960> causes<00:52:20.280> that<00:52:20.400> can<00:52:20.480> be<00:52:20.640> known<00:52:20.799> or

kind of causes that can be known or

maybe<00:52:21.160> they<00:52:21.559> do<00:52:22.559> but<00:52:22.760> we<00:52:22.880> just<00:52:23.040> the<00:52:23.160> fact<00:52:23.319> that

maybe they do but we just the fact that

we<00:52:23.520> don’t<00:52:23.720> know<00:52:24.040> them<00:52:24.720> doesn’t<00:52:25.000> mean<00:52:25.160> that<00:52:25.280> we

we don’t know them doesn’t mean that we

don’t<00:52:25.520> know<00:52:25.680> anything<00:52:26.000> about<00:52:26.240> them

so<00:52:28.960> that’s<00:52:29.200> more<00:52:29.799> like<00:52:30.799> uh<00:52:30.960> most<00:52:31.200> of<00:52:31.520> modern

so that’s more like uh most of modern

Sciences<00:52:33.280> right

Sciences right

uh<00:52:36.359> more<00:52:36.880> like<00:52:37.880> there<00:52:38.000> is<00:52:38.119> a<00:52:38.359> there’s<00:52:38.520> a

uh more like there is a there’s a

there’s<00:52:38.920> a<00:52:39.040> problem<00:52:39.359> here<00:52:39.520> but<00:52:39.760> if<00:52:39.880> you

there’s a problem here but if you

continue<00:52:40.599> I<00:52:40.760> I’ll<00:52:40.839> show<00:52:41.000> you<00:52:41.119> what<00:52:41.240> he

continue I I’ll show you what he

says

okay<00:52:45.960> at<00:52:46.119> least<00:52:46.400> we<00:52:46.599> can<00:52:46.839> we<00:52:46.960> can<00:52:47.200> like<00:52:47.440> sort<00:52:47.640> of

okay at least we can we can like sort of

understand<00:52:48.599> that<00:52:48.720> there<00:52:48.839> are<00:52:49.040> levels<00:52:49.400> like<00:52:49.559> in

understand that there are levels like in

other<00:52:49.839> words<00:52:50.119> so<00:52:51.040> well<00:52:51.760> can<00:52:51.920> you<00:52:52.040> go<00:52:52.160> to<00:52:52.319> a

other words so well can you go to a

pizza<00:52:52.720> cutting<00:52:53.040> store<00:52:53.599> a<00:52:53.720> a<00:52:54.240> school<00:52:55.240> with<00:52:55.400> a

pizza cutting store a a school with a

teacher<00:52:55.799> to<00:52:55.880> do<00:52:56.040> better<00:52:56.200> job<00:52:56.599> cutting

teacher to do better job cutting

Pizza<00:52:59.119> yeah<00:52:59.680> and<00:52:59.839> who<00:53:00.040> decides<00:53:00.440> what<00:53:00.559> the

Pizza yeah and who decides what the

better<00:53:00.960> job<00:53:01.160> is<00:53:01.359> well<00:53:01.480> it’s<00:53:01.599> not<00:53:01.799> to<00:53:02.000> everrun

better job is well it’s not to everrun

the

school<00:53:05.319> is<00:53:05.440> it<00:53:05.720> Humanity<00:53:06.240> in<00:53:06.400> general<00:53:07.040> like

school is it Humanity in general like

all<00:53:07.599> people<00:53:07.880> who<00:53:08.040> ever<00:53:08.200> eat<00:53:08.520> pizza<00:53:09.200> maybe<00:53:10.200> but

all people who ever eat pizza maybe but

they’re<00:53:10.599> still<00:53:11.200> valuable<00:53:11.720> it’s<00:53:12.040> still

they’re still valuable it’s still

valuable<00:53:12.599> to<00:53:12.680> learn<00:53:12.880> it<00:53:13.040> if<00:53:13.160> you’re

valuable to learn it if you’re

interested<00:53:13.799> in<00:53:13.920> a<00:53:14.079> career<00:53:14.359> in<00:53:14.559> Pizza<00:53:15.319> C<00:53:16.319> you

interested in a career in Pizza C you

should<00:53:16.680> definitely<00:53:17.040> go<00:53:17.200> to<00:53:17.359> that<00:53:17.559> course

should definitely go to that course

otherwise<00:53:18.680> your<00:53:18.880> pizzas<00:53:19.240> will<00:53:19.400> all<00:53:19.599> end<00:53:19.760> up

otherwise your pizzas will all end up

being<00:53:20.160> very<00:53:20.359> messed<00:53:20.680> up<00:53:21.000> and<00:53:21.760> now<00:53:21.920> we’re<00:53:22.079> not

being very messed up and now we’re not

aiming<00:53:22.640> to<00:53:22.839> the<00:53:22.960> full<00:53:23.200> Precision<00:53:23.599> but<00:53:23.720> we’re

aiming to the full Precision but we’re

aiming<00:53:24.079> to<00:53:24.319> some<00:53:24.599> kind<00:53:24.799> of<00:53:25.640> acceptable

aiming to some kind of acceptable

precision<00:53:26.720> or<00:53:26.839> acceptable<00:53:27.359> knowledge<00:53:28.359> and

precision or acceptable knowledge and

there<00:53:28.599> might<00:53:28.760> even<00:53:28.960> be<00:53:29.079> some<00:53:29.240> techniques<00:53:29.640> or

there might even be some techniques or

some<00:53:29.960> rules<00:53:30.280> or<00:53:30.400> some

some rules or some

generalizations<00:53:32.200> that<00:53:32.359> you’ll<00:53:32.559> be<00:53:32.720> able<00:53:32.960> to

generalizations that you’ll be able to

use<00:53:33.559> to<00:53:33.880> guide<00:53:34.079> you<00:53:34.200> in<00:53:34.319> your<00:53:34.480> feza<00:53:34.839> carding

use to guide you in your feza carding

career<00:53:36.680> uh<00:53:37.400> which<00:53:37.559> you<00:53:37.640> should<00:53:37.960> definitely

career uh which you should definitely

use

learn<00:53:45.480> it<00:53:45.599> literally<00:53:45.920> says<00:53:46.119> like<00:53:46.280> this<00:53:46.400> it

learn it literally says like this it

literally<00:53:46.760> says<00:53:46.920> and<00:53:47.079> if<00:53:47.200> you<00:53:47.400> if<00:53:47.480> you<00:53:47.559> go<00:53:47.680> to

literally says and if you if you go to

the<00:53:47.920> beginning<00:53:48.280> of<00:53:48.520> the<00:53:48.880> of

the beginning of the of

the<00:53:50.960> uh<00:53:51.160> here<00:53:51.720> in<00:53:52.359> the<00:53:52.520> second<00:53:52.839> sentence<00:53:53.200> sort

the uh here in the second sentence sort

of<00:53:53.520> of<00:53:53.640> the<00:53:53.760> first<00:53:53.920> paragraph<00:53:54.280> it<00:53:54.319> says<00:53:54.520> the

of of the first paragraph it says the

things<00:53:54.799> which<00:53:54.960> are<00:53:55.319> that<00:53:55.400> are<00:53:55.520> beautiful<00:53:55.839> and

things which are that are beautiful and

just

about<00:53:57.680> the<00:53:58.119> about<00:53:58.480> which<00:53:58.760> politics

about the about which politics

investigates<00:53:59.880> so<00:54:00.119> politics<00:54:00.480> is<00:54:00.640> what<00:54:00.720> he

investigates so politics is what he

calls<00:54:01.079> ethics<00:54:01.440> here<00:54:02.160> involve<00:54:02.680> Great

calls ethics here involve Great

disagreement<00:54:03.400> and<00:54:04.000> inconsistency<00:54:05.000> so<00:54:05.520> that

disagreement and inconsistency so that

they<00:54:05.760> are<00:54:05.960> thought<00:54:06.160> to<00:54:06.319> belong<00:54:06.680> only<00:54:06.880> to

they are thought to belong only to

Convention<00:54:07.440> and<00:54:07.559> not<00:54:07.680> to<00:54:07.839> Nature<00:54:08.160> he<00:54:08.240> says

Convention and not to Nature he says

these<00:54:08.920> subjects<00:54:09.319> are<00:54:09.520> so<00:54:10.160> inconsistent<00:54:11.160> and

these subjects are so inconsistent and

they<00:54:11.400> have<00:54:11.480> so<00:54:11.640> much<00:54:11.799> disagreement<00:54:12.280> is<00:54:12.440> are

they have so much disagreement is are

two<00:54:12.760> different<00:54:13.480> problems<00:54:14.480> that<00:54:14.799> causes

two different problems that causes

people<00:54:15.480> to<00:54:15.680> say<00:54:16.000> that<00:54:16.480> ethics<00:54:16.799> as

people to say that ethics as

conventional<00:54:18.079> so<00:54:19.079> conventional<00:54:19.559> means

conventional so conventional means

doesn’t<00:54:20.119> really<00:54:20.440> exist<00:54:20.920> right<00:54:21.280> what<00:54:21.400> you<00:54:21.599> call

doesn’t really exist right what you call

social

facts<00:54:24.079> right<00:54:24.520> but<00:54:24.640> he<00:54:24.760> doesn’t<00:54:25.000> agree<00:54:25.240> with

facts right but he doesn’t agree with

that<00:54:25.559> yet<00:54:26.079> he<00:54:26.200> does<00:54:26.480> he’s<00:54:26.640> not<00:54:26.760> convinced<00:54:27.160> you

that yet he does he’s not convinced you

see<00:54:27.480> you<00:54:27.760> when<00:54:27.880> you<00:54:28.000> get<00:54:28.160> convinced<00:54:28.480> by<00:54:28.559> this

see you when you get convinced by this

argument<00:54:28.960> you’re<00:54:29.079> also<00:54:29.280> doing<00:54:29.520> things<00:54:29.720> way

argument you’re also doing things way

too<00:54:30.280> fast<00:54:31.280> maybe<00:54:31.559> yes<00:54:31.760> maybe<00:54:32.040> not<00:54:32.400> but<00:54:32.520> he’s

too fast maybe yes maybe not but he’s

saying<00:54:32.839> that<00:54:32.960> there’s<00:54:33.119> a<00:54:33.760> problem<00:54:34.760> and<00:54:34.920> even

saying that there’s a problem and even

the<00:54:35.240> things<00:54:35.400> that<00:54:35.520> are<00:54:35.720> good<00:54:35.920> have<00:54:36.079> this<00:54:36.200> kind

the things that are good have this kind

so<00:54:36.640> in<00:54:36.839> starts<00:54:37.079> he<00:54:37.160> said<00:54:37.319> even<00:54:37.480> the<00:54:37.559> things

so in starts he said even the things

that<00:54:37.799> are<00:54:37.960> good<00:54:38.119> have<00:54:38.280> this<00:54:38.440> cons<00:54:39.040> this<00:54:39.200> kind

that are good have this cons this kind

of<00:54:39.520> inconsistency<00:54:40.319> for

of inconsistency for

example<00:54:42.839> if<00:54:42.960> you<00:54:43.079> take<00:54:43.319> any<00:54:43.599> good<00:54:44.280> thing<00:54:45.280> both

example if you take any good thing both

external<00:54:45.920> good<00:54:46.040> things<00:54:46.240> and<00:54:46.359> internal<00:54:46.760> good

external good things and internal good

things<00:54:48.640> you’ll<00:54:48.960> find<00:54:49.200> that<00:54:49.599> sometimes<00:54:49.839> not

good<00:54:55.280> for<00:54:55.440> example<00:54:55.799> money<00:54:56.400> for<00:54:56.520> example<00:54:56.839> power

good for example money for example power

for<00:54:57.280> example<00:54:57.760> courage<00:54:58.760> for<00:54:58.960> example<00:54:59.880> patience

for example courage for example patience

all<00:55:01.000> of<00:55:01.200> these<00:55:01.359> things<00:55:01.559> are<00:55:01.760> like<00:55:01.960> good<00:55:02.280> but

all of these things are like good but

not<00:55:02.640> always<00:55:03.280> mess<00:55:03.520> a<00:55:03.599> couple<00:55:03.799> of<00:55:03.920> people<00:55:04.520> over

not always mess a couple of people over

what<00:55:05.799> they’ll<00:55:06.040> mess<00:55:06.200> up<00:55:06.359> a<00:55:06.480> few<00:55:07.319> yeah<00:55:08.319> and<00:55:09.319> this

what they’ll mess up a few yeah and this

is<00:55:09.599> like<00:55:09.799> the<00:55:10.079> the<00:55:10.480> prime<00:55:11.040> example<00:55:11.440> of<00:55:11.720> why

is like the the prime example of why

it’s<00:55:12.960> very<00:55:13.200> hard<00:55:13.440> to<00:55:13.720> make<00:55:14.160> ethics<00:55:14.480> into<00:55:14.720> a

it’s very hard to make ethics into a

science<00:55:15.720> into<00:55:15.960> a<00:55:16.079> demonstrable

science into a demonstrable

science<00:55:18.760> because<00:55:19.040> most<00:55:19.200> of<00:55:19.319> the<00:55:19.440> things<00:55:19.599> you

science because most of the things you

say<00:55:19.960> the<00:55:20.079> opposite<00:55:20.440> of<00:55:20.559> them<00:55:20.640> is<00:55:20.760> also

say the opposite of them is also

true<00:55:23.799> you<00:55:24.000> should<00:55:24.280> take<00:55:24.640> life<00:55:24.880> more<00:55:25.160> easy<00:55:25.680> yes

true you should take life more easy yes

you<00:55:26.480> should<00:55:26.640> also<00:55:26.839> take<00:55:26.960> it<00:55:27.079> more<00:55:27.520> seriously

you should also take it more seriously

well<00:55:28.880> sometimes<00:55:29.079> you<00:55:29.160> could<00:55:29.319> say<00:55:29.559> okay<00:55:29.680> so<00:55:30.280> you

well sometimes you could say okay so you

see<00:55:30.640> that<00:55:30.799> this<00:55:30.920> kind<00:55:31.079> of<00:55:31.240> problem<00:55:31.480> is<00:55:31.599> not

see that this kind of problem is not

really<00:55:31.960> the<00:55:32.119> pizza<00:55:32.480> kind<00:55:32.640> of<00:55:32.839> problem<00:55:33.359> it’s<00:55:33.480> a

really the pizza kind of problem it’s a

much<00:55:33.760> more<00:55:33.920> basic<00:55:34.280> kind<00:55:34.400> of<00:55:34.559> problem<00:55:34.839> which

much more basic kind of problem which

people<00:55:35.240> pass<00:55:35.440> over<00:55:35.640> usually<00:55:35.920> when<00:55:36.079> discussing

people pass over usually when discussing

these<00:55:36.839> things<00:55:37.839> uh<00:55:38.000> it’s<00:55:38.160> the<00:55:38.359> problem<00:55:38.760> of<00:55:39.079> like

these things uh it’s the problem of like

maybe<00:55:39.799> we<00:55:40.000> can’t<00:55:40.319> have<00:55:40.559> like<00:55:40.680> some<00:55:40.839> sort<00:55:41.000> of

maybe we can’t have like some sort of

formula<00:55:41.599> that<00:55:41.760> covers<00:55:42.079> enough

formula that covers enough

cases<00:55:44.559> maybe<00:55:44.880> the<00:55:45.079> question<00:55:45.400> is<00:55:45.599> not<00:55:45.880> precise

cases maybe the question is not precise

enough<00:55:46.599> like<00:55:46.880> is<00:55:47.160> eating<00:55:47.640> good<00:55:47.960> I<00:55:48.039> mean<00:55:48.960> you

enough like is eating good I mean you

the<00:55:49.400> answer<00:55:49.640> always<00:55:49.839> ends<00:55:50.039> up<00:55:50.280> being<00:55:50.480> in

the answer always ends up being in

measure<00:55:51.160> it’s<00:55:51.440> good<00:55:52.319> but<00:55:52.440> that’s<00:55:52.640> just

measure it’s good but that’s just

like<00:55:54.960> maybe<00:55:55.240> that’s<00:55:55.440> useful<00:55:55.760> that<00:55:55.960> answer

like maybe that’s useful that answer

but<00:55:57.839> there’s<00:55:58.000> still<00:55:58.200> like<00:55:58.440> confusion<00:55:58.839> there’s

but there’s still like confusion there’s

still<00:55:59.200> something<00:55:59.520> here<00:55:59.680> that<00:55:59.799> causes<00:56:00.160> people

still something here that causes people

to<00:56:00.520> not<00:56:00.680> be<00:56:00.799> able<00:56:01.000> to<00:56:01.200> talk<00:56:01.599> correctly<00:56:02.119> about

to not be able to talk correctly about

things<00:56:05.079> and<00:56:05.240> there<00:56:05.359> might<00:56:05.559> even<00:56:05.760> be<00:56:06.079> B<00:56:06.240> more

things and there might even be B more

basic<00:56:06.839> conflicts<00:56:07.280> about<00:56:07.480> what<00:56:07.599> is<00:56:07.799> good<00:56:08.559> that

basic conflicts about what is good that

are<00:56:08.880> not<00:56:09.079> really<00:56:09.319> resolvable<00:56:09.799> or<00:56:09.960> not<00:56:10.079> easily

are not really resolvable or not easily

resolvable<00:56:12.839> this<00:56:12.960> is<00:56:13.079> the<00:56:13.240> reason<00:56:13.440> the<00:56:13.520> thing

resolvable this is the reason the thing

that<00:56:13.880> he<00:56:14.119> the<00:56:14.240> problem<00:56:14.480> has<00:56:14.599> and<00:56:14.720> he<00:56:14.799> says<00:56:15.000> he

that he the problem has and he says he

claims<00:56:15.520> that<00:56:15.760> this<00:56:15.839> is<00:56:16.000> the<00:56:16.359> problem<00:56:17.240> that

claims that this is the problem that

causes<00:56:17.880> there<00:56:18.000> are<00:56:18.160> some<00:56:18.319> people<00:56:18.599> that<00:56:18.799> claim

causes there are some people that claim

that<00:56:20.680> politics<00:56:21.160> that<00:56:21.280> the<00:56:21.480> good<00:56:21.839> is<00:56:21.960> a<00:56:22.079> matter

that politics that the good is a matter

of<00:56:22.799> convention<00:56:23.799> and<00:56:23.920> the<00:56:24.039> reason<00:56:24.319> they<00:56:24.440> claim

of convention and the reason they claim

it’s<00:56:24.960> because<00:56:25.119> of<00:56:25.319> this

right<00:56:28.799> it’s<00:56:29.000> not<00:56:29.599> really<00:56:30.599> because<00:56:31.200> well<00:56:31.359> who

right it’s not really because well who

says<00:56:31.760> that<00:56:31.880> things<00:56:32.039> are<00:56:32.319> good<00:56:33.240> maybe<00:56:33.520> that’s

says that things are good maybe that’s

not<00:56:33.880> a<00:56:34.280> very<00:56:34.520> smart<00:56:34.920> argument<00:56:35.440> because

not a very smart argument because

obviously<00:56:36.319> money<00:56:36.599> is

obviously money is

good<00:56:39.839> not<00:56:40.119> it’s<00:56:40.280> not<00:56:40.440> clear<00:56:40.680> that<00:56:40.839> that<00:56:41.000> should

good not it’s not clear that that should

be<00:56:41.319> the

be the

question<00:56:43.119> but<00:56:43.280> also<00:56:43.640> sometimes<00:56:43.799> it’s<00:56:43.920> not

question but also sometimes it’s not

good<00:56:44.280> and<00:56:44.400> that’s<00:56:44.559> also<00:56:44.799> very<00:56:44.960> clearly

good and that’s also very clearly

true<00:56:47.680> so<00:56:48.359> whichever<00:56:48.720> solution<00:56:49.079> you<00:56:49.200> sort<00:56:49.359> of

true so whichever solution you sort of

like<00:56:49.720> sidey<00:56:50.400> you<00:56:50.480> fall<00:56:50.720> on<00:56:51.039> like<00:56:51.280> well<00:56:51.400> it’s

like sidey you fall on like well it’s

not<00:56:51.839> good<00:56:52.119> well<00:56:52.280> that’s<00:56:52.400> a<00:56:52.559> lie<00:56:52.839> it<00:56:52.960> is<00:56:53.119> good

not good well that’s a lie it is good

it’s<00:56:53.400> a<00:56:53.559> lie<00:56:54.280> it’s<00:56:54.559> sometimes<00:56:54.799> good<00:56:54.920> and

it’s a lie it’s sometimes good and

sometimes<00:56:55.319> not<00:56:55.480> good<00:56:55.680> okay<00:56:55.839> so<00:56:55.960> maybe<00:56:56.280> we’re

sometimes not good okay so maybe we’re

making<00:56:56.640> some<00:56:56.799> progress<00:56:57.200> maybe<00:56:57.359> we’ll<00:56:57.480> figure

making some progress maybe we’ll figure

something

out<00:57:01.319> so<00:57:01.520> there’s<00:57:01.640> no<00:57:01.760> such<00:57:01.880> a<00:57:01.960> thing<00:57:02.079> as<00:57:02.240> good

out so there’s no such a thing as good

and<00:57:02.520> not<00:57:03.200> good<00:57:04.200> it’s<00:57:04.359> only<00:57:04.599> what<00:57:04.760> you<00:57:05.400> want

and not good it’s only what you want

well<00:57:06.680> that<00:57:06.799> might<00:57:06.960> be<00:57:07.039> a<00:57:07.160> solution<00:57:07.520> to<00:57:07.680> the

well that might be a solution to the

problem<00:57:09.119> not<00:57:09.359> like<00:57:09.520> the<00:57:09.880> necessarily<00:57:10.400> the

problem not like the necessarily the

most<00:57:10.760> obvious<00:57:11.119> and<00:57:11.319> the<00:57:11.440> most<00:57:11.640> simple

most obvious and the most simple

solution<00:57:13.160> but<00:57:13.319> it’s<00:57:13.440> a

solution but it’s a

solution<00:57:15.680> it’s<00:57:15.920> true<00:57:16.160> that<00:57:16.319> it’s<00:57:16.440> a<00:57:16.599> big

solution it’s true that it’s a big

enough<00:57:17.079> problem<00:57:17.400> to<00:57:17.599> cause<00:57:17.960> that<00:57:18.119> solution<00:57:18.440> to

enough problem to cause that solution to

be<00:57:18.680> a

possibility<00:57:22.599> but<00:57:22.760> we<00:57:22.880> still<00:57:23.039> have<00:57:23.119> to<00:57:23.240> think

possibility but we still have to think

about<00:57:23.480> the<00:57:23.640> problem<00:57:23.920> not<00:57:24.039> about<00:57:24.240> the

about the problem not about the

solutions<00:57:25.920> that<00:57:26.039> Mak

solutions that Mak

sense

right<00:57:30.440> and<00:57:30.680> this<00:57:30.799> is<00:57:31.200> why<00:57:32.000> we<00:57:32.160> have<00:57:32.240> to<00:57:32.400> be

right and this is why we have to be

happy<00:57:32.960> to<00:57:33.079> speak<00:57:33.319> about<00:57:33.559> things<00:57:34.160> roughly<00:57:34.520> and

happy to speak about things roughly and

for<00:57:34.839> the<00:57:35.000> most<00:57:35.720> part<00:57:36.720> that’s<00:57:37.119> that’s<00:57:37.319> his

for the most part that’s that’s his

um<00:57:40.200> that’s<00:57:40.440> his<00:57:40.559> sort<00:57:40.760> of<00:57:40.960> at<00:57:41.079> least

um that’s his sort of at least

preliminary<00:57:42.079> uh<00:57:42.359> solution<00:57:42.839> like<00:57:42.960> if<00:57:43.079> I<00:57:43.359> talk

preliminary uh solution like if I talk

it<00:57:43.839> tell<00:57:44.039> you<00:57:44.240> that<00:57:44.480> having<00:57:44.720> money<00:57:45.000> is<00:57:45.200> good

it tell you that having money is good

don’t<00:57:47.640> come<00:57:47.839> up<00:57:48.000> with<00:57:48.079> a<00:57:48.240> counterargument<00:57:49.119> of

don’t come up with a counterargument of

the<00:57:49.440> one<00:57:49.799> guy<00:57:50.440> who<00:57:50.640> had<00:57:50.799> too<00:57:50.960> much<00:57:51.079> money<00:57:51.319> and

the one guy who had too much money and

therefore<00:57:51.720> killed<00:57:52.000> himself<00:57:52.880> cuz<00:57:53.079> of<00:57:53.160> course<00:57:53.319> I

therefore killed himself cuz of course I

didn’t<00:57:53.599> mean<00:57:53.799> that<00:57:53.920> to<00:57:54.079> begin<00:57:54.880> with<00:57:55.880> he<00:57:56.200> sort

didn’t mean that to begin with he sort

of<00:57:56.440> forewarning<00:57:57.079> himself<00:57:57.640> from<00:57:58.640> uh<00:57:58.839> all<00:57:59.119> kind

of forewarning himself from uh all kind

of<00:57:59.680> exception<00:58:00.160> arguments<00:58:00.720> exactly<00:58:01.559> and<00:58:01.720> but

of exception arguments exactly and but

that<00:58:02.119> basically<00:58:02.480> means<00:58:02.680> that<00:58:02.799> he’s<00:58:02.960> not

that basically means that he’s not

looking<00:58:03.400> for<00:58:03.640> the<00:58:03.839> kind<00:58:04.000> of<00:58:04.839> a<00:58:05.039> definition<00:58:05.480> or

looking for the kind of a definition or

demonstration<00:58:06.480> that<00:58:06.839> that<00:58:07.039> kind<00:58:07.160> of<00:58:07.319> argument

demonstration that that kind of argument

would

destroy<00:58:09.760> because<00:58:10.039> AR<00:58:10.240> of<00:58:10.359> course<00:58:10.680> in<00:58:10.880> math<00:58:11.200> any

destroy because AR of course in math any

exception<00:58:11.880> disproves<00:58:12.359> your<00:58:12.559> theory<00:58:13.559> but<00:58:13.680> in

exception disproves your theory but in

ethics<00:58:14.160> it

doesn’t<00:58:17.520> why<00:58:17.720> doesn’t<00:58:18.400> it<00:58:19.400> because<00:58:19.640> things

doesn’t why doesn’t it because things

can<00:58:20.000> still<00:58:20.240> be<00:58:20.440> good<00:58:20.599> for<00:58:20.760> the<00:58:20.920> most<00:58:21.160> part<00:58:21.359> even

can still be good for the most part even

if<00:58:21.640> they’re<00:58:21.760> not<00:58:21.920> always

good<00:58:25.880> why<00:58:26.200> is<00:58:26.400> that<00:58:26.640> well<00:58:26.880> good<00:58:27.039> question<00:58:27.319> but

good why is that well good question but

it<00:58:27.559> still<00:58:27.760> it’s

it still it’s

true<00:58:30.440> so<00:58:30.640> at<00:58:30.720> least<00:58:30.880> we<00:58:30.960> shouldn’t<00:58:31.280> let<00:58:31.920> oursel

true so at least we shouldn’t let oursel

let<00:58:33.079> oursel<00:58:33.640> be<00:58:34.079> destroyed<00:58:34.599> immediately<00:58:35.119> by

let oursel be destroyed immediately by

such<00:58:35.480> arguments<00:58:36.160> because<00:58:36.599> that’s<00:58:36.799> not<00:58:37.000> the

such arguments because that’s not the

kind<00:58:37.440> of<00:58:37.640> subject<00:58:37.960> we’re

kind of subject we’re

in<00:58:39.960> now<00:58:40.240> this<00:58:40.440> and<00:58:40.559> this<00:58:40.640> is<00:58:40.799> very<00:58:40.920> interesting

in now this and this is very interesting

this<00:58:41.559> means<00:58:42.559> that<00:58:42.720> we<00:58:42.839> have<00:58:42.960> to<00:58:43.160> write<00:58:43.440> now<00:58:43.640> in

this means that we have to write now in

the<00:58:43.880> next<00:58:44.119> paragraph<00:58:44.880> We<00:58:45.039> have<00:58:45.160> to<00:58:45.400> figure<00:58:45.680> out

the next paragraph We have to figure out

who<00:58:46.160> we<00:58:46.280> should<00:58:46.520> learn<00:58:46.960> from<00:58:47.280> or<00:58:47.559> with<00:58:48.079> or<00:58:48.280> who

who we should learn from or with or who

is<00:58:48.599> ready<00:58:48.839> to<00:58:49.000> learn<00:58:49.520> to<00:58:49.720> study<00:58:50.119> this

subject<00:58:55.559> okay

subject okay

he<00:58:57.119> says<00:58:58.119> and<00:58:58.200> he<00:58:58.359> starts<00:58:58.640> with<00:58:58.799> like<00:58:58.920> the

he says and he starts with like the

general<00:58:59.880> statement<00:59:00.280> and<00:59:00.480> then<00:59:01.079> applies<00:59:01.520> it

general statement and then applies it

all<00:59:02.680> people<00:59:02.880> are<00:59:03.039> good<00:59:03.200> at<00:59:03.359> making

all people are good at making

distinctions<00:59:04.160> about<00:59:04.359> the<00:59:04.440> things<00:59:04.599> they’re

distinctions about the things they’re

acquainted

with<00:59:06.920> and<00:59:07.039> each<00:59:07.160> of<00:59:07.319> these<00:59:07.440> is<00:59:07.559> a<00:59:07.720> good<00:59:07.880> judge

with and each of these is a good judge

of<00:59:08.400> those<00:59:09.039> things<00:59:10.039> so<00:59:10.280> now<00:59:11.280> so<00:59:11.480> let’s<00:59:11.720> assume

of those things so now so let’s assume

right<00:59:13.000> let’s<00:59:13.200> assume<00:59:13.480> that<00:59:13.599> we’re<00:59:13.760> not<00:59:14.200> we

right let’s assume that we’re not we

understand<00:59:14.680> that<00:59:14.760> we’re<00:59:14.960> not<00:59:15.160> looking<00:59:15.400> for

understand that we’re not looking for

like<00:59:15.760> some<00:59:16.039> General<00:59:16.680> de

like some General de

demonstrations<00:59:18.720> so<00:59:18.839> we<00:59:18.960> have<00:59:19.079> to<00:59:19.200> start

demonstrations so we have to start

somewhere<00:59:21.359> now<00:59:21.640> it<00:59:21.880> seems<00:59:22.640> obvious<00:59:23.640> that

somewhere now it seems obvious that

people<00:59:24.240> are<00:59:24.520> good<00:59:24.720> at<00:59:25.240> making<00:59:25.599> distinction<00:59:26.400> at

people are good at making distinction at

knowing<00:59:27.119> the<00:59:27.280> difference<00:59:27.599> between<00:59:27.839> good<00:59:27.960> and

knowing the difference between good and

bad<00:59:28.559> is<00:59:28.960> or<00:59:29.160> better<00:59:29.400> and<00:59:29.640> worse<00:59:30.559> or<00:59:30.760> what<00:59:30.920> works

bad is or better and worse or what works

and<00:59:31.280> that<00:59:31.400> doesn’t<00:59:31.599> work<00:59:31.799> about<00:59:32.000> the<00:59:32.079> things

and that doesn’t work about the things

that<00:59:32.359> they’re<00:59:32.520> familiar<00:59:33.359> with<00:59:34.359> that’s<00:59:34.559> almost

that they’re familiar with that’s almost

like<00:59:34.960> a

like a

toyology<00:59:37.200> right<00:59:37.359> Bakers<00:59:37.720> are<00:59:37.880> good<00:59:38.039> at

toyology right Bakers are good at

knowing<00:59:38.520> which<00:59:38.760> bread<00:59:39.039> is<00:59:39.599> good<00:59:40.599> and<00:59:40.799> bankers

knowing which bread is good and bankers

are<00:59:41.760> supposed<00:59:42.039> to<00:59:42.119> be<00:59:42.280> good<00:59:42.400> at<00:59:42.520> knowing<00:59:42.760> how

are supposed to be good at knowing how

to<00:59:43.000> make<00:59:43.200> money<00:59:43.480> or<00:59:43.640> how<00:59:43.760> to<00:59:43.880> steal<00:59:44.160> money

to make money or how to steal money

something<00:59:44.880> to<00:59:45.039> do<00:59:45.160> with<00:59:45.280> it<00:59:45.480> and<00:59:45.599> so

something to do with it and so

on<00:59:47.920> right<00:59:48.839> now<00:59:49.000> there<00:59:49.160> is<00:59:49.319> such<00:59:49.799> now<00:59:50.079> it’s

on right now there is such now it’s

interesting<00:59:50.520> there’s<00:59:50.720> something<00:59:50.920> called

interesting there’s something called

good<00:59:51.280> judgment<00:59:51.720> in

good judgment in

general<00:59:53.720> what<00:59:53.839> does<00:59:54.039> that<00:59:54.200> mean<00:59:54.839> how<00:59:55.079> how

general what does that mean how how

could<00:59:55.319> there<00:59:55.440> be<00:59:55.559> such<00:59:55.720> a<00:59:55.799> thing

and<00:59:58.520> if<00:59:58.640> you<00:59:58.720> think<00:59:58.880> about<00:59:59.200> ethics<00:59:59.480> it’s<00:59:59.599> sort

and if you think about ethics it’s sort

of<00:59:59.960> about

of about

that<01:00:01.880> this<01:00:02.160> that<01:00:02.280> was<01:00:02.440> the<01:00:02.559> first<01:00:02.839> chapter<01:00:03.200> and

that this that was the first chapter and

the<01:00:03.400> second<01:00:03.640> chapter<01:00:03.839> where<01:00:04.039> about<01:00:04.280> this

the second chapter where about this

right<01:00:05.039> how<01:00:05.280> politics<01:00:05.680> is<01:00:05.880> the<01:00:06.000> is<01:00:06.079> the

right how politics is the is the

knowledge<01:00:06.559> of<01:00:06.920> the<01:00:07.039> good<01:00:07.200> of

knowledge of the good of

everything<01:00:10.280> because<01:00:10.520> we’re<01:00:10.760> I’m<01:00:10.839> telling<01:00:11.039> you

everything because we’re I’m telling you

how<01:00:11.240> to<01:00:11.359> live<01:00:11.480> your<01:00:11.599> life<01:00:11.760> I’m<01:00:11.839> not<01:00:12.000> telling

how to live your life I’m not telling

you<01:00:12.319> all<01:00:12.400> to<01:00:12.520> be<01:00:12.599> a<01:00:12.720> good<01:00:13.000> cook<01:00:13.480> to<01:00:13.640> be<01:00:13.760> a<01:00:13.880> good

you all to be a good cook to be a good

cook<01:00:14.200> you<01:00:14.319> got<01:00:14.400> to<01:00:14.520> go<01:00:14.599> to<01:00:14.799> cooking<01:00:15.119> school<01:00:15.720> but

cook you got to go to cooking school but

to<01:00:15.920> be<01:00:16.039> a<01:00:16.160> good<01:00:16.359> person<01:00:17.280> you<01:00:17.400> have<01:00:17.520> to<01:00:17.599> do<01:00:17.799> the

to be a good person you have to do the

good<01:00:18.160> as

good as

such<01:00:20.920> now<01:00:21.079> who<01:00:21.359> who<01:00:21.480> knows

such now who who knows

that<01:00:23.920> someone<01:00:24.160> who<01:00:24.240> knows<01:00:24.480> everything

that someone who knows everything

seems<01:00:26.640> to<01:00:26.760> be<01:00:26.960> very<01:00:27.319> hard<01:00:27.720> just<01:00:27.920> even<01:00:28.119> to<01:00:28.319> start

seems to be very hard just even to start

learning<01:00:29.559> about<01:00:29.839> ethics<01:00:30.160> you<01:00:30.280> have<01:00:30.359> to<01:00:30.480> know

learning about ethics you have to know

about

everything<01:00:36.079> for<01:00:36.319> this<01:00:36.520> reason<01:00:37.480> and<01:00:37.920> if<01:00:38.079> follow

everything for this reason and if follow

us<01:00:38.359> throw<01:00:38.520> on<01:00:38.640> this<01:00:38.760> Logic<01:00:39.079> for<01:00:39.240> this<01:00:39.400> reason

us throw on this Logic for this reason

it<01:00:40.119> is<01:00:40.240> not<01:00:40.400> appropriate<01:00:40.799> for<01:00:40.920> a<01:00:41.039> young<01:00:41.319> person

it is not appropriate for a young person

to<01:00:41.680> be<01:00:41.799> a<01:00:41.960> student<01:00:42.200> of

to be a student of

politics<01:00:45.160> since<01:00:45.440> the<01:00:45.599> young<01:00:45.920> are<01:00:46.119> not<01:00:46.760> are

politics since the young are not are

inexperienced<01:00:47.520> in<01:00:47.640> the<01:00:47.760> actions<01:00:48.039> of<01:00:48.280> life

inexperienced in the actions of life

well<01:00:49.400> those<01:00:49.559> are<01:00:49.680> the<01:00:49.799> things<01:00:50.160> about<01:00:50.400> which

well those are the things about which

politics<01:00:51.119> speaks<01:00:51.680> and<01:00:51.880> from<01:00:52.160> which<01:00:52.359> it

politics speaks and from which it

reasons

so<01:00:56.599> this<01:00:56.680> is<01:00:56.799> the<01:00:56.920> first<01:00:57.280> reason<01:00:58.280> young<01:00:58.559> people

so this is the first reason young people

should<01:00:59.119> not<01:00:59.280> come<01:00:59.440> to<01:00:59.559> the<01:00:59.760> course<01:01:00.119> on

should not come to the course on

ethics<01:01:02.319> just<01:01:02.599> like<01:01:03.079> people<01:01:03.359> that<01:01:03.520> have<01:01:03.680> no

ethics just like people that have no

experience<01:01:04.559> with<01:01:04.760> cars<01:01:05.119> should<01:01:05.319> not<01:01:05.520> come<01:01:05.680> to

experience with cars should not come to

the<01:01:06.000> course<01:01:06.280> on<01:01:06.480> how<01:01:06.680> cars

the course on how cars

work<01:01:08.640> or<01:01:09.000> what<01:01:09.119> a<01:01:09.240> good<01:01:09.440> what<01:01:09.520> would<01:01:09.640> make<01:01:09.799> a

work or what a good what would make a

good<01:01:10.160> car<01:01:10.559> really<01:01:10.839> even<01:01:11.240> even<01:01:12.000> slightly<01:01:12.520> more

good car really even even slightly more

advanced<01:01:13.119> than

that<01:01:16.640> why<01:01:16.839> not<01:01:17.559> you<01:01:17.720> don’t<01:01:17.839> know<01:01:17.920> what<01:01:18.000> you’re

that why not you don’t know what you’re

talking

about<01:01:20.440> that’s<01:01:20.599> why<01:01:20.760> all<01:01:20.920> the<01:01:21.000> university

about that’s why all the university

courses<01:01:21.839> that<01:01:22.000> teach<01:01:22.240> ethics<01:01:22.559> are<01:01:22.760> wasting

courses that teach ethics are wasting

their<01:01:23.440> time<01:01:24.440> cuz<01:01:24.640> ethics<01:01:24.920> is<01:01:25.000> about<01:01:25.160> how<01:01:25.240> to

their time cuz ethics is about how to

live<01:01:25.480> your<01:01:25.599> life<01:01:25.720> and<01:01:26.039> got<01:01:26.200> no<01:01:26.559> experience<01:01:26.960> of

live your life and got no experience of

life<01:01:28.599> or<01:01:28.760> no<01:01:28.960> subst<01:01:29.400> no<01:01:30.240> substantial

life or no subst no substantial

experience<01:01:31.079> of<01:01:31.200> adult<01:01:31.640> life<01:01:32.640> how<01:01:32.760> would<01:01:32.880> you

experience of adult life how would you

even<01:01:33.119> know<01:01:33.240> what<01:01:33.359> we’re<01:01:33.520> talking

about<01:01:38.000> so<01:01:38.160> you<01:01:38.240> should<01:01:38.400> only<01:01:38.559> study<01:01:38.880> this<01:01:39.119> like

about so you should only study this like

after<01:01:39.640> you<01:01:39.760> have<01:01:39.880> some<01:01:40.119> experience<01:01:40.520> of<01:01:40.760> Life

after you have some experience of Life

some<01:01:41.480> models<01:01:41.799> of<01:01:41.960> Ethics<01:01:42.480> are<01:01:42.720> easy<01:01:42.960> to<01:01:43.079> teach

some models of Ethics are easy to teach

without<01:01:43.799> that<01:01:43.880> are<01:01:44.280> not<01:01:44.760> the<01:01:44.839> ones<01:01:45.000> that

without that are not the ones that

pretend<01:01:45.400> to<01:01:45.480> be

pretend to be

demonstrations

maybe<01:01:50.119> but<01:01:50.319> not<01:01:50.480> the<01:01:50.599> ones<01:01:50.799> that<01:01:51.000> decide<01:01:51.319> what

maybe but not the ones that decide what

is<01:01:51.559> a<01:01:51.680> good<01:01:51.920> life

this<01:02:00.880> is<01:02:01.000> like<01:02:01.160> his<01:02:01.359> basic<01:02:02.000> argument<01:02:03.000> now<01:02:03.119> of

this is like his basic argument now of

course<01:02:03.359> you’ll<01:02:03.520> notice<01:02:03.760> that<01:02:03.920> there’s

course you’ll notice that there’s

something<01:02:04.319> circular<01:02:05.200> right<01:02:05.440> away<01:02:05.760> but<01:02:06.200> he<01:02:06.559> he

something circular right away but he he

didn’t<01:02:06.960> really<01:02:07.359> not<01:02:07.720> he<01:02:07.839> didn’t<01:02:08.079> forget<01:02:08.480> that

didn’t really not he didn’t forget that

right<01:02:09.680> in<01:02:09.839> other<01:02:10.359> words<01:02:11.359> I<01:02:11.440> mean<01:02:11.599> doesn’t<01:02:12.160> he

right in other words I mean doesn’t he

doesn’t<01:02:12.520> entirely<01:02:12.920> say<01:02:13.079> that<01:02:13.319> right<01:02:13.520> here<01:02:14.079> but

doesn’t entirely say that right here but

it’s<01:02:14.599> it’s<01:02:14.799> almost<01:02:15.119> going<01:02:15.279> to<01:02:15.400> be<01:02:15.559> saying<01:02:16.440> that

it’s it’s almost going to be saying that

only<01:02:17.000> good<01:02:17.240> people<01:02:17.520> should<01:02:17.760> study

only good people should study

ethics<01:02:20.400> because<01:02:20.559> they<01:02:20.680> have<01:02:20.799> experience<01:02:21.160> with

ethics because they have experience with

good<01:02:21.880> things<01:02:22.880> so<01:02:23.079> they<01:02:23.240> know<01:02:23.359> how<01:02:23.440> to<01:02:23.599> talk

good things so they know how to talk

about<01:02:24.039> them

about them

because<01:02:26.760> obviously<01:02:27.119> someone<01:02:27.400> who<01:02:27.720> has<01:02:27.799> a<01:02:27.920> bad

because obviously someone who has a bad

experience<01:02:28.480> of<01:02:28.599> life<01:02:28.760> is<01:02:28.880> not<01:02:29.000> who<01:02:29.119> he’s

experience of life is not who he’s

talking<01:02:29.839> about<01:02:30.839> he<01:02:30.960> knows<01:02:31.119> how<01:02:31.240> to<01:02:31.359> be<01:02:31.559> bad

talking about he knows how to be bad

well<01:02:32.000> maybe<01:02:32.279> in<01:02:32.440> some<01:02:32.680> funny<01:02:33.079> sense<01:02:33.680> you<01:02:33.880> could

well maybe in some funny sense you could

say<01:02:34.279> he<01:02:34.400> says<01:02:34.559> it<01:02:34.760> the<01:02:34.880> next<01:02:35.119> thing<01:02:35.319> and<01:02:35.400> I<01:02:35.520> say

say he says it the next thing and I say

there’s<01:02:35.799> another<01:02:36.039> reason<01:02:36.279> why<01:02:36.400> young<01:02:36.599> people

there’s another reason why young people

are<01:02:36.960> not<01:02:37.200> good<01:02:38.000> are<01:02:38.240> not<01:02:38.559> there<01:02:39.200> that’s<01:02:39.359> one

are not good are not there that’s one

reason<01:02:39.760> why<01:02:39.920> young<01:02:40.079> people<01:02:40.240> shouldn’t<01:02:40.520> come

reason why young people shouldn’t come

to<01:02:40.799> the<01:02:40.920> course<01:02:41.559> and<01:02:41.720> also<01:02:42.000> since<01:02:42.160> the<01:02:42.279> young

to the course and also since the young

are<01:02:42.640> AP<01:02:42.839> to<01:02:42.920> follow<01:02:43.200> their<01:02:43.359> impulses<01:02:44.000> so<01:02:44.160> there

are AP to follow their impulses so there

would<01:02:44.400> be<01:02:44.520> no<01:02:44.720> use<01:02:45.319> of<01:02:45.440> coming<01:02:45.640> to<01:02:45.839> these

would be no use of coming to these

discourses<01:02:46.599> since<01:02:46.799> their<01:02:46.960> end<01:02:47.160> is<01:02:47.279> not

discourses since their end is not

knowing<01:02:47.799> but<01:02:48.000> action<01:02:48.839> this<01:02:48.960> is<01:02:49.079> another<01:02:49.279> thing

knowing but action this is another thing

and<01:02:49.520> this<01:02:49.640> and<01:02:49.799> then<01:02:49.920> for<01:02:50.119> this<01:02:50.240> he<01:02:50.319> says<01:02:50.599> I

and this and then for this he says I

think<01:02:51.359> this<01:02:51.559> doesn’t<01:02:51.799> really<01:02:52.119> not<01:02:52.279> talking

think this doesn’t really not talking

about<01:02:52.720> age<01:02:53.200> a<01:02:53.359> certain<01:02:53.760> maturity<01:02:54.200> of

about age a certain maturity of

character

right<01:03:00.920> so<01:03:01.119> there’s<01:03:01.319> two<01:03:01.520> problems<01:03:01.880> young

right so there’s two problems young

people<01:03:02.279> don’t<01:03:02.440> have<01:03:02.680> experience<01:03:03.119> so<01:03:03.279> they

people don’t have experience so they

don’t<01:03:03.559> know<01:03:03.760> what<01:03:04.079> what<01:03:04.160> they’re<01:03:04.319> talking

don’t know what what they’re talking

about<01:03:06.960> and<01:03:07.200> secondly<01:03:07.640> young<01:03:07.920> people<01:03:08.480> tend<01:03:08.760> to

about and secondly young people tend to

file<01:03:09.160> their

file their

impulses<01:03:12.319> citation

impulses citation

needed

and

therefore<01:03:19.119> there<01:03:19.279> would<01:03:19.400> be<01:03:19.559> no<01:03:19.680> use<01:03:19.960> for<01:03:20.079> them

therefore there would be no use for them

to<01:03:20.319> study<01:03:20.599> ethics<01:03:20.960> why

not<01:03:24.200> study<01:03:24.559> politics<01:03:25.000> he<01:03:25.119> calls<01:03:25.319> it<01:03:25.480> which

not study politics he calls it which

stop<01:03:25.960> saying

ethics<01:03:29.880> because<01:03:30.079> ethics<01:03:30.359> is<01:03:30.520> not<01:03:30.920> like<01:03:31.039> we

ethics because ethics is not like we

said<01:03:31.559> a<01:03:31.680> second<01:03:31.920> ago<01:03:32.119> ethics<01:03:32.359> is<01:03:32.440> about<01:03:32.599> making

said a second ago ethics is about making

you<01:03:32.960> into<01:03:33.119> a<01:03:33.240> better<01:03:33.480> person<01:03:34.200> it’s<01:03:34.359> not<01:03:34.520> about

you into a better person it’s not about

knowing<01:03:35.039> anything<01:03:35.760> it’s<01:03:35.880> not<01:03:36.000> a<01:03:36.160> theoretical

knowing anything it’s not a theoretical

knowledge<01:03:37.599> it’s<01:03:37.720> a<01:03:37.920> practical

knowledge it’s a practical

knowledge<01:03:39.839> and<01:03:40.240> and<01:03:40.359> there<01:03:40.520> some<01:03:40.720> way<01:03:41.000> some

knowledge and and there some way some

just<01:03:41.440> someone<01:03:41.760> that<01:03:41.960> thought<01:03:42.079> you<01:03:42.200> know

just someone that thought you know

doesn’t<01:03:42.680> have<01:03:43.119> H<01:03:43.839> doesn’t<01:03:44.119> have<01:03:44.279> feet<01:03:44.599> or

doesn’t have H doesn’t have feet or

something<01:03:45.039> like<01:03:45.279> that<01:03:45.559> is<01:03:45.680> not<01:03:45.839> going<01:03:46.000> to<01:03:46.160> gain

something like that is not going to gain

much<01:03:46.520> from<01:03:46.680> a<01:03:46.799> running

much from a running

course<01:03:49.119> so<01:03:49.279> someone<01:03:49.520> that<01:03:49.640> doesn’t<01:03:50.000> have<01:03:50.720> what

course so someone that doesn’t have what

just<01:03:51.839> to<01:03:52.279> understand<01:03:52.440> it<01:03:52.640> as<01:03:52.760> it<01:03:52.920> relates<01:03:53.200> to

just to understand it as it relates to

an<01:03:53.480> example<01:03:53.880> that<01:03:54.000> I’m<01:03:54.279> still<01:03:54.520> using<01:03:55.119> any<01:03:55.400> if

an example that I’m still using any if

someone<01:03:55.799> never<01:03:55.960> saw<01:03:56.119> how<01:03:56.279> Pie<01:03:56.480> Pizza<01:03:56.720> is<01:03:56.839> cut

someone never saw how Pie Pizza is cut

them<01:03:57.079> they<01:03:57.240> cut<01:03:57.359> it<01:03:57.440> into<01:03:57.720> squares<01:03:58.720> something

them they cut it into squares something

like<01:03:59.279> that<01:04:00.160> well<01:04:00.319> the<01:04:00.480> first<01:04:00.720> not<01:04:01.279> the<01:04:01.400> first

like that well the first not the first

the<01:04:02.039> first<01:04:02.200> one<01:04:02.440> the<01:04:02.520> second<01:04:02.720> one<01:04:02.880> the<01:04:03.000> first

the first one the second one the first

one<01:04:03.400> is<01:04:03.799> someone<01:04:04.079> who<01:04:04.240> doesn’t<01:04:04.599> eat<01:04:04.960> pizza<01:04:05.559> or

one is someone who doesn’t eat pizza or

we’re<01:04:06.000> talking<01:04:06.200> about<01:04:06.319> splitting<01:04:06.599> the<01:04:06.720> pizza

we’re talking about splitting the pizza

among<01:04:07.160> your<01:04:07.240> friends<01:04:07.640> right<01:04:07.960> geometry

among your friends right geometry

someone<01:04:09.200> who<01:04:09.359> doesn’t<01:04:09.720> split<01:04:10.119> pizza

someone who doesn’t split pizza

ever<01:04:13.119> is<01:04:13.359> not<01:04:13.599> going<01:04:13.799> to<01:04:13.920> be<01:04:14.039> able<01:04:14.240> to<01:04:14.359> learn

ever is not going to be able to learn

our<01:04:15.480> more<01:04:15.799> precise<01:04:16.240> Pizza<01:04:16.520> coton<01:04:16.880> course<01:04:17.799> just

our more precise Pizza coton course just

because<01:04:18.359> they<01:04:18.480> don’t<01:04:18.599> know<01:04:18.760> what<01:04:18.920> pizza<01:04:19.200> is

because they don’t know what pizza is

and<01:04:19.480> I’ll<01:04:19.760> try<01:04:19.920> to<01:04:20.039> explain<01:04:20.400> something<01:04:20.680> like

and I’ll try to explain something like

well<01:04:21.079> you’ll<01:04:21.279> notice<01:04:21.839> that<01:04:22.039> if<01:04:22.200> you<01:04:22.359> cut<01:04:22.559> it

well you’ll notice that if you cut it

this<01:04:23.160> way<01:04:23.440> then<01:04:23.559> you<01:04:23.680> end<01:04:23.880> up<01:04:24.160> with<01:04:24.559> the<01:04:24.760> wrong

this way then you end up with the wrong

shaped<01:04:25.400> pieces<01:04:25.799> or<01:04:25.920> something<01:04:26.200> like<01:04:26.440> that<01:04:27.240> and

shaped pieces or something like that and

he<01:04:27.520> doesn’t<01:04:28.119> know<01:04:28.319> what’s<01:04:28.559> wrong<01:04:28.760> with<01:04:28.920> that

he doesn’t know what’s wrong with that

right<01:04:30.359> if<01:04:30.480> I<01:04:30.599> would<01:04:31.119> give<01:04:31.240> you<01:04:31.319> like<01:04:31.400> a<01:04:31.520> theory

right if I would give you like a theory

of<01:04:31.920> you<01:04:32.039> know<01:04:32.200> the<01:04:32.440> reason<01:04:32.839> why<01:04:33.000> you<01:04:33.160> got<01:04:33.240> to

of you know the reason why you got to

cut<01:04:33.520> it<01:04:33.680> this<01:04:33.839> way<01:04:34.000> is<01:04:34.240> because<01:04:35.240> such<01:04:35.440> and<01:04:35.599> such

cut it this way is because such and such

and<01:04:35.960> now<01:04:36.079> you<01:04:36.160> could<01:04:36.319> apply<01:04:36.720> that<01:04:36.880> knowledge

and now you could apply that knowledge

and<01:04:37.920> in<01:04:38.200> different<01:04:38.559> cases<01:04:38.839> and<01:04:39.000> know<01:04:39.119> how<01:04:39.240> to

and in different cases and know how to

how<01:04:39.680> to<01:04:39.799> cut<01:04:39.960> the<01:04:40.119> pizza<01:04:40.440> better<01:04:41.240> that<01:04:41.359> is<01:04:41.480> all

how to cut the pizza better that is all

useful<01:04:42.000> to<01:04:42.119> someone<01:04:42.440> already<01:04:42.920> has<01:04:43.160> some<01:04:43.520> what

useful to someone already has some what

call<01:04:44.079> experience<01:04:44.480> in<01:04:44.559> other<01:04:44.680> words<01:04:44.839> he

call experience in other words he

already<01:04:45.119> knows<01:04:45.319> the<01:04:45.440> effects<01:04:45.720> he<01:04:45.880> already

already knows the effects he already

knows<01:04:46.839> how<01:04:47.079> good<01:04:47.240> pizzas<01:04:47.559> and<01:04:47.680> bad<01:04:47.839> pizzas

knows how good pizzas and bad pizzas

Works<01:04:48.400> he<01:04:48.520> just<01:04:48.640> doesn’t<01:04:48.839> know<01:04:49.000> how<01:04:49.079> to<01:04:49.319> get<01:04:49.680> to

Works he just doesn’t know how to get to

always<01:04:49.960> have<01:04:50.119> the<01:04:50.240> good<01:04:50.400> ones<01:04:50.799> and<01:04:50.960> not<01:04:51.079> the

always have the good ones and not the

bad<01:04:51.440> ones<01:04:51.640> or<01:04:51.799> something<01:04:52.079> like<01:04:52.279> that<01:04:52.599> I<01:04:52.680> can

bad ones or something like that I can

teach<01:04:53.039> him<01:04:53.359> that<01:04:53.920> but<01:04:54.079> if<01:04:54.160> you<01:04:54.240> have<01:04:54.400> no<01:04:54.520> idea

teach him that but if you have no idea

what<01:04:55.079> a<01:04:55.240> pizza<01:04:55.520> is<01:04:55.799> or<01:04:55.920> if<01:04:56.000> you<01:04:56.119> don’t<01:04:56.400> have<01:04:57.359> uh

what a pizza is or if you don’t have uh

experience<01:04:58.039> of<01:04:58.279> eating<01:04:58.640> pizza<01:04:58.920> and<01:04:59.039> splitting

experience of eating pizza and splitting

it<01:04:59.480> with<01:04:59.599> your<01:04:59.839> friends<01:05:00.839> then<01:05:01.160> you’re<01:05:01.319> not

it with your friends then you’re not

going<01:05:01.680> to<01:05:02.640> you’re<01:05:02.760> not<01:05:02.880> going<01:05:03.079> to<01:05:03.240> stand<01:05:03.480> the

going to you’re not going to stand the

first<01:05:03.760> thing<01:05:03.839> you’re<01:05:03.960> not<01:05:04.079> going<01:05:04.520> understand

first thing you’re not going understand

what<01:05:04.839> I’m<01:05:04.960> talking<01:05:05.240> about<01:05:05.480> even<01:05:06.039> right<01:05:07.039> maybe

what I’m talking about even right maybe

I’ll<01:05:07.359> show<01:05:07.599> it<01:05:07.720> to<01:05:07.839> you<01:05:08.000> and<01:05:08.240> do<01:05:08.359> it<01:05:08.480> all<01:05:08.760> one

I’ll show it to you and do it all one

course<01:05:09.240> but<01:05:09.359> I’m<01:05:09.559> saying<01:05:10.079> if<01:05:10.160> you<01:05:10.319> never<01:05:10.480> sell

course but I’m saying if you never sell

pizza<01:05:11.400> and<01:05:11.520> you<01:05:11.680> never<01:05:11.839> split<01:05:12.160> it<01:05:13.160> it’s<01:05:13.319> just

pizza and you never split it it’s just

going<01:05:13.559> to<01:05:13.680> be<01:05:14.000> waste<01:05:14.200> of

going to be waste of

time<01:05:16.200> you’re<01:05:16.359> not<01:05:16.480> going<01:05:16.599> to<01:05:16.680> know<01:05:16.799> what<01:05:16.920> I’m

time you’re not going to know what I’m

talking<01:05:17.240> about<01:05:17.480> the<01:05:17.599> second<01:05:17.920> problem<01:05:18.319> is

talking about the second problem is

someone<01:05:19.200> who<01:05:19.400> just<01:05:19.839> doesn’t<01:05:20.359> want<01:05:20.640> to<01:05:20.839> cut<01:05:21.039> the

someone who just doesn’t want to cut the

pizza<01:05:21.680> evenly<01:05:22.680> he<01:05:22.799> wants<01:05:23.079> to<01:05:23.200> have<01:05:23.319> do<01:05:23.559> pizza

pizza evenly he wants to have do pizza

for<01:05:23.960> himself

for himself

now<01:05:26.359> if<01:05:26.480> it’s<01:05:26.599> a<01:05:26.760> course<01:05:27.119> about<01:05:27.599> having<01:05:27.880> the

now if it’s a course about having the

theoretical<01:05:28.760> knowledge<01:05:29.119> of<01:05:29.319> how<01:05:29.599> the<01:05:29.720> even

theoretical knowledge of how the even

Pizza<01:05:30.359> would<01:05:30.520> be<01:05:30.640> cut<01:05:30.920> into<01:05:31.839> that<01:05:31.920> would<01:05:32.039> be

Pizza would be cut into that would be

very<01:05:32.440> nice<01:05:33.079> but<01:05:33.200> since<01:05:33.440> this<01:05:33.559> is<01:05:33.720> not<01:05:33.920> that

very nice but since this is not that

course<01:05:34.400> this<01:05:34.480> is<01:05:34.640> the<01:05:34.760> course<01:05:35.000> of<01:05:35.160> how<01:05:35.319> to<01:05:35.480> cut

course this is the course of how to cut

the<01:05:35.839> pizza

the pizza

evenly<01:05:37.799> then<01:05:37.960> the<01:05:38.160> guy<01:05:38.359> who<01:05:38.480> is<01:05:38.680> just<01:05:39.160> I<01:05:39.240> don’t

evenly then the guy who is just I don’t

want<01:05:39.640> to<01:05:39.839> he<01:05:39.960> needs<01:05:40.119> a<01:05:40.240> different<01:05:40.480> course<01:05:40.760> how

want to he needs a different course how

to<01:05:41.039> be<01:05:41.160> the<01:05:41.240> biggest<01:05:41.559> card<01:05:42.279> that’s<01:05:42.440> a

to be the biggest card that’s a

different<01:05:42.880> course<01:05:43.200> that’s<01:05:43.359> not<01:05:43.559> this<01:05:43.760> course

different course that’s not this course

and<01:05:44.200> he’s<01:05:44.359> going<01:05:44.480> to<01:05:44.640> gain<01:05:44.880> nothing<01:05:45.119> out<01:05:45.240> of

and he’s going to gain nothing out of

this<01:05:45.520> course<01:05:46.319> by<01:05:46.520> the<01:05:46.640> criteria<01:05:47.000> of<01:05:47.079> the

this course by the criteria of the

course<01:05:47.400> right<01:05:47.559> he<01:05:47.680> going<01:05:47.760> to<01:05:47.880> gain<01:05:48.039> some

course right he going to gain some

knowledge<01:05:48.680> but<01:05:49.119> that’s<01:05:49.279> not<01:05:49.440> the<01:05:49.559> criteria

knowledge but that’s not the criteria

the<01:05:50.319> criteria<01:05:50.720> is

action<01:05:54.119> it’s<01:05:54.240> interesting<01:05:54.640> then<01:05:54.760> that<01:05:54.880> he

action it’s interesting then that he

critiques<01:05:55.319> the<01:05:55.680> for<01:05:55.799> being<01:05:56.039> interested<01:05:56.520> in

critiques the for being interested in

not<01:05:57.839> knowledge<01:05:58.279> but

not knowledge but

action<01:06:00.599> well<01:06:00.839> Le<01:06:01.200> they’re<01:06:01.480> interested<01:06:01.799> in

action well Le they’re interested in

action<01:06:02.279> were<01:06:02.400> the<01:06:02.520> wrong

action were the wrong

ones<01:06:05.599> when<01:06:05.720> he<01:06:05.799> says<01:06:05.960> young<01:06:06.279> in<01:06:06.520> in<01:06:06.640> that<01:06:06.799> me

ones when he says young in in that me

sense<01:06:07.240> he<01:06:07.359> say<01:06:07.799> I<01:06:07.880> don’t<01:06:08.000> mean<01:06:08.160> young

sense he say I don’t mean young

specifically<01:06:09.079> I<01:06:09.200> mean<01:06:09.480> bad<01:06:09.720> people<01:06:10.240> basic

specifically I mean bad people basic

uneducated

people<01:06:13.480> so<01:06:13.640> in<01:06:13.760> other<01:06:13.960> words<01:06:14.400> you<01:06:14.640> first<01:06:14.960> need

people so in other words you first need

to<01:06:15.720> have<01:06:16.039> both<01:06:16.520> like<01:06:16.640> the<01:06:16.799> most<01:06:17.079> basic<01:06:17.440> thing

to have both like the most basic thing

right<01:06:18.079> is<01:06:18.240> very<01:06:18.359> interesting<01:06:18.640> you<01:06:18.720> need<01:06:18.799> to

right is very interesting you need to

have<01:06:19.000> the<01:06:19.119> most<01:06:19.319> basic<01:06:19.760> at<01:06:19.920> the<01:06:20.039> most<01:06:20.400> that<01:06:20.599> the

have the most basic at the most that the

the<01:06:21.079> goal<01:06:21.400> is<01:06:21.599> general

the goal is general

knowledge<01:06:23.760> which<01:06:23.880> to<01:06:24.039> me<01:06:24.160> doesn’t<01:06:24.400> seem<01:06:24.640> any

knowledge which to me doesn’t seem any

less<01:06:25.640> what<01:06:25.720> do<01:06:25.760> you<01:06:25.839> mean<01:06:26.119> intelligible<01:06:26.720> to

less what do you mean intelligible to

someone<01:06:27.440> just<01:06:27.599> because<01:06:27.839> they<01:06:28.000> don’t<01:06:28.200> have

someone just because they don’t have

exposure<01:06:29.599> oh<01:06:30.200> yeah<01:06:30.359> it<01:06:30.520> is<01:06:30.920> it<01:06:31.079> is<01:06:31.400> because

exposure oh yeah it is it is because

because<01:06:33.160> uh<01:06:33.319> you<01:06:33.680> just<01:06:33.920> we<01:06:34.079> just<01:06:34.240> have<01:06:34.400> too

because uh you just we just have too

much<01:06:34.720> exposure<01:06:35.119> to<01:06:35.279> everything<01:06:36.240> that<01:06:36.400> it’s

much exposure to everything that it’s

hard<01:06:36.720> to<01:06:36.839> realize

hard to realize

this

um<01:06:41.240> but<01:06:42.200> I<01:06:42.319> think<01:06:42.680> that

uh<01:06:48.160> that’s<01:06:48.319> what<01:06:48.440> I<01:06:48.559> M<01:06:48.880> doesn’t<01:06:49.039> have<01:06:49.160> enough

uh that’s what I M doesn’t have enough

exposure<01:06:49.760> to<01:06:50.119> understand<01:06:50.359> that<01:06:50.559> like<01:06:50.960> the

exposure to understand that like the

easiest<01:06:51.480> way<01:06:51.599> to<01:06:51.720> divide<01:06:52.000> a<01:06:52.119> pizza<01:06:52.520> is<01:06:52.640> to<01:06:52.799> do

easiest way to divide a pizza is to do

it<01:06:53.119> this<01:06:53.279> way<01:06:53.400> instead<01:06:53.680> of<01:06:53.839> squares<01:06:54.680> yeah<01:06:55.319> yeah

it this way instead of squares yeah yeah

or<01:06:56.520> or<01:06:57.520> I<01:06:57.599> don’t<01:06:57.720> know<01:06:57.839> if<01:06:58.039> that<01:06:58.319> that<01:06:58.520> example

or or I don’t know if that that example

is<01:06:59.000> going<01:06:59.160> to<01:06:59.319> eluminate<01:06:59.839> this

is going to eluminate this

problem<01:07:02.599> uh<01:07:02.760> middle<01:07:03.000> of<01:07:03.119> a<01:07:03.240> class<01:07:03.559> you<01:07:03.640> could

problem uh middle of a class you could

listen<01:07:05.160> okay<01:07:05.359> fine<01:07:05.599> never<01:07:05.880> mind<01:07:06.720> yeah<01:07:06.880> you<01:07:07.000> can

listen okay fine never mind yeah you can

call<01:07:07.319> me<01:07:07.440> later<01:07:07.640> in<01:07:07.799> about<01:07:08.000> half<01:07:08.200> hour<01:07:09.119> okay

call me later in about half hour okay

problem<01:07:10.079> okay<01:07:10.400> bye<01:07:11.400> um<01:07:11.680> but<01:07:11.960> more<01:07:12.680> like

problem okay bye um but more like

um<01:07:16.200> I’m<01:07:16.359> trying<01:07:16.599> to<01:07:16.760> think<01:07:16.960> of<01:07:17.119> a<01:07:17.400> easy<01:07:17.880> easy

um I’m trying to think of a easy easy

example<01:07:18.680> for<01:07:19.000> for<01:07:19.160> this<01:07:19.319> kind<01:07:19.480> of<01:07:19.720> problem

example for for this kind of problem

maybe<01:07:20.359> my<01:07:20.520> piz<01:07:20.760> is<01:07:20.839> not<01:07:20.920> a<01:07:21.039> good<01:07:21.200> example<01:07:21.520> for

maybe my piz is not a good example for

that<01:07:24.000> let’s<01:07:24.319> say<01:07:24.960> no<01:07:25.319> don’t<01:07:25.480> tell<01:07:25.599> me<01:07:25.680> you<01:07:25.799> tell

that let’s say no don’t tell me you tell

me<01:07:26.079> an

example<01:07:30.039> I<01:07:30.200> want<01:07:30.359> to<01:07:30.599> show<01:07:31.200> how<01:07:31.640> not<01:07:31.880> knowing

example I want to show how not knowing

the<01:07:32.359> thing<01:07:32.559> that<01:07:32.680> we’re<01:07:32.880> trying<01:07:33.119> to

the thing that we’re trying to

explain<01:07:35.119> it<01:07:35.240> doesn’t<01:07:35.520> allow<01:07:35.760> you<01:07:35.880> to<01:07:36.279> accept

explain it doesn’t allow you to accept

to<01:07:37.000> accept<01:07:37.240> or<01:07:37.640> understand<01:07:37.760> the<01:07:37.880> source

to accept or understand the source

criteria<01:07:38.920> well<01:07:39.079> I<01:07:39.200> have<01:07:39.359> this<01:07:39.520> problem<01:07:39.799> all

criteria well I have this problem all

the<01:07:40.039> time<01:07:40.240> with<01:07:40.400> people<01:07:40.640> just<01:07:40.760> to<01:07:40.880> be<01:07:41.039> clear

the time with people just to be clear

right<01:07:41.920> if<01:07:42.079> I<01:07:42.319> come<01:07:42.520> and<01:07:42.720> tell<01:07:43.000> someone<01:07:43.359> you

right if I come and tell someone you

know<01:07:45.119> the<01:07:45.279> real<01:07:45.520> meaning<01:07:45.920> of<01:07:46.200> the<01:07:46.440> Caba<01:07:47.760> is<01:07:48.760> not

know the real meaning of the Caba is not

to<01:07:49.240> answer<01:07:49.599> this<01:07:49.760> question<01:07:50.000> but<01:07:50.119> to<01:07:50.240> answer<01:07:50.480> a

to answer this question but to answer a

different

question<01:07:52.400> now<01:07:52.599> the<01:07:52.760> people<01:07:53.039> who’ve<01:07:53.319> never<01:07:53.680> had

question now the people who’ve never had

the<01:07:54.079> problem<01:07:54.599> or<01:07:54.799> have<01:07:54.960> never<01:07:55.160> read<01:07:55.799> they

the problem or have never read they

don’t<01:07:56.119> really<01:07:56.279> know<01:07:56.440> what<01:07:56.520> I’m<01:07:56.680> talking<01:07:56.920> about

don’t really know what I’m talking about

may<01:07:57.839> maybe<01:07:58.079> I<01:07:58.160> can<01:07:58.279> tell<01:07:58.480> it<01:07:58.599> to<01:07:58.760> them<01:07:58.920> but<01:07:59.079> then

may maybe I can tell it to them but then

I’ll<01:07:59.599> be<01:07:59.720> doing<01:07:59.960> the<01:08:00.079> first<01:08:00.440> course<01:08:00.760> too<01:08:01.119> but

I’ll be doing the first course too but

assuming<01:08:02.039> that<01:08:02.200> they<01:08:02.440> don’t<01:08:02.680> I<01:08:02.880> don’t<01:08:03.880> I’m

assuming that they don’t I don’t I’m

just<01:08:04.160> not<01:08:04.319> solving<01:08:04.720> any<01:08:04.920> problem<01:08:05.160> the<01:08:05.319> person

just not solving any problem the person

has<01:08:06.279> well<01:08:06.440> that’s<01:08:06.599> a<01:08:06.760> way<01:08:06.880> of<01:08:07.000> talking<01:08:07.240> about

has well that’s a way of talking about

this<01:08:07.520> is<01:08:07.640> not<01:08:07.920> safe<01:08:08.240> that<01:08:08.440> way<01:08:08.760> but

this is not safe that way but

right<01:08:11.760> or<01:08:11.920> if<01:08:12.039> someone<01:08:12.359> comes<01:08:12.559> and<01:08:12.720> says<01:08:13.039> you

right or if someone comes and says you

know

uh<01:08:24.839> well<01:08:25.080> he<01:08:25.199> he’s<01:08:25.520> want<01:08:25.640> to<01:08:25.719> say<01:08:25.839> it<01:08:26.120> in

uh well he he’s want to say it in

another<01:08:26.600> way<01:08:26.960> in<01:08:27.040> a<01:08:27.159> minute<01:08:27.440> that<01:08:27.600> which<01:08:27.679> is

another way in a minute that which is

what<01:08:27.960> I’m<01:08:28.120> keeping<01:08:28.440> on<01:08:28.719> I<01:08:28.839> keep<01:08:29.000> on<01:08:29.159> reaching

what I’m keeping on I keep on reaching

to<01:08:30.920> um<01:08:31.199> if<01:08:31.319> I<01:08:31.400> want<01:08:31.520> to<01:08:31.679> tell<01:08:31.839> you<01:08:32.040> something

to um if I want to tell you something

like<01:08:33.799> why<01:08:34.199> right<01:08:34.640> certain<01:08:34.960> principles<01:08:35.560> like

like why right certain principles like

why<01:08:37.359> is

it<01:08:42.920> yeah<01:08:43.120> something

like<01:08:48.400> why<01:08:48.560> is<01:08:48.679> it<01:08:48.920> easier<01:08:49.239> to<01:08:49.480> build<01:08:49.640> a<01:08:50.000> plane<01:08:51.000> a

like why is it easier to build a plane a

helicopter<01:08:51.960> or<01:08:52.199> the<01:08:52.279> opposite<01:08:52.600> I<01:08:52.640> don’t<01:08:52.759> know

helicopter or the opposite I don’t know

which<01:08:53.000> one<01:08:53.080> is<01:08:53.199> easier<01:08:53.600> or<01:08:53.799> why<01:08:53.960> those<01:08:54.159> one

which one is easier or why those one

need<01:08:54.520> more<01:08:54.679> energy<01:08:55.000> than<01:08:55.120> the<01:08:55.239> other<01:08:55.520> there

need more energy than the other there

okay<01:08:58.400> and<01:08:59.080> you<01:08:59.279> don’t<01:08:59.799> know<01:09:00.040> what<01:09:00.159> a<01:09:00.319> plane<01:09:00.560> or

okay and you don’t know what a plane or

helicopter<01:09:01.279> is<01:09:01.440> you’ve<01:09:01.640> never<01:09:01.839> met<01:09:02.000> them<01:09:02.159> in

helicopter is you’ve never met them in

your<01:09:02.839> life<01:09:03.839> I’m<01:09:04.000> pretty<01:09:04.239> sure<01:09:04.480> that<01:09:04.640> that

your life I’m pretty sure that that

would<01:09:04.839> be<01:09:04.960> a<01:09:05.080> very<01:09:05.279> useless<01:09:05.880> course<01:09:06.880> in<01:09:07.040> the

would be a very useless course in the

sense<01:09:07.359> of<01:09:07.520> you’re<01:09:07.640> not<01:09:07.759> even<01:09:07.880> going<01:09:08.000> to<01:09:08.080> know

sense of you’re not even going to know

what<01:09:10.000> right<01:09:10.480> the<01:09:10.640> subject<01:09:11.000> matter<01:09:11.600> yeah<01:09:12.319> you

what right the subject matter yeah you

have<01:09:12.560> to<01:09:12.679> have<01:09:12.839> experience<01:09:13.239> you<01:09:13.359> have<01:09:13.480> to<01:09:13.640> have

have to have experience you have to have

built<01:09:14.080> planes<01:09:14.440> or<01:09:14.640> have<01:09:14.960> known<01:09:15.600> about<01:09:15.960> that

built planes or have known about that

and<01:09:17.040> built<01:09:17.359> helicopters<01:09:18.080> and<01:09:18.239> then<01:09:18.480> I<01:09:18.560> can

and built helicopters and then I can

tell<01:09:18.839> you<01:09:19.000> well<01:09:19.159> this<01:09:19.400> has<01:09:19.520> to<01:09:19.719> push<01:09:19.920> the<01:09:20.040> air

tell you well this has to push the air

that<01:09:20.359> has<01:09:20.480> tole<01:09:20.839> the<01:09:20.920> air<01:09:21.080> or<01:09:21.239> whatever<01:09:21.520> it<01:09:21.640> is

that has tole the air or whatever it is

and<01:09:22.319> now<01:09:22.440> you<01:09:23.120> even<01:09:23.319> know

and now you even know

why<01:09:25.359> see<01:09:25.560> now<01:09:25.679> you<01:09:25.799> have<01:09:25.920> knowledge<01:09:26.279> maybe

why see now you have knowledge maybe

it’s<01:09:26.600> only<01:09:26.839> practical<01:09:27.199> knowledge<01:09:27.520> or

it’s only practical knowledge or

whatever<01:09:28.199> it<01:09:28.679> is<01:09:29.679> but<01:09:29.839> if<01:09:29.920> you<01:09:30.040> don’t<01:09:30.199> know

whatever it is but if you don’t know

what<01:09:30.440> I’m<01:09:30.600> talking<01:09:30.839> about<01:09:31.120> and<01:09:31.279> it’s<01:09:31.480> like<01:09:31.960> I

what I’m talking about and it’s like I

mean<01:09:32.239> you<01:09:32.359> could<01:09:32.799> sort<01:09:33.040> of<01:09:33.799> again<01:09:34.600> you<01:09:34.719> could

mean you could sort of again you could

like<01:09:35.279> get<01:09:35.520> everything<01:09:35.799> as<01:09:35.920> a<01:09:36.040> sort<01:09:36.199> of<01:09:36.359> formal

like get everything as a sort of formal

empty<01:09:37.159> formalisms<01:09:38.000> like<01:09:38.120> you<01:09:38.359> like<01:09:38.480> A’s<01:09:38.679> and

empty formalisms like you like A’s and

B’s<01:09:39.080> and

B’s and

C’s<01:09:41.560> but<01:09:41.719> that’s<01:09:41.920> not<01:09:42.480> understanding<01:09:43.000> for<01:09:43.239> him

C’s but that’s not understanding for him

that’s<01:09:44.319> just<01:09:44.440> doing<01:09:44.759> logic<01:09:45.400> and<01:09:45.560> logic

that’s just doing logic and logic

doesn’t<01:09:46.080> care<01:09:46.279> about<01:09:46.480> the<01:09:46.600> content<01:09:47.000> of<01:09:47.239> things

doesn’t care about the content of things

it’s<01:09:47.640> a<01:09:47.799> very<01:09:48.159> great<01:09:48.480> thing<01:09:49.359> but<01:09:49.480> that’s<01:09:49.679> not

it’s a very great thing but that’s not

knowing<01:09:50.359> anything<01:09:51.080> right

I<01:09:56.199> mean<01:09:56.360> if<01:09:56.440> you<01:09:56.560> want<01:09:56.640> to<01:09:56.800> know<01:09:57.000> why<01:09:57.360> wood<01:09:57.760> has

I mean if you want to know why wood has

different<01:09:58.920> uh<01:09:59.920> attributes<01:10:00.480> different<01:10:00.800> Works

different uh attributes different Works

reacts<01:10:01.719> differently<01:10:02.080> to<01:10:02.199> water<01:10:02.480> than<01:10:02.840> plastic

reacts differently to water than plastic

you’ve<01:10:04.239> have<01:10:04.360> to<01:10:04.560> have<01:10:04.679> some<01:10:04.920> experience<01:10:05.239> with

you’ve have to have some experience with

water<01:10:05.560> and<01:10:06.120> plastic<01:10:07.120> I’m<01:10:07.280> going<01:10:07.480> this

water and plastic I’m going this

experience<01:10:08.000> just<01:10:08.120> in<01:10:08.199> a<01:10:08.320> sense<01:10:08.600> the

experience just in a sense the

differentiate<01:10:09.239> from<01:10:09.400> knowledge<01:10:10.000> I<01:10:10.040> don’t

differentiate from knowledge I don’t

have<01:10:10.280> to<01:10:10.400> know<01:10:10.640> why<01:10:10.880> would<01:10:11.040> is<01:10:11.199> this<01:10:11.440> way<01:10:11.920> and

have to know why would is this way and

why<01:10:12.360> plastic<01:10:12.679> is<01:10:12.800> that<01:10:12.960> with<01:10:13.199> just<01:10:13.480> only<01:10:13.719> kind

why plastic is that with just only kind

according<01:10:14.480> to<01:10:14.560> him<01:10:14.679> only<01:10:14.920> y<01:10:15.480> count<01:10:15.760> as

according to him only y count as

knowledge<01:10:16.600> but<01:10:16.719> I<01:10:16.840> have<01:10:16.960> to<01:10:17.040> know<01:10:17.199> at<01:10:17.320> least

knowledge but I have to know at least

that<01:10:18.760> right<01:10:18.880> and<01:10:19.000> they<01:10:19.120> KN<01:10:19.440> that<01:10:19.600> basically

that right and they KN that basically

means<01:10:20.400> either<01:10:20.600> I<01:10:20.719> did<01:10:20.800> it<01:10:20.960> myself<01:10:21.159> or<01:10:21.280> someone

means either I did it myself or someone

told<01:10:21.679> me<01:10:21.800> that<01:10:21.880> when<01:10:21.960> you<01:10:22.000> spill<01:10:22.239> water<01:10:22.480> on

told me that when you spill water on

wood<01:10:23.239> it<01:10:23.400> tends<01:10:23.640> to<01:10:23.800> blow<01:10:24.000> off<01:10:24.199> and<01:10:24.280> you<01:10:24.440> do<01:10:24.520> it

wood it tends to blow off and you do it

on<01:10:24.719> plastic<01:10:25.000> nothing<01:10:25.400> happens<01:10:25.800> most<01:10:25.960> of<01:10:26.080> the

on plastic nothing happens most of the

time<01:10:28.520> okay<01:10:29.080> now<01:10:29.320> we<01:10:29.440> could<01:10:29.600> do<01:10:29.800> Material

time okay now we could do Material

Science<01:10:30.520> and<01:10:30.679> figure<01:10:30.880> out<01:10:31.159> why<01:10:31.440> and<01:10:31.719> maybe<01:10:31.880> you

Science and figure out why and maybe you

want<01:10:32.080> to<01:10:32.159> make<01:10:32.280> a<01:10:32.520> kind<01:10:32.760> of<01:10:32.880> what<01:10:33.080> that<01:10:33.159> doesn’t

want to make a kind of what that doesn’t

have<01:10:33.600> the<01:10:33.800> problem<01:10:34.080> or<01:10:34.239> so<01:10:34.960> but<01:10:35.320> you<01:10:35.440> could<01:10:35.719> do

have the problem or so but you could do

a<01:10:35.960> lot<01:10:36.080> of<01:10:36.239> things<01:10:36.560> you<01:10:36.640> could<01:10:36.760> do<01:10:36.880> a<01:10:36.960> lot<01:10:37.080> of

a lot of things you could do a lot of

work<01:10:37.960> but<01:10:38.159> without<01:10:38.480> having<01:10:38.679> the<01:10:38.840> most<01:10:39.080> basic

work but without having the most basic

knowledge<01:10:39.760> of<01:10:39.920> the<01:10:40.440> facts<01:10:41.440> or<01:10:41.679> the<01:10:41.840> experience

knowledge of the facts or the experience

right<01:10:42.560> the<01:10:42.679> empirical<01:10:43.199> facts<01:10:44.080> you’re<01:10:44.239> going

right the empirical facts you’re going

to<01:10:44.480> get

to get

nowhere<01:10:46.800> and<01:10:46.960> in<01:10:47.040> a<01:10:47.199> very<01:10:47.400> similar<01:10:47.760> way<01:10:47.960> he

nowhere and in a very similar way he

thinks<01:10:48.920> that<01:10:49.040> if<01:10:49.120> I<01:10:49.280> want<01:10:49.360> to<01:10:49.480> talk<01:10:49.600> to<01:10:49.719> you

thinks that if I want to talk to you

about<01:10:50.239> way<01:10:50.480> of<01:10:50.760> living<01:10:51.080> your<01:10:51.320> life<01:10:52.280> or<01:10:52.480> ways<01:10:52.760> of

about way of living your life or ways of

life<01:10:54.199> or<01:10:54.480> the<01:10:54.640> good<01:10:54.840> things<01:10:55.000> in

life or the good things in

life<01:10:58.040> and<01:10:58.159> you<01:10:58.320> have<01:10:58.480> never<01:10:58.760> done<01:10:59.080> those

things<01:11:03.320> or<01:11:03.440> if<01:11:03.520> you’ve<01:11:03.719> only<01:11:03.880> done<01:11:04.199> bad<01:11:04.440> things

things or if you’ve only done bad things

and<01:11:04.920> I<01:11:05.000> want<01:11:05.159> to<01:11:05.280> teach<01:11:05.440> you<01:11:05.560> about<01:11:05.840> good

and I want to teach you about good

things<01:11:08.679> what<01:11:08.800> am<01:11:08.920> I<01:11:09.040> even<01:11:09.280> talking

about<01:11:18.800> I<01:11:18.960> actually<01:11:19.280> think<01:11:19.440> that<01:11:19.560> this<01:11:19.640> is<01:11:19.760> a

about I actually think that this is a

real<01:11:20.080> thing<01:11:20.320> for<01:11:20.440> example<01:11:21.440> should<01:11:21.600> I<01:11:21.719> give

real thing for example should I give

like<01:11:22.560> bad

like bad

examples<01:11:24.640> I<01:11:24.800> actually<01:11:25.000> think<01:11:25.440> that<01:11:25.520> this<01:11:25.600> is

examples I actually think that this is

something<01:11:25.920> that<01:11:26.040> happens<01:11:26.320> all<01:11:26.480> the<01:11:26.840> time<01:11:27.840> and

something that happens all the time and

in<01:11:28.520> other<01:11:28.719> words<01:11:28.920> he<01:11:29.120> coming<01:11:29.320> out<01:11:29.520> against

in other words he coming out against

theoretical<01:11:30.280> ethics<01:11:30.600> right<01:11:30.719> he<01:11:30.880> coming<01:11:31.040> out

theoretical ethics right he coming out

against<01:11:32.520> uh<01:11:32.800> doing<01:11:33.440> ethics<01:11:33.760> from<01:11:33.960> first

against uh doing ethics from first

principles<01:11:34.840> because<01:11:35.000> he<01:11:35.120> says<01:11:35.480> and<01:11:35.560> then<01:11:35.960> says

principles because he says and then says

the<01:11:36.239> next<01:11:36.400> page<01:11:36.560> we<01:11:36.640> don’t<01:11:36.760> really<01:11:36.920> do

the next page we don’t really do

anything<01:11:37.280> from<01:11:37.440> first<01:11:37.639> principle<01:11:38.080> we<01:11:38.199> all<01:11:38.320> the

anything from first principle we all the

first<01:11:38.600> principles<01:11:38.960> we<01:11:39.080> know<01:11:39.560> we<01:11:39.760> came<01:11:40.000> from

first principles we know we came from

the<01:11:40.280> bottom<01:11:40.520> up<01:11:40.719> and<01:11:40.840> then<01:11:40.920> we<01:11:41.040> came<01:11:41.280> back<01:11:41.679> down

the bottom up and then we came back down

but<01:11:42.880> since<01:11:43.120> we<01:11:43.199> don’t<01:11:43.600> really<01:11:43.800> know<01:11:43.960> the<01:11:44.080> first

but since we don’t really know the first

principle<01:11:44.639> of<01:11:44.800> Ethics<01:11:45.320> we<01:11:45.440> definitely<01:11:45.760> can’t

principle of Ethics we definitely can’t

be<01:11:46.080> doing<01:11:46.280> it<01:11:46.560> in<01:11:46.760> this<01:11:47.400> case<01:11:48.480> but<01:11:49.480> there’s<01:11:49.679> a

be doing it in this case but there’s a

whole<01:11:50.199> bunch<01:11:50.400> of<01:11:50.679> facts<01:11:50.960> and<01:11:51.080> now<01:11:51.239> human<01:11:51.520> life

whole bunch of facts and now human life

is<01:11:51.880> weird<01:11:52.120> in<01:11:52.280> this<01:11:52.400> way<01:11:52.600> right<01:11:52.719> so<01:11:52.920> now<01:11:53.280> when<01:11:53.400> I

is weird in this way right so now when I

talk<01:11:53.679> about<01:11:53.840> pizzas<01:11:54.239> or<01:11:54.360> I<01:11:54.440> talk<01:11:54.600> about<01:11:54.719> tables

talk about pizzas or I talk about tables

and<01:11:55.040> ch<01:11:55.360> all<01:11:55.480> those<01:11:55.600> things<01:11:55.719> are<01:11:55.840> pretty

and ch all those things are pretty

simple<01:11:56.280> to<01:11:56.480> experience<01:11:57.000> and<01:11:57.120> since<01:11:57.239> you<01:11:57.360> have

simple to experience and since you have

a<01:11:57.520> lot<01:11:57.600> of<01:11:57.719> other<01:11:57.920> experiences<01:11:58.320> you<01:11:58.400> might

a lot of other experiences you might

even<01:11:58.719> be<01:11:58.840> able<01:11:59.040> to<01:11:59.159> analogize<01:12:00.080> from<01:12:00.280> some

even be able to analogize from some

experience<01:12:00.840> you<01:12:00.960> have<01:12:01.080> you<01:12:01.159> sort<01:12:01.280> of<01:12:01.400> know

experience you have you sort of know

what<01:12:01.600> I’m<01:12:01.719> talking<01:12:01.960> about<01:12:02.159> even<01:12:02.320> if<01:12:02.400> you<01:12:02.480> were

what I’m talking about even if you were

never<01:12:02.760> on<01:12:02.880> a<01:12:03.199> helicopter<01:12:04.199> uh<01:12:04.280> you<01:12:04.360> sort<01:12:04.560> of

never on a helicopter uh you sort of

could<01:12:05.040> understand<01:12:05.159> that<01:12:05.320> you<01:12:05.400> never<01:12:05.560> wrote<01:12:05.719> a

could understand that you never wrote a

motorcycle<01:12:06.360> but<01:12:06.480> you<01:12:06.560> could<01:12:07.000> understand<01:12:07.280> very

motorcycle but you could understand very

simply<01:12:07.880> why<01:12:08.040> it’s<01:12:08.239> like<01:12:08.440> more<01:12:08.679> comp<01:12:09.040> more

simply why it’s like more comp more

dangerous<01:12:09.480> than<01:12:09.600> riding<01:12:09.840> a<01:12:10.000> car<01:12:10.239> and<01:12:10.400> so<01:12:10.560> on

dangerous than riding a car and so on

but<01:12:13.600> when<01:12:13.760> we<01:12:13.920> talk<01:12:14.159> about<01:12:14.719> the<01:12:15.679> you<01:12:15.960> like<01:12:16.280> the

but when we talk about the you like the

things<01:12:16.600> we<01:12:17.000> we<01:12:17.120> call<01:12:17.320> virtues<01:12:17.960> right

things we we call virtues right

or<01:12:19.719> uh<01:12:20.120> right<01:12:20.960> for<01:12:21.159> someone<01:12:21.760> take<01:12:21.960> something

or uh right for someone take something

like<01:12:22.320> courage<01:12:22.800> right<01:12:23.320> courage<01:12:23.679> is<01:12:24.199> one<01:12:24.320> of<01:12:24.440> the

like courage right courage is one of the

classical<01:12:24.880> virtues

classical virtues

and<01:12:26.719> not<01:12:26.880> one<01:12:27.000> of<01:12:27.120> the<01:12:27.199> matter<01:12:27.520> virtues<01:12:27.880> more

and not one of the matter virtues more

or<01:12:28.320> less<01:12:29.320> uh<01:12:29.440> nobody<01:12:29.719> believes<01:12:30.000> in<01:12:30.120> it<01:12:30.719> nobody

or less uh nobody believes in it nobody

practices<01:12:31.560> it<01:12:32.199> nobody<01:12:32.480> even<01:12:32.600> thinks<01:12:32.800> that

practices it nobody even thinks that

it’s<01:12:33.000> a<01:12:33.199> thing<01:12:34.199> we<01:12:34.360> have<01:12:34.520> different<01:12:34.840> ways<01:12:35.040> of

it’s a thing we have different ways of

talking<01:12:35.440> about<01:12:35.600> it<01:12:35.760> but<01:12:35.880> we<01:12:35.960> don’t<01:12:36.120> call<01:12:36.320> them

talking about it but we don’t call them

courage<01:12:38.440> now<01:12:38.679> if<01:12:38.800> you<01:12:39.280> never<01:12:39.520> had<01:12:39.800> courage<01:12:40.120> or

courage now if you never had courage or

you<01:12:40.719> never<01:12:41.719> acted<01:12:42.080> with<01:12:42.280> courage<01:12:42.639> or<01:12:42.719> you

you never acted with courage or you

never<01:12:43.400> maybe<01:12:43.639> saw<01:12:43.920> someone<01:12:44.199> acting<01:12:44.480> with

never maybe saw someone acting with

courage<01:12:44.920> or<01:12:45.040> read<01:12:45.199> a<01:12:45.320> good<01:12:45.520> book<01:12:45.719> about

courage or read a good book about

something<01:12:46.199> someone<01:12:46.440> acting<01:12:46.679> with<01:12:46.840> courage

something someone acting with courage

all<01:12:47.239> those<01:12:47.400> things<01:12:47.679> are<01:12:48.679> some<01:12:48.920> kind<01:12:49.159> of

all those things are some kind of

experience<01:12:51.120> I<01:12:51.239> could<01:12:51.480> give<01:12:51.600> you<01:12:51.760> a<01:12:51.960> long<01:12:52.320> du

experience I could give you a long du

about<01:12:53.239> why<01:12:53.560> we<01:12:53.719> have<01:12:53.840> to<01:12:53.960> talk<01:12:54.159> about<01:12:54.280> more

about why we have to talk about more

about<01:12:54.679> courage<01:12:55.280> how<01:12:55.480> why<01:12:55.679> courage<01:12:56.000> is<01:12:56.199> very

about courage how why courage is very

good<01:12:56.760> and<01:12:57.199> maybe<01:12:57.719> sometimes<01:12:57.880> it’s<01:12:58.040> not<01:12:58.239> good

good and maybe sometimes it’s not good

like<01:12:58.600> everything<01:12:58.880> else<01:12:59.239> so<01:12:59.440> we<01:12:59.560> got<01:12:59.679> to<01:12:59.880> find

like everything else so we got to find

out<01:13:00.400> when<01:13:00.560> it<01:13:00.679> is<01:13:00.880> good<01:13:01.040> and<01:13:01.600> figure<01:13:01.880> out<01:13:02.040> some

out when it is good and figure out some

definition<01:13:02.800> for<01:13:02.960> this<01:13:03.960> but<01:13:04.280> you’re<01:13:04.600> going<01:13:04.920> not

definition for this but you’re going not

going<01:13:05.280> to<01:13:05.440> get<01:13:05.600> anything<01:13:05.880> out<01:13:06.040> of

going to get anything out of

it<01:13:07.840> not<01:13:08.040> in<01:13:08.159> the<01:13:08.239> sense<01:13:08.400> of<01:13:08.480> not<01:13:08.600> being<01:13:08.719> able<01:13:08.920> to

it not in the sense of not being able to

repeat<01:13:09.280> the<01:13:09.560> words<01:13:10.560> they<01:13:10.760> just<01:13:10.880> not<01:13:11.159> going<01:13:11.320> to

repeat the words they just not going to

help<01:13:11.639> you<01:13:11.880> have<01:13:12.040> more

courage<01:13:16.360> I<01:13:16.440> think<01:13:16.679> because<01:13:17.120> human<01:13:17.880> human

courage I think because human human

goods<01:13:18.520> and<01:13:18.719> human<01:13:19.280> uh<01:13:19.520> he<01:13:19.639> doesn’t<01:13:19.880> say<01:13:20.120> all

goods and human uh he doesn’t say all

any<01:13:20.440> of<01:13:20.600> this<01:13:20.760> I’m<01:13:20.840> just<01:13:20.960> telling<01:13:21.239> you<01:13:21.440> things

any of this I’m just telling you things

from<01:13:21.760> my<01:13:22.080> experience<01:13:23.080> because<01:13:23.440> human<01:13:24.159> uh<01:13:24.400> life

from my experience because human uh life

I<01:13:25.719> mean<01:13:25.960> he<01:13:26.080> does<01:13:26.320> talk<01:13:26.480> about<01:13:26.639> this<01:13:26.719> in<01:13:26.840> some

I mean he does talk about this in some

way<01:13:27.120> where<01:13:27.239> he<01:13:27.320> talks<01:13:27.520> about<01:13:27.679> the<01:13:27.880> B<01:13:28.199> the<01:13:28.400> basic

way where he talks about the B the basic

problem<01:13:29.040> of<01:13:29.199> Ethics<01:13:29.840> being<01:13:30.040> that<01:13:30.159> there’s<01:13:30.440> too

problem of Ethics being that there’s too

many<01:13:31.080> human<01:13:31.400> Goods<01:13:31.920> there<01:13:32.000> are<01:13:32.159> too<01:13:32.360> many

many human Goods there are too many

things<01:13:33.400> there’s<01:13:33.600> too<01:13:33.760> many<01:13:33.960> ways<01:13:34.120> of<01:13:34.239> living

things there’s too many ways of living

your<01:13:34.679> life<01:13:35.520> there’s<01:13:35.760> very<01:13:35.920> few<01:13:36.120> ways<01:13:36.280> of

your life there’s very few ways of

cutting<01:13:36.639> a<01:13:36.719> pizza<01:13:37.000> relative<01:13:37.360> to<01:13:37.800> that<01:13:38.800> and

cutting a pizza relative to that and

very<01:13:39.120> few<01:13:39.320> ways<01:13:39.480> of<01:13:39.600> making<01:13:39.800> a<01:13:39.920> plane<01:13:40.120> or<01:13:40.280> a<01:13:40.440> car

very few ways of making a plane or a car

but<01:13:41.320> there’s<01:13:41.560> a<01:13:42.000> a<01:13:42.120> lot<01:13:42.280> of<01:13:42.440> ways<01:13:42.639> of<01:13:42.760> being<01:13:42.920> a

but there’s a a lot of ways of being a

person<01:13:44.679> and<01:13:45.000> people<01:13:45.280> that<01:13:45.560> have<01:13:46.560> seen<01:13:47.199> or

person and people that have seen or

experienced<01:13:47.920> by<01:13:48.120> themselves<01:13:48.320> or<01:13:48.440> maybe<01:13:48.679> seen

experienced by themselves or maybe seen

by<01:13:49.120> people<01:13:49.520> they<01:13:49.880> like<01:13:50.040> I<01:13:50.159> said<01:13:50.400> you<01:13:50.760> maybe<01:13:51.000> get

by people they like I said you maybe get

it<01:13:51.239> from<01:13:51.560> others<01:13:52.560> certain<01:13:52.840> ways<01:13:53.040> of<01:13:53.239> life<01:13:53.480> have

it from others certain ways of life have

no<01:13:53.800> idea<01:13:54.120> what<01:13:54.320> those<01:13:54.480> ways<01:13:54.679> of<01:13:54.760> life<01:13:54.920> are

no idea what those ways of life are

you<01:13:55.719> could<01:13:55.880> tell<01:13:56.080> to<01:13:56.199> them<01:13:56.360> but<01:13:56.440> they<01:13:56.560> still

you could tell to them but they still

don’t<01:13:56.840> know<01:13:56.960> what<01:13:57.080> it<01:13:57.199> is<01:13:57.360> it’s<01:13:57.600> like<01:13:57.960> uh<01:13:58.719> you

don’t know what it is it’s like uh you

know<01:13:58.960> like<01:13:59.080> telling<01:13:59.280> a<01:13:59.400> blind<01:13:59.679> person<01:13:59.960> colors

know like telling a blind person colors

you<01:14:00.440> know<01:14:00.679> the<01:14:00.960> famous<01:14:01.480> example<01:14:02.480> doesn’t<01:14:02.679> know

you know the famous example doesn’t know

what<01:14:02.920> it<01:14:03.080> is<01:14:03.480> and<01:14:03.679> I<01:14:03.800> can’t<01:14:04.000> even<01:14:04.159> start

what it is and I can’t even start

discussing<01:14:04.840> with<01:14:04.920> you<01:14:05.040> if<01:14:05.120> it’s<01:14:05.280> good<01:14:05.400> or<01:14:05.639> bad

discussing with you if it’s good or bad

cuz<01:14:06.760> you<01:14:06.960> never<01:14:07.159> seen

cuz you never seen

it<01:14:09.920> and<01:14:10.040> you<01:14:10.120> don’t<01:14:10.320> even<01:14:10.560> have<01:14:10.719> any<01:14:11.000> any<01:14:11.159> way

it and you don’t even have any any way

of<01:14:11.360> discerning<01:14:11.840> which<01:14:11.960> is<01:14:12.040> a<01:14:12.159> good<01:14:12.320> one<01:14:12.440> and

of discerning which is a good one and

which<01:14:12.679> is<01:14:12.760> a<01:14:12.960> bad<01:14:13.159> one<01:14:14.120> I<01:14:14.199> mean<01:14:14.360> you<01:14:14.440> know<01:14:14.800> the

which is a bad one I mean you know the

the<01:14:15.360> psychologists<01:14:16.040> and<01:14:16.239> people<01:14:16.480> like<01:14:16.639> that

the psychologists and people like that

have<01:14:16.960> been<01:14:17.080> talking<01:14:17.320> about<01:14:17.520> these<01:14:17.679> kind<01:14:17.840> of

have been talking about these kind of

things<01:14:19.360> uh<01:14:19.480> you<01:14:19.639> know<01:14:20.120> if<01:14:20.239> you<01:14:20.440> take

uh<01:14:24.639> if<01:14:24.760> you<01:14:24.880> have<01:14:25.120> like<01:14:25.199> a<01:14:25.280> whole<01:14:25.480> society<01:14:25.840> of<01:14:26.040> a

uh if you have like a whole society of a

whole<01:14:26.400> like<01:14:26.600> sub<01:14:26.960> Subs<01:14:27.320> Society<01:14:27.679> or<01:14:27.840> something

whole like sub Subs Society or something

which<01:14:29.000> in<01:14:29.199> which<01:14:29.360> there’s<01:14:29.639> no

which in which there’s no

uh<01:14:31.880> say<01:14:32.080> something<01:14:32.360> like<01:14:32.480> there’s<01:14:32.639> no<01:14:32.800> good

uh say something like there’s no good

Fathers

right<01:14:35.600> which<01:14:35.760> there<01:14:35.840> are<01:14:36.040> people<01:14:36.320> that<01:14:36.560> some

right which there are people that some

take<01:14:37.280> responsibility<01:14:38.000> and<01:14:38.239> authority<01:14:39.199> and

take responsibility and authority and

maybe<01:14:39.639> there’s<01:14:39.880> bad<01:14:40.080> ones<01:14:40.320> who<01:14:40.480> only<01:14:40.679> take

maybe there’s bad ones who only take

authority<01:14:41.239> without<01:14:41.600> responsibility<01:14:42.600> maybe

authority without responsibility maybe

there’s<01:14:43.000> good<01:14:43.159> ones<01:14:43.480> there’s<01:14:44.199> like<01:14:44.600> hurtful

there’s good ones there’s like hurtful

ones<01:14:45.400> that<01:14:45.520> only<01:14:45.719> take<01:14:45.920> responsibility

ones that only take responsibility

without<01:14:47.159> Authority<01:14:48.159> hurts<01:14:48.440> the<01:14:48.639> father<01:14:48.920> and

without Authority hurts the father and

makes<01:14:49.360> them<01:14:49.480> a<01:14:49.600> bad<01:14:49.880> father<01:14:50.800> and<01:14:50.920> maybe

makes them a bad father and maybe

there’s<01:14:51.400> the<01:14:51.600> like<01:14:51.760> balanced<01:14:52.159> ones<01:14:52.360> or<01:14:52.480> maybe

there’s the like balanced ones or maybe

you<01:14:52.960> closer<01:14:53.360> to<01:14:53.560> that<01:14:53.760> and<01:14:53.880> then<01:14:53.960> we<01:14:54.080> can<01:14:54.199> start

you closer to that and then we can start

talking<01:14:54.679> about<01:14:54.840> them

talking about them

this<01:14:56.520> but<01:14:56.679> if<01:14:56.800> we<01:14:57.000> never<01:14:57.280> saw

this but if we never saw

it<01:14:59.600> we<01:14:59.719> could<01:14:59.840> have<01:14:59.960> all<01:15:00.199> kind<01:15:00.400> theoretical

it we could have all kind theoretical

things<01:15:01.080> then<01:15:01.199> someone<01:15:01.440> could<01:15:01.960> oh<01:15:02.120> Bo<01:15:02.239> so

things then someone could oh Bo so

you’re<01:15:02.440> talking<01:15:02.639> about<01:15:02.760> the<01:15:02.920> patriarchy

you’re talking about the patriarchy

which<01:15:03.600> I<01:15:03.800> read<01:15:03.960> is<01:15:04.080> a<01:15:04.239> bad

which I read is a bad

thing<01:15:06.480> well<01:15:06.679> maybe<01:15:07.000> but<01:15:07.120> I<01:15:07.199> don’t<01:15:07.480> I’ve<01:15:07.639> never

thing well maybe but I don’t I’ve never

seen<01:15:07.960> the<01:15:08.080> patriarchy<01:15:08.639> either<01:15:08.840> so<01:15:08.960> I<01:15:09.080> don’t

seen the patriarchy either so I don’t

know<01:15:10.400> but<01:15:11.400> or<01:15:11.679> may<01:15:12.120> then<01:15:12.280> there<01:15:12.480> like<01:15:12.560> a<01:15:12.679> theory

know but or may then there like a theory

so<01:15:13.159> you<01:15:13.280> have<01:15:13.400> to<01:15:13.920> all<01:15:14.040> these<01:15:14.199> things<01:15:14.320> are

so you have to all these things are

based<01:15:14.679> on<01:15:14.840> experience<01:15:15.199> of<01:15:15.360> human<01:15:15.639> life<01:15:15.960> of<01:15:16.199> of

based on experience of human life of of

good<01:15:16.719> and<01:15:16.920> bad<01:15:17.080> ways<01:15:17.239> of<01:15:17.360> being<01:15:17.560> human<01:15:18.159> beings

good and bad ways of being human beings

and<01:15:19.320> very<01:15:19.520> often<01:15:19.800> people<01:15:20.040> have<01:15:20.199> no<01:15:20.400> experience

and very often people have no experience

of<01:15:20.880> certain<01:15:21.159> good<01:15:21.320> ways<01:15:21.520> or<01:15:21.639> of<01:15:21.800> bad<01:15:22.280> ways<01:15:23.280> and

of certain good ways or of bad ways and

makes<01:15:23.760> very<01:15:23.960> hard<01:15:24.239> to<01:15:24.440> do<01:15:25.000> any<01:15:25.199> real<01:15:26.320> ethics<01:15:27.320> or

makes very hard to do any real ethics or

to<01:15:27.600> make<01:15:27.760> any<01:15:28.000> progress<01:15:28.320> in<01:15:28.480> some<01:15:28.840> something

to make any progress in some something

like<01:15:29.199> a<01:15:29.320> course<01:15:29.600> and<01:15:29.719> something<01:15:30.000> like<01:15:30.199> a<01:15:30.600> study

like a course and something like a study

it<01:15:34.679> I’m<01:15:35.239> yeah<01:15:35.360> this<01:15:35.480> is<01:15:35.639> and<01:15:35.760> this<01:15:35.840> is<01:15:35.960> true<01:15:36.080> for

it I’m yeah this is and this is true for

the<01:15:36.360> bad<01:15:36.520> ways<01:15:36.760> also<01:15:37.040> of<01:15:37.360> course<01:15:38.360> like<01:15:38.520> there’s

the bad ways also of course like there’s

all<01:15:38.880> kind<01:15:39.040> of<01:15:39.239> like<01:15:39.400> naive<01:15:39.840> people<01:15:40.120> who<01:15:40.360> like

all kind of like naive people who like

never<01:15:42.719> never<01:15:43.679> uh<01:15:44.679> never<01:15:44.920> really<01:15:45.159> lied<01:15:45.760> never

never never uh never really lied never

really<01:15:46.159> figured<01:15:46.480> out<01:15:46.639> that<01:15:46.760> you<01:15:46.920> know<01:15:47.080> you

really figured out that you know you

could<01:15:47.360> just<01:15:47.560> lie<01:15:47.920> and<01:15:48.719> say<01:15:49.000> things<01:15:49.159> that<01:15:49.280> are

could just lie and say things that are

not<01:15:49.600> true<01:15:49.960> and

not true and

benefit<01:15:52.440> most<01:15:52.719> kids<01:15:52.920> figure<01:15:53.159> that<01:15:53.280> out<01:15:53.400> at

benefit most kids figure that out at

some<01:15:53.639> point<01:15:53.800> but<01:15:53.920> some<01:15:54.040> people<01:15:54.239> never<01:15:54.400> figure

some point but some people never figure

it<01:15:54.719> out

it out

and<01:15:55.600> makes<01:15:55.760> it<01:15:55.920> very<01:15:56.080> hard<01:15:56.239> to<01:15:56.360> deal<01:15:56.639> with

and makes it very hard to deal with

them<01:15:58.639> I<01:15:58.840> not<01:15:58.960> only<01:15:59.120> to<01:15:59.280> deal<01:15:59.480> with<01:15:59.639> them

them I not only to deal with them

practical<01:16:00.840> problem<01:16:01.239> makes<01:16:01.400> it<01:16:01.520> very<01:16:01.679> hard<01:16:01.840> to

practical problem makes it very hard to

talk<01:16:02.159> about<01:16:02.480> okay<01:16:02.600> so<01:16:02.760> when<01:16:02.920> is<01:16:03.040> it<01:16:03.159> good<01:16:03.280> to

talk about okay so when is it good to

lie<01:16:03.560> when<01:16:03.679> is<01:16:03.760> it<01:16:03.880> bad<01:16:04.159> lie<01:16:04.320> is<01:16:04.400> it<01:16:04.800> you<01:16:04.920> know

lie when is it bad lie is it you know

never<01:16:06.239> should<01:16:06.360> we<01:16:06.480> make<01:16:06.600> the<01:16:06.719> rule<01:16:06.880> that<01:16:07.000> he

never should we make the rule that he

never<01:16:07.280> lie<01:16:07.719> should<01:16:07.880> we<01:16:08.159> sometimes<01:16:08.440> lie<01:16:09.000> should

never lie should we sometimes lie should

we<01:16:09.320> manipulate<01:16:09.760> people<01:16:10.080> half<01:16:10.280> lies<01:16:10.679> all<01:16:10.840> these

we manipulate people half lies all these

concept<01:16:11.560> just<01:16:11.679> don’t<01:16:12.320> exist<01:16:12.600> in<01:16:12.760> them<01:16:12.920> because

concept just don’t exist in them because

they<01:16:13.120> don’t<01:16:13.239> have<01:16:13.320> any<01:16:13.520> experience<01:16:13.880> of<01:16:14.040> it<01:16:14.960> and

they don’t have any experience of it and

if<01:16:15.239> they<01:16:15.360> read<01:16:15.520> a<01:16:15.679> book<01:16:15.880> that<01:16:16.000> says<01:16:16.239> you<01:16:16.360> know

if they read a book that says you know

all<01:16:17.120> to<01:16:17.280> Li<01:16:17.600> to<01:16:17.719> LS<01:16:18.040> and<01:16:18.159> nothing<01:16:18.400> to<01:16:18.520> LS<01:16:18.760> and

all to Li to LS and nothing to LS and

they<01:16:19.080> like<01:16:19.560> it’s<01:16:19.719> some<01:16:19.920> kind

they like it’s some kind

of<01:16:21.600> it<01:16:21.719> means<01:16:22.000> nothing<01:16:22.400> that’s<01:16:22.560> not<01:16:22.719> helping

of it means nothing that’s not helping

them<01:16:23.320> not<01:16:23.480> helping<01:16:23.760> anyone

them not helping anyone

so<01:16:26.800> I<01:16:26.960> actually<01:16:27.280> think<01:16:27.639> yeah<01:16:27.960> I<01:16:28.080> actually

so I actually think yeah I actually

think<01:16:28.480> this<01:16:28.679> kind<01:16:28.840> of<01:16:29.040> problem<01:16:29.360> of<01:16:29.480> not<01:16:29.679> having

think this kind of problem of not having

experience<01:16:30.560> of<01:16:30.840> of

experience of of

life<01:16:33.239> he<01:16:33.440> probably<01:16:33.719> thinks<01:16:34.080> mostly<01:16:34.480> good<01:16:34.760> but

life he probably thinks mostly good but

either<01:16:35.199> good<01:16:35.400> or<01:16:35.679> bad<01:16:36.360> makes<01:16:36.560> it<01:16:36.760> very<01:16:37.000> hard<01:16:37.239> to

either good or bad makes it very hard to

do<01:16:40.040> uh<01:16:40.239> ethics<01:16:40.639> that’s<01:16:40.880> why<01:16:41.000> the<01:16:41.120> student<01:16:41.360> of

do uh ethics that’s why the student of

Ethics<01:16:41.960> is<01:16:42.159> an<01:16:42.360> older<01:16:42.760> person<01:16:43.120> curring<01:16:43.400> time

Ethics is an older person curring time

the<01:16:43.679> student<01:16:43.920> of

the student of

politics<01:16:46.840> because<01:16:46.960> they<01:16:47.080> need<01:16:47.199> to<01:16:47.280> know<01:16:47.440> a<01:16:47.600> lot

politics because they need to know a lot

of<01:16:48.080> things<01:16:49.080> order<01:16:49.280> to<01:16:49.400> start<01:16:49.600> judging<01:16:50.040> them

of things order to start judging them

and<01:16:50.320> to<01:16:50.440> start<01:16:51.000> understanding<01:16:51.360> them

in<01:16:56.120> the<01:16:56.280> similar<01:16:56.679> way<01:16:56.840> to<01:16:57.040> which<01:16:57.280> you<01:16:57.360> know<01:16:57.480> you

in the similar way to which you know you

need<01:16:57.719> to<01:16:57.840> know<01:16:57.960> a<01:16:58.040> lot<01:16:58.159> of<01:16:58.239> things<01:16:58.400> to<01:16:58.520> start

need to know a lot of things to start

any<01:16:59.040> science<01:17:00.040> the<01:17:00.199> thing<01:17:00.400> is<01:17:00.560> that<01:17:01.320> many

any science the thing is that many

Sciences<01:17:02.000> are<01:17:02.120> at<01:17:02.199> least<01:17:02.360> the<01:17:02.440> things<01:17:02.600> that<01:17:02.719> we

Sciences are at least the things that we

consider<01:17:03.480> also<01:17:03.719> the<01:17:03.840> reconsidered<01:17:04.679> uh<01:17:04.960> you

consider also the reconsidered uh you

know<01:17:05.280> basic<01:17:05.679> Sciences<01:17:06.120> physical<01:17:06.480> sciences

know basic Sciences physical sciences

are<01:17:07.520> things<01:17:07.719> that<01:17:07.840> we<01:17:07.960> have<01:17:08.199> a<01:17:08.360> lot<01:17:08.520> of

experience<01:17:12.120> like<01:17:12.320> I’ve<01:17:12.440> been<01:17:12.719> experiencing

experience like I’ve been experiencing

you<01:17:13.560> know<01:17:13.960> um<01:17:14.960> mechanics<01:17:15.440> and<01:17:15.639> physics<01:17:15.960> since

you know um mechanics and physics since

I<01:17:16.239> was<01:17:16.639> uh<01:17:16.800> a<01:17:16.920> few<01:17:17.120> weeks<01:17:17.600> old<01:17:18.600> doing<01:17:18.840> the<01:17:18.880> a<01:17:18.960> lot

I was uh a few weeks old doing the a lot

of<01:17:19.199> experiments<01:17:19.679> with<01:17:19.800> it<01:17:19.880> you<01:17:19.960> know<01:17:20.080> drop

of experiments with it you know drop

bits<01:17:20.560> see<01:17:20.719> what

bits see what

happens<01:17:23.560> but<01:17:23.719> I<01:17:23.800> have<01:17:23.920> not<01:17:24.159> been<01:17:24.400> I<01:17:24.480> have<01:17:24.639> not

happens but I have not been I have not

again<01:17:26.000> if<01:17:26.199> I<01:17:26.920> either<01:17:27.239> myself<01:17:27.760> or<01:17:28.639> second<01:17:29.080> hand

again if I either myself or second hand

maybe<01:17:29.880> don’t<01:17:30.080> have<01:17:30.199> a<01:17:30.280> lot<01:17:30.400> of<01:17:30.520> experience

maybe don’t have a lot of experience

with<01:17:30.960> being<01:17:31.159> becoming<01:17:31.440> a<01:17:31.600> good<01:17:32.239> person<01:17:33.239> and

with being becoming a good person and

how<01:17:33.520> can<01:17:33.639> I<01:17:33.840> do<01:17:33.960> a<01:17:34.120> sence<01:17:34.440> of<01:17:34.679> it<01:17:35.679> and<01:17:35.880> this

how can I do a sence of it and this

means<01:17:36.320> now<01:17:36.480> this<01:17:36.600> is<01:17:36.679> very<01:17:36.840> important<01:17:37.400> this

means now this is very important this

means<01:17:37.760> that<01:17:37.960> then<01:17:38.280> like<01:17:38.440> the<01:17:38.600> first<01:17:38.880> question

means that then like the first question

that<01:17:39.280> people<01:17:39.480> do<01:17:39.679> like<01:17:39.840> R<01:17:40.120> ethics<01:17:40.480> like<01:17:40.719> why

that people do like R ethics like why

should<01:17:41.040> I<01:17:41.120> even<01:17:41.239> want<01:17:41.360> to<01:17:41.480> be<01:17:41.600> a<01:17:41.719> good<01:17:42.199> person

should I even want to be a good person

right<01:17:44.360> why<01:17:44.679> why<01:17:45.000> maybe<01:17:45.239> we<01:17:45.320> should<01:17:45.480> be<01:17:45.639> bad

right why why maybe we should be bad

people<01:17:46.639> prove<01:17:46.840> it<01:17:46.960> to<01:17:47.600> me<01:17:48.600> this<01:17:48.719> is<01:17:48.920> very

people prove it to me this is very

problematic<01:17:49.719> question<01:17:50.679> if<01:17:50.760> you<01:17:50.920> realize<01:17:51.280> what

problematic question if you realize what

I’m<01:17:51.520> saying<01:17:51.880> now<01:17:52.880> why<01:17:53.000> is<01:17:53.080> it<01:17:53.159> a<01:17:53.320> problematic

I’m saying now why is it a problematic

question<01:17:55.040> not<01:17:55.280> because<01:17:55.480> it’s<01:17:55.760> you<01:17:55.800> shouldn’t

question not because it’s you shouldn’t

have<01:17:56.199> an<01:17:56.360> answer<01:17:56.639> to<01:17:56.800> it<01:17:57.520> maybe<01:17:57.760> you

have an answer to it maybe you

should<01:18:00.239> but<01:18:00.480> because<01:18:00.800> it’s<01:18:01.040> like<01:18:01.520> proven<01:18:01.920> to

should but because it’s like proven to

me<01:18:02.320> that<01:18:02.520> things<01:18:02.800> should<01:18:03.000> fall<01:18:03.600> down<01:18:04.280> this<01:18:04.440> way

me that things should fall down this way

and<01:18:04.800> not<01:18:05.199> up<01:18:06.000> when<01:18:06.159> I’ve<01:18:06.360> never<01:18:06.760> I<01:18:06.880> Liv<01:18:07.080> on<01:18:07.239> some

and not up when I’ve never I Liv on some

other<01:18:07.679> planet<01:18:07.960> or<01:18:08.080> some<01:18:08.239> other<01:18:08.400> Universe

other planet or some other Universe

where<01:18:09.800> there<01:18:09.920> isn’t<01:18:10.520> any<01:18:10.920> any<01:18:11.239> direction<01:18:11.560> in

where there isn’t any any direction in

which<01:18:11.880> Things

Fall<01:18:15.600> you<01:18:15.760> don’t<01:18:16.080> have<01:18:16.280> any<01:18:16.920> uh<01:18:17.360> basis<01:18:17.760> of

Fall you don’t have any uh basis of

facts<01:18:18.320> even<01:18:18.480> of

facts even of

opinions<01:18:20.679> right<01:18:21.040> we<01:18:21.120> don’t<01:18:21.239> really<01:18:21.400> know<01:18:21.560> the

opinions right we don’t really know the

facts<01:18:22.000> cuz<01:18:22.120> it<01:18:22.239> seem<01:18:22.560> one<01:18:22.719> way<01:18:22.840> and<01:18:22.960> it’s

facts cuz it seem one way and it’s

somewhat<01:18:23.480> different<01:18:23.719> way<01:18:24.120> but<01:18:24.239> we<01:18:24.320> don’t<01:18:24.440> even

somewhat different way but we don’t even

have<01:18:24.840> any<01:18:25.040> basic<01:18:25.320> of<01:18:25.520> seeming<01:18:25.880> to<01:18:26.040> be<01:18:26.320> facts

have any basic of seeming to be facts

any<01:18:26.880> basis<01:18:27.280> from<01:18:27.480> which<01:18:27.600> to<01:18:27.800> start<01:18:28.000> the

any basis from which to start the

discussion<01:18:29.840> anytime<01:18:30.239> we<01:18:30.400> start<01:18:30.679> when<01:18:30.800> you<01:18:30.960> ask

discussion anytime we start when you ask

a<01:18:31.280> question<01:18:31.800> why<01:18:32.600> like<01:18:32.840> you<01:18:32.920> know<01:18:33.159> like<01:18:33.679> who

a question why like you know like who

says<01:18:34.199> anything<01:18:35.199> that’s<01:18:35.520> asking<01:18:35.840> the<01:18:35.960> most

says anything that’s asking the most

fundamental<01:18:36.760> questions<01:18:37.159> right<01:18:37.280> it’s<01:18:37.440> like

fundamental questions right it’s like

the<01:18:37.679> highest<01:18:38.040> questions<01:18:38.600> right<01:18:38.880> so<01:18:39.480> why<01:18:39.679> be

the highest questions right so why be

good

anyways<01:18:42.760> and<01:18:42.880> it’s<01:18:43.040> something<01:18:43.440> it’s<01:18:43.639> very

anyways and it’s something it’s very

similar<01:18:44.159> to<01:18:44.360> like<01:18:44.520> you<01:18:44.639> know<01:18:44.920> why<01:18:45.360> should

similar to like you know why should

Things<01:18:45.760> Fall<01:18:46.120> anywhere<01:18:46.520> or<01:18:46.719> why<01:18:46.840> should

Things Fall anywhere or why should

things<01:18:47.440> do

things do

anything<01:18:49.280> and<01:18:49.560> those<01:18:49.679> are<01:18:49.880> very<01:18:50.080> good

anything and those are very good

questions<01:18:50.520> those<01:18:50.639> are<01:18:50.760> the<01:18:50.920> fundamental

questions those are the fundamental

questions<01:18:52.520> but<01:18:52.600> in<01:18:52.679> order<01:18:52.920> to<01:18:53.080> speak<01:18:53.280> about

questions but in order to speak about

them<01:18:53.639> intelligently<01:18:54.199> or<01:18:54.280> really<01:18:54.520> order<01:18:54.800> to

them intelligently or really order to

even<01:18:55.159> ask<01:18:55.639> them<01:18:56.639> I<01:18:56.800> need<01:18:56.920> to<01:18:57.080> start<01:18:57.280> with<01:18:57.400> a

even ask them I need to start with a

fact<01:18:58.040> like<01:18:58.320> we<01:18:58.440> start<01:18:58.880> all<01:18:59.000> the<01:18:59.120> way<01:18:59.360> down<01:18:59.560> here

fact like we start all the way down here

things<01:19:00.040> keep<01:19:00.199> on<01:19:00.360> moving<01:19:00.679> and<01:19:00.800> falling<01:19:01.199> and

things keep on moving and falling and

acting<01:19:02.080> in<01:19:02.239> certain<01:19:02.480> ways<01:19:02.760> and<01:19:02.960> we<01:19:03.080> observe

acting in certain ways and we observe

them<01:19:03.520> we<01:19:03.639> make<01:19:03.719> sure<01:19:03.880> we’re<01:19:04.000> observing

them we make sure we’re observing

correctly<01:19:05.280> and<01:19:05.400> then<01:19:05.560> we<01:19:05.719> figure<01:19:06.000> out<01:19:06.239> okay

correctly and then we figure out okay

that’s<01:19:06.600> because<01:19:06.760> of<01:19:06.920> that<01:19:07.040> and<01:19:07.120> then<01:19:07.239> we<01:19:07.320> can

that’s because of that and then we can

go<01:19:07.560> one<01:19:07.760> step<01:19:07.960> higher<01:19:08.199> and<01:19:08.360> ask<01:19:08.639> why<01:19:08.760> is<01:19:08.960> that

go one step higher and ask why is that

and<01:19:09.600> why<01:19:09.760> is<01:19:10.120> that<01:19:11.120> until<01:19:11.520> we<01:19:12.080> hopefully<01:19:12.679> find

and why is that until we hopefully find

get<01:19:13.159> to<01:19:13.400> the<01:19:13.679> to<01:19:13.800> the<01:19:13.920> end<01:19:14.120> of<01:19:14.480> everything

get to the to the end of everything

which<01:19:15.639> nobody<01:19:15.960> got<01:19:16.120> to<01:19:16.360> yet<01:19:16.600> but

which nobody got to yet but

hopefully<01:19:18.520> but<01:19:18.760> when<01:19:18.920> you<01:19:19.080> start<01:19:20.000> you<01:19:20.280> if<01:19:20.400> you

hopefully but when you start you if you

would<01:19:20.760> start<01:19:21.120> purely<01:19:21.520> from<01:19:21.800> there<01:19:22.520> without

would start purely from there without

any<01:19:23.560> experience<01:19:24.560> like<01:19:24.760> like<01:19:24.960> why<01:19:25.080> is<01:19:25.199> it<01:19:25.360> good

any experience like like why is it good

to<01:19:25.560> be<01:19:25.679> a<01:19:25.800> good<01:19:26.040> person<01:19:26.480> well<01:19:26.639> what<01:19:26.760> is<01:19:26.840> a<01:19:27.000> good

to be a good person well what is a good

person<01:19:27.600> first<01:19:28.239> there’s<01:19:28.400> a<01:19:28.560> basic<01:19:28.840> F<01:19:29.239> you<01:19:29.320> could

person first there’s a basic F you could

say<01:19:29.639> well<01:19:29.840> how<01:19:29.960> who<01:19:30.120> said<01:19:30.360> that<01:19:30.719> I<01:19:31.280> I<01:19:31.360> agree

say well how who said that I I agree

with<01:19:31.760> you<01:19:32.520> but<01:19:32.719> if<01:19:32.960> if<01:19:33.120> I<01:19:33.239> would<01:19:33.440> have<01:19:33.600> some

with you but if if I would have some

basis<01:19:34.080> of<01:19:34.320> fact<01:19:34.600> to<01:19:34.719> start<01:19:35.040> with<01:19:35.560> like<01:19:35.760> I<01:19:35.840> have

basis of fact to start with like I have

some<01:19:36.600> experience<01:19:37.600> like<01:19:37.840> okay<01:19:38.040> it’s<01:19:38.239> good<01:19:38.360> to

some experience like okay it’s good to

have<01:19:38.639> money<01:19:38.960> it’s<01:19:39.159> also<01:19:39.360> good<01:19:39.480> to<01:19:39.600> be<01:19:39.760> healthy

have money it’s also good to be healthy

it’s<01:19:40.719> also<01:19:41.120> good<01:19:41.360> to<01:19:41.719> have<01:19:41.960> friends<01:19:42.960> it’s<01:19:43.120> also

it’s also good to have friends it’s also

good<01:19:43.560> to<01:19:43.800> not<01:19:44.280> be<01:19:45.040> too<01:19:45.280> much<01:19:45.560> too<01:19:45.840> fight<01:19:46.080> too

good to not be too much too fight too

much<01:19:46.600> the<01:19:46.800> little<01:19:46.960> bit<01:19:47.080> is<01:19:47.320> good<01:19:47.760> I<01:19:47.840> don’t<01:19:48.000> know

much the little bit is good I don’t know

so<01:19:48.880> and<01:19:49.040> so<01:19:49.159> on<01:19:49.960> and<01:19:50.080> I<01:19:50.159> know<01:19:50.360> these<01:19:50.520> things

so and so on and I know these things

from<01:19:50.880> experience<01:19:51.199> it’s<01:19:51.360> good<01:19:51.440> to<01:19:51.560> have

from experience it’s good to have

courage<01:19:52.360> not<01:19:52.520> too<01:19:52.719> much<01:19:53.400> and<01:19:53.560> so<01:19:53.719> on<01:19:54.719> then<01:19:54.840> I

courage not too much and so on then I

could<01:19:55.120> start<01:19:55.360> thinking<01:19:55.719> okay<01:19:55.920> but<01:19:56.199> why<01:19:56.400> is<01:19:56.520> it

could start thinking okay but why is it

good<01:19:56.840> to<01:19:57.000> have<01:19:57.560> courage<01:19:58.560> what<01:19:58.760> makes<01:19:59.000> that

good to have courage what makes that

good<01:19:59.400> maybe<01:19:59.639> it’s<01:19:59.800> the<01:19:59.920> opposite<01:20:00.239> maybe<01:20:00.480> being

good maybe it’s the opposite maybe being

whatever<01:20:01.520> the<01:20:01.600> opposite<01:20:01.880> of<01:20:02.040> Courage<01:20:02.320> is

whatever the opposite of Courage is

maybe<01:20:02.760> being<01:20:02.960> a<01:20:03.080> coward<01:20:03.360> is<01:20:03.520> actually<01:20:03.800> better

maybe being a coward is actually better

and<01:20:04.800> I<01:20:04.920> could<01:20:05.040> bring<01:20:05.199> you<01:20:05.400> proof<01:20:05.760> okay<01:20:06.000> this

and I could bring you proof okay this

guy<01:20:06.320> was<01:20:06.400> a<01:20:06.520> coward<01:20:06.880> and<01:20:07.239> it<01:20:07.360> was<01:20:07.480> more

guy was a coward and it was more

successful<01:20:08.040> in<01:20:08.280> life

successful in life

or<01:20:10.080> no<01:20:10.760> problem<01:20:11.760> we’ll<01:20:12.000> figure<01:20:12.280> out<01:20:12.560> we<01:20:12.679> can

or no problem we’ll figure out we can

have<01:20:12.920> a<01:20:13.080> discussion<01:20:13.520> about

have a discussion about

this<01:20:15.920> but<01:20:16.719> you<01:20:16.920> can’t<01:20:17.159> discuss<01:20:17.560> any<01:20:17.800> science

this but you can’t discuss any science

or<01:20:18.239> any<01:20:18.440> knowledge<01:20:18.800> or<01:20:18.960> any<01:20:19.800> thing<01:20:20.120> from<01:20:20.360> just

or any knowledge or any thing from just

starting<01:20:21.320> from<01:20:22.320> why<01:20:22.520> should<01:20:22.760> there<01:20:23.480> why

starting from why should there why

should<01:20:23.719> there<01:20:23.840> be<01:20:23.960> courage<01:20:24.239> in<01:20:24.360> the<01:20:24.400> world

should there be courage in the world

that’s<01:20:26.040> a<01:20:26.199> good<01:20:26.400> question<01:20:27.400> but<01:20:27.560> what<01:20:27.679> is<01:20:27.880> this

that’s a good question but what is this

thing<01:20:28.199> that<01:20:28.320> we’re<01:20:28.480> talking<01:20:28.840> about<01:20:29.840> after<01:20:30.080> we

thing that we’re talking about after we

finish<01:20:30.480> talking<01:20:30.679> about<01:20:30.840> it<01:20:31.000> all<01:20:31.199> from<01:20:31.320> the

finish talking about it all from the

bottom<01:20:31.719> off<01:20:32.000> then<01:20:32.080> we<01:20:32.199> might<01:20:32.360> be<01:20:32.440> able<01:20:32.679> to<01:20:32.800> go

bottom off then we might be able to go

tap<01:20:33.600> down<01:20:33.840> and<01:20:34.360> have<01:20:34.560> like<01:20:34.800> this<01:20:34.960> one<01:20:35.159> clear

tap down and have like this one clear

deduction<01:20:36.760> that<01:20:36.920> shows<01:20:37.199> us<01:20:37.360> also<01:20:37.639> why<01:20:37.760> to<01:20:37.920> have

deduction that shows us also why to have

courage<01:20:39.120> and<01:20:39.280> why<01:20:39.480> courage<01:20:39.719> is<01:20:39.800> a<01:20:39.960> good

courage and why courage is a good

thing<01:20:41.719> but<01:20:41.920> since<01:20:42.239> we’re<01:20:42.480> not<01:20:42.679> there<01:20:42.920> yet<01:20:43.120> I

thing but since we’re not there yet I

mean<01:20:43.719> even<01:20:43.920> if<01:20:44.080> we<01:20:44.280> would<01:20:44.480> be<01:20:44.639> there<01:20:44.800> we’d<01:20:44.960> be

mean even if we would be there we’d be

accepting<01:20:45.400> it<01:20:45.520> on<01:20:45.760> faith<01:20:45.960> you<01:20:46.040> know<01:20:46.159> Plato

accepting it on faith you know Plato

said<01:20:46.840> that<01:20:47.159> this<01:20:47.320> whole<01:20:47.560> system<01:20:47.960> and<01:20:48.320> that’s

said that this whole system and that’s

why<01:20:48.600> you<01:20:48.679> should<01:20:48.840> have<01:20:49.000> courage<01:20:49.520> okay<01:20:50.280> but<01:20:50.960> if

why you should have courage okay but if

we<01:20:51.199> want<01:20:51.320> to<01:20:51.440> do<01:20:51.600> some<01:20:51.800> research<01:20:52.120> if<01:20:52.199> you<01:20:52.320> want

we want to do some research if you want

to<01:20:52.520> do<01:20:52.639> philosophy<01:20:53.080> if<01:20:53.159> you<01:20:53.280> want<01:20:53.360> to<01:20:53.520> do

to do philosophy if you want to do

want<01:20:56.159> to<01:20:56.320> like<01:20:56.719> think<01:20:56.960> of<01:20:57.159> think<01:20:57.320> through<01:20:57.480> it

want to like think of think through it

from<01:20:57.800> ourself<01:20:58.639> we’re<01:20:58.760> going<01:20:58.880> to<01:20:58.960> have<01:20:59.080> to<01:20:59.159> have

from ourself we’re going to have to have

somewh<01:20:59.560> where<01:20:59.679> to<01:20:59.800> start<01:21:00.000> to<01:21:00.159> think

somewh where to start to think

from<01:21:03.120> just<01:21:03.280> like<01:21:03.440> in<01:21:03.560> any<01:21:03.760> other<01:21:04.000> thing<01:21:05.000> and<01:21:05.320> if

from just like in any other thing and if

our<01:21:05.840> subject<01:21:06.239> is<01:21:06.440> human<01:21:06.800> life<01:21:07.239> or<01:21:07.679> all<01:21:07.960> the

our subject is human life or all the

goods<01:21:08.320> of<01:21:08.440> human<01:21:08.679> life<01:21:08.840> or<01:21:08.960> what’s<01:21:09.159> the<01:21:09.280> only

goods of human life or what’s the only

good<01:21:09.760> what’s<01:21:09.920> the<01:21:10.040> ultimate<01:21:10.400> good<01:21:10.639> what

good what’s the ultimate good what

something<01:21:11.679> like<01:21:11.960> that<01:21:12.719> we’re<01:21:12.880> going<01:21:12.960> to<01:21:13.040> have

something like that we’re going to have

to<01:21:13.239> start<01:21:13.480> with<01:21:13.600> a<01:21:13.719> lot<01:21:13.880> of<01:21:14.360> data<01:21:15.360> about

to start with a lot of data about

that<01:21:17.360> and<01:21:17.880> assuming<01:21:18.239> and<01:21:18.400> this<01:21:18.520> is<01:21:18.719> where<01:21:18.960> we

that and assuming and this is where we

get<01:21:19.239> into<01:21:19.440> some<01:21:19.600> kind<01:21:19.719> of<01:21:19.920> paradox<01:21:20.840> assuming

get into some kind of paradox assuming

if<01:21:22.040> someone<01:21:22.360> lives<01:21:22.560> in<01:21:22.719> a<01:21:23.080> a<01:21:23.159> whole<01:21:23.400> life<01:21:23.600> where

if someone lives in a a whole life where

you<01:21:23.840> never<01:21:24.000> met<01:21:24.120> a<01:21:24.239> good<01:21:24.360> person<01:21:24.760> or<01:21:24.840> he<01:21:24.960> never

you never met a good person or he never

was<01:21:25.320> a<01:21:25.480> good

was a good

person<01:21:27.360> then<01:21:27.520> he<01:21:27.600> could<01:21:27.760> always<01:21:28.000> come<01:21:28.159> with

person then he could always come with

this<01:21:28.520> like<01:21:28.800> H<01:21:29.199> and<01:21:29.320> say<01:21:29.639> yeah<01:21:29.840> but<01:21:30.000> maybe<01:21:30.199> we

this like H and say yeah but maybe we

should<01:21:30.440> be<01:21:30.679> bad<01:21:30.920> people<01:21:31.440> yes

should be bad people yes

maybe<01:21:33.480> but<01:21:33.679> that<01:21:33.840> doesn’t<01:21:34.080> really<01:21:34.360> help<01:21:34.679> me

maybe but that doesn’t really help me

for<01:21:35.120> my<01:21:35.880> research<01:21:36.360> into<01:21:36.679> the<01:21:36.880> good<01:21:37.280> the<01:21:37.440> good

for my research into the good the good

people<01:21:38.400> for<01:21:38.600> which<01:21:38.760> I<01:21:38.840> have<01:21:38.960> to<01:21:39.040> start

people for which I have to start

studying<01:21:39.560> the<01:21:39.679> good<01:21:39.880> people<01:21:40.639> you<01:21:40.760> want<01:21:40.840> to

studying the good people you want to

also<01:21:41.080> study<01:21:41.320> the<01:21:41.440> bad<01:21:41.560> people<01:21:41.760> we’ll<01:21:41.880> study

also study the bad people we’ll study

also<01:21:42.280> the<01:21:42.400> bad<01:21:42.560> people<01:21:42.840> no<01:21:43.080> problem<01:21:43.880> but

also the bad people no problem but

you’re<01:21:44.920> missing

you’re missing

some<01:21:47.159> some<01:21:47.520> kind<01:21:47.760> of<01:21:48.280> uh<01:21:48.679> basis<01:21:48.960> for<01:21:49.120> where<01:21:49.280> to

some some kind of uh basis for where to

start<01:21:49.600> the

start the

discussion<01:21:51.639> and<01:21:51.920> if<01:21:52.239> after<01:21:52.639> you<01:21:52.800> know<01:21:53.120> taking

discussion and if after you know taking

all<01:21:53.560> this<01:21:53.679> into<01:21:53.920> account<01:21:54.120> we’ll<01:21:54.280> come<01:21:54.600> to<01:21:54.719> some

all this into account we’ll come to some

kind<01:21:54.960> of<01:21:55.120> conclusion<01:21:55.639> that<01:21:55.920> every<01:21:56.199> only<01:21:56.360> thing

kind of conclusion that every only thing

that<01:21:56.639> matters<01:21:56.920> is<01:21:57.159> power<01:21:58.040> no

that matters is power no

problem<01:22:00.120> but<01:22:00.280> that<01:22:00.360> will<01:22:00.520> also<01:22:00.679> have<01:22:00.800> to<01:22:00.880> be

problem but that will also have to be

start<01:22:01.320> from<01:22:01.520> some<01:22:01.679> kind<01:22:01.840> of<01:22:02.000> experience

right<01:22:12.400> so<01:22:12.600> this<01:22:12.679> is<01:22:12.840> how<01:22:12.960> we<01:22:13.040> end<01:22:13.239> up<01:22:13.360> in<01:22:13.520> this

right so this is how we end up in this

like<01:22:13.960> funny<01:22:14.360> Paradox<01:22:15.440> where<01:22:16.440> in<01:22:16.600> order<01:22:16.960> to

like funny Paradox where in order to

start<01:22:17.679> studying<01:22:18.120> ethics<01:22:18.440> need<01:22:18.600> to<01:22:18.679> already<01:22:18.880> be

start studying ethics need to already be

a<01:22:19.120> good

a good

person<01:22:20.840> or<01:22:21.120> at<01:22:21.280> least<01:22:21.679> know<01:22:21.960> about<01:22:22.239> good

person or at least know about good

people

it<01:22:26.360> doesn’t<01:22:26.600> say<01:22:26.760> they<01:22:26.920> have<01:22:27.120> to<01:22:28.040> it<01:22:28.360> doesn’t

it doesn’t say they have to it doesn’t

of<01:22:29.600> Life<01:22:29.920> yeah<01:22:30.080> I

of Life yeah I

agree<01:22:31.719> yeah<01:22:31.840> he<01:22:31.920> ends<01:22:32.120> up<01:22:32.239> saying<01:22:32.560> that<01:22:32.840> though

agree yeah he ends up saying that though

he<01:22:33.239> ends<01:22:33.440> up<01:22:33.600> saying<01:22:33.880> that<01:22:34.040> about<01:22:34.520> the<01:22:34.679> people

he ends up saying that about the people

and<01:22:35.120> the<01:22:35.280> next<01:22:35.600> and<01:22:35.719> the<01:22:35.840> next<01:22:36.639> and<01:22:36.800> the<01:22:36.920> next

and the next and the next and the next

thing<01:22:37.320> it<01:22:37.480> sort<01:22:37.679> of

thing it sort of

says

um<01:22:47.840> um<01:22:48.280> it<01:22:48.480> says<01:22:48.880> here<01:22:49.400> in<01:22:49.639> in<01:22:49.760> the<01:22:49.920> end<01:22:50.639> of

um um it says here in in the end of

uh<01:22:53.560> like<01:22:53.679> I<01:22:53.800> said<01:22:53.960> maybe<01:22:54.120> you’ll<01:22:54.239> find<01:22:54.679> why<01:22:54.800> the

uh like I said maybe you’ll find why the

bad<01:22:55.080> things<01:22:55.239> are<01:22:55.440> bad<01:22:56.400> but<01:22:56.719> to<01:22:56.840> find<01:22:56.960> out<01:22:57.120> why

bad things are bad but to find out why

the<01:22:57.320> good<01:22:57.440> things<01:22:57.560> are<01:22:57.719> good<01:22:57.840> you<01:22:57.960> have<01:22:58.040> to

the good things are good you have to

have<01:22:58.280> experience<01:22:58.600> with<01:22:58.719> the<01:22:58.880> good<01:22:59.520> of<01:22:59.679> the

have experience with the good of the

good

things<01:23:05.360> he<01:23:05.520> does<01:23:05.920> say

things he does say

ER<01:23:09.520> and<01:23:10.199> where<01:23:10.320> I<01:23:10.480> was<01:23:10.560> trying<01:23:10.800> to<01:23:10.880> get<01:23:11.040> to<01:23:11.239> over

ER and where I was trying to get to over

here

um<01:23:14.440> here<01:23:15.280> let’s<01:23:16.000> go<01:23:16.159> to<01:23:16.440> go<01:23:16.560> to<01:23:16.719> it<01:23:16.800> says<01:23:17.000> this

um here let’s go to go to it says this

explicitly<01:23:17.600> if<01:23:17.679> you<01:23:17.800> go<01:23:17.960> to<01:23:18.159> the<01:23:18.719> to<01:23:18.880> the<01:23:19.000> end

explicitly if you go to the to the end

of<01:23:19.400> this<01:23:19.800> SEC<01:23:20.360> second<01:23:20.679> chapter<01:23:21.040> on<01:23:21.480> on<01:23:21.880> second

of this SEC second chapter on on second

paragraph<01:23:22.520> on<01:23:22.600> the<01:23:22.679> second<01:23:22.920> bit<01:23:23.159> where

paragraph on the second bit where

there’s<01:23:23.480> like<01:23:23.560> a<01:23:23.679> three

there’s like a three

after<01:23:25.199> 1095b<01:23:26.000> it<01:23:26.080> says<01:23:26.360> per<01:23:27.040> this<01:23:27.120> is<01:23:27.320> why<01:23:27.480> one

after 1095b it says per this is why one

was<01:23:27.840> going<01:23:28.040> to<01:23:28.159> listen<01:23:28.440> adequately<01:23:28.880> to

was going to listen adequately to

discourse<01:23:29.480> about<01:23:29.679> things<01:23:29.840> that<01:23:29.960> are

discourse about things that are

beautiful<01:23:30.400> and<01:23:30.639> just<01:23:31.159> and<01:23:31.320> general<01:23:31.679> about

beautiful and just and general about

things<01:23:32.000> that<01:23:32.120> pertain<01:23:32.400> to<01:23:32.520> political<01:23:32.920> matters

things that pertain to political matters

need<01:23:34.000> to<01:23:34.120> have<01:23:34.280> been<01:23:34.480> beautifully<01:23:35.000> brought<01:23:35.360> up

need to have been beautifully brought up

beautifully<01:23:36.560> is<01:23:36.800> this<01:23:37.040> person<01:23:37.440> doing<01:23:37.679> a<01:23:37.760> very

beautifully is this person doing a very

little<01:23:38.120> translation<01:23:38.560> that<01:23:38.639> means<01:23:38.880> well

little translation that means well

brought<01:23:39.639> up<01:23:40.639> um<01:23:41.199> beautifully<01:23:41.639> in<01:23:41.719> the<01:23:41.840> moral

brought up um beautifully in the moral

sense<01:23:42.440> right<01:23:42.600> now<01:23:43.320> uh<01:23:43.400> by<01:23:43.520> means<01:23:43.760> of<01:23:43.960> habit<01:23:44.800> for

sense right now uh by means of habit for

the<01:23:45.199> primary<01:23:45.639> thing<01:23:45.840> is<01:23:45.960> that<01:23:46.120> something<01:23:46.400> is

the primary thing is that something is

so<01:23:47.239> that<01:23:47.480> primary<01:23:47.880> means<01:23:48.159> from<01:23:48.280> our<01:23:48.639> side<01:23:49.639> and

so that primary means from our side and

if<01:23:50.199> this<01:23:50.280> is<01:23:50.400> sufficiently<01:23:50.920> evident<01:23:51.400> there’s

if this is sufficiently evident there’s

no<01:23:52.280> additional<01:23:52.600> need<01:23:52.800> for<01:23:52.920> the<01:23:53.080> reason<01:23:53.480> why<01:23:54.280> or

no additional need for the reason why or

well<01:23:54.560> there<01:23:54.760> might<01:23:54.920> be<01:23:55.000> a<01:23:55.120> need<01:23:55.480> in<01:23:55.639> some

well there might be a need in some

scientific<01:23:56.320> sense<01:23:56.679> but<01:23:57.360> you<01:23:57.560> if<01:23:57.639> you<01:23:57.840> know<01:23:58.080> see

scientific sense but you if you know see

that<01:23:58.440> something<01:23:58.679> is<01:23:58.840> good<01:23:59.040> I<01:23:59.159> don’t<01:23:59.320> have<01:23:59.400> to

that something is good I don’t have to

prove<01:23:59.679> it<01:23:59.840> you<01:23:59.960> might<01:24:00.159> have<01:24:00.280> to<01:24:00.679> explain<01:24:01.120> why

prove it you might have to explain why

it’s<01:24:01.520> good<01:24:01.800> or<01:24:02.000> how<01:24:02.120> it<01:24:02.239> stands<01:24:02.520> in<01:24:02.639> proportion

it’s good or how it stands in proportion

to<01:24:03.080> other<01:24:03.199> things<01:24:03.360> that<01:24:03.440> are<01:24:03.600> good<01:24:03.760> and<01:24:03.880> so<01:24:04.040> on

to other things that are good and so on

but<01:24:06.080> if<01:24:06.280> someone<01:24:06.560> does<01:24:06.760> not<01:24:06.960> is<01:24:07.159> was<01:24:07.320> not<01:24:07.520> well

but if someone does not is was not well

brought<01:24:08.000> up<01:24:08.440> so<01:24:08.719> the<01:24:08.840> person<01:24:09.080> neither<01:24:09.480> has<01:24:09.800> or

brought up so the person neither has or

eily<01:24:10.400> gets<01:24:10.639> hold<01:24:10.920> of<01:24:11.120> the<01:24:11.239> things<01:24:11.480> that<01:24:11.600> come

eily gets hold of the things that come

first<01:24:13.360> and<01:24:13.480> if<01:24:13.600> one<01:24:13.800> neither<01:24:14.080> has<01:24:14.280> them<01:24:14.400> nor

first and if one neither has them nor

has<01:24:14.800> it<01:24:14.960> in<01:24:15.080> him<01:24:15.199> to<01:24:15.320> get<01:24:15.440> hold<01:24:15.600> of<01:24:15.719> them<01:24:15.960> either

has it in him to get hold of them either

you<01:24:16.239> have<01:24:16.360> to<01:24:16.600> be<01:24:16.800> good<01:24:17.120> already<01:24:17.360> have<01:24:17.560> good

you have to be good already have good

virtues<01:24:18.080> or<01:24:18.199> you<01:24:18.719> learn<01:24:19.080> them<01:24:19.480> or<01:24:19.719> at<01:24:19.840> least

virtues or you learn them or at least

listen<01:24:20.199> to<01:24:20.360> someone<01:24:20.679> else<01:24:20.920> that<01:24:21.080> has<01:24:21.280> them<01:24:21.520> and

listen to someone else that has them and

they<01:24:21.760> quote<01:24:22.040> s<01:24:22.480> saying<01:24:22.840> that<01:24:23.199> the<01:24:23.360> best<01:24:23.520> is

they quote s saying that the best is

someone<01:24:23.840> that<01:24:23.920> knows<01:24:24.120> things<01:24:24.679> but<01:24:24.840> the<01:24:24.960> second

someone that knows things but the second

to<01:24:25.520> best<01:24:26.239> is<01:24:26.440> someone<01:24:26.719> that<01:24:26.840> listens<01:24:27.120> to

to best is someone that listens to

people<01:24:27.520> that<01:24:27.840> know<01:24:28.199> or<01:24:28.360> that<01:24:28.480> have<01:24:28.679> good

people that know or that have good

education<01:24:31.400> um<01:24:32.400> so<01:24:32.560> you<01:24:32.679> end<01:24:32.920> up<01:24:33.159> sort<01:24:33.440> of<01:24:33.679> and

education um so you end up sort of and

this<01:24:33.960> is<01:24:34.239> actually<01:24:34.480> the<01:24:34.639> answer<01:24:34.880> for<01:24:35.159> why<01:24:35.679> it’s

this is actually the answer for why it’s

actually<01:24:36.120> very<01:24:36.320> legitimate<01:24:36.840> to<01:24:37.000> do<01:24:37.600> this

actually very legitimate to do this

manipulation<01:24:38.480> that<01:24:38.600> we<01:24:38.760> did<01:24:39.400> that<01:24:39.560> in<01:24:39.639> order

manipulation that we did that in order

to<01:24:40.000> become<01:24:40.159> a<01:24:40.280> good<01:24:40.480> person<01:24:40.719> you<01:24:40.800> need<01:24:40.960> to<01:24:41.080> sort

to become a good person you need to sort

of<01:24:41.600> be<01:24:41.840> good<01:24:42.040> be<01:24:42.239> well<01:24:42.400> educated<01:24:43.119> now<01:24:43.239> being

of be good be well educated now being

well<01:24:43.600> educated<01:24:44.040> of<01:24:44.159> course<01:24:44.400> does<01:24:44.639> include

well educated of course does include

some<01:24:45.159> instruction<01:24:45.800> it<01:24:45.920> does<01:24:46.199> me<01:24:46.400> include<01:24:46.679> me

some instruction it does me include me

telling<01:24:47.119> you<01:24:47.400> these<01:24:47.520> are<01:24:47.679> the<01:24:47.840> good<01:24:48.000> things

telling you these are the good things

but<01:24:48.880> I’m<01:24:49.040> not<01:24:49.159> telling<01:24:49.360> you<01:24:49.719> that<01:24:49.800> you<01:24:49.880> should

but I’m not telling you that you should

know<01:24:50.199> these<01:24:50.320> are<01:24:50.400> the<01:24:50.560> good<01:24:50.679> things<01:24:51.280> I’m

know these are the good things I’m

telling<01:24:51.639> you<01:24:51.760> in<01:24:51.880> order<01:24:52.080> for<01:24:52.199> you<01:24:52.320> to<01:24:53.119> gain

telling you in order for you to gain

beginnings

right<01:24:55.400> so<01:24:55.560> you<01:24:55.639> should<01:24:55.920> see<01:24:56.239> them<01:24:56.800> that<01:24:56.960> these

right so you should see them that these

are<01:24:57.239> the<01:24:57.360> good<01:24:57.560> things<01:24:58.159> and<01:24:58.360> then<01:24:58.679> in<01:24:58.840> some

are the good things and then in some

sense<01:24:59.239> it’s<01:24:59.440> evident<01:24:59.880> I<01:25:00.360> by<01:25:00.520> still<01:25:01.080> only<01:25:01.239> know

sense it’s evident I by still only know

the<01:25:01.600> effect<01:25:01.880> if<01:25:01.960> you<01:25:02.040> want<01:25:02.400> like<01:25:02.600> know<01:25:02.800> why

the effect if you want like know why

they’re<01:25:03.199> good<01:25:03.360> things<01:25:04.119> which<01:25:04.280> would<01:25:04.520> be<01:25:04.800> would

they’re good things which would be would

be<01:25:05.080> doing<01:25:05.360> philosophy<01:25:06.119> you<01:25:06.320> have<01:25:06.400> to<01:25:06.520> start

be doing philosophy you have to start

after<01:25:07.040> that<01:25:07.360> but<01:25:08.000> you’re<01:25:08.199> only<01:25:08.400> going<01:25:08.560> to

after that but you’re only going to

understand<01:25:09.159> it<01:25:09.679> if<01:25:09.840> you<01:25:09.960> were<01:25:10.639> uh<01:25:10.800> brought<01:25:11.080> up

understand it if you were uh brought up

well<01:25:13.080> or<01:25:13.320> if<01:25:13.639> in<01:25:13.840> these<01:25:14.080> case<01:25:14.360> calls<01:25:14.600> it<01:25:14.800> habits

well or if in these case calls it habits

if<01:25:15.560> if<01:25:15.639> you<01:25:15.760> have<01:25:16.480> right<01:25:16.719> not<01:25:16.920> by<01:25:17.080> knowledge

if if you have right not by knowledge

because<01:25:17.679> you<01:25:17.800> can’t<01:25:18.000> start<01:25:18.520> can’t<01:25:18.719> have<01:25:18.920> that

because you can’t start can’t have that

knowledge<01:25:20.199> before<01:25:20.440> you’re<01:25:20.679> good<01:25:21.320> but<01:25:21.440> you

knowledge before you’re good but you

have<01:25:21.639> to<01:25:21.800> first<01:25:22.239> be<01:25:22.920> good<01:25:23.920> and<01:25:24.080> then<01:25:24.679> you<01:25:24.840> might

have to first be good and then you might

say<01:25:25.239> then<01:25:25.360> if<01:25:25.480> I’m<01:25:25.600> already<01:25:25.840> good<01:25:26.000> and<01:25:26.119> why<01:25:26.280> I

say then if I’m already good and why I

need<01:25:26.560> proof<01:25:27.000> for<01:25:27.199> why<01:25:27.400> to<01:25:27.520> be<01:25:27.679> good<01:25:27.880> well<01:25:28.000> you

need proof for why to be good well you

don’t<01:25:28.920> this<01:25:29.040> is<01:25:29.159> all<01:25:29.360> another<01:25:29.639> way<01:25:29.760> of<01:25:29.880> saying

don’t this is all another way of saying

that<01:25:30.440> you<01:25:30.600> can’t<01:25:30.800> make<01:25:30.960> a<01:25:31.239> bad<01:25:31.560> person<01:25:31.880> good<01:25:32.080> by

that you can’t make a bad person good by

arguments<01:25:34.960> right<01:25:35.440> because<01:25:35.600> if<01:25:35.719> there<01:25:35.840> would

arguments right because if there would

be<01:25:36.119> a<01:25:36.280> way<01:25:36.719> and<01:25:36.840> this<01:25:36.960> is<01:25:37.159> if<01:25:37.280> there<01:25:37.400> would<01:25:37.560> be<01:25:37.639> a

be a way and this is if there would be a

way<01:25:37.920> to<01:25:38.199> prove<01:25:38.600> that<01:25:38.760> you<01:25:38.840> should<01:25:39.040> be<01:25:39.159> a<01:25:39.320> good

way to prove that you should be a good

person<01:25:40.679> then<01:25:40.840> you<01:25:40.920> would<01:25:41.040> have<01:25:41.159> been<01:25:41.280> able<01:25:41.480> to

person then you would have been able to

make<01:25:41.719> a<01:25:41.960> bad<01:25:42.199> person<01:25:42.520> good<01:25:42.760> by

make a bad person good by

arguments

right<01:25:47.520> and<01:25:47.600> you<01:25:47.719> remember<01:25:48.000> PL<01:25:48.800> was<01:25:49.000> very

right and you remember PL was very

worried<01:25:49.480> about<01:25:49.639> if<01:25:49.800> ethics<01:25:50.119> can<01:25:50.239> be<01:25:50.440> taught

worried about if ethics can be taught

and<01:25:50.920> so<01:25:51.080> on<01:25:51.600> but<01:25:51.719> it<01:25:51.840> seems<01:25:52.000> to<01:25:52.119> me<01:25:52.239> that<01:25:52.320> the

and so on but it seems to me that the

experience<01:25:52.840> is<01:25:53.000> for<01:25:53.199> sure<01:25:53.520> that<01:25:53.800> bad<01:25:54.000> people

experience is for sure that bad people

don’t<01:25:54.560> become<01:25:54.920> good<01:25:55.119> by<01:25:55.320> arguments<01:25:55.880> they

don’t become good by arguments they

become<01:25:56.320> good<01:25:56.480> by<01:25:56.639> just<01:25:56.800> becoming

become good by just becoming

good<01:26:00.000> you<01:26:00.159> can’t<01:26:00.400> reason<01:26:00.800> someone<01:26:01.040> into

good you can’t reason someone into

becoming<01:26:01.560> a<01:26:01.679> better

person<01:26:07.679> you<01:26:07.920> could<01:26:08.040> reason<01:26:08.320> someone<01:26:08.760> and<01:26:09.000> why

person you could reason someone and why

that<01:26:12.880> according<01:26:13.159> to<01:26:13.280> what<01:26:13.360> we’re<01:26:13.520> saying<01:26:13.800> here

that according to what we’re saying here

it’s<01:26:14.239> because<01:26:15.199> you<01:26:15.360> can’t<01:26:15.600> reason<01:26:15.920> someone

it’s because you can’t reason someone

into<01:26:16.480> seeing

into seeing

anything<01:26:20.119> you<01:26:20.239> could<01:26:20.400> reason<01:26:20.679> someone<01:26:21.000> into

anything you could reason someone into

why<01:26:22.000> explaining<01:26:22.480> why<01:26:22.679> things<01:26:22.840> aren<01:26:23.159> after

why explaining why things aren after

they<01:26:23.480> see<01:26:23.760> them

they see them

at<01:26:26.360> least<01:26:26.600> as<01:26:26.719> long<01:26:26.880> as<01:26:27.040> we<01:26:27.159> don’t<01:26:27.360> have<01:26:27.600> like

at least as long as we don’t have like

some<01:26:28.000> kind<01:26:28.320> of<01:26:29.320> uh<01:26:29.440> fundamental<01:26:29.920> SS<01:26:30.159> of<01:26:30.280> things

some kind of uh fundamental SS of things

maybe<01:26:30.760> even<01:26:30.960> after<01:26:31.199> in<01:26:31.320> other<01:26:31.440> words<01:26:31.639> maybe

maybe even after in other words maybe

there<01:26:31.960> is<01:26:32.080> such<01:26:32.280> a<01:26:32.520> such<01:26:32.679> an<01:26:32.920> ultimate<01:26:33.280> science

there is such a such an ultimate science

of<01:26:33.719> everything<01:26:34.639> but<01:26:35.000> I<01:26:35.159> can’t<01:26:35.440> teach<01:26:35.719> it

of everything but I can’t teach it

except<01:26:36.560> by<01:26:36.719> the<01:26:36.840> way<01:26:37.000> of<01:26:37.760> starting<01:26:38.199> from<01:26:38.360> the

botom<01:26:42.280> anyway<01:26:42.679> that’s<01:26:42.960> that’s<01:26:43.159> the<01:26:43.320> basic<01:26:44.600> uh

botom anyway that’s that’s the basic uh

this<01:26:45.719> is<01:26:45.880> also<01:26:46.159> why<01:26:46.320> we<01:26:46.440> should<01:26:46.679> listen<01:26:46.960> to

this is also why we should listen to

people’s<01:26:47.400> opinions<01:26:48.119> this<01:26:48.280> is<01:26:48.480> also

people’s opinions this is also

why<01:26:50.679> does<01:26:50.960> does<01:26:51.159> not<01:26:51.320> mean<01:26:51.600> what<01:26:51.719> I<01:26:51.880> said<01:26:52.520> the

why does does not mean what I said the

the<01:26:52.840> cartisian<01:26:53.199> meaning<01:26:53.679> of<01:26:53.800> it<01:26:53.920> it<01:26:54.000> doesn’t

the cartisian meaning of it it doesn’t

do<01:26:54.360> mean<01:26:54.679> just<01:26:54.920> accept<01:26:55.199> the<01:26:55.320> truth<01:26:55.679> without

do mean just accept the truth without

relation<01:26:56.280> it<01:26:56.360> means<01:26:56.560> listen<01:26:56.800> to<01:26:57.040> everyone<01:26:57.639> and

relation it means listen to everyone and

not<01:26:57.920> actually<01:26:58.159> to<01:26:58.320> everyone<01:26:58.760> though<01:26:59.320> the

not actually to everyone though the

people<01:26:59.840> that<01:27:00.040> you<01:27:00.199> deem<01:27:00.440> worthy<01:27:00.679> of<01:27:00.800> listening

people that you deem worthy of listening

again<01:27:01.600> because<01:27:01.719> you<01:27:01.800> have<01:27:01.880> to<01:27:01.960> start

again because you have to start

somewhere<01:27:03.239> but<01:27:03.360> you<01:27:03.440> should<01:27:03.639> listen<01:27:03.880> to<01:27:04.080> them

somewhere but you should listen to them

and<01:27:05.199> that<01:27:05.400> might<01:27:05.679> lead<01:27:05.920> you<01:27:06.560> somewhere<01:27:07.560> of

and that might lead you somewhere of

course<01:27:07.800> we<01:27:07.920> have<01:27:08.000> to<01:27:08.080> figure<01:27:08.280> out<01:27:08.520> what<01:27:08.639> the

course we have to figure out what the

steps<01:27:09.000> are<01:27:09.159> to<01:27:09.360> like<01:27:09.520> make<01:27:09.679> things<01:27:09.920> better<01:27:10.280> to

steps are to like make things better to

to<01:27:11.000> remove<01:27:11.400> mistakes<01:27:11.800> and<01:27:11.960> so<01:27:12.080> on<01:27:12.360> but<01:27:13.040> you

to remove mistakes and so on but you

should<01:27:13.440> listen<01:27:13.679> to<01:27:13.880> people<01:27:14.280> not<01:27:14.440> you

should listen to people not you

shouldn’t<01:27:14.760> listen<01:27:14.960> to

shouldn’t listen to

anyone<01:27:17.719> just<01:27:17.920> like<01:27:18.119> the<01:27:18.280> famous<01:27:18.600> quote<01:27:18.920> from

anyone just like the famous quote from

later<01:27:19.639> in<01:27:19.800> this<01:27:20.000> book

later in this book

says<01:27:22.239> we<01:27:22.600> Plato<01:27:22.920> is<01:27:23.040> our<01:27:23.239> friend<01:27:23.520> but<01:27:23.639> we<01:27:23.760> love

says we Plato is our friend but we love

truth<01:27:24.600> more<01:27:24.800> than

truth more than

Plato<01:27:26.639> that’s<01:27:26.760> why<01:27:26.920> we<01:27:27.000> don’t<01:27:27.159> believe<01:27:27.520> in<01:27:27.679> the

Plato that’s why we don’t believe in the

forms<01:27:28.800> or<01:27:28.960> the<01:27:29.080> form<01:27:29.320> of<01:27:29.440> the<01:27:29.800> good<01:27:30.800> um<01:27:31.719> and

forms or the form of the good um and

that<01:27:32.000> doesn’t<01:27:32.440> say<01:27:33.360> we<01:27:33.520> don’t<01:27:33.719> like<01:27:33.920> play<01:27:34.320> at

that doesn’t say we don’t like play at

all<01:27:34.520> we<01:27:34.639> only<01:27:34.840> like<01:27:35.000> the

truth<01:27:38.239> of<01:27:38.360> course<01:27:38.600> we<01:27:38.719> do<01:27:38.960> and<01:27:39.199> it’s<01:27:39.400> actually

truth of course we do and it’s actually

correct<01:27:40.719> to<01:27:40.920> listen<01:27:41.239> to<01:27:41.400> the<01:27:41.560> opinions<01:27:41.920> of<01:27:42.040> the

correct to listen to the opinions of the

smart<01:27:42.520> people<01:27:43.159> and<01:27:43.280> they’re<01:27:43.480> usually<01:27:43.760> more

smart people and they’re usually more

correct<01:27:44.280> than<01:27:44.520> other

correct than other

people<01:27:46.639> that’s<01:27:46.800> just<01:27:46.920> a<01:27:47.040> bias<01:27:47.360> that<01:27:47.440> you

people that’s just a bias that you

should<01:27:47.719> have<01:27:47.920> not<01:27:48.080> a<01:27:48.520> way<01:27:48.679> of

should have not a way of

truth<01:27:50.520> if<01:27:50.639> you<01:27:50.800> figure<01:27:51.040> out<01:27:51.199> that<01:27:51.480> you<01:27:51.560> have<01:27:51.639> a

truth if you figure out that you have a

good<01:27:51.960> question<01:27:52.360> then<01:27:52.679> say<01:27:53.159> ask<01:27:53.400> a<01:27:53.520> good

good question then say ask a good

question<01:27:54.239> no<01:27:54.719> problem<01:27:55.719> but<01:27:55.920> you<01:27:56.080> can’t

question no problem but you can’t

start<01:27:58.480> for<01:27:58.560> sure<01:27:58.760> not<01:27:58.880> for<01:27:59.040> this<01:27:59.199> kind<01:27:59.360> of

start for sure not for this kind of

subject<01:27:59.840> he<01:27:59.960> doesn’t<01:28:00.159> believe<01:28:00.400> that<01:28:00.520> you<01:28:00.600> can

subject he doesn’t believe that you can

start<01:28:01.199> from<01:28:01.639> from<01:28:01.800> some<01:28:01.960> kind<01:28:02.119> of

start from from some kind of

zero<01:28:04.000> uh<01:28:04.159> or<01:28:04.320> something<01:28:04.600> like

zero uh or something like

that<01:28:07.440> anyway<01:28:07.800> that’s<01:28:08.080> that’s<01:28:08.320> my<01:28:08.560> delution

that anyway that’s that’s my delution

for<01:28:09.520> today<01:28:10.520> more<01:28:10.719> or<01:28:10.920> less

English, Shmone Prakim Preface - English, Youtube, בית המדרש עיון למחשבה, סוגיות, שמונה פרקים

וּכְשֵׁם שֶׁאֲנִי

Rambam telling us his sources and concealing them

Contents

Transcript