Either it’s a chidush and a lie or it’s not a chidush and old – either way you don’t get credit.

Either it's a chidush and a lie or it's not a chidush and old – either way you don't get credit.

Matching Campaign Link

https://thechesedfund.com/orhasechelinc/tora84/teams/rabbilowy

Please support our beis medrash

https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=SMGXBETTK3Z94

make a monthly membership

https://yitzchoklowy.com/membership-account/membership-levels/

Transcript

Official transcript:

Kind: captions

Language: en

we’re<00:00:00.240> going<00:00:00.359> to<00:00:00.440> start<00:00:00.640> a<00:00:00.839> sheet<00:00:01.839> point<00:00:02.040> is

we’re going to start a sheet point is

that<00:00:02.280> this<00:00:02.399> is<00:00:02.520> the<00:00:02.639> only<00:00:02.840> sheet<00:00:03.480> of<00:00:03.600> its<00:00:03.879> kind

that this is the only sheet of its kind

that<00:00:04.560> exists<00:00:04.880> in<00:00:05.000> the<00:00:05.520> universe<00:00:06.520> like<00:00:06.720> Dam

that exists in the universe like Dam

says<00:00:07.399> there’s<00:00:07.759> not<00:00:08.000> a<00:00:08.240> kind<00:00:09.080> it’s<00:00:09.360> a<00:00:10.160> an

says there’s not a kind it’s a an

individual<00:00:10.920> although<00:00:11.200> it’s<00:00:11.280> a<00:00:11.440> whole<00:00:11.679> kind

individual although it’s a whole kind

not<00:00:12.840> like<00:00:13.000> one<00:00:13.200> out<00:00:13.320> of<00:00:13.440> a

not like one out of a

group<00:00:15.280> it’s<00:00:15.480> making<00:00:15.759> a<00:00:15.839> new<00:00:16.039> kind<00:00:16.199> of<00:00:16.320> group<00:00:17.039> is

group it’s making a new kind of group is

going<00:00:17.240> to<00:00:17.279> be<00:00:17.320> a<00:00:17.400> lot<00:00:17.560> of<00:00:17.680> this<00:00:17.840> group<00:00:18.119> really

going to be a lot of this group really

my<00:00:18.560> goal<00:00:18.720> is<00:00:18.840> not<00:00:19.039> to<00:00:19.240> be<00:00:19.480> staying<00:00:19.920> here<00:00:20.720> but

my goal is not to be staying here but

it’s<00:00:21.240> like<00:00:21.960> aiming<00:00:22.279> at<00:00:22.439> doing<00:00:22.680> a<00:00:22.840> new<00:00:23.119> kind<00:00:23.320> of

it’s like aiming at doing a new kind of

thing<00:00:24.560> not<00:00:24.760> another<00:00:25.039> one<00:00:25.240> of<00:00:25.560> some<00:00:25.760> other

thing not another one of some other

thing<00:00:26.920> but<00:00:27.080> until<00:00:27.560> people<00:00:27.800> realize<00:00:28.279> that

thing but until people realize that

we’re<00:00:28.679> using<00:00:29.039> the<00:00:29.199> Frameworks<00:00:29.720> of<00:00:30.080> other

we’re using the Frameworks of other

kinds<00:00:30.560> of<00:00:30.800> things<00:00:31.599> so<00:00:31.840> to<00:00:32.079> get<00:00:32.239> people<00:00:32.520> closer

kinds of things so to get people closer

it<00:00:35.000> make

it make

sense<00:00:37.840> all<00:00:38.000> of<00:00:38.120> you<00:00:38.200> will<00:00:38.360> do<00:00:38.480> your<00:00:38.640> own

sense all of you will do your own

classes<00:00:39.360> and<00:00:39.600> then<00:00:40.480> I<00:00:40.559> won’t<00:00:40.800> have<00:00:40.920> to<00:00:41.000> do<00:00:41.160> my

classes and then I won’t have to do my

own

anymore<00:00:45.600> I<00:00:45.719> mean<00:00:45.960> while<00:00:46.199> everyone<00:00:46.480> should

anymore I mean while everyone should

should<00:00:47.000> pay<00:00:47.160> for<00:00:47.320> it<00:00:47.680> so<00:00:48.160> otherwise<00:00:48.600> it’s

should pay for it so otherwise it’s

going<00:00:49.480> to<00:00:49.680> crash<00:00:50.120> and<00:00:50.640> burn<00:00:51.640> out<00:00:51.800> of<00:00:52.000> low

going to crash and burn out of low

fuel<00:00:54.760> and<00:00:54.920> there’s<00:00:55.079> a<00:00:55.239> link<00:00:55.520> you’ll<00:00:55.719> get<00:00:55.840> a

fuel and there’s a link you’ll get a

link<00:00:56.480> to<00:00:56.719> do<00:00:57.039> that<00:00:58.039> okay<00:00:58.280> now<00:00:58.719> we’re<00:00:58.879> doing<00:00:59.199> the

link to do that okay now we’re doing the

ra<00:00:59.760> like<00:01:00.079> always

ra like always

do<00:01:02.680> ra<00:01:03.399> we<00:01:03.519> talked<00:01:03.800> last<00:01:04.000> week<00:01:04.239> about

do ra we talked last week about

the<00:01:07.040> idea<00:01:07.479> of<00:01:07.720> why<00:01:07.960> we<00:01:08.119> have<00:01:08.240> to

the idea of why we have to

do<00:01:10.759> which<00:01:10.920> is<00:01:11.200> in<00:01:11.280> order<00:01:11.520> to<00:01:11.640> become<00:01:11.799> Ai<00:01:12.479> and<00:01:12.560> to

do which is in order to become Ai and to

become<00:01:12.880> a<00:01:13.240> you<00:01:13.320> have<00:01:13.400> to<00:01:13.520> become

become a you have to become

and<00:01:17.400> includes<00:01:17.920> at<00:01:18.240> least<00:01:19.240> also<00:01:19.560> something

and includes at least also something

called

Mal<00:01:22.200> the<00:01:22.479> virtues

Mal the virtues

of<00:01:25.920> how<00:01:26.040> do<00:01:26.119> you<00:01:26.200> say<00:01:26.400> mid<00:01:26.720> in<00:01:26.880> English<00:01:27.400> the

of how do you say mid in English the

virtues<00:01:27.799> of<00:01:27.960> Virtues<00:01:28.320> or<00:01:28.560> the<00:01:28.840> the<00:01:29.240> excellent

virtues of Virtues or the the excellent

virt

virtues<00:01:32.119> but<00:01:32.280> this<00:01:32.360> is<00:01:32.479> a<00:01:32.799> weird<00:01:33.079> word<00:01:33.280> that

virtues but this is a weird word that

nobody<00:01:33.640> knows<00:01:33.840> what<00:01:33.960> it<00:01:34.040> means<00:01:34.439> maybe<00:01:34.640> we’ll

nobody knows what it means maybe we’ll

find<00:01:35.000> out<00:01:35.159> at<00:01:35.280> one

find out at one

point<00:01:38.439> measurements<00:01:39.439> measurements<00:01:40.240> yeah

point measurements measurements yeah

great<00:01:41.920> that

helps<00:01:47.399> he’s<00:01:47.560> going<00:01:47.680> to<00:01:47.799> explain<00:01:48.079> it<00:01:48.200> he’s

helps he’s going to explain it he’s

going<00:01:48.439> to<00:01:48.560> explain<00:01:48.840> he’s<00:01:48.960> going<00:01:49.079> to<00:01:49.159> be

going to explain he’s going to be

explicit<00:01:49.680> about<00:01:49.840> it<00:01:50.040> later<00:01:50.360> so<00:01:50.600> we<00:01:50.680> don’t<00:01:50.840> have

explicit about it later so we don’t have

to<00:01:51.079> make<00:01:51.200> up<00:01:51.360> our<00:01:51.479> own

to make up our own

stuff<00:01:53.759> but<00:01:53.960> what<00:01:54.040> it<00:01:54.119> means<00:01:54.719> is<00:01:55.719> we<00:01:55.880> discussed

stuff but what it means is we discussed

this<00:01:56.439> once<00:01:56.680> in<00:01:56.960> in<00:01:57.200> in<00:01:57.280> a<00:01:57.479> different<00:01:58.079> class

this once in in in a different class

about<00:01:59.280> three

about three

right<00:02:01.759> m<00:02:02.039> is<00:02:02.159> what<00:02:02.240> he<00:02:02.360> discusses<00:02:03.039> in<00:02:04.039> more<00:02:04.159> or

less<00:02:09.399> in<00:02:09.560> words<00:02:09.959> yes<00:02:10.239> but<00:02:10.560> in

less in words yes but in

claim<00:02:13.160> can<00:02:13.360> mean<00:02:13.720> something<00:02:14.040> like<00:02:14.319> kinds<00:02:14.680> of

claim can mean something like kinds of

people<00:02:15.360> or<00:02:15.599> different<00:02:16.480> ways<00:02:16.720> in<00:02:16.879> which<00:02:17.040> people

are<00:02:22.800> yeah<00:02:22.959> it’s<00:02:23.760> with<00:02:24.720> maybe<00:02:24.879> there’s<00:02:25.040> a<00:02:25.640> but

are yeah it’s with maybe there’s a but

not<00:02:26.840> I<00:02:26.920> don’t<00:02:27.120> think<00:02:27.239> it’s<00:02:27.440> important<00:02:27.720> to

not I don’t think it’s important to

really<00:02:28.560> not<00:02:28.680> for<00:02:28.879> this<00:02:29.040> maybe<00:02:29.239> for<00:02:30.160> but<00:02:30.319> for

really not for this maybe for but for

for<00:02:31.080> when<00:02:31.200> we<00:02:31.319> talk<00:02:31.480> about<00:02:31.680> M<00:02:32.080> here<00:02:32.200> it<00:02:32.319> doesn’t

for when we talk about M here it doesn’t

we<00:02:32.720> don’t<00:02:32.879> have<00:02:33.000> to<00:02:33.080> I<00:02:33.160> don’t<00:02:33.319> think<00:02:33.440> you<00:02:33.519> have

we don’t have to I don’t think you have

to<00:02:33.760> think<00:02:33.879> about<00:02:34.879> like<00:02:35.000> that<00:02:35.120> has<00:02:35.239> the

to think about like that has the

measurements<00:02:36.040> of<00:02:37.040> that’s<00:02:37.160> a<00:02:37.280> different<00:02:37.560> kind

measurements of that’s a different kind

like<00:02:41.599> it’s<00:02:41.879> skills<00:02:42.360> that<00:02:42.480> are<00:02:42.760> automatically

like it’s skills that are automatically

prompted<00:02:44.120> into<00:02:45.080> into<00:02:45.360> being<00:02:45.599> by<00:02:45.800> certain

prompted into into being by certain

situations<00:02:46.959> right<00:02:47.360> yeah<00:02:47.480> we’ll<00:02:47.680> get<00:02:47.800> to<00:02:48.000> that

situations right yeah we’ll get to that

but<00:02:48.680> uh<00:02:48.840> I’m<00:02:48.959> saying<00:02:49.200> it’s<00:02:49.360> nothing<00:02:49.560> to<00:02:49.680> do

but uh I’m saying it’s nothing to do

with<00:02:49.920> Midas<00:02:50.239> in<00:02:50.360> the<00:02:50.440> sense<00:02:50.920> of<00:02:51.920> like<00:02:52.080> mid<00:02:52.680> in

with Midas in the sense of like mid in

in<00:02:53.800> the<00:02:54.560> means

in the means

measurement<00:02:57.720> and<00:02:57.879> so<00:02:58.000> on<00:02:58.920> I<00:02:59.000> don’t<00:02:59.200> think<00:02:59.360> it

measurement and so on I don’t think it

has<00:02:59.560> much<00:02:59.879> to<00:03:00.000> do<00:03:00.120> with<00:03:00.360> that<00:03:00.840> maybe<00:03:01.040> it<00:03:01.159> comes

has much to do with that maybe it comes

from<00:03:01.599> that<00:03:01.920> it’s<00:03:02.159> really<00:03:02.319> a<00:03:02.519> word<00:03:03.000> a<00:03:03.159> word<00:03:03.640> that

from that it’s really a word a word that

the<00:03:04.680> um<00:03:05.680> made<00:03:05.879> up<00:03:06.120> more<00:03:06.239> or<00:03:06.400> less<00:03:06.840> K<00:03:07.159> it<00:03:07.239> doesn’t

the um made up more or less K it doesn’t

really<00:03:07.680> meanness<00:03:08.200> maybe<00:03:08.440> once<00:03:08.640> or<00:03:08.799> twice<00:03:09.599> that

really meanness maybe once or twice that

Mom<00:03:09.959> claims<00:03:10.239> it<00:03:10.360> does<00:03:10.640> I<00:03:10.720> don’t<00:03:10.840> know<00:03:11.000> if<00:03:11.080> it’s

Mom claims it does I don’t know if it’s

true<00:03:12.360> but<00:03:12.640> it’s<00:03:12.879> really<00:03:13.120> a<00:03:13.280> word<00:03:13.560> from<00:03:14.519> that

true but it’s really a word from that

was<00:03:15.000> the<00:03:15.200> sort<00:03:15.440> of<00:03:16.000> came<00:03:16.239> to<00:03:16.360> have<00:03:16.519> this

was the sort of came to have this

meaning<00:03:19.000> somewhere<00:03:19.360> in<00:03:19.560> this<00:03:19.920> in<00:03:20.080> this

meaning somewhere in this in this

area<00:03:22.319> of<00:03:22.440> course<00:03:22.599> the<00:03:22.760> zor<00:03:23.000> uses<00:03:23.239> it<00:03:23.920> for

area of course the zor uses it for

something<00:03:24.519> similar<00:03:25.080> but

something similar but

anyways<00:03:27.760> um

okay<00:03:31.159> that’s<00:03:31.439> that’s<00:03:31.680> but<00:03:32.080> we’re<00:03:32.200> going<00:03:32.280> to

okay that’s that’s but we’re going to

get<00:03:32.519> to<00:03:32.680> this<00:03:33.000> to<00:03:33.200> explain<00:03:33.519> but<00:03:33.640> the<00:03:33.840> point<00:03:34.040> is

get to this to explain but the point is

is<00:03:35.080> mostly<00:03:35.360> about<00:03:35.599> these<00:03:35.760> kinds<00:03:35.959> of<00:03:36.120> things

is mostly about these kinds of things

and<00:03:36.560> these<00:03:36.680> kind<00:03:36.840> of<00:03:36.959> things<00:03:37.080> are<00:03:37.280> important

and these kind of things are important

for<00:03:38.400> being<00:03:38.640> a<00:03:38.760> perfect<00:03:39.040> human<00:03:39.280> being<00:03:39.519> which<00:03:39.599> is

for being a perfect human being which is

another<00:03:39.920> word<00:03:40.080> of<00:03:40.239> saying<00:03:40.519> being<00:03:40.760> a<00:03:41.000> noi<00:03:42.000> and

another word of saying being a noi and

therefore<00:03:42.439> you<00:03:42.560> have<00:03:42.640> to<00:03:42.720> Lear<00:03:43.519> okay<00:03:43.680> so<00:03:43.840> we’re

therefore you have to Lear okay so we’re

going<00:03:44.080> to<00:03:44.200> get<00:03:44.319> to<00:03:44.439> this<00:03:44.599> to<00:03:44.760> all<00:03:44.840> of<00:03:44.959> this<00:03:45.120> now

going to get to this to all of this now

I’m<00:03:45.480> up<00:03:45.599> to<00:03:45.680> the<00:03:45.840> third<00:03:46.080> chap<00:03:46.360> the<00:03:46.519> third<00:03:46.920> uh

I’m up to the third chap the third uh

paragraph<00:03:47.720> okay<00:03:48.400> it<00:03:48.519> says<00:03:48.799> like<00:03:49.000> this<00:03:49.400> I<00:03:49.560> need

paragraph okay it says like this I need

to<00:03:50.560> this<00:03:50.840> is<00:03:51.840> saying<00:03:52.079> something<00:03:52.280> that<00:03:52.400> we

to this is saying something that we

already<00:03:52.840> explained<00:03:53.239> I<00:03:53.360> think<00:03:53.519> in<00:03:53.680> the

already explained I think in the

paragraphs<00:03:56.120> I’m<00:03:56.239> going<00:03:56.400> to<00:03:56.799> preface<00:03:57.519> before<00:03:57.760> I

paragraphs I’m going to preface before I

start<00:03:58.280> finish

start finish

okay<00:04:01.439> each<00:04:02.360> a<00:04:02.439> lot<00:04:02.519> of<00:04:02.959> in<00:04:03.079> each<00:04:03.920> he<00:04:04.040> doesn’t

okay each a lot of in each he doesn’t

call<00:04:04.360> it<00:04:04.480> m<00:04:04.879> calls

call it m calls

it<00:04:07.239> um<00:04:08.239> before<00:04:08.480> I<00:04:08.599> explain<00:04:09.040> each<00:04:10.040> I<00:04:10.079> will<00:04:10.280> give

it um before I explain each I will give

you

useful<00:04:13.079> good

useful good

chapters<00:04:15.239> and<00:04:15.360> from<00:04:15.599> them<00:04:15.840> you<00:04:15.959> will<00:04:16.120> achieve

chapters and from them you will achieve

you<00:04:16.479> will<00:04:16.959> understand<00:04:17.239> some<00:04:18.239> some<00:04:18.759> basic

you will understand some some basic

thoughts<00:04:20.600> some<00:04:21.600> general

concepts<00:04:25.560> this<00:04:25.639> is<00:04:25.759> what<00:04:25.880> we<00:04:26.040> explained<00:04:26.479> that

concepts this is what we explained that

this<00:04:26.919> this<00:04:27.680> is<00:04:27.880> not<00:04:28.120> about<00:04:29.120> giving<00:04:29.320> you

this this is not about giving you

specific<00:04:29.720> specific<00:04:30.039> explanations<00:04:30.479> of

specific specific explanations of

specific<00:04:31.400> mishna<00:04:32.400> it’s<00:04:32.560> more<00:04:32.759> of<00:04:32.960> giving<00:04:33.240> you

specific mishna it’s more of giving you

General<00:04:34.800> uh<00:04:35.000> rules<00:04:35.400> or<00:04:35.560> general<00:04:35.960> under<00:04:36.600> wise

General uh rules or general under wise

right<00:04:37.360> or

right or

framework<00:04:39.440> right<00:04:39.800> like

framework right like

Callas<00:04:41.800> which<00:04:42.199> then<00:04:42.600> he<00:04:42.680> says<00:04:42.960> like<00:04:43.039> a<00:04:43.639> meaning

Callas which then he says like a meaning

to<00:04:44.080> say<00:04:44.639> like<00:04:44.759> if<00:04:44.880> I<00:04:45.000> tell<00:04:45.199> you<00:04:45.880> which<00:04:46.000> is<00:04:46.120> going

to say like if I tell you which is going

to<00:04:46.360> do<00:04:46.560> for<00:04:46.720> example<00:04:46.960> if<00:04:47.039> I<00:04:47.160> tell<00:04:47.280> you<00:04:47.400> there’s

to do for example if I tell you there’s

two<00:04:47.800> kinds<00:04:48.000> of<00:04:48.160> malice<00:04:48.560> there’s<00:04:48.720> two<00:04:48.880> kinds<00:04:49.080> of

two kinds of malice there’s two kinds of

Perfections<00:04:50.160> there’s<00:04:50.960> medis

Perfections there’s medis

Perfections<00:04:53.000> and<00:04:53.199> there<00:04:53.400> is<00:04:54.400> C<00:04:55.080> intellectual

Perfections and there is C intellectual

Perfections<00:04:56.120> these<00:04:56.240> are<00:04:56.360> two<00:04:56.479> kinds<00:04:56.680> of

Perfections these are two kinds of

Perfections<00:04:57.280> for<00:04:57.440> example<00:04:58.240> so<00:04:58.520> now<00:04:59.120> when<00:04:59.240> it

Perfections for example so now when it

comes<00:04:59.520> to<00:04:59.720> so<00:05:00.320> which

says<00:05:04.479> I’ll<00:05:04.639> tell<00:05:04.800> you<00:05:05.039> thats<00:05:05.520> means<00:05:05.880> truth<00:05:06.520> so

says I’ll tell you thats means truth so

theal<00:05:07.600> Perfection<00:05:08.000> and<00:05:08.520> is<00:05:09.000> something<00:05:09.280> that

theal Perfection and is something that

includes<00:05:09.800> all<00:05:10.000> kinds<00:05:10.240> of<00:05:10.919> virtue<00:05:11.360> Perfection

includes all kinds of virtue Perfection

so<00:05:12.199> now<00:05:12.320> you<00:05:12.639> understand<00:05:12.800> what<00:05:12.880> I’m<00:05:13.039> talking

so now you understand what I’m talking

about<00:05:13.479> and<00:05:13.800> in<00:05:14.759> he’s<00:05:14.880> going<00:05:14.960> to<00:05:15.080> explain<00:05:15.759> what

about and in he’s going to explain what

it<00:05:15.960> means<00:05:16.160> to<00:05:16.280> have<00:05:16.440> these<00:05:16.560> kinds<00:05:16.759> of<00:05:16.960> malice

it means to have these kinds of malice

for<00:05:17.479> example<00:05:17.759> so<00:05:17.919> that’s<00:05:18.240> an<00:05:18.400> example<00:05:18.759> of

for example so that’s an example of

giving<00:05:19.560> you<00:05:19.720> the<00:05:19.880> like<00:05:20.080> general<00:05:20.400> rules<00:05:20.639> and

giving you the like general rules and

then<00:05:20.919> he<00:05:21.039> just<00:05:21.199> has<00:05:21.319> to<00:05:21.440> put<00:05:21.560> it<00:05:21.680> into

then he just has to put it into

different<00:05:22.520> it’s<00:05:22.639> like<00:05:22.720> a<00:05:23.199> in<00:05:23.280> the<00:05:23.360> sense<00:05:23.520> of<00:05:23.600> a

different it’s like a in the sense of a

key<00:05:24.360> he<00:05:24.479> likes<00:05:24.720> this<00:05:24.840> metaphor<00:05:25.199> of<00:05:25.319> a<00:05:25.440> key<00:05:25.639> and

key he likes this metaphor of a key and

or<00:05:26.039> a<00:05:26.199> door<00:05:26.400> in<00:05:26.560> different<00:05:26.840> places<00:05:27.120> if<00:05:27.199> I<00:05:27.360> give

or a door in different places if I give

you<00:05:27.560> a<00:05:27.720> key<00:05:28.479> then<00:05:29.280> they<00:05:29.440> could<00:05:29.720> open<00:05:29.880> every

you a key then they could open every

door<00:05:30.280> like<00:05:30.400> a<00:05:30.520> key<00:05:30.680> of<00:05:30.800> a<00:05:30.960> code<00:05:31.319> right<00:05:32.160> a<00:05:32.400> means

door like a key of a code right a means

b<00:05:32.919> b<00:05:33.080> means<00:05:33.319> c<00:05:33.520> and<00:05:33.680> d<00:05:33.880> means<00:05:34.479> e<00:05:34.720> and<00:05:35.000> and<00:05:35.160> so<00:05:35.319> on

b b means c and d means e and and so on

so<00:05:36.080> I<00:05:36.199> just<00:05:36.319> need<00:05:36.440> to<00:05:36.560> give<00:05:36.680> you<00:05:36.800> the<00:05:37.280> key<00:05:38.280> and

so I just need to give you the key and

then<00:05:38.520> you<00:05:38.680> could<00:05:38.919> solve<00:05:39.400> all<00:05:39.520> the<00:05:39.680> crills<00:05:40.240> that

then you could solve all the crills that

are<00:05:40.800> solved<00:05:41.199> by<00:05:41.319> this<00:05:41.440> key<00:05:41.639> or<00:05:41.919> all<00:05:42.039> the<00:05:42.160> doors

are solved by this key or all the doors

you<00:05:42.600> could<00:05:42.800> open<00:05:43.039> all<00:05:43.160> the<00:05:43.280> doors<00:05:43.479> that<00:05:43.600> are

you could open all the doors that are

open<00:05:44.160> by<00:05:44.319> this<00:05:44.440> key<00:05:44.680> but<00:05:44.759> if<00:05:44.840> you<00:05:44.919> don’t<00:05:45.039> have

open by this key but if you don’t have

the<00:05:45.319> key<00:05:45.479> then<00:05:45.600> it’s<00:05:45.800> all<00:05:46.360> Clos<00:05:46.680> to<00:05:46.800> you<00:05:46.919> so

the key then it’s all Clos to you so

this<00:05:47.120> is<00:05:47.199> the<00:05:47.360> kind<00:05:47.520> of<00:05:47.880> opening<00:05:48.880> that<00:05:49.080> Ram<00:05:49.560> is

this is the kind of opening that Ram is

trying<00:05:49.840> to<00:05:50.000> do<00:05:50.919> like<00:05:51.120> we<00:05:51.240> explained<00:05:51.639> I<00:05:51.720> think

trying to do like we explained I think

this<00:05:52.080> already<00:05:52.440> right<00:05:52.560> if<00:05:52.639> you<00:05:52.759> have<00:05:53.120> to<00:05:53.240> do

this already right if you have to do

this<00:05:53.440> just<00:05:53.840> for<00:05:54.120> for<00:05:54.639> he’s<00:05:54.759> trying<00:05:54.919> to<00:05:55.039> do<00:05:55.199> this

this just for for he’s trying to do this

for<00:05:55.919> trying<00:05:56.039> to<00:05:56.120> do<00:05:56.240> this<00:05:56.360> for<00:05:56.759> life<00:05:57.759> he<00:05:57.919> does

for trying to do this for life he does

this<00:05:58.199> with<00:05:58.319> the<00:05:58.479> T<00:05:58.840> the<00:05:59.039> first<00:05:59.400> first<00:05:59.680> part<00:05:59.800> of

this with the T the first first part of

is<00:06:00.680> basically<00:06:01.039> doing<00:06:01.400> this<00:06:01.720> in<00:06:01.800> a<00:06:02.000> very

is basically doing this in a very

explicit<00:06:03.199> way<00:06:04.000> other<00:06:04.199> parts<00:06:04.800> but<00:06:04.919> this<00:06:05.039> is<00:06:05.240> a

explicit way other parts but this is a

it’s<00:06:05.520> an<00:06:05.680> important<00:06:06.039> thing<00:06:06.199> to

it’s an important thing to

realize<00:06:08.440> okay<00:06:08.680> now<00:06:08.919> there<00:06:09.120> not<00:06:09.400> that’s<00:06:09.560> one

realize okay now there not that’s one

thing<00:06:09.919> now<00:06:10.280> now<00:06:10.400> there’s<00:06:10.520> a<00:06:10.639> very<00:06:10.840> important

thing now now there’s a very important

uh<00:06:12.520> a<00:06:12.680> very<00:06:12.840> important<00:06:13.319> I<00:06:13.360> don’t<00:06:13.520> know<00:06:13.680> why

uh a very important I don’t know why

this<00:06:14.039> person<00:06:14.360> he<00:06:14.479> should<00:06:14.639> have<00:06:15.199> stopped<00:06:15.599> the

this person he should have stopped the

sh<00:06:15.960> paragraph<00:06:16.400> here<00:06:16.560> because<00:06:16.720> there<00:06:16.960> nothing

sh paragraph here because there nothing

to<00:06:17.280> do<00:06:17.400> with<00:06:17.520> the<00:06:17.639> previous<00:06:18.000> line<00:06:18.800> that<00:06:19.120> now

to do with the previous line that now

know<00:06:19.639> I<00:06:19.800> want<00:06:20.160> I<00:06:20.240> want<00:06:20.360> you<00:06:20.479> to<00:06:20.599> know

know I want I want you to know

something<00:06:22.800> want<00:06:23.000> to<00:06:23.120> know<00:06:23.280> something<00:06:23.479> like

something want to know something like

this<00:06:24.840> what<00:06:25.000> does<00:06:25.120> he<00:06:25.240> want<00:06:25.360> us<00:06:25.479> to

this what does he want us to

know<00:06:28.479> says<00:06:28.720> we<00:06:29.039> he<00:06:29.120> should<00:06:29.280> know<00:06:29.360> we<00:06:29.599> should

know says we he should know we should

know<00:06:29.919> it<00:06:30.280> right<00:06:31.280> remember<00:06:31.599> when<00:06:31.720> someone<00:06:31.960> says

know it right remember when someone says

you<00:06:32.199> should<00:06:32.360> know<00:06:32.560> something<00:06:32.880> what<00:06:33.160> what<00:06:33.240> do

you should know something what what do

you<00:06:33.440> do<00:06:33.599> with<00:06:33.880> it<00:06:34.880> know<00:06:35.080> it<00:06:36.000> that’s<00:06:36.199> I<00:06:36.319> thing<00:06:36.440> to

you do with it know it that’s I thing to

do<00:06:37.240> okay<00:06:37.360> and<00:06:37.560> this<00:06:37.639> is<00:06:37.800> something<00:06:38.199> what<00:06:38.280> you

do okay and this is something what you

should<00:06:38.479> do<00:06:38.639> with<00:06:38.800> this<00:06:39.039> with<00:06:39.199> this

should do with this with this

information<00:06:39.800> I’m<00:06:39.919> giving<00:06:40.160> you<00:06:40.280> now<00:06:40.440> with<00:06:40.560> this

information I’m giving you now with this

knowledge<00:06:41.000> I’m<00:06:41.120> giving<00:06:41.319> you<00:06:41.400> now<00:06:41.560> you<00:06:41.639> should

knowledge I’m giving you now you should

know<00:06:41.960> it<00:06:42.720> you<00:06:42.800> should<00:06:43.000> know<00:06:43.160> that<00:06:43.280> the<00:06:43.400> things

know it you should know that the things

that<00:06:43.680> I’m<00:06:43.800> telling<00:06:44.000> you<00:06:44.120> in<00:06:44.240> these<00:06:44.440> chapters

that I’m telling you in these chapters

and<00:06:45.560> the<00:06:45.639> things<00:06:45.800> that<00:06:45.880> I<00:06:45.960> will<00:06:46.080> tell<00:06:46.240> you<00:06:46.360> in

and the things that I will tell you in

the<00:06:46.680> later<00:06:46.919> in<00:06:47.080> the<00:06:47.199> interpretation

the later in the interpretation

the<00:06:50.000> are<00:06:50.199> not<00:06:50.479> things<00:06:51.000> I<00:06:51.639> made<00:06:51.960> up<00:06:52.240> from<00:06:52.400> my<00:06:52.560> own

the are not things I made up from my own

from

myself<00:06:57.240> I<00:06:57.360> didn’t<00:06:57.680> come<00:06:57.879> up<00:06:58.080> with<00:06:58.240> them<00:06:58.520> from

myself I didn’t come up with them from

myself

or<00:07:01.319> they’re

or they’re

not<00:07:03.080> they’re<00:07:03.240> not<00:07:04.120> interpretations

not they’re not interpretations

explanations<00:07:05.560> that<00:07:05.720> I<00:07:05.960> made<00:07:06.240> up<00:07:07.240> okay

explanations that I made up okay

or<00:07:11.039> they’re<00:07:11.199> not<00:07:11.400> things<00:07:11.599> that<00:07:11.800> I<00:07:11.919> made<00:07:12.120> up<00:07:12.360> so

or they’re not things that I made up so

there’s<00:07:12.680> two<00:07:12.840> things<00:07:13.039> here<00:07:13.639> two<00:07:13.800> ways<00:07:14.000> of

there’s two things here two ways of

reading<00:07:14.360> this<00:07:14.520> that<00:07:14.599> you<00:07:14.680> should<00:07:14.840> notice<00:07:15.400> one

reading this that you should notice one

is<00:07:15.720> it’s<00:07:15.879> not<00:07:16.000> things<00:07:16.199> that<00:07:16.440> I<00:07:16.759> made<00:07:17.280> up<00:07:18.280> second

is it’s not things that I made up second

it’s<00:07:18.759> not<00:07:18.960> things<00:07:19.120> that<00:07:19.240> are<00:07:19.400> made<00:07:19.599> up<00:07:20.520> those

it’s not things that are made up those

are<00:07:20.800> two<00:07:21.000> different<00:07:21.759> uh<00:07:22.680> how<00:07:22.840> do<00:07:22.919> you<00:07:23.080> say

are two different uh how do you say

emphasis<00:07:24.400> on<00:07:24.759> a<00:07:24.919> sentence<00:07:25.240> if<00:07:25.360> someone<00:07:25.560> says

emphasis on a sentence if someone says

listen<00:07:26.039> I’m<00:07:26.120> going<00:07:26.199> to<00:07:26.280> tell<00:07:26.400> you<00:07:26.560> something

listen I’m going to tell you something

don’t<00:07:27.400> think<00:07:27.560> that<00:07:27.680> I’m<00:07:27.800> do<00:07:27.960> on<00:07:28.080> making<00:07:28.319> up<00:07:28.479> all

don’t think that I’m do on making up all

these<00:07:28.800> things<00:07:29.759> right<00:07:30.240> so<00:07:30.680> you<00:07:30.800> could<00:07:31.039> mean<00:07:31.400> you

these things right so you could mean you

could<00:07:31.800> hear<00:07:31.960> it<00:07:32.120> saying<00:07:32.639> don’t<00:07:32.840> think<00:07:33.039> that

could hear it saying don’t think that

I’m<00:07:33.440> making<00:07:33.720> up<00:07:33.840> all<00:07:34.039> these<00:07:34.199> things<00:07:34.520> these<00:07:34.639> are

I’m making up all these things these are

things<00:07:34.960> that<00:07:35.360> people<00:07:35.599> before<00:07:35.840> me<00:07:36.000> have<00:07:36.160> made

things that people before me have made

up<00:07:36.520> and<00:07:36.720> they’ll<00:07:36.879> say<00:07:37.199> okay<00:07:37.800> and<00:07:37.919> if<00:07:38.039> those

up and they’ll say okay and if those

people<00:07:38.360> have<00:07:38.520> made<00:07:38.680> it<00:07:38.879> up<00:07:39.520> why<00:07:39.599> is<00:07:39.759> that

people have made it up why is that

better<00:07:40.160> than<00:07:40.319> you<00:07:40.680> or<00:07:40.840> why<00:07:40.919> is<00:07:41.000> it<00:07:41.160> worse<00:07:41.400> who

better than you or why is it worse who

cares<00:07:41.759> who<00:07:41.919> made<00:07:42.039> it<00:07:42.160> up<00:07:42.280> it’s<00:07:42.440> made

cares who made it up it’s made

up<00:07:44.680> well<00:07:44.879> and<00:07:45.000> or<00:07:45.159> you<00:07:45.240> could<00:07:45.360> say<00:07:45.560> well<00:07:45.680> what’s

up well and or you could say well what’s

wrong<00:07:45.960> with<00:07:46.039> people<00:07:46.199> making<00:07:46.440> up<00:07:46.599> stuff<00:07:46.879> isn’t

wrong with people making up stuff isn’t

that<00:07:47.159> what<00:07:47.280> people<00:07:47.440> do<00:07:47.639> they<00:07:47.759> make<00:07:47.919> up

that what people do they make up

thoughts<00:07:49.919> what’s<00:07:50.120> wrong<00:07:50.280> if<00:07:50.400> I<00:07:50.560> take<00:07:51.440> imagine

thoughts what’s wrong if I take imagine

would<00:07:52.280> come<00:07:52.400> and<00:07:52.759> say<00:07:53.759> that’s<00:07:53.840> what<00:07:53.960> we<00:07:54.039> come

would come and say that’s what we come

all<00:07:54.280> the<00:07:54.400> time<00:07:55.360> who<00:07:55.479> madees<00:07:56.440> well<00:07:56.560> if<00:07:56.639> you’re

all the time who madees well if you’re

you<00:07:57.319> say<00:07:57.520> me<00:07:57.639> if<00:07:57.720> you’re<00:07:58.159> you<00:07:58.319> say

so<00:08:02.440> which<00:08:02.560> one<00:08:02.720> is<00:08:02.840> better<00:08:03.080> I<00:08:03.120> don’t<00:08:03.240> know

so which one is better I don’t know

makes<00:08:03.560> no<00:08:03.720> difference<00:08:04.560> if<00:08:04.639> it’s<00:08:04.800> a<00:08:05.800> I<00:08:05.879> mean

makes no difference if it’s a I mean

then<00:08:06.319> say<00:08:06.440> it’s<00:08:06.560> the<00:08:06.720> good<00:08:07.319> so<00:08:07.960> I<00:08:08.039> don’t<00:08:08.159> know

then say it’s the good so I don’t know

if<00:08:08.360> is<00:08:08.440> it<00:08:08.520> AES<00:08:09.120> then<00:08:09.280> by<00:08:09.440> definition<00:08:09.800> seems<00:08:10.000> to

if is it AES then by definition seems to

me<00:08:10.240> that<00:08:10.360> it’s<00:08:10.520> not

me that it’s not

true<00:08:13.199> what’s<00:08:13.400> wrong<00:08:13.560> with<00:08:13.639> saying<00:08:13.800> I<00:08:13.919> have

AES<00:08:21.440> why<00:08:21.560> wouldn’t<00:08:21.759> he<00:08:21.879> want<00:08:22.000> to<00:08:22.120> have<00:08:22.319> kadish

AES why wouldn’t he want to have kadish

by<00:08:22.840> the<00:08:22.919> way<00:08:23.039> I<00:08:23.120> mean<00:08:23.240> it<00:08:23.319> sounds<00:08:23.599> like<00:08:23.759> most

by the way I mean it sounds like most

people<00:08:24.080> want<00:08:24.199> to<00:08:24.360> have<00:08:24.879> nowadays<00:08:25.280> at<00:08:25.400> least

people want to have nowadays at least

like<00:08:27.639> I<00:08:27.759> want<00:08:27.840> to<00:08:27.919> tell<00:08:28.039> you<00:08:28.280> big

like I want to tell you big

why<00:08:30.879> why<00:08:31.000> would<00:08:31.120> someone<00:08:31.440> disavow<00:08:31.919> his<00:08:32.440> saying

why why would someone disavow his saying

that<00:08:32.760> he<00:08:32.839> has<00:08:33.279> AES<00:08:34.279> it<00:08:34.479> could<00:08:34.680> it<00:08:34.800> could<00:08:34.959> be

that he has AES it could it could be

maybe<00:08:35.399> he’s<00:08:35.560> just<00:08:35.680> so<00:08:35.880> honest<00:08:36.240> like<00:08:36.360> it

maybe he’s just so honest like it

doesn’t<00:08:36.640> want<00:08:37.080> think<00:08:37.279> that<00:08:37.360> he<00:08:37.479> make<00:08:37.680> things

doesn’t want think that he make things

up<00:08:38.399> once<00:08:38.839> you<00:08:39.120> think

that<00:08:44.200> truth

that truth

be<00:08:47.080> I<00:08:47.160> know<00:08:47.320> there<00:08:47.440> is<00:08:47.600> continuing<00:08:48.080> I

know<00:08:52.240> he’s<00:08:52.480> asking<00:08:52.800> youever<00:08:53.720> the<00:08:54.399> cas<00:08:55.399> it’s

know he’s asking youever the cas it’s

more<00:08:55.720> likely<00:08:56.000> if<00:08:56.120> someone<00:08:56.360> doesn’t<00:08:56.640> make

more likely if someone doesn’t make

something<00:08:57.040> out<00:08:57.920> for<00:08:58.040> a<00:08:58.200> long<00:08:58.440> time<00:08:59.920> more<00:09:00.360> more

something out for a long time more more

of<00:09:00.839> the<00:09:01.200> the<00:09:01.360> shortcomings<00:09:02.079> of<00:09:02.320> that<00:09:02.640> idea<00:09:03.560> or

of the the shortcomings of that idea or

something<00:09:04.160> were<00:09:04.320> not<00:09:04.920> out<00:09:05.200> yet<00:09:05.920> doesn’t<00:09:06.120> mean

something were not out yet doesn’t mean

it’s<00:09:06.320> a<00:09:06.480> bad<00:09:06.680> idea<00:09:07.120> but<00:09:07.640> new<00:09:07.800> IDE<00:09:08.120> someone<00:09:08.320> else

it’s a bad idea but new IDE someone else

thought<00:09:08.640> of<00:09:08.720> it<00:09:08.839> a<00:09:08.959> thousand<00:09:09.240> years<00:09:09.440> ago<00:09:09.839> and

thought of it a thousand years ago and

then<00:09:10.079> I<00:09:10.200> think<00:09:10.360> of<00:09:10.440> it<00:09:10.600> today<00:09:10.920> and<00:09:11.040> I<00:09:11.160> see<00:09:11.360> it

then I think of it today and I see it

then<00:09:11.640> I<00:09:11.760> also<00:09:11.959> see<00:09:12.279> yenim<00:09:12.600> who<00:09:12.720> asked<00:09:12.920> the

then I also see yenim who asked the

question<00:09:13.320> on<00:09:13.480> it<00:09:13.959> and<00:09:14.079> the<00:09:14.200> other<00:09:14.399> guy<00:09:14.560> who

question on it and the other guy who

answered<00:09:15.040> it<00:09:15.200> and<00:09:15.320> the<00:09:15.440> other<00:09:15.720> guy<00:09:15.880> who<00:09:16.040> then

answered it and the other guy who then

resurfaced<00:09:16.959> that<00:09:17.120> question<00:09:17.519> because<00:09:18.040> those

resurfaced that question because those

two<00:09:18.360> are<00:09:18.480> working<00:09:18.720> on<00:09:18.839> the<00:09:19.000> wrong<00:09:19.200> assumption

two are working on the wrong assumption

and<00:09:21.200> if<00:09:21.440> an<00:09:21.640> idea<00:09:21.920> has<00:09:22.040> a<00:09:22.120> certain<00:09:22.360> amount<00:09:22.560> of

and if an idea has a certain amount of

development<00:09:23.160> and

find<00:09:27.120> there<00:09:27.839> okay<00:09:28.839> so<00:09:29.000> let’s<00:09:29.160> think<00:09:29.640> number

find there okay so let’s think number

firstly<00:09:30.399> for<00:09:30.519> sure<00:09:30.800> he’s<00:09:31.120> he’s<00:09:31.320> doing<00:09:31.560> the

firstly for sure he’s he’s doing the

simple<00:09:31.959> thing<00:09:32.160> which<00:09:32.240> is<00:09:32.360> disa<00:09:33.040> that<00:09:33.240> he<00:09:33.720> if

simple thing which is disa that he if

you<00:09:33.959> have<00:09:34.160> problems<00:09:34.519> with<00:09:34.640> what<00:09:34.760> he’s<00:09:34.880> saying

you have problems with what he’s saying

don’t<00:09:35.320> come<00:09:35.480> to<00:09:35.640> him<00:09:35.839> because<00:09:35.959> he<00:09:36.040> didn’t<00:09:36.240> make

don’t come to him because he didn’t make

up<00:09:36.519> all<00:09:36.680> these<00:09:36.839> things<00:09:37.839> they<00:09:38.000> were<00:09:38.240> they’re

up all these things they were they’re

older<00:09:38.760> than<00:09:38.959> him<00:09:39.560> right<00:09:40.519> and<00:09:40.680> in<00:09:40.800> some<00:09:41.040> sense

older than him right and in some sense

that’s<00:09:41.720> one<00:09:41.880> thing<00:09:42.120> but<00:09:42.279> in<00:09:42.399> some<00:09:42.560> sense<00:09:42.800> the

that’s one thing but in some sense the

basic<00:09:43.200> sense<00:09:43.480> that’s<00:09:43.760> people<00:09:43.959> read<00:09:44.200> this

basic sense that’s people read this

thing<00:09:44.519> and<00:09:44.640> the<00:09:44.800> basic<00:09:45.040> sense<00:09:45.279> is<00:09:45.560> like<00:09:46.160> I’m

thing and the basic sense is like I’m

just<00:09:46.440> being<00:09:46.680> honest<00:09:47.120> you<00:09:47.240> know<00:09:48.000> nowadays<00:09:48.360> in

just being honest you know nowadays in

Academia<00:09:48.920> we<00:09:49.040> have<00:09:49.160> this<00:09:49.320> like<00:09:49.760> huge<00:09:50.160> ethics

Academia we have this like huge ethics

of<00:09:51.240> not<00:09:51.399> being<00:09:51.600> a<00:09:52.120> plagiarizer<00:09:53.120> never<00:09:53.519> say<00:09:53.920> in

of not being a plagiarizer never say in

your<00:09:54.160> own<00:09:54.360> name<00:09:54.600> something<00:09:54.839> that<00:09:54.959> someone

your own name something that someone

else<00:09:55.480> says<00:09:55.839> you<00:09:55.920> know<00:09:56.200> why<00:09:56.399> not

oh<00:10:00.200> because<00:10:00.320> it<00:10:00.440> stops<00:10:00.720> the<00:10:00.800> other<00:10:01.040> person

oh because it stops the other person

from<00:10:01.959> understanding<00:10:02.959> the<00:10:03.079> source<00:10:03.399> and<00:10:03.560> the

from understanding the source and the

discussion<00:10:04.040> that<00:10:04.200> surrounds<00:10:04.600> that<00:10:05.079> idea<00:10:06.079> okay

discussion that surrounds that idea okay

that<00:10:06.360> would<00:10:06.519> be<00:10:06.640> a<00:10:06.800> nice<00:10:07.000> reason<00:10:07.360> the<00:10:07.480> actual

that would be a nice reason the actual

reason<00:10:08.040> that<00:10:08.200> people<00:10:08.399> do<00:10:08.560> it

is<00:10:13.680> don’t<00:10:13.920> don’t<00:10:14.079> look<00:10:14.200> at

is don’t don’t look at

me<00:10:16.640> and<00:10:16.760> it’s<00:10:16.920> also<00:10:17.160> people<00:10:17.360> want<00:10:17.440> to<00:10:17.560> stay

me and it’s also people want to stay

clinically<00:10:18.160> detached<00:10:18.600> you’re<00:10:18.760> so<00:10:18.920> nice<00:10:19.680> no

clinically detached you’re so nice no

people<00:10:20.040> also<00:10:20.240> want<00:10:20.320> to<00:10:20.440> stay<00:10:20.600> detached<00:10:21.040> why

people also want to stay detached why

why<00:10:21.279> is<00:10:21.360> everyone<00:10:21.680> mait<00:10:22.120> on<00:10:22.360> on<00:10:22.519> plagiarism<00:10:23.160> so

why is everyone mait on on plagiarism so

much

phct<00:10:41.720> the<00:10:41.920> first<00:10:42.639> first<00:10:43.160> so<00:10:43.320> you<00:10:43.480> can<00:10:43.760> always

phct the first first so you can always

come<00:10:44.360> back<00:10:44.519> to

come back to

the<00:10:47.079> okay<00:10:47.240> so<00:10:47.440> one<00:10:47.639> reason<00:10:47.920> at<00:10:48.079> least<00:10:48.440> okay<00:10:49.040> all

the okay so one reason at least okay all

of<00:10:49.240> these<00:10:49.360> things<00:10:49.560> are<00:10:50.040> options<00:10:50.519> I<00:10:50.600> don’t<00:10:50.760> know

of these things are options I don’t know

at<00:10:51.560> least<00:10:51.760> what<00:10:51.839> I<00:10:51.959> would<00:10:52.120> think<00:10:52.279> is<00:10:52.480> one<00:10:52.720> thing

at least what I would think is one thing

that<00:10:53.680> people<00:10:53.920> nowadays<00:10:54.279> are<00:10:54.440> very<00:10:54.639> M<00:10:55.079> credit

that people nowadays are very M credit

is<00:10:55.639> because<00:10:55.839> they<00:10:55.959> want<00:10:56.040> to<00:10:56.200> give<00:10:56.720> like<00:10:57.440> like

is because they want to give like like

say

why<00:11:04.200> and<00:11:04.399> if<00:11:04.560> we<00:11:04.760> have<00:11:05.040> like<00:11:05.519> an<00:11:05.880> an<00:11:06.079> economy<00:11:06.600> of

why and if we have like an an economy of

of<00:11:07.480> of<00:11:08.000> prestige

of of prestige

ofish<00:11:10.560> which<00:11:11.040> that’s<00:11:11.440> sort<00:11:11.639> of<00:11:11.880> in<00:11:11.959> a<00:11:12.120> certain

ofish which that’s sort of in a certain

sense<00:11:13.240> the<00:11:13.399> intellectual<00:11:14.079> economy<00:11:15.079> is<00:11:15.240> it<00:11:16.120> you

sense the intellectual economy is it you

don’t<00:11:16.399> make<00:11:16.560> money<00:11:16.800> from<00:11:17.000> having<00:11:17.279> kadish

don’t make money from having kadish

right<00:11:17.920> all<00:11:18.040> you<00:11:18.200> make<00:11:18.399> is<00:11:18.560> credit<00:11:19.519> if<00:11:19.639> you’d

right all you make is credit if you’d

make<00:11:20.040> money<00:11:20.480> then<00:11:20.639> maybe<00:11:20.839> you<00:11:20.920> wouldn’t<00:11:21.360> fight

make money then maybe you wouldn’t fight

over<00:11:21.800> credit<00:11:22.079> so<00:11:22.279> much<00:11:23.160> but<00:11:23.320> since<00:11:23.480> you<00:11:23.560> don’t

over credit so much but since you don’t

make<00:11:23.839> money<00:11:24.040> you<00:11:24.160> only<00:11:24.320> make<00:11:24.760> credit<00:11:25.760> you<00:11:25.920> have

make money you only make credit you have

enough<00:11:26.240> credit<00:11:26.480> you<00:11:26.639> make<00:11:27.200> money<00:11:28.200> yeah<00:11:28.560> maybe

enough credit you make money yeah maybe

you<00:11:30.480> have<00:11:30.600> a<00:11:30.680> lot<00:11:30.800> of<00:11:30.920> citations<00:11:31.560> on<00:11:31.839> the<00:11:31.959> H

you have a lot of citations on the H

index<00:11:32.680> whatever<00:11:33.000> it’s<00:11:33.440> called

index whatever it’s called

um<00:11:35.959> lot<00:11:36.120> of<00:11:36.519> links<00:11:37.519> then<00:11:37.800> Google<00:11:38.399> exactly<00:11:39.399> so

um lot of links then Google exactly so

maybe<00:11:40.519> like<00:11:40.760> just<00:11:40.920> an<00:11:41.079> eon<00:11:41.399> it’s<00:11:41.519> like<00:11:41.600> a

maybe like just an eon it’s like a

fearness<00:11:42.160> thing<00:11:42.519> right<00:11:42.920> it’s<00:11:43.120> based<00:11:43.360> on

fearness thing right it’s based on

fearness<00:11:43.839> and<00:11:43.959> a<00:11:44.120> certain<00:11:44.720> concept<00:11:45.040> of

fearness and a certain concept of

fearness<00:11:45.560> that<00:11:45.720> people<00:11:46.000> deserve<00:11:46.600> to<00:11:47.000> have<00:11:47.560> the

fearness that people deserve to have the

co<00:11:48.399> for<00:11:48.839> the<00:11:49.839> that<00:11:49.959> they<00:11:50.160> have<00:11:50.720> does<00:11:50.880> that<00:11:51.079> make

sense<00:11:55.920> yeah<00:11:56.040> and<00:11:56.120> he’s<00:11:56.320> dead<00:11:56.480> who<00:11:56.639> cares

isn’t<00:12:05.360> isn’t<00:12:05.519> it<00:12:05.639> a<00:12:05.760> little<00:12:05.880> bit<00:12:06.320> dishonesty

isn’t isn’t it a little bit dishonesty

you<00:12:07.519> say<00:12:07.720> like<00:12:07.880> being

you say like being

dishonest<00:12:09.720> it’s<00:12:09.880> being<00:12:10.200> dishonest<00:12:10.959> if<00:12:11.240> I<00:12:11.680> tell

dishonest it’s being dishonest if I tell

you<00:12:12.079> something<00:12:12.399> as<00:12:12.560> if<00:12:12.720> I<00:12:12.880> made<00:12:13.079> it<00:12:13.279> up<00:12:13.800> and<00:12:14.120> I

you something as if I made it up and I

say<00:12:14.560> someone<00:12:14.760> else<00:12:14.920> made<00:12:15.120> it<00:12:15.360> up<00:12:16.120> yeah<00:12:16.320> I<00:12:16.440> guess

say someone else made it up yeah I guess

I’m

lying<00:12:18.519> have<00:12:18.600> to<00:12:18.720> know<00:12:19.079> wrong<00:12:20.079> depends<00:12:20.320> on<00:12:20.480> what

lying have to know wrong depends on what

you<00:12:20.639> claim<00:12:20.880> to<00:12:21.000> be<00:12:21.160> presenting<00:12:21.680> what<00:12:21.760> you

you claim to be presenting what you

claim<00:12:22.079> to<00:12:22.199> be<00:12:22.320> presenting<00:12:22.800> is<00:12:23.600> is<00:12:24.120> is<00:12:24.320> like<00:12:24.560> a<00:12:24.920> a

claim to be presenting is is is like a a

novelty<00:12:25.560> of<00:12:25.839> thought<00:12:26.760> oh<00:12:27.760> thiss

novelty of thought oh thiss

the<00:12:29.680> the<00:12:30.399> if<00:12:30.519> I<00:12:30.639> let’s<00:12:30.800> say<00:12:30.920> I<00:12:31.040> write<00:12:31.160> a<00:12:31.240> book

the the if I let’s say I write a book

and<00:12:31.480> I<00:12:31.600> say<00:12:32.040> these<00:12:32.240> ideas<00:12:32.720> nothing

and I say these ideas nothing

necessarily<00:12:33.560> comes<00:12:33.760> from<00:12:33.959> myself<00:12:34.360> but<00:12:34.480> this

necessarily comes from myself but this

is<00:12:34.959> an<00:12:35.160> exposition<00:12:35.800> of<00:12:36.279> of<00:12:36.399> my<00:12:36.600> thinking<00:12:36.920> about

is an exposition of of my thinking about

an<00:12:37.480> idea<00:12:38.480> right<00:12:38.639> it<00:12:38.760> doesn’t<00:12:39.000> matter<00:12:39.320> whose

an idea right it doesn’t matter whose

idea<00:12:39.880> it<00:12:40.000> is<00:12:40.240> that<00:12:40.440> if<00:12:40.560> it’s<00:12:40.760> if<00:12:40.839> it’s<00:12:40.959> the

idea it is that if it’s if it’s the

truth<00:12:41.279> it<00:12:41.399> was<00:12:41.600> true<00:12:41.880> before<00:12:42.320> I<00:12:42.920> invented<00:12:43.320> it

truth it was true before I invented it

and<00:12:43.639> if<00:12:43.800> it’s<00:12:44.480> and<00:12:44.600> if<00:12:44.720> it’s<00:12:44.880> false<00:12:45.279> it<00:12:45.399> was

and if it’s and if it’s false it was

false<00:12:45.839> no<00:12:46.000> matter<00:12:46.240> how<00:12:46.360> many<00:12:46.560> people<00:12:46.880> if<00:12:47.000> I

false no matter how many people if I

invented<00:12:47.440> it<00:12:47.560> today<00:12:47.800> or<00:12:47.880> if<00:12:48.120> 100<00:12:48.320> people

invented it today or if 100 people

invented<00:12:48.800> it<00:12:48.920> before<00:12:49.120> me<00:12:49.560> right<00:12:50.120> right<00:12:50.240> so

invented it before me right right so

this<00:12:50.519> becomes<00:12:50.800> more<00:12:50.959> important<00:12:51.240> in<00:12:51.360> other

this becomes more important in other

words<00:12:52.279> there<00:12:52.360> is<00:12:52.600> one<00:12:52.839> way<00:12:53.000> in<00:12:53.240> which<00:12:53.360> you<00:12:53.480> want

words there is one way in which you want

someone<00:12:54.000> can<00:12:54.199> disavow<00:12:54.880> originality<00:12:55.880> just<00:12:56.040> by

someone can disavow originality just by

being<00:12:56.440> honest<00:12:56.760> like<00:12:56.880> don’t<00:12:57.040> think<00:12:57.160> I’m<00:12:57.279> so

being honest like don’t think I’m so

smart<00:12:57.880> I<00:12:57.959> didn’t<00:12:58.160> come<00:12:58.240> up<00:12:58.360> with<00:12:58.560> leasing

smart I didn’t come up with leasing

myself<00:12:59.279> I’m<00:12:59.360> not<00:12:59.480> taking<00:12:59.680> the<00:12:59.760> honor<00:12:59.959> to

myself I’m not taking the honor to

myself<00:13:00.399> the<00:13:00.480> honor<00:13:00.760> all<00:13:00.959> those<00:13:01.120> to<00:13:01.399> the<00:13:02.399> who

myself the honor all those to the who

said<00:13:02.800> all<00:13:02.959> these<00:13:03.600> things<00:13:04.600> um<00:13:05.600> or<00:13:05.959> for<00:13:06.120> all<00:13:06.240> the

said all these things um or for all the

reasons<00:13:06.560> that<00:13:06.720> you<00:13:06.839> people<00:13:07.160> said<00:13:07.440> maybe

reasons that you people said maybe

because<00:13:08.519> I<00:13:08.639> want<00:13:08.800> people<00:13:08.959> to<00:13:09.040> be<00:13:09.120> able<00:13:09.240> to<00:13:09.360> go

because I want people to be able to go

to<00:13:09.560> the<00:13:09.680> source<00:13:10.000> if<00:13:10.120> they<00:13:10.240> want<00:13:10.320> to<00:13:10.480> find

to the source if they want to find

things<00:13:11.320> like<00:13:11.480> that<00:13:12.120> okay<00:13:13.560> um<00:13:14.560> and<00:13:14.760> that<00:13:14.880> is<00:13:15.279> if

things like that okay um and that is if

the<00:13:15.680> subject<00:13:16.160> is<00:13:16.440> who<00:13:16.600> is<00:13:16.720> the<00:13:16.839> Mad<00:13:17.240> of<00:13:17.360> this<00:13:17.519> no

the subject is who is the Mad of this no

in<00:13:17.959> other<00:13:18.079> words<00:13:18.320> like<00:13:18.399> I<00:13:18.480> said<00:13:18.639> we<00:13:18.760> have<00:13:18.880> some

in other words like I said we have some

kind<00:13:19.199> of<00:13:19.320> econom<00:13:19.600> I<00:13:19.680> make<00:13:19.800> fun<00:13:19.959> of<00:13:20.040> it<00:13:20.160> it’s

kind of econom I make fun of it it’s

just<00:13:20.399> an<00:13:20.519> economy<00:13:20.880> of<00:13:21.000> credit<00:13:21.680> maybe<00:13:21.920> there’s

just an economy of credit maybe there’s

some<00:13:23.000> moral<00:13:23.399> in<00:13:23.600> that<00:13:23.760> maybe<00:13:23.959> there’s<00:13:24.120> some

some moral in that maybe there’s some

virtue<00:13:24.639> in<00:13:24.839> like<00:13:25.079> not<00:13:25.279> taking<00:13:25.560> credit<00:13:25.800> for

virtue in like not taking credit for

yourself<00:13:26.839> and<00:13:26.959> being<00:13:27.240> honest<00:13:27.760> and<00:13:28.040> you<00:13:28.160> know

yourself and being honest and you know

there’s<00:13:30.480> some<00:13:30.720> novelty<00:13:31.199> and<00:13:31.600> I’m<00:13:31.680> telling<00:13:31.920> you

there’s some novelty and I’m telling you

whose<00:13:32.279> novelty<00:13:32.720> it<00:13:32.839> is<00:13:33.199> I’m<00:13:33.320> not<00:13:33.480> taking<00:13:33.680> it

whose novelty it is I’m not taking it

for<00:13:34.160> myself

for myself

okay<00:13:37.839> um<00:13:38.839> but<00:13:39.000> now<00:13:39.240> this<00:13:39.399> is<00:13:39.760> seems<00:13:40.120> very<00:13:40.320> wrong

okay um but now this is seems very wrong

to<00:13:40.800> me<00:13:41.120> this<00:13:41.320> whole<00:13:41.600> story<00:13:42.079> right<00:13:42.839> because<00:13:43.519> if

to me this whole story right because if

there’s<00:13:44.000> such<00:13:44.160> a<00:13:44.399> thing<00:13:44.760> as<00:13:45.079> knowledge<00:13:45.760> if

there’s such a thing as knowledge if

there’s<00:13:46.120> such<00:13:46.240> a<00:13:46.360> thing<00:13:46.600> as<00:13:46.839> even<00:13:47.519> not

there’s such a thing as even not

knowledge<00:13:48.160> but<00:13:48.360> good<00:13:48.519> things<00:13:48.720> or<00:13:48.959> useful

knowledge but good things or useful

useful

ideas<00:13:51.839> then<00:13:52.560> the<00:13:52.759> main<00:13:53.079> thing<00:13:53.399> like<00:13:53.560> the<00:13:53.839> main

ideas then the main thing like the main

emphasis<00:13:54.639> when<00:13:54.759> I<00:13:54.880> tell<00:13:55.000> you<00:13:55.199> it<00:13:55.800> something

emphasis when I tell you it something

doesn’t<00:13:56.880> seem<00:13:57.079> to<00:13:57.199> be<00:13:57.360> who<00:13:57.519> made<00:13:57.720> it<00:13:57.880> up<00:13:58.759> and

doesn’t seem to be who made it up and

not<00:13:59.800> and<00:14:00.040> even<00:14:00.240> the<00:14:00.399> opposite<00:14:00.839> making<00:14:01.120> things

not and even the opposite making things

up<00:14:01.519> seems<00:14:01.759> to<00:14:01.880> be<00:14:02.160> bad<00:14:02.959> to<00:14:03.160> begin<00:14:03.480> with<00:14:04.120> because

up seems to be bad to begin with because

if<00:14:04.360> I<00:14:04.480> say<00:14:04.639> I<00:14:04.720> made<00:14:04.880> it<00:14:05.000> up<00:14:05.160> no<00:14:05.279> someone<00:14:05.480> else

if I say I made it up no someone else

made<00:14:05.720> it<00:14:05.759> up<00:14:05.880> we<00:14:06.120> both<00:14:06.279> fighting<00:14:06.560> over<00:14:06.800> who’s

made it up we both fighting over who’s

the<00:14:07.079> first<00:14:07.320> liar<00:14:08.079> right<00:14:08.240> because<00:14:08.399> make<00:14:08.600> go

the first liar right because make go

making<00:14:09.000> up<00:14:09.199> is<00:14:09.279> another<00:14:09.480> word<00:14:09.639> for<00:14:09.800> lying

right<00:14:13.519> truths<00:14:13.920> are<00:14:14.199> the<00:14:14.320> things<00:14:14.519> that<00:14:14.639> are<00:14:14.759> not

right truths are the things that are not

made<00:14:15.079> up<00:14:15.920> does<00:14:16.079> that<00:14:16.240> make

made up does that make

sense<00:14:18.000> not<00:14:18.639> by<00:14:18.720> the<00:14:18.759> way<00:14:18.880> this<00:14:18.959> is<00:14:19.000> the<00:14:19.120> basic

sense not by the way this is the basic

problem<00:14:19.880> if<00:14:19.959> you<00:14:20.079> ask<00:14:21.079> truth<00:14:21.759> you<00:14:21.839> could<00:14:22.000> make

problem if you ask truth you could make

up<00:14:22.320> a<00:14:22.440> truth<00:14:22.680> if<00:14:22.759> you’re<00:14:22.880> the<00:14:22.959> first<00:14:23.279> person

up a truth if you’re the first person

said<00:14:24.040> then<00:14:24.320> then<00:14:24.480> you<00:14:24.920> you<00:14:25.199> discovered<00:14:25.440> it

said then then you you discovered it

right<00:14:26.680> usually<00:14:26.959> we<00:14:27.079> say<00:14:27.279> that<00:14:27.399> you<00:14:27.680> discover

right usually we say that you discover

truth<00:14:28.160> and<00:14:28.240> you<00:14:28.360> make<00:14:28.480> up<00:14:28.720> lies

truth and you make up lies

that’s<00:14:30.120> why<00:14:30.199> if<00:14:30.320> someone

that’s why if someone

says<00:14:33.040> if<00:14:33.160> it’s<00:14:33.279> true<00:14:33.519> then<00:14:33.639> it’s<00:14:33.800> old<00:14:34.320> from<00:14:34.440> the

says if it’s true then it’s old from the

times<00:14:34.720> of<00:14:35.600> and<00:14:35.720> if<00:14:35.800> it’s<00:14:36.040> new<00:14:36.440> it’s

times of and if it’s new it’s

not<00:14:38.519> it’s<00:14:38.600> a<00:14:38.759> basic<00:14:39.079> problem<00:14:39.519> there’s<00:14:39.720> anwers

not it’s a basic problem there’s anwers

to<00:14:40.079> this<00:14:40.199> problem<00:14:40.399> but<00:14:40.480> it’s<00:14:40.600> a<00:14:40.720> basic<00:14:41.000> problem

to this problem but it’s a basic problem

right<00:14:43.720> so<00:14:44.279> you<00:14:44.399> could

right so you could

say<00:14:47.199> oh<00:14:47.360> wait<00:14:47.480> so<00:14:47.600> you’re<00:14:47.920> discovering<00:14:48.480> very

say oh wait so you’re discovering very

good<00:14:48.800> so<00:14:48.920> there<00:14:49.040> should

be<00:14:53.199> that’s<00:14:53.360> how<00:14:54.360> people<00:14:54.600> never<00:14:54.759> say<00:14:54.920> that<00:14:55.040> they

be that’s how people never say that they

make<00:14:55.600> they<00:14:55.720> say<00:14:55.800> that<00:14:55.920> they’re<00:14:56.040> Mak<00:14:56.959> because

make they say that they’re Mak because

they<00:14:57.160> see<00:14:57.440> themselves<00:14:57.639> as<00:14:57.800> scientist

they see themselves as scientist

discovering<00:14:58.639> things

well<00:15:02.440> it<00:15:02.519> is<00:15:02.680> weird<00:15:02.959> when<00:15:03.120> for<00:15:03.240> example<00:15:03.600> people

well it is weird when for example people

name<00:15:04.079> diseases<00:15:04.519> after<00:15:04.759> their

name diseases after their

finder<00:15:06.720> as<00:15:06.839> if<00:15:07.079> like<00:15:07.199> this<00:15:07.399> guy<00:15:07.519> brought<00:15:07.759> this

finder as if like this guy brought this

disease<00:15:08.240> into<00:15:08.600> existence<00:15:09.320> I<00:15:09.399> think<00:15:09.560> you

disease into existence I think you

usually<00:15:10.000> name<00:15:10.160> it<00:15:10.639> I<00:15:10.720> think<00:15:10.839> you<00:15:10.920> should<00:15:11.079> name

usually name it I think you should name

it<00:15:11.320> after<00:15:11.519> his<00:15:11.639> enemy<00:15:11.920> cl’s

it after his enemy cl’s

disease<00:15:16.639> there’s<00:15:16.880> worse<00:15:17.160> examples<00:15:17.759> Uncle

disease there’s worse examples Uncle

Crone

like<00:15:20.240> he<00:15:20.360> was<00:15:20.560> one<00:15:20.680> who<00:15:20.759> figur<00:15:21.000> out<00:15:21.199> the<00:15:21.320> reason

like he was one who figur out the reason

why<00:15:21.800> this<00:15:22.000> person’s<00:15:22.399> dying<00:15:22.839> like<00:15:23.240> there’s<00:15:23.399> a

why this person’s dying like there’s a

sayon<00:15:24.519> on<00:15:24.759> the<00:15:24.920> legion<00:15:25.320> and<00:15:25.440> the<00:15:25.600> guy’s<00:15:25.839> skin

sayon on the legion and the guy’s skin

you<00:15:26.320> know<00:15:26.560> I<00:15:26.600> don’t<00:15:26.759> know<00:15:26.880> it’s<00:15:26.959> a<00:15:27.079> little

you know I don’t know it’s a little

weird<00:15:28.120> but

weird but

um<00:15:30.399> name<00:15:30.639> Stars<00:15:30.920> you<00:15:31.000> know<00:15:31.399> I<00:15:31.519> do<00:15:31.759> think<00:15:32.160> I<00:15:32.240> do

um name Stars you know I do think I do

think<00:15:32.600> that<00:15:32.800> there<00:15:32.959> are<00:15:33.480> novel<00:15:33.920> ideas

think that there are novel ideas

especially<00:15:34.759> that<00:15:34.839> are<00:15:35.000> generated<00:15:35.639> from<00:15:35.839> let’s

especially that are generated from let’s

say

non-organic<00:15:37.920> categories<00:15:38.720> let’s<00:15:38.880> say<00:15:39.120> for

non-organic categories let’s say for

example<00:15:39.680> someone<00:15:39.959> comes<00:15:40.160> up<00:15:40.319> with<00:15:40.399> a<00:15:40.560> Kish<00:15:40.880> and

example someone comes up with a Kish and

how<00:15:41.279> to<00:15:41.440> play<00:15:41.720> poker<00:15:42.199> right<00:15:42.440> so<00:15:42.680> poker<00:15:43.000> itself

how to play poker right so poker itself

is<00:15:43.600> AES<00:15:44.600> right<00:15:45.120> a<00:15:45.360> specific<00:15:45.759> intricacy<00:15:46.279> in<00:15:46.399> the

is AES right a specific intricacy in the

game<00:15:46.880> let’s<00:15:47.240> say<00:15:48.240> that’s<00:15:48.480> something<00:15:48.800> that<00:15:49.160> I

game let’s say that’s something that I

think<00:15:49.399> should<00:15:49.600> be<00:15:49.720> credited<00:15:50.199> okay<00:15:50.319> we<00:15:50.399> can

think should be credited okay we can

think<00:15:50.680> about<00:15:50.959> that<00:15:51.560> we<00:15:51.680> can<00:15:51.800> think<00:15:51.959> about

think about that we can think about

Creations<00:15:53.160> which<00:15:53.240> are<00:15:53.560> not<00:15:54.319> which<00:15:54.399> are<00:15:54.519> not<00:15:55.040> we

Creations which are not which are not we

can<00:15:55.279> think<00:15:55.440> of<00:15:55.720> exactly<00:15:56.079> synthetic<00:15:56.480> Creations

can think of exactly synthetic Creations

which<00:15:57.120> are<00:15:57.880> not

which are not

made<00:15:59.839> up<00:16:00.040> but<00:16:00.199> still<00:16:00.440> true<00:16:01.199> there’s<00:16:01.360> a

made up but still true there’s a

category<00:16:02.199> called<00:16:02.639> creativity<00:16:03.639> which<00:16:03.920> has

category called creativity which has

well<00:16:04.519> it’s<00:16:04.680> not<00:16:05.000> false<00:16:05.360> I<00:16:05.440> don’t<00:16:05.560> know<00:16:05.639> if<00:16:05.720> it’s

well it’s not false I don’t know if it’s

true<00:16:06.079> in<00:16:06.199> the<00:16:06.279> same<00:16:06.440> way<00:16:06.560> as<00:16:07.000> uncreated<00:16:08.000> true

true in the same way as uncreated true

it’s<00:16:08.319> not<00:16:08.519> true<00:16:08.759> that<00:16:08.839> it<00:16:09.360> it’s<00:16:09.480> a<00:16:09.600> kind<00:16:09.720> of

it’s not true that it it’s a kind of

true<00:16:10.120> it’s<00:16:10.240> not<00:16:10.440> at<00:16:10.519> least<00:16:10.720> not<00:16:10.920> false<00:16:11.279> at

true it’s not at least not false at

least<00:16:11.959> my<00:16:12.319> my<00:16:12.519> like<00:16:12.680> sophistry<00:16:13.240> where<00:16:13.360> I<00:16:13.440> said

least my my like sophistry where I said

thees<00:16:14.079> has<00:16:14.199> to<00:16:14.279> be<00:16:14.440> false<00:16:14.759> is<00:16:14.880> not<00:16:15.079> true

thees has to be false is not true

because<00:16:16.399> just<00:16:16.560> like<00:16:16.959> they<00:16:17.079> used<00:16:17.279> to<00:16:17.360> me<00:16:17.519> not<00:16:17.639> be

because just like they used to me not be

cars<00:16:18.000> and<00:16:18.120> now<00:16:18.240> there’s<00:16:18.440> cars<00:16:18.680> that<00:16:18.800> doesn’t

cars and now there’s cars that doesn’t

mean<00:16:19.120> that<00:16:19.319> cars<00:16:19.519> are<00:16:20.040> false<00:16:21.040> then<00:16:21.560> they<00:16:21.720> might

mean that cars are false then they might

not<00:16:22.040> be<00:16:22.199> true<00:16:22.440> so<00:16:22.600> we<00:16:22.680> have<00:16:22.800> to<00:16:22.959> have<00:16:23.240> three<00:16:23.680> we

not be true so we have to have three we

have<00:16:24.000> three<00:16:24.399> three<00:16:24.600> distinctions<00:16:25.120> here

have three three distinctions here

already<00:16:25.880> there<00:16:26.040> could<00:16:26.160> be<00:16:26.399> true<00:16:26.639> things<00:16:26.959> false

already there could be true things false

things<00:16:27.800> and<00:16:27.959> new<00:16:28.199> things<00:16:28.480> created<00:16:29.040> things

things and new things created things

which<00:16:29.480> is<00:16:29.720> something<00:16:30.040> in<00:16:30.639> in<00:16:30.800> between<00:16:31.120> or

which is something in in between or

something<00:16:31.560> different<00:16:32.040> very<00:16:32.680> interesting<00:16:33.680> not

something different very interesting not

only<00:16:34.040> that<00:16:34.240> can<00:16:34.360> we<00:16:34.480> have<00:16:34.639> synthetic<00:16:35.639> about

only that can we have synthetic about

synthetic<00:16:36.399> things<00:16:36.680> can<00:16:36.759> we<00:16:36.880> have<00:16:37.040> synthetic

synthetic things can we have synthetic

truths<00:16:37.920> about<00:16:38.399> about<00:16:38.839> things<00:16:39.000> that<00:16:39.079> are

truths about about things that are

organically<00:16:40.120> or<00:16:40.360> that<00:16:40.600> organic<00:16:41.440> okay<00:16:42.440> but

organically or that organic okay but

that’s<00:16:43.160> that’s<00:16:43.440> true<00:16:43.959> so<00:16:44.199> if<00:16:44.319> you<00:16:44.480> think<00:16:44.639> of

that’s that’s true so if you think of

like<00:16:45.000> art<00:16:45.279> or<00:16:45.680> technology<00:16:46.680> or<00:16:47.680> maybe<00:16:47.959> there’s

like art or technology or maybe there’s

something<00:16:48.360> that’s<00:16:48.600> Mak<00:16:48.800> become<00:16:49.079> making<00:16:49.240> a<00:16:49.360> new

something that’s Mak become making a new

kind<00:16:49.680> of<00:16:49.880> person<00:16:50.160> like<00:16:50.279> I<00:16:50.399> claimed<00:16:50.720> I’m<00:16:50.839> making

kind of person like I claimed I’m making

a<00:16:51.160> new<00:16:51.360> kind<00:16:51.560> of<00:16:52.040> class<00:16:52.360> or<00:16:52.560> something<00:16:53.560> maybe

a new kind of class or something maybe

that’s<00:16:54.040> something<00:16:54.319> which<00:16:54.440> can<00:16:54.560> be<00:16:54.720> new<00:16:54.880> or

that’s something which can be new or

maybe<00:16:55.279> not<00:16:56.279> good<00:16:56.480> question<00:16:56.839> is<00:16:56.959> there

maybe not good question is there

creativity<00:16:57.680> and<00:16:57.880> kinds<00:16:58.079> of<00:16:58.279> people<00:16:58.639> like<00:16:58.920> I

creativity and kinds of people like I

invented<00:16:59.319> a<00:16:59.440> kind<00:16:59.639> of<00:16:59.880> guy<00:17:00.839> nobody<00:17:01.160> was<00:17:01.360> this

invented a kind of guy nobody was this

kind<00:17:01.639> of<00:17:01.800> guy<00:17:01.959> before<00:17:02.240> I<00:17:02.440> was<00:17:02.759> and<00:17:02.880> now

kind of guy before I was and now

everyone<00:17:03.319> is<00:17:03.440> doing<00:17:03.880> is<00:17:04.039> copying

everyone is doing is copying

me<00:17:06.959> you<00:17:07.079> know<00:17:07.199> about<00:17:07.400> the<00:17:07.520> M<00:17:08.120> Finance<00:17:08.600> Bros<00:17:09.039> no

me you know about the M Finance Bros no

yeah<00:17:10.039> they<00:17:10.240> they<00:17:10.520> kind<00:17:10.679> of<00:17:10.880> guy<00:17:11.079> that

wasn’t

vs<00:17:18.439> okay<00:17:18.600> but<00:17:18.720> that’s<00:17:18.919> like

vs okay but that’s like

okay<00:17:21.400> exist<00:17:22.400> I<00:17:22.799> hear<00:17:23.799> um<00:17:24.640> that’s<00:17:25.240> interesting

okay exist I hear um that’s interesting

so<00:17:26.400> for<00:17:26.600> truth<00:17:27.000> it<00:17:27.160> doesn’t<00:17:27.360> seem<00:17:27.840> so<00:17:28.919> this<00:17:29.000> is

so for truth it doesn’t seem so this is

interesting<00:17:29.440> so<00:17:29.640> we<00:17:29.799> so<00:17:29.919> we<00:17:30.039> figured<00:17:30.400> out<00:17:31.200> that

interesting so we so we figured out that

there’s<00:17:31.720> three<00:17:31.960> kinds<00:17:32.200> of<00:17:32.400> things<00:17:33.080> there’s

there’s three kinds of things there’s

true<00:17:33.600> things<00:17:33.799> which<00:17:33.919> are<00:17:34.120> always<00:17:34.440> old<00:17:34.919> or

true things which are always old or

always<00:17:35.480> just<00:17:35.679> what<00:17:35.840> they

are<00:17:39.160> yeah<00:17:39.320> there’s<00:17:39.520> full<00:17:39.919> things<00:17:40.120> which<00:17:40.240> are

are yeah there’s full things which are

made<00:17:40.600> up<00:17:40.840> like<00:17:40.960> if<00:17:41.120> I<00:17:41.320> tell<00:17:41.480> you<00:17:41.679> I’m<00:17:41.799> the<00:17:41.960> one

made up like if I tell you I’m the one

that<00:17:42.240> made<00:17:42.400> up<00:17:42.559> that<00:17:42.679> the<00:17:42.760> moon<00:17:42.919> is<00:17:43.039> made<00:17:43.200> out

that made up that the moon is made out

of<00:17:43.480> cheese<00:17:44.360> well<00:17:44.480> I’m<00:17:44.600> not<00:17:44.760> that<00:17:44.960> one<00:17:45.120> I’m<00:17:45.200> a

of cheese well I’m not that one I’m a

liar<00:17:45.679> someone<00:17:45.919> else<00:17:46.080> made<00:17:46.280> up<00:17:46.440> that<00:17:46.600> lie<00:17:47.320> and

liar someone else made up that lie and

if<00:17:47.520> I<00:17:47.640> take<00:17:47.799> the<00:17:47.880> credit<00:17:48.160> for<00:17:48.280> making<00:17:48.520> it<00:17:48.640> up

if I take the credit for making it up

I’m<00:17:49.000> a<00:17:49.480> liar

I’m a liar

but<00:17:53.120> so<00:17:53.480> in<00:17:53.640> that<00:17:53.760> world<00:17:54.000> in<00:17:54.080> the<00:17:54.200> world<00:17:54.600> it

but so in that world in the world it

would<00:17:54.880> make<00:17:55.039> sense<00:17:55.240> to<00:17:55.360> have<00:17:55.440> a<00:17:55.559> credit<00:17:55.880> War

would make sense to have a credit War

like<00:17:56.840> who<00:17:56.960> should<00:17:57.200> I<00:17:57.360> who<00:17:57.440> should<00:17:57.640> take<00:17:57.799> the

like who should I who should take the

credit<00:17:58.440> but<00:17:58.559> the<00:17:58.640> whole<00:17:58.919> thing<00:17:59.000> would<00:17:59.120> be

credit but the whole thing would be

based<00:17:59.400> on<00:17:59.559> lies<00:18:00.320> right<00:18:01.320> then<00:18:01.440> somehow<00:18:01.720> we<00:18:01.799> have

based on lies right then somehow we have

a<00:18:02.039> third<00:18:02.280> category<00:18:02.799> which<00:18:02.919> is<00:18:03.159> human<00:18:03.440> creation

a third category which is human creation

or<00:18:04.000> synthetic<00:18:04.400> creation<00:18:05.360> discover<00:18:05.919> no

or synthetic creation discover no

one<00:18:08.000> nobody<00:18:08.559> I<00:18:08.600> mean<00:18:08.760> it<00:18:08.880> doesn’t<00:18:09.159> make<00:18:09.400> sense

one nobody I mean it doesn’t make sense

you<00:18:10.080> could<00:18:10.240> maybe<00:18:10.480> get<00:18:10.679> credit<00:18:10.919> for<00:18:11.080> being<00:18:11.240> the

you could maybe get credit for being the

discoverer<00:18:12.799> but<00:18:13.000> that<00:18:13.120> seems<00:18:13.320> to<00:18:13.440> be<00:18:13.559> very

discoverer but that seems to be very

minor<00:18:14.240> relative<00:18:14.559> to<00:18:14.799> the<00:18:15.080> question<00:18:15.360> if<00:18:15.520> is<00:18:15.600> it

minor relative to the question if is it

true<00:18:17.320> right<00:18:17.919> like<00:18:18.080> we<00:18:18.200> have<00:18:18.280> Newton’s<00:18:18.679> Laws<00:18:18.880> of

true right like we have Newton’s Laws of

Motion<00:18:19.679> but<00:18:19.840> Newton<00:18:20.159> didn’t<00:18:20.360> create<00:18:20.600> those

Motion but Newton didn’t create those

laws<00:18:20.919> of<00:18:21.039> motion<00:18:21.280> and<00:18:21.440> not<00:18:21.600> really<00:18:21.880> his

laws of motion and not really his

correct<00:18:22.880> in<00:18:23.000> any<00:18:23.200> real<00:18:23.559> way<00:18:24.559> yeah<00:18:24.720> thank<00:18:24.880> you

correct in any real way yeah thank you

very<00:18:25.240> much<00:18:25.400> for<00:18:25.600> telling<00:18:25.880> it<00:18:26.000> to<00:18:26.159> us<00:18:26.520> okay<00:18:26.960> even

very much for telling it to us okay even

even<00:18:27.440> evened<00:18:28.880> pure<00:18:29.159> truths<00:18:29.720> become<00:18:30.480> diluted

even evened pure truths become diluted

in<00:18:31.760> specific<00:18:32.200> ways<00:18:32.520> depending<00:18:32.840> on<00:18:33.000> how

in specific ways depending on how

they’re<00:18:33.280> brought<00:18:33.600> into<00:18:34.480> reality<00:18:34.880> and

they’re brought into reality and

articulated<00:18:35.880> right<00:18:36.400> some<00:18:36.640> theories<00:18:37.200> okay

articulated right some theories okay

wait<00:18:37.559> wait<00:18:37.679> you’re<00:18:37.840> making<00:18:38.159> me<00:18:38.240> a<00:18:38.320> fourth

wait wait you’re making me a fourth

category<00:18:39.000> I’m<00:18:39.120> getting<00:18:39.320> confused<00:18:39.679> already

category I’m getting confused already

let<00:18:40.440> me<00:18:40.640> finish<00:18:41.000> with<00:18:41.159> one<00:18:41.960> if<00:18:42.200> someone<00:18:42.480> tells

let me finish with one if someone tells

so<00:18:43.640> let’s<00:18:43.799> I’m<00:18:43.919> trying<00:18:44.159> to<00:18:44.280> think<00:18:44.440> about<00:18:44.760> let’s

so let’s I’m trying to think about let’s

say<00:18:45.000> if<00:18:45.080> I<00:18:45.200> teach<00:18:45.360> you<00:18:45.840> mechanics<00:18:46.840> and<00:18:46.960> I’m

say if I teach you mechanics and I’m

very<00:18:47.320> M<00:18:47.600> I’m<00:18:47.720> very

very M I’m very

firm<00:18:50.640> so<00:18:50.760> I<00:18:50.880> keep<00:18:51.000> on<00:18:51.120> saying<00:18:51.400> Omar

firm so I keep on saying Omar

Newton<00:18:54.000> at<00:18:54.120> some<00:18:54.280> point<00:18:54.520> you<00:18:54.600> should<00:18:54.760> throw<00:18:54.960> me

Newton at some point you should throw me

out<00:18:56.320> because<00:18:56.520> it’s<00:18:56.679> true<00:18:56.840> that<00:18:57.000> newon<00:18:57.280> said

out because it’s true that newon said

and<00:18:57.600> we’ll<00:18:57.799> have<00:18:57.919> a<00:18:58.080> history<00:18:58.360> of<00:18:58.760> mechanics

and we’ll have a history of mechanics

class<00:19:00.120> which<00:19:00.520> gives<00:19:00.720> Newton<00:19:01.039> his<00:19:01.159> due<00:19:01.400> respect

class which gives Newton his due respect

and<00:19:01.799> we’ll<00:19:01.960> have<00:19:02.039> a<00:19:02.480> statue<00:19:02.799> of<00:19:02.880> Newton<00:19:03.120> and<00:19:03.240> B

and we’ll have a statue of Newton and B

to<00:19:03.640> him<00:19:03.760> three<00:19:03.919> times<00:19:04.080> a<00:19:04.240> day<00:19:04.520> whatever

to him three times a day whatever

respect<00:19:05.440> he<00:19:05.559> needs<00:19:06.159> he<00:19:06.280> should<00:19:06.600> get<00:19:07.600> but<00:19:07.840> one

respect he needs he should get but one

respect<00:19:08.400> he<00:19:08.559> does<00:19:08.720> not<00:19:08.880> deserve<00:19:09.440> and<00:19:09.600> which

respect he does not deserve and which

would<00:19:10.000> actually<00:19:10.280> be<00:19:10.520> wrong<00:19:11.440> was<00:19:11.600> if<00:19:11.799> I<00:19:12.000> teach

would actually be wrong was if I teach

you<00:19:12.480> it<00:19:12.600> all<00:19:12.799> as<00:19:12.919> you<00:19:13.000> should<00:19:13.200> say<00:19:13.440> Newton<00:19:13.799> said

you it all as you should say Newton said

it’s<00:19:14.440> not<00:19:14.559> true<00:19:14.840> that<00:19:15.039> Newton<00:19:15.400> said<00:19:15.640> this

it’s not true that Newton said this

other<00:19:15.960> words<00:19:16.080> it’s<00:19:16.159> true<00:19:16.320> that<00:19:16.400> Newton<00:19:16.679> said

other words it’s true that Newton said

it<00:19:17.280> but<00:19:17.400> it’s<00:19:17.559> not<00:19:17.720> true<00:19:17.919> that<00:19:18.080> that’s<00:19:18.360> an

it but it’s not true that that’s an

inherent<00:19:19.000> part<00:19:19.240> of<00:19:19.400> the<00:19:19.520> knowledge<00:19:19.880> that<00:19:19.960> I’m

inherent part of the knowledge that I’m

teaching<00:19:20.440> you<00:19:21.360> or<00:19:21.520> it<00:19:21.640> shouldn’t<00:19:22.000> be<00:19:22.640> it’s

teaching you or it shouldn’t be it’s

only<00:19:23.000> true<00:19:23.200> and<00:19:23.280> so<00:19:23.440> far<00:19:23.600> it’s<00:19:23.760> false<00:19:24.080> and<00:19:24.200> so

only true and so far it’s false and so

far<00:19:24.480> as<00:19:24.559> it’s<00:19:24.760> true<00:19:25.520> it’s<00:19:25.840> this<00:19:25.960> is<00:19:26.080> how<00:19:26.200> the

far as it’s true it’s this is how the

universe<00:19:26.720> works<00:19:27.039> it’s<00:19:27.159> not<00:19:27.320> this<00:19:27.400> is<00:19:27.520> what

universe works it’s not this is what

Newton<00:19:28.000> said

B<00:19:32.120> just<00:19:32.240> showed<00:19:32.480> you<00:19:32.600> what<00:19:32.760> already<00:19:33.080> existed

B just showed you what already existed

yeah<00:19:36.039> right<00:19:36.200> but

yeah right but

when<00:19:38.080> when<00:19:38.240> Newton<00:19:38.520> showed<00:19:38.799> you<00:19:38.919> what<00:19:39.120> existed

when when Newton showed you what existed

he<00:19:39.679> also<00:19:39.880> showed<00:19:40.159> it<00:19:40.280> to<00:19:40.600> you<00:19:41.600> through<00:19:42.280> let’s

he also showed it to you through let’s

say<00:19:42.600> a<00:19:42.679> lower<00:19:43.120> prophetic<00:19:43.600> level<00:19:44.280> then<00:19:45.200> like<00:19:45.320> a

say a lower prophetic level then like a

pure<00:19:45.840> insight<00:19:46.240> into<00:19:46.480> the<00:19:46.640> entire<00:19:47.000> truth<00:19:47.240> of<00:19:47.400> it

pure insight into the entire truth of it

right<00:19:49.080> so<00:19:49.280> so<00:19:49.520> you’re<00:19:49.760> saying<00:19:50.480> that<00:19:50.679> let’s<00:19:50.880> say

right so so you’re saying that let’s say

if<00:19:51.520> he<00:19:51.640> come<00:19:51.840> up<00:19:51.960> with<00:19:52.039> a<00:19:52.120> good<00:19:52.240> mus<00:19:52.679> almost

if he come up with a good mus almost

take<00:19:53.039> credit<00:19:53.280> for<00:19:53.360> your<00:19:53.520> deficiencies<00:19:54.280> right

take credit for your deficiencies right

came<00:19:54.760> up<00:19:54.840> with<00:19:54.919> a<00:19:55.080> good<00:19:55.240> mus<00:19:56.039> or<00:19:56.159> maybe<00:19:56.320> if

came up with a good mus or maybe if

someone<00:19:56.640> would<00:19:56.760> tell<00:19:56.919> you<00:19:57.120> something<00:19:57.400> like

someone would tell you something like

you<00:19:57.600> know<00:19:57.720> Newton’s<00:19:58.159> laws<00:19:58.360> are<00:19:58.480> not<00:19:58.919> actually

you know Newton’s laws are not actually

the<00:19:59.480> way<00:19:59.640> the<00:19:59.760> world<00:20:00.000> Works<00:20:00.440> were<00:20:00.520> you<00:20:00.600> say<00:20:00.760> the

the way the world Works were you say the

same<00:20:01.080> about<00:20:01.240> aane<00:20:01.840> meaning<00:20:02.240> like<00:20:02.600> airplanes

same about aane meaning like airplanes

were<00:20:03.360> possible<00:20:03.840> before<00:20:04.039> the<00:20:04.200> right<00:20:04.440> Brothers

were possible before the right Brothers

but<00:20:04.919> they<00:20:05.120> created<00:20:05.840> yeah<00:20:05.960> yeah<00:20:06.080> that’s<00:20:06.200> what

but they created yeah yeah that’s what

we’re<00:20:06.440> saying<00:20:06.600> that’s<00:20:06.760> the<00:20:06.880> third<00:20:07.080> the<00:20:07.159> third

we’re saying that’s the third the third

category<00:20:07.720> it’s<00:20:07.840> up<00:20:08.000> to<00:20:08.120> the<00:20:08.240> second<00:20:08.520> categ

category it’s up to the second categ

right<00:20:09.240> yes<00:20:09.480> they<00:20:09.840> they<00:20:09.960> were<00:20:10.400> so<00:20:10.640> if<00:20:10.760> you

right yes they they were so if you

say<00:20:12.400> the<00:20:12.880> the<00:20:13.480> that<00:20:13.559> was<00:20:13.679> the<00:20:13.840> category

say the the that was the category

creativity<00:20:15.039> where<00:20:15.159> you<00:20:15.280> have<00:20:15.480> something

creativity where you have something

where<00:20:16.200> airplanes<00:20:16.600> are<00:20:16.760> obviously<00:20:17.080> not<00:20:17.240> false

where airplanes are obviously not false

because<00:20:17.760> they<00:20:18.120> exist<00:20:19.120> and<00:20:19.360> obviously<00:20:19.840> the

because they exist and obviously the

whoever<00:20:20.280> invented<00:20:20.679> it<00:20:21.600> if<00:20:21.720> they<00:20:21.799> were<00:20:21.960> the

whoever invented it if they were the

right<00:20:22.200> brothers<00:20:22.440> or<00:20:22.559> not<00:20:22.760> I<00:20:22.840> don’t<00:20:23.000> know<00:20:23.400> but

right brothers or not I don’t know but

whoever<00:20:26.799> whoever<00:20:27.799> well<00:20:28.120> it<00:20:28.320> had<00:20:29.080> as<00:20:29.200> the

whoever whoever well it had as the

potential<00:20:29.720> for<00:20:29.880> airplanes<00:20:30.520> not

potential for airplanes not

manifestation<00:20:32.080> of<00:20:32.600> yeah<00:20:32.720> so<00:20:32.840> we<00:20:32.960> get<00:20:33.080> into<00:20:33.320> the

manifestation of yeah so we get into the

do<00:20:33.880> we<00:20:34.120> if<00:20:34.280> we’re<00:20:35.280> yeah<00:20:35.600> but<00:20:35.919> wait<00:20:36.200> wait<00:20:36.679> but

do we if we’re yeah but wait wait but

you’re<00:20:36.919> saying<00:20:37.120> something<00:20:37.280> else<00:20:37.440> you’re

you’re saying something else you’re

saying<00:20:37.720> a<00:20:37.799> fourth<00:20:38.080> thing<00:20:38.600> we<00:20:38.720> already<00:20:38.919> know

saying a fourth thing we already know

that<00:20:39.640> are<00:20:39.880> presented<00:20:40.360> or<00:20:40.520> even<00:20:40.960> and<00:20:41.080> and<00:20:41.280> let’s

that are presented or even and and let’s

let’s<00:20:41.679> just<00:20:41.799> say<00:20:42.120> right<00:20:42.280> like<00:20:42.400> what<00:20:42.520> we<00:20:42.640> said

let’s just say right like what we said

with<00:20:43.480> with<00:20:43.799> with<00:20:44.000> with<00:20:44.159> Misha<00:20:44.559> right<00:20:44.840> that<00:20:45.039> the

with with with with Misha right that the

total<00:20:45.520> Perfection<00:20:45.919> is<00:20:46.080> no<00:20:46.280> variation<00:20:47.000> right

total Perfection is no variation right

but<00:20:48.120> still<00:20:48.440> lower<00:20:48.760> levels<00:20:49.000> of<00:20:49.159> perfection<00:20:49.559> do

but still lower levels of perfection do

have<00:20:49.960> variation<00:20:50.880> right<00:20:51.880> so<00:20:52.799> the<00:20:52.960> level<00:20:53.159> of

have variation right so the level of

variation<00:20:53.880> that<00:20:54.039> something<00:20:54.400> has<00:20:54.559> and<00:20:54.720> the

variation that something has and the

person<00:20:55.240> presenting<00:20:55.640> it<00:20:55.799> with<00:20:56.000> that

person presenting it with that

particular<00:20:56.840> let’s<00:20:56.960> say<00:20:57.200> configuration<00:20:57.880> or

particular let’s say configuration or

that<00:20:58.640> that<00:20:58.840> particular<00:20:59.200> way<00:20:59.320> of<00:20:59.480> structuring

that that particular way of structuring

it<00:21:01.039> however<00:21:01.679> however<00:21:02.440> you<00:21:02.559> know<00:21:02.840> they<00:21:03.039> bear

it however however you know they bear

the<00:21:03.440> marks<00:21:03.720> of<00:21:03.880> the<00:21:04.039> imperfections<00:21:04.559> of<00:21:04.760> those

the marks of the imperfections of those

ideas<00:21:05.559> right<00:21:06.440> right<00:21:06.760> so<00:21:07.039> so<00:21:07.280> that’s<00:21:07.400> a<00:21:07.600> weird

ideas right right so so that’s a weird

interesting<00:21:08.280> thing<00:21:08.480> to<00:21:08.640> think<00:21:08.799> of<00:21:09.440> so<00:21:10.159> like<00:21:10.400> I

interesting thing to think of so like I

I<00:21:10.840> would<00:21:11.000> call<00:21:11.120> it<00:21:11.240> venting<00:21:11.520> a<00:21:11.640> new<00:21:11.799> mus<00:21:12.440> right

I would call it venting a new mus right

because<00:21:13.240> imagine<00:21:13.559> someone<00:21:13.880> says<00:21:14.039> Newton’s

because imagine someone says Newton’s

law<00:21:14.600> are<00:21:14.720> not<00:21:14.960> actually<00:21:15.240> the<00:21:15.360> way<00:21:15.480> the<00:21:15.559> world

law are not actually the way the world

works<00:21:16.520> because<00:21:16.679> we<00:21:16.840> have<00:21:17.039> quantum<00:21:17.520> mechanics

works because we have quantum mechanics

and<00:21:18.360> relativity<00:21:18.840> and<00:21:18.960> all<00:21:19.080> kind<00:21:19.240> of<00:21:19.400> things

and relativity and all kind of things

but<00:21:20.159> they<00:21:20.240> are<00:21:20.400> a<00:21:20.600> good<00:21:20.840> way<00:21:20.960> of<00:21:21.159> thinking<00:21:21.440> of

but they are a good way of thinking of

it<00:21:21.840> at<00:21:22.000> least<00:21:22.320> you<00:21:22.440> know<00:21:22.720> for<00:21:23.039> for<00:21:23.559> for<00:21:23.760> not<00:21:23.919> too

it at least you know for for for not too

big<00:21:24.200> and<00:21:24.360> not<00:21:24.480> too<00:21:24.640> small<00:21:25.159> things

big and not too small things

and<00:21:28.600> do<00:21:28.760> fast<00:21:28.960> things<00:21:29.200> you<00:21:29.320> know<00:21:29.600> whatever<00:21:30.279> and

and do fast things you know whatever and

so<00:21:30.559> on<00:21:31.880> and<00:21:32.880> and<00:21:33.000> Newton<00:21:33.360> came<00:21:33.520> up<00:21:33.679> with<00:21:33.880> this

so on and and Newton came up with this

so<00:21:34.200> he<00:21:34.320> gets<00:21:34.559> credit<00:21:34.840> for<00:21:35.000> the<00:21:35.400> for<00:21:35.720> for<00:21:35.919> the

so he gets credit for the for for the

idea<00:21:36.760> to<00:21:36.880> the<00:21:37.000> extent<00:21:37.240> that<00:21:37.360> it’s<00:21:37.480> false<00:21:38.279> but

idea to the extent that it’s false but

not<00:21:38.799> entirely<00:21:39.159> false<00:21:39.440> to<00:21:39.559> the<00:21:39.679> extent<00:21:40.000> that

not entirely false to the extent that

it’s<00:21:40.360> useful<00:21:40.760> although<00:21:41.080> it’s<00:21:41.240> false<00:21:41.880> or<00:21:42.000> to

it’s useful although it’s false or to

the<00:21:42.360> kind<00:21:42.559> of<00:21:42.799> way<00:21:43.039> in<00:21:43.200> which<00:21:43.360> he<00:21:43.559> sort<00:21:43.720> of

the kind of way in which he sort of

which<00:21:44.080> is<00:21:44.240> not<00:21:44.480> really<00:21:44.880> FSE<00:21:45.480> yeah<00:21:46.120> it’s

which is not really FSE yeah it’s

something<00:21:46.480> in<00:21:46.640> between<00:21:46.960> in<00:21:47.080> the<00:21:47.200> kind<00:21:47.400> of<00:21:47.559> way

something in between in the kind of way

it’s<00:21:47.919> still<00:21:48.159> different<00:21:48.400> than<00:21:48.480> the<00:21:48.559> airplane

it’s still different than the airplane

example<00:21:49.760> right<00:21:50.159> because<00:21:50.279> the<00:21:50.360> airplane

example right because the airplane

example<00:21:50.960> is<00:21:51.120> really<00:21:51.279> a<00:21:51.400> new<00:21:51.640> thing<00:21:52.400> unless

example is really a new thing unless

we’re<00:21:52.840> talking<00:21:53.039> about<00:21:53.200> the<00:21:53.400> thought<00:21:53.679> like

we’re talking about the thought like

could<00:21:53.960> there<00:21:54.039> be<00:21:54.159> an<00:21:54.240> airplane<00:21:54.640> but<00:21:54.720> we’re

could there be an airplane but we’re

talking<00:21:55.000> about<00:21:55.120> the<00:21:55.240> actual

talking about the actual

airplane<00:21:56.960> but<00:21:57.120> in<00:21:57.279> this<00:21:57.440> example<00:21:57.799> in<00:21:57.880> the

airplane but in this example in the

Newton<00:21:58.240> example<00:21:58.880> it’s<00:21:59.039> something<00:21:59.360> like<00:21:59.679> he

Newton example it’s something like he

came<00:22:00.000> up<00:22:00.120> with<00:22:00.200> a<00:22:00.320> new<00:22:00.640> mus<00:22:01.640> right<00:22:01.760> he<00:22:01.880> came<00:22:02.039> up

came up with a new mus right he came up

with<00:22:02.240> a<00:22:02.320> new<00:22:02.480> formulation<00:22:03.080> new<00:22:03.240> model<00:22:04.159> which

with a new formulation new model which

helps<00:22:04.640> us<00:22:04.760> and<00:22:04.919> also<00:22:05.120> hinders<00:22:05.480> Us<00:22:05.600> in<00:22:05.760> other

ways<00:22:09.480> no<00:22:10.320> the<00:22:10.559> the<00:22:10.720> concept<00:22:11.080> of<00:22:11.159> it<00:22:11.320> maybe<00:22:11.600> like

ways no the the concept of it maybe like

the<00:22:12.159> of<00:22:12.279> how<00:22:12.440> to<00:22:12.640> make<00:22:12.799> it<00:22:13.240> was<00:22:13.520> unnown<00:22:13.919> but

the of how to make it was unnown but

then<00:22:14.279> was

then was

discovered<00:22:16.679> but<00:22:16.919> the<00:22:17.320> one<00:22:17.600> itself<00:22:18.320> was

discovered but the one itself was

created<00:22:18.760> by<00:22:18.880> some<00:22:19.240> unless<00:22:19.400> you<00:22:19.520> get<00:22:19.679> really

created by some unless you get really

close<00:22:20.080> to<00:22:20.279> M<00:22:20.799> become<00:22:21.200> him<00:22:21.799> right<00:22:22.200> you<00:22:22.320> don’t

close to M become him right you don’t

the<00:22:22.760> forms<00:22:23.039> of<00:22:23.159> the<00:22:23.240> airplanes<00:22:23.880> existed

the forms of the airplanes existed

before<00:22:26.559> the<00:22:27.000> physical<00:22:27.360> airplanes<00:22:27.880> possibili

before the physical airplanes possibili

yeah<00:22:29.440> or<00:22:29.600> if<00:22:29.679> they<00:22:29.840> have<00:22:29.919> a<00:22:30.039> form<00:22:30.440> or<00:22:30.640> whatever

yeah or if they have a form or whatever

if<00:22:31.039> there’s<00:22:31.279> forms<00:22:31.600> of<00:22:31.919> of<00:22:32.240> of<00:22:32.559> of<00:22:32.960> of

if there’s forms of of of of of

artificial<00:22:33.600> things<00:22:33.840> don’t<00:22:34.000> know<00:22:34.559> but

artificial things don’t know but

um<00:22:37.559> uh<00:22:37.760> but<00:22:38.039> the<00:22:38.640> the<00:22:38.799> actual<00:22:39.120> one<00:22:39.320> was<00:22:39.480> paid

um uh but the the actual one was paid

it<00:22:41.320> so<00:22:41.799> it<00:22:41.960> does<00:22:42.279> we<00:22:42.480> seem<00:22:42.720> to<00:22:42.799> be<00:22:42.960> back<00:22:43.159> at<00:22:43.320> that

it so it does we seem to be back at that

thought<00:22:43.760> that<00:22:43.880> you<00:22:44.000> get<00:22:44.640> credit<00:22:45.640> the<00:22:45.840> more

thought that you get credit the more

credit<00:22:46.320> you<00:22:46.440> get<00:22:46.640> the<00:22:46.760> more<00:22:47.279> lies<00:22:47.600> you<00:22:47.720> said

credit you get the more lies you said

just<00:22:48.559> in<00:22:48.679> a<00:22:48.880> more<00:22:49.120> complicated<00:22:49.520> way<00:22:49.640> than<00:22:49.760> we

just in a more complicated way than we

said<00:22:50.000> it<00:22:50.120> before<00:22:50.320> not<00:22:50.480> simply<00:22:50.840> lies<00:22:51.480> but<00:22:51.640> the

said it before not simply lies but the

credit<00:22:52.039> is<00:22:52.200> always<00:22:52.559> on<00:22:52.799> the<00:22:53.279> way<00:22:53.480> in<00:22:53.600> which<00:22:53.760> you

credit is always on the way in which you

made<00:22:54.039> it<00:22:54.200> human<00:22:54.440> or<00:22:54.600> the<00:22:54.799> way<00:22:55.159> you<00:22:55.360> made<00:22:55.520> it

made it human or the way you made it

contingent<00:22:57.039> the<00:22:57.120> other<00:22:57.240> way<00:22:57.320> up<00:22:57.440> the<00:22:57.559> ladder

contingent the other way up the ladder

right<00:22:58.080> you<00:22:58.200> can<00:22:58.559> say<00:22:58.720> that<00:22:58.919> this<00:22:59.720> that<00:22:59.880> this

right you can say that this that this

contains<00:23:00.480> less<00:23:00.760> deficiencies<00:23:01.360> than<00:23:01.559> other

contains less deficiencies than other

configurations<00:23:02.320> of<00:23:02.480> the<00:23:02.600> same<00:23:02.840> idea<00:23:03.360> okay<00:23:03.480> so

configurations of the same idea okay so

you<00:23:03.880> get<00:23:04.159> but<00:23:04.279> you<00:23:04.400> get<00:23:04.600> credit<00:23:05.679> for<00:23:06.679> before

you get but you get credit for before

Newton<00:23:07.200> we<00:23:07.279> thought<00:23:07.520> even<00:23:07.720> bigger<00:23:08.000> lie<00:23:08.600> and

Newton we thought even bigger lie and

now<00:23:08.880> you<00:23:09.000> think<00:23:09.159> a<00:23:09.279> slight<00:23:09.520> or<00:23:09.760> less<00:23:10.000> lie

now you think a slight or less lie

slightly<00:23:10.919> less<00:23:11.120> lie<00:23:11.400> it<00:23:11.480> could<00:23:11.600> be<00:23:11.720> it<00:23:11.799> could

slightly less lie it could be it could

be<00:23:12.000> a<00:23:12.080> nonlinear<00:23:12.679> variation<00:23:13.480> meaning<00:23:14.159> let’s

be a nonlinear variation meaning let’s

say<00:23:14.919> you<00:23:15.039> havea<00:23:15.679> in<00:23:15.840> which<00:23:16.159> case<00:23:16.480> all<00:23:16.840> truth<00:23:17.520> is

say you havea in which case all truth is

is<00:23:18.440> uniform<00:23:19.080> right<00:23:19.240> because<00:23:19.400> there’s<00:23:19.559> no

is uniform right because there’s no

Variety<00:23:20.360> in<00:23:20.600> in<00:23:20.960> the<00:23:21.080> absolute<00:23:21.440> truth<00:23:21.679> of

Variety in in the absolute truth of

things<00:23:22.400> right<00:23:23.400> but<00:23:23.559> then<00:23:23.760> beneath<00:23:24.120> mea<00:23:24.520> maybe

things right but then beneath mea maybe

there’s<00:23:24.880> still<00:23:25.159> one<00:23:26.159> basic<00:23:26.520> way<00:23:26.640> of

there’s still one basic way of

explaining<00:23:27.320> it<00:23:27.720> but<00:23:28.520> start<00:23:28.679> to<00:23:28.760> have

explaining it but start to have

divergences<00:23:29.440> and<00:23:29.600> two<00:23:30.240> let’s<00:23:30.360> say<00:23:30.559> let’s<00:23:30.720> say

divergences and two let’s say let’s say

two<00:23:31.080> competitively<00:23:31.679> false<00:23:32.080> models<00:23:32.840> for<00:23:33.080> the

two competitively false models for the

same<00:23:33.880> you<00:23:34.000> know<00:23:34.360> that<00:23:34.480> let’s<00:23:34.600> say<00:23:34.799> each

same you know that let’s say each

explain<00:23:35.279> a<00:23:35.440> half<00:23:35.600> of<00:23:35.720> it<00:23:36.279> okay<00:23:36.799> right<00:23:37.080> so<00:23:37.679> so<00:23:37.880> if

explain a half of it okay right so so if

someone<00:23:38.279> finds<00:23:38.600> the<00:23:38.760> one<00:23:39.000> model<00:23:39.360> that’s<00:23:39.720> more

someone finds the one model that’s more

true<00:23:40.840> then<00:23:40.960> he<00:23:41.080> gets<00:23:41.360> credit<00:23:41.880> because<00:23:42.159> of<00:23:42.400> he

true then he gets credit because of he

saved<00:23:43.279> us<00:23:43.480> from<00:23:43.640> bigger<00:23:43.919> lives<00:23:44.360> that’s

saved us from bigger lives that’s

differently

FSE<00:23:46.600> okay<00:23:47.080> yeah<00:23:47.520> that<00:23:47.640> was<00:23:47.799> that’s<00:23:48.000> useless<00:23:48.960> or

FSE okay yeah that was that’s useless or

better<00:23:49.720> one<00:23:50.120> fall<00:23:50.320> in<00:23:50.400> the<00:23:50.520> opposite

better one fall in the opposite

direction<00:23:51.480> it<00:23:51.679> also<00:23:51.960> informs<00:23:52.320> you<00:23:52.520> of

direction it also informs you of

something<00:23:53.400> okay<00:23:54.159> okay<00:23:54.320> it<00:23:54.400> could<00:23:54.520> even<00:23:54.679> be

something okay okay it could even be

further<00:23:55.400> away<00:23:55.559> from<00:23:55.720> the<00:23:55.799> truth<00:23:56.039> but<00:23:56.159> still

further away from the truth but still

reveal<00:23:56.600> a<00:23:56.679> certain<00:23:56.919> true<00:23:57.159> Dimension<00:23:57.679> yeah<00:23:57.960> all

reveal a certain true Dimension yeah all

these<00:23:58.240> lies<00:23:58.880> might<00:23:59.279> might<00:23:59.559> have<00:23:59.960> might<00:24:00.120> in

these lies might might have might in

some<00:24:00.440> sense<00:24:00.720> reveal<00:24:01.000> truth<00:24:01.240> also<00:24:01.600> might<00:24:01.720> be

some sense reveal truth also might be

the<00:24:02.039> truth<00:24:02.279> in<00:24:02.400> it<00:24:02.640> also<00:24:03.159> right<00:24:03.679> yes<00:24:04.120> yes<00:24:04.640> but

the truth in it also right yes yes but

you<00:24:04.840> don’t<00:24:05.080> get<00:24:05.240> credit<00:24:05.520> for<00:24:05.679> the<00:24:05.799> truth<00:24:06.039> that

you don’t get credit for the truth that

you<00:24:06.240> reveal<00:24:06.600> you<00:24:06.720> get<00:24:06.840> credit<00:24:07.120> for<00:24:07.240> the<00:24:07.400> lie

you reveal you get credit for the lie

it’s<00:24:08.679> sometimes<00:24:08.880> the<00:24:08.960> only<00:24:09.159> way<00:24:09.279> to

it’s sometimes the only way to

distinguish<00:24:09.880> it<00:24:10.200> right<00:24:10.480> possible<00:24:11.320> so<00:24:11.480> you<00:24:11.640> say

distinguish it right possible so you say

basically<00:24:14.880> exist<00:24:15.880> every<00:24:16.159> IDE<00:24:16.799> all<00:24:16.880> the<00:24:16.960> true

basically exist every IDE all the true

ones<00:24:17.360> not<00:24:17.480> all<00:24:17.600> of<00:24:17.720> the<00:24:17.919> ideas<00:24:18.360> only<00:24:18.640> the<00:24:18.760> true

ones not all of the ideas only the true

ideas<00:24:19.279> were<00:24:19.559> existed<00:24:20.559> or<00:24:20.720> only<00:24:20.960> the<00:24:21.120> truth<00:24:21.440> of

ideas were existed or only the truth of

the<00:24:21.760> ideas<00:24:22.200> the<00:24:22.400> truth<00:24:22.600> that<00:24:22.720> the<00:24:22.840> ideas<00:24:23.120> are

the ideas the truth that the ideas are

about<00:24:23.720> the<00:24:23.880> false<00:24:24.440> were<00:24:24.720> existed<00:24:25.399> as<00:24:25.520> a<00:24:25.799> false

about the false were existed as a false

as<00:24:27.159> false<00:24:28.080> I<00:24:28.159> don’t<00:24:28.440> false<00:24:28.679> IDE<00:24:29.279> I<00:24:29.360> don’t<00:24:29.520> know

as false I don’t false IDE I don’t know

but<00:24:30.279> uh<00:24:31.279> because<00:24:31.520> false<00:24:31.840> ideas<00:24:32.200> ideas<00:24:32.480> are<00:24:32.600> not

but uh because false ideas ideas are not

every<00:24:33.320> possibility<00:24:33.880> is<00:24:34.120> possible<00:24:34.559> right<00:24:34.880> no

every possibility is possible right no

no<00:24:35.760> if<00:24:35.919> every<00:24:36.679> if<00:24:36.840> every<00:24:37.120> possibility<00:24:37.559> is

no if every if every possibility is

possible<00:24:38.240> then<00:24:38.600> doesn’t<00:24:38.840> think<00:24:39.000> like<00:24:39.159> that<00:24:39.399> if

possible then doesn’t think like that if

every<00:24:39.760> possibility<00:24:40.200> is<00:24:40.360> possible<00:24:40.679> then

every possibility is possible then

thought<00:24:41.039> is

thought is

impossible<00:24:42.960> okay<00:24:43.120> I’m<00:24:43.240> not<00:24:43.360> going<00:24:43.480> to<00:24:43.640> get

impossible okay I’m not going to get

stuck<00:24:44.240> in<00:24:44.440> that<00:24:44.679> but<00:24:44.799> no<00:24:45.039> not<00:24:45.200> every

stuck in that but no not every

possibility<00:24:45.799> is

possibility is

possible<00:24:47.440> in<00:24:47.600> other<00:24:47.799> words<00:24:48.159> every

possible in other words every

possibility<00:24:48.799> is<00:24:48.960> possible

possibility is possible

impossible<00:24:51.200> we’re<00:24:51.279> GNA<00:24:51.480> get<00:24:51.600> stuck<00:24:51.840> here

impossible we’re GNA get stuck here

the<00:24:53.840> the<00:24:53.960> point<00:24:54.159> is

the the point is

no<00:24:56.559> no<00:24:56.679> an<00:24:56.799> idea

no no an idea

actually<00:24:58.919> credit<00:24:59.279> for<00:24:59.480> nothing<00:24:59.840> because

actually credit for nothing because

every<00:25:00.600> idea<00:25:00.919> was<00:25:01.120> existing<00:25:01.919> ideas<00:25:02.360> that<00:25:02.440> are

every idea was existing ideas that are

revealing<00:25:03.440> something<00:25:04.320> behind<00:25:04.640> them<00:25:04.840> right

revealing something behind them right

ideas<00:25:05.279> not<00:25:05.440> interesting<00:25:05.720> for<00:25:05.880> the<00:25:06.000> words<00:25:06.360> for

ideas not interesting for the words for

the<00:25:06.679> for<00:25:06.840> the<00:25:06.960> mush<00:25:07.279> they’re<00:25:07.440> interesting<00:25:08.000> if

the for the mush they’re interesting if

I<00:25:08.240> tell<00:25:08.399> you<00:25:08.600> how<00:25:08.720> the<00:25:08.840> world<00:25:09.039> works<00:25:09.279> and<00:25:09.440> now

I tell you how the world works and now

it’s<00:25:09.720> the<00:25:09.840> world<00:25:10.159> that’s<00:25:10.320> true<00:25:10.600> not<00:25:10.720> the<00:25:10.840> idea

it’s the world that’s true not the idea

that’s<00:25:11.320> true<00:25:11.600> right<00:25:11.720> an<00:25:11.840> idea<00:25:12.080> is<00:25:12.200> just

that’s true right an idea is just

something<00:25:12.679> that<00:25:13.039> brings<00:25:13.399> the<00:25:13.520> world<00:25:13.760> to<00:25:13.919> you

something that brings the world to you

right<00:25:14.440> that<00:25:14.520> was<00:25:14.679> my<00:25:14.799> she<00:25:15.080> last<00:25:15.240> week<00:25:15.760> that

right that was my she last week that

ideas<00:25:16.200> are<00:25:16.360> just<00:25:16.520> ways<00:25:16.720> of<00:25:16.840> connecting<00:25:17.200> with

ideas are just ways of connecting with

the<00:25:17.559> reality<00:25:18.360> right

the reality right

create<00:25:20.559> well<00:25:20.799> God<00:25:20.960> is<00:25:21.080> the<00:25:21.200> biggest<00:25:21.480> liar

create well God is the biggest liar

according<00:25:22.159> to<00:25:22.360> this<00:25:22.720> because<00:25:22.919> he’s<00:25:23.120> the<00:25:23.200> only

according to this because he’s the only

one<00:25:23.520> that<00:25:23.640> could<00:25:23.840> create<00:25:24.520> things<00:25:24.760> that<00:25:24.919> never

one that could create things that never

existed<00:25:25.520> before<00:25:26.039> and<00:25:26.200> that’s<00:25:26.320> like<00:25:26.440> the

existed before and that’s like the

definition<00:25:26.880> of<00:25:27.000> a<00:25:27.159> lie<00:25:28.440> but<00:25:28.559> that’s<00:25:28.679> a

definition of a lie but that’s a

different<00:25:29.080> theological

different theological

problem<00:25:31.840> think<00:25:32.039> about<00:25:32.240> it<00:25:33.080> making<00:25:33.320> things<00:25:33.520> up

problem think about it making things up

is<00:25:33.799> a<00:25:33.960> lie<00:25:34.320> right<00:25:34.919> oh<00:25:35.120> God<00:25:35.320> makes<00:25:35.520> up<00:25:35.679> true

is a lie right oh God makes up true

things<00:25:36.640> God<00:25:36.799> doesn’t<00:25:36.960> make<00:25:37.080> up<00:25:37.200> true<00:25:37.360> things

things God doesn’t make up true things

either<00:25:37.760> he<00:25:37.880> wouldn’t<00:25:38.159> make<00:25:38.320> up<00:25:38.559> things<00:25:38.880> the

either he wouldn’t make up things the

way<00:25:39.159> we<00:25:39.360> make<00:25:39.480> up<00:25:39.679> things<00:25:40.240> yeah<00:25:40.440> he<00:25:40.559> would<00:25:40.720> make

way we make up things yeah he would make

them<00:25:41.279> up<00:25:41.480> slightly<00:25:41.840> better<00:25:42.080> than<00:25:42.240> we<00:25:42.360> do<00:25:42.760> but

them up slightly better than we do but

still<00:25:43.240> not<00:25:43.440> as<00:25:43.640> good<00:25:43.799> as<00:25:43.960> himself<00:25:44.480> no<00:25:45.240> also

still not as good as himself no also

also<00:25:47.120> don’t<00:25:47.279> get<00:25:47.440> stuck<00:25:47.679> here<00:25:48.320> but<00:25:48.679> those<00:25:48.799> are

also don’t get stuck here but those are

also<00:25:49.200> things<00:25:49.360> that<00:25:49.440> are<00:25:49.559> forced<00:25:49.919> by<00:25:50.120> proximity

also things that are forced by proximity

and<00:25:50.880> not<00:25:51.360> and<00:25:51.480> not<00:25:51.640> and<00:25:51.760> not<00:25:51.919> forced<00:25:52.480> by<00:25:52.880> by<00:25:53.520> by

and not and not and not forced by by by

inventiveness<00:25:54.679> right<00:25:55.240> meaning<00:25:55.880> meaning<00:25:56.200> the

inventiveness right meaning meaning the

things<00:25:56.480> that<00:25:56.559> are<00:25:56.720> false<00:25:56.960> are<00:25:57.159> false<00:25:57.520> because

things that are false are false because

of<00:25:57.880> the<00:25:58.480> let’s<00:25:58.640> say<00:25:58.799> to<00:25:58.960> use<00:25:59.120> a<00:25:59.399> basic<00:25:59.679> Simpson

of the let’s say to use a basic Simpson

Rell<00:26:00.440> right<00:26:00.559> they<00:26:00.679> have<00:26:00.799> a<00:26:00.919> certain<00:26:01.240> proximity

Rell right they have a certain proximity

from<00:26:02.000> God<00:26:03.000> right<00:26:03.520> the<00:26:03.640> further<00:26:04.000> something<00:26:04.279> is

from God right the further something is

from<00:26:05.039> God<00:26:06.039> that<00:26:06.159> just<00:26:06.360> means<00:26:06.760> but<00:26:06.880> that<00:26:07.000> just

from God that just means but that just

means<00:26:07.399> the<00:26:07.559> further<00:26:07.919> something<00:26:08.399> is<00:26:08.559> from<00:26:08.799> the

means the further something is from the

way<00:26:09.360> reality<00:26:09.840> really<00:26:10.200> is<00:26:10.799> right<00:26:11.200> right<00:26:11.679> but

way reality really is right right but

that<00:26:12.120> that<00:26:12.360> with<00:26:12.520> with<00:26:12.760> God<00:26:13.000> it’s<00:26:13.200> not<00:26:13.399> it’s

that that with with God it’s not it’s

not<00:26:14.039> the<00:26:14.200> proximity<00:26:14.760> is<00:26:15.039> is<00:26:15.720> is<00:26:16.480> inevitably<00:26:16.960> a

not the proximity is is is inevitably a

problem<00:26:17.360> it’s<00:26:17.559> backwards<00:26:18.559> no<00:26:18.679> it’s<00:26:18.760> not<00:26:18.880> only

problem it’s backwards no it’s not only

that<00:26:19.120> it’s<00:26:19.640> inevitable<00:26:20.640> right<00:26:21.039> right<00:26:21.279> it’s

that it’s inevitable right right it’s

inevitable<00:26:22.039> that<00:26:22.399> nothing<00:26:23.399> I<00:26:23.559> I’m<00:26:23.679> this<00:26:23.840> this

inevitable that nothing I I’m this this

nonsense<00:26:24.520> it’s<00:26:24.679> sist<00:26:25.000> stre<00:26:25.200> when<00:26:25.320> I<00:26:25.440> say<00:26:25.640> this

nonsense it’s sist stre when I say this

but<00:26:26.000> doesn’t<00:26:26.240> matter<00:26:26.799> because<00:26:27.240> the<00:26:28.080> the<00:26:28.399> point

but doesn’t matter because the the point

is<00:26:29.039> God

is God

himself

no<00:26:35.080> wasn’t<00:26:35.440> existed<00:26:36.000> before<00:26:37.000> and<00:26:37.399> now<00:26:37.760> you’re

no wasn’t existed before and now you’re

coming<00:26:38.240> and<00:26:38.440> telling<00:26:38.799> me<00:26:39.320> but<00:26:39.760> but<00:26:40.240> but<00:26:40.520> if

coming and telling me but but but if

it’s<00:26:41.039> supposed<00:26:41.399> to<00:26:41.640> be<00:26:42.399> this<00:26:42.520> is<00:26:42.679> the<00:26:42.799> way<00:26:42.919> it’s

it’s supposed to be this is the way it’s

supposed<00:26:43.320> to<00:26:43.440> be<00:26:43.679> that<00:26:44.480> it<00:26:44.679> wasn’t<00:26:45.080> before

supposed to be that it wasn’t before

because<00:26:45.760> it<00:26:45.960> wasn’t<00:26:46.480> a<00:26:46.840> thing<00:26:47.480> before<00:26:48.480> they

because it wasn’t a thing before they

right<00:26:49.440> but<00:26:49.559> then<00:26:49.679> it’s<00:26:50.080> like<00:26:50.360> like<00:26:50.640> you<00:26:50.799> could

right but then it’s like like you could

do<00:26:51.080> the<00:26:51.159> same<00:26:51.279> thing<00:26:51.399> for<00:26:51.559> human<00:26:51.840> things<00:26:52.080> it

do the same thing for human things it

wasn’t<00:26:52.520> the<00:26:52.640> thing<00:26:52.760> before<00:26:52.919> before<00:26:53.159> to<00:26:53.279> know

wasn’t the thing before before to know

about<00:26:54.039> relativity<00:26:54.559> and<00:26:54.640> then<00:26:54.799> Einstein<00:26:55.159> came

about relativity and then Einstein came

and<00:26:55.440> told<00:26:55.600> that<00:26:55.760> to<00:26:55.919> us<00:26:56.320> and<00:26:56.440> there<00:26:56.600> was

and told that to us and there was

probably<00:26:57.000> a<00:26:57.120> reason<00:26:57.360> why<00:26:57.480> it<00:26:57.559> wasn’t<00:26:57.799> for

probably a reason why it wasn’t for

before

it<00:26:59.480> was<00:26:59.640> before<00:26:59.919> the<00:27:00.000> reality<00:27:00.320> was<00:27:00.440> like<00:27:00.559> that

it was before the reality was like that

before<00:27:00.960> but<00:27:01.120> people<00:27:01.320> didn’t<00:27:01.559> know<00:27:01.720> about<00:27:01.880> it

before but people didn’t know about it

exactly<00:27:02.799> didn’t<00:27:03.039> reveal<00:27:03.320> it<00:27:03.679> but<00:27:03.840> it<00:27:04.039> was

exactly didn’t reveal it but it was

before<00:27:06.960> okay<00:27:07.480> yeah<00:27:07.799> the<00:27:07.960> world<00:27:08.600> even<00:27:08.840> though

before okay yeah the world even though

it<00:27:09.159> wasn’t<00:27:09.559> before

it wasn’t before

and<00:27:12.600> let’s<00:27:12.760> not<00:27:12.960> let’s<00:27:13.120> not<00:27:13.279> get<00:27:13.399> stuck<00:27:13.760> about

and let’s not let’s not get stuck about

and<00:27:14.880> that’s<00:27:15.039> why<00:27:15.279> TR<00:27:15.640> it’s<00:27:15.799> not<00:27:15.960> a<00:27:16.600> lie<00:27:17.600> n

and that’s why TR it’s not a lie n

Health<00:27:18.600> okay<00:27:18.840> let’s<00:27:19.000> not<00:27:19.159> get<00:27:19.240> Stu<00:27:19.559> here<00:27:19.799> let’s

Health okay let’s not get Stu here let’s

not<00:27:20.039> get<00:27:20.159> Stu<00:27:20.440> here<00:27:20.600> because<00:27:20.720> it’s<00:27:21.360> it<00:27:21.480> doesn’t

not get Stu here because it’s it doesn’t

it<00:27:21.840> doesn’t<00:27:22.080> make<00:27:22.799> make<00:27:22.960> it<00:27:23.200> make<00:27:23.360> it<00:27:23.880> better

it doesn’t make make it make it better

or<00:27:24.279> worse<00:27:24.640> I<00:27:24.720> think<00:27:24.840> that<00:27:25.000> it’s<00:27:25.200> true<00:27:26.120> that<00:27:26.720> um

or worse I think that it’s true that um

back<00:27:27.640> to

trying<00:27:31.279> to<00:27:31.399> think<00:27:31.559> if<00:27:31.720> you<00:27:31.919> have<00:27:32.320> credit<00:27:33.320> then

trying to think if you have credit then

you<00:27:33.559> have<00:27:33.679> to<00:27:33.799> give<00:27:33.960> credit<00:27:34.880> well<00:27:35.080> in<00:27:35.320> certain

you have to give credit well in certain

sense<00:27:36.039> the<00:27:36.240> only<00:27:36.640> real<00:27:36.960> credit<00:27:37.320> can<00:27:37.559> be<00:27:37.720> given

sense the only real credit can be given

for<00:27:38.120> any<00:27:38.360> truth<00:27:38.640> is<00:27:38.760> to<00:27:39.000> God<00:27:39.960> that’s<00:27:40.080> why<00:27:40.320> God

for any truth is to God that’s why God

is<00:27:40.559> the<00:27:40.679> author<00:27:40.880> of<00:27:41.039> Truth<00:27:41.640> although<00:27:42.640> it’s

is the author of Truth although it’s

only<00:27:43.000> true<00:27:43.240> in<00:27:43.399> so<00:27:43.559> far<00:27:43.720> as<00:27:43.880> it<00:27:44.000> doesn’t<00:27:44.360> exist

only true in so far as it doesn’t exist

which<00:27:45.559> means<00:27:46.440> whatever<00:27:47.440> okay<00:27:47.760> the<00:27:47.919> K

which means whatever okay the K

said<00:27:50.000> let’s<00:27:50.159> not<00:27:50.360> make<00:27:50.600> this<00:27:50.799> theological

said let’s not make this theological

problem<00:27:51.600> now<00:27:51.799> it’s<00:27:51.919> not<00:27:52.080> for<00:27:52.399> we’re<00:27:52.519> going<00:27:52.600> to

problem now it’s not for we’re going to

just<00:27:52.880> get<00:27:53.080> lost<00:27:53.760> point<00:27:54.080> is<00:27:54.200> something<00:27:54.519> simple

just get lost point is something simple

that<00:27:56.000> you<00:27:56.399> can’t<00:27:56.720> say<00:27:57.080> Omar<00:27:57.799> Mishu

that you can’t say Omar Mishu

person<00:28:00.840> only<00:28:01.080> to<00:28:01.240> the<00:28:01.399> extent<00:28:01.880> that<00:28:02.159> it’s<00:28:02.600> I

person only to the extent that it’s I

mean<00:28:03.000> would<00:28:03.159> wouldn’t<00:28:03.399> be<00:28:03.559> true<00:28:03.760> in<00:28:03.880> the<00:28:04.000> sense

mean would wouldn’t be true in the sense

of<00:28:04.360> course<00:28:04.480> he<00:28:04.600> could<00:28:04.760> say<00:28:04.880> it<00:28:05.039> in<00:28:05.120> the<00:28:05.200> sense

of course he could say it in the sense

that<00:28:05.480> he<00:28:05.559> revealed<00:28:05.880> it<00:28:06.000> he<00:28:06.159> told<00:28:06.279> it<00:28:06.399> to<00:28:06.519> me<00:28:06.840> and

that he revealed it he told it to me and

he<00:28:07.080> deserves<00:28:07.440> credit<00:28:07.720> all<00:28:07.840> these<00:28:08.000> things

he deserves credit all these things

we’re<00:28:08.320> not<00:28:08.559> we’re<00:28:08.720> not<00:28:08.880> arguing<00:28:09.279> about<00:28:09.559> but<00:28:09.679> if

we’re not we’re not arguing about but if

I’m<00:28:10.159> here<00:28:10.399> if<00:28:10.519> my<00:28:10.760> goal<00:28:11.120> right<00:28:11.279> again<00:28:11.440> we<00:28:11.559> said

I’m here if my goal right again we said

last<00:28:11.960> time<00:28:12.080> we<00:28:12.200> have<00:28:12.279> to<00:28:12.440> measure<00:28:12.720> everything

last time we have to measure everything

according<00:28:13.240> to<00:28:13.360> our<00:28:13.480> criteria<00:28:14.039> right<00:28:14.480> if<00:28:14.600> my

according to our criteria right if my

criteria<00:28:15.240> is<00:28:15.760> understanding<00:28:16.760> you<00:28:16.880> don’t

criteria is understanding you don’t

understand<00:28:17.559> anything<00:28:17.840> better<00:28:18.039> by<00:28:18.159> knowing

understand anything better by knowing

who<00:28:18.559> said

who said

it<00:28:20.320> is<00:28:20.480> that<00:28:20.640> correct<00:28:21.360> yeah<00:28:21.840> at<00:28:21.960> least<00:28:22.399> unless

it is that correct yeah at least unless

unless<00:28:23.039> it<00:28:23.200> give<00:28:23.360> some<00:28:23.559> validity<00:28:24.000> to<00:28:24.159> the

unless it give some validity to the

words<00:28:25.519> meaning<00:28:26.200> that’s<00:28:26.399> that’s<00:28:26.519> the<00:28:26.640> second

words meaning that’s that’s the second

category<00:28:27.440> composition<00:28:28.200> other<00:28:28.320> words<00:28:28.519> unless

category composition other words unless

it’s<00:28:29.080> not<00:28:29.279> really<00:28:29.480> true<00:28:29.679> it’s<00:28:29.799> only<00:28:30.000> true

it’s not really true it’s only true

because<00:28:30.440> someone<00:28:30.679> said

because someone said

it<00:28:32.360> I<00:28:32.600> I<00:28:32.679> don’t<00:28:32.760> know<00:28:32.840> if<00:28:32.960> this<00:28:33.080> makes<00:28:33.200> sense

it I I don’t know if this makes sense

just<00:28:33.720> the<00:28:33.919> past<00:28:34.200> history<00:28:34.760> of<00:28:35.080> actually<00:28:35.480> you

just the past history of actually you

know<00:28:35.720> the<00:28:35.840> things<00:28:36.000> that<00:28:36.120> they<00:28:36.240> said<00:28:36.399> were<00:28:36.600> true

know the things that they said were true

so<00:28:37.480> we’re<00:28:37.640> just<00:28:37.760> going<00:28:37.840> to<00:28:37.960> assume<00:28:38.240> they<00:28:38.320> have

so we’re just going to assume they have

a<00:28:38.519> good<00:28:38.679> track<00:28:38.960> record<00:28:39.960> oh<00:28:40.159> that’s<00:28:40.320> a<00:28:40.440> question

a good track record oh that’s a question

of<00:28:40.760> trust<00:28:41.399> I’m<00:28:41.519> saying<00:28:41.760> you<00:28:41.880> should<00:28:42.159> but<00:28:42.279> then

of trust I’m saying you should but then

I<00:28:42.480> don’t<00:28:42.679> know<00:28:43.279> I’m<00:28:43.519> just<00:28:43.840> secondhand

I don’t know I’m just secondhand

knowledge<00:28:44.799> right<00:28:45.000> I<00:28:45.440> I’m<00:28:45.600> saying<00:28:46.080> you<00:28:46.159> should

knowledge right I I’m saying you should

you<00:28:46.679> should<00:28:46.840> assume<00:28:47.120> this<00:28:47.279> because<00:28:47.399> a<00:28:47.480> smart

you should assume this because a smart

guy<00:28:47.919> said<00:28:48.080> it<00:28:48.279> okay<00:28:48.440> that<00:28:48.559> makes<00:28:48.799> sense<00:28:49.320> but

guy said it okay that makes sense but

that’s<00:28:49.720> not<00:28:50.000> when<00:28:50.120> we’re<00:28:50.279> after<00:28:50.519> knowledge

that’s not when we’re after knowledge

that’s<00:28:51.080> not<00:28:51.200> a<00:28:51.360> good<00:28:51.600> a<00:28:51.720> good<00:28:51.840> way<00:28:51.960> of<00:28:52.080> doing

that’s not a good a good way of doing

things<00:28:52.399> in<00:28:52.480> any<00:28:52.679> case<00:28:53.000> right<00:28:53.279> that’s<00:28:53.640> that’s

things in any case right that’s that’s

just<00:28:54.120> what<00:28:54.240> we<00:28:54.360> call<00:28:54.640> argument<00:28:55.000> from

just what we call argument from

Authority<00:28:55.679> which<00:28:55.799> is<00:28:55.960> not<00:28:56.640> a<00:28:56.760> good<00:28:56.919> way<00:28:57.039> of

Authority which is not a good way of

knowing<00:28:57.399> it’s<00:28:57.480> a<00:28:57.600> good<00:28:57.720> way<00:28:57.840> of<00:28:58.159> living

knowing it’s a good way of living

because<00:28:58.760> obviously<00:28:59.080> we<00:28:59.200> don’t<00:28:59.279> know

because obviously we don’t know

everything<00:28:59.720> so<00:28:59.840> we’re<00:28:59.960> going<00:29:00.039> to<00:29:00.120> rely<00:29:00.320> on

everything so we’re going to rely on

people<00:29:01.080> but<00:29:01.360> it’s<00:29:01.600> not<00:29:02.240> right<00:29:03.159> so<00:29:03.440> that’s<00:29:03.559> a

people but it’s not right so that’s a

way<00:29:03.840> that’s<00:29:04.000> true<00:29:04.440> we<00:29:04.600> we<00:29:04.919> sometimes<00:29:05.320> we

way that’s true we we sometimes we

sometimes<00:29:06.080> like<00:29:06.320> ground<00:29:06.679> the<00:29:06.799> truth<00:29:07.039> of

sometimes like ground the truth of

something<00:29:07.399> and<00:29:07.559> saying<00:29:07.760> that<00:29:07.919> someone<00:29:08.159> said

something and saying that someone said

it<00:29:08.760> but<00:29:08.880> we<00:29:09.000> don’t<00:29:09.200> really<00:29:09.399> mean<00:29:09.559> to<00:29:09.720> ground

it but we don’t really mean to ground

the<00:29:10.039> truth<00:29:10.200> in<00:29:10.320> that<00:29:10.399> we<00:29:10.480> mean<00:29:10.640> to<00:29:10.720> ground<00:29:10.919> it

the truth in that we mean to ground it

in<00:29:11.279> the<00:29:11.399> step<00:29:11.840> true<00:29:12.080> because<00:29:12.480> right<00:29:12.640> that’s

in the step true because right that’s

not<00:29:12.919> what<00:29:13.080> makes<00:29:13.279> it<00:29:13.399> true<00:29:13.640> what<00:29:13.760> makes<00:29:13.919> it

not what makes it true what makes it

true<00:29:14.240> is<00:29:14.360> that<00:29:14.559> that<00:29:14.720> guy<00:29:14.840> knew<00:29:15.000> what<00:29:15.120> he<00:29:15.200> was

true is that that guy knew what he was

talking<00:29:15.600> about<00:29:15.840> in<00:29:15.919> other<00:29:16.080> words<00:29:16.799> he<00:29:16.960> just<00:29:17.120> a

talking about in other words he just a

signed<00:29:17.519> that<00:29:17.640> it’s<00:29:17.760> true<00:29:18.080> because<00:29:18.840> usually

signed that it’s true because usually

that<00:29:19.360> guy<00:29:19.480> when<00:29:19.600> he<00:29:19.720> said<00:29:19.919> things<00:29:20.080> he<00:29:20.159> didn’t

that guy when he said things he didn’t

lie<00:29:20.760> right<00:29:20.960> that’s<00:29:21.720> again<00:29:21.880> the<00:29:22.080> person<00:29:22.760> is<00:29:22.960> the

lie right that’s again the person is the

name<00:29:23.279> is<00:29:23.440> only<00:29:23.679> important<00:29:24.279> in<00:29:24.399> the<00:29:24.519> sense<00:29:24.720> that

name is only important in the sense that

it’s<00:29:25.039> not<00:29:25.240> him<00:29:25.399> that<00:29:25.519> made<00:29:25.679> it<00:29:25.840> up<00:29:26.080> cuz<00:29:26.240> if<00:29:26.360> he

it’s not him that made it up cuz if he

would<00:29:26.760> be<00:29:27.000> a<00:29:27.120> liar<00:29:27.440> then<00:29:27.559> it<00:29:27.640> would<00:29:27.760> be<00:29:27.880> bad

would be a liar then it would be bad

right<00:29:29.640> I<00:29:29.679> mean<00:29:29.919> this<00:29:30.000> is<00:29:30.159> sort<00:29:30.320> of<00:29:30.600> why<00:29:31.279> I<00:29:31.360> mean

right I mean this is sort of why I mean

you<00:29:31.720> know<00:29:32.240> oh

you know oh

hello<00:29:34.440> and<00:29:34.559> then<00:29:34.679> we<00:29:34.799> have<00:29:34.919> this<00:29:35.080> other

hello and then we have this other

category<00:29:35.760> of<00:29:35.919> arts<00:29:36.399> and<00:29:36.720> and<00:29:37.000> artificial

category of arts and and artificial

things<00:29:37.960> and<00:29:38.200> and<00:29:38.360> things<00:29:38.679> where<00:29:39.279> at<00:29:39.399> least<00:29:39.600> in

things and and things where at least in

some<00:29:40.440> sense<00:29:41.440> they<00:29:41.600> belong<00:29:42.080> in<00:29:42.200> a<00:29:42.360> real<00:29:42.559> way<00:29:42.720> to

some sense they belong in a real way to

the<00:29:43.000> person<00:29:43.240> that<00:29:43.360> made<00:29:43.559> them<00:29:43.799> that’s<00:29:43.960> why

the person that made them that’s why

other<00:29:44.679> words<00:29:45.600> novel<00:29:46.080> right<00:29:46.559> so<00:29:46.799> it<00:29:47.000> might<00:29:47.240> be

other words novel right so it might be

even<00:29:48.240> then<00:29:48.440> I<00:29:48.519> think<00:29:48.679> it’s<00:29:48.840> more<00:29:49.039> complicated

even then I think it’s more complicated

because<00:29:49.960> to<00:29:50.120> the<00:29:50.240> extent<00:29:50.640> that<00:29:51.279> novels

because to the extent that novels

entirely<00:29:52.279> belong<00:29:52.559> to<00:29:52.720> the<00:29:52.880> author<00:29:53.840> they’re

entirely belong to the author they’re

not<00:29:54.159> true<00:29:54.320> and<00:29:54.440> you<00:29:54.480> shouldn’t<00:29:54.760> read<00:29:55.360> them

not true and you shouldn’t read them

right<00:29:56.559> they’re<00:29:56.720> only<00:29:56.880> interesting<00:29:57.240> in<00:29:57.519> in<00:29:57.600> so

right they’re only interesting in in so

far<00:29:57.880> that<00:29:58.039> they<00:29:58.120> don’t<00:29:58.279> entirely<00:29:58.640> belong<00:29:58.880> to

far that they don’t entirely belong to

their<00:29:59.120> authors<00:29:59.679> right<00:29:59.760> but<00:29:59.880> let’s<00:30:00.039> say<00:30:00.240> let’s

their authors right but let’s say let’s

say<00:30:00.600> let’s<00:30:00.720> say<00:30:00.880> someone<00:30:01.159> has<00:30:01.320> let’s<00:30:01.480> say

say let’s say someone has let’s say

again<00:30:02.120> this<00:30:02.240> is<00:30:02.440> this<00:30:02.559> is<00:30:02.760> a<00:30:03.559> educational

again this is this is a educational

truth<00:30:04.840> and<00:30:04.919> not<00:30:05.080> a<00:30:05.240> whatever<00:30:05.600> but<00:30:05.720> if<00:30:05.840> someone

truth and not a whatever but if someone

I<00:30:06.919> think<00:30:07.440> sometimes<00:30:07.640> we<00:30:07.760> do<00:30:07.880> try<00:30:08.039> to<00:30:08.159> give

I think sometimes we do try to give

people<00:30:08.519> credit<00:30:08.799> for<00:30:09.120> the<00:30:09.360> the<00:30:09.559> method<00:30:09.840> in

people credit for the the method in

which<00:30:10.159> they<00:30:10.320> draw<00:30:10.679> people<00:30:10.919> closer<00:30:11.279> to<00:30:11.960> truth

which they draw people closer to truth

it’s<00:30:12.360> not<00:30:12.559> theirs<00:30:13.200> so<00:30:13.320> what<00:30:13.399> can<00:30:13.519> I<00:30:13.640> apply<00:30:14.000> my

it’s not theirs so what can I apply my

test<00:30:14.559> do<00:30:14.799> you<00:30:15.360> understand<00:30:15.519> the<00:30:15.640> novel<00:30:16.039> better

test do you understand the novel better

by<00:30:16.399> knowing<00:30:16.679> its

by knowing its

author<00:30:19.120> sometimes<00:30:20.120> for<00:30:20.480> like<00:30:20.640> how<00:30:21.279> if<00:30:21.399> someone

author sometimes for like how if someone

uses<00:30:21.919> a<00:30:22.039> certain<00:30:22.279> literary<00:30:22.720> device<00:30:23.120> let’s<00:30:23.360> say

uses a certain literary device let’s say

or<00:30:24.640> has<00:30:24.760> a<00:30:24.919> certain<00:30:25.399> you<00:30:25.519> know<00:30:25.880> always<00:30:26.120> tends

or has a certain you know always tends

to<00:30:26.519> bury<00:30:26.799> a<00:30:26.919> certain<00:30:27.519> in<00:30:27.640> the<00:30:27.760> B<00:30:28.159> right<00:30:28.880> is<00:30:29.000> much

to bury a certain in the B right is much

more<00:30:29.240> interesting<00:30:29.559> when<00:30:29.640> you<00:30:29.760> know<00:30:29.960> that<00:30:30.120> God

more interesting when you know that God

wrote<00:30:30.559> it<00:30:31.120> well<00:30:31.279> we’re<00:30:31.360> going<00:30:31.440> to<00:30:31.559> get<00:30:31.679> to<00:30:31.799> that

wrote it well we’re going to get to that

but<00:30:32.440> wait<00:30:33.240> uh<00:30:33.519> no<00:30:33.919> because<00:30:34.919> well<00:30:35.600> meaning<00:30:36.360> it’s

but wait uh no because well meaning it’s

similar<00:30:36.919> to<00:30:37.039> what<00:30:37.159> he<00:30:37.279> was<00:30:37.399> saying<00:30:38.320> wait<00:30:38.519> wait

similar to what he was saying wait wait

no<00:30:38.799> but<00:30:38.919> that’s<00:30:39.080> similar<00:30:39.360> to<00:30:39.519> argument<00:30:39.880> to

no but that’s similar to argument to

using<00:30:40.399> the<00:30:40.519> Authority<00:30:41.159> or<00:30:41.320> in<00:30:41.399> other<00:30:41.559> words

using the Authority or in other words

then<00:30:41.960> it<00:30:42.120> it<00:30:42.240> be<00:30:42.440> still<00:30:42.720> it’s<00:30:42.919> still<00:30:43.480> we’re

then it it be still it’s still we’re

still<00:30:43.960> saying<00:30:44.360> that<00:30:44.519> we’re<00:30:44.720> it’s<00:30:44.840> interesting

still saying that we’re it’s interesting

for<00:30:45.360> example<00:30:46.039> if<00:30:46.200> you<00:30:46.440> know<00:30:46.919> by<00:30:47.039> the<00:30:47.159> way<00:30:47.360> this

for example if you know by the way this

is<00:30:47.720> it’s<00:30:48.360> very<00:30:49.360> it’s<00:30:49.559> actually<00:30:49.840> very<00:30:50.039> limited

is it’s very it’s actually very limited

and<00:30:50.720> actually<00:30:51.039> like<00:30:51.559> I’m<00:30:51.679> on<00:30:51.840> the<00:30:52.039> side<00:30:52.159> of<00:30:52.279> the

and actually like I’m on the side of the

people<00:30:52.600> that<00:30:52.760> say<00:30:53.120> that<00:30:53.320> all<00:30:53.480> the<00:30:53.720> scholarship

people that say that all the scholarship

of<00:30:54.360> finding<00:30:54.679> out<00:30:54.880> who<00:30:55.039> Homer<00:30:55.399> was<00:30:55.519> and<00:30:55.639> who

of finding out who Homer was and who

Shakespeare<00:30:56.200> was<00:30:56.360> and<00:30:56.440> who<00:30:56.559> wrote<00:30:56.799> the<00:30:56.919> Bible

Shakespeare was and who wrote the Bible

is<00:30:58.120> at<00:30:58.200> least<00:30:58.360> for<00:30:58.559> the<00:30:58.760> sense<00:30:59.399> task<00:30:59.639> of

is at least for the sense task of

understanding<00:31:00.279> those<00:31:00.440> books<00:31:00.760> mostly<00:31:01.039> a<00:31:01.159> waste

understanding those books mostly a waste

of<00:31:01.519> time<00:31:01.720> like<00:31:02.080> 98%<00:31:03.080> there’s<00:31:03.279> 2%<00:31:03.720> in<00:31:03.840> which

of time like 98% there’s 2% in which

it’s<00:31:04.080> useful<00:31:04.440> but<00:31:04.559> the<00:31:04.639> 98%<00:31:05.320> is<00:31:06.039> a<00:31:06.159> waste<00:31:06.360> of

it’s useful but the 98% is a waste of

time<00:31:06.679> not<00:31:06.840> because<00:31:07.240> it’s<00:31:08.240> picous<00:31:08.720> or

time not because it’s picous or

something<00:31:09.120> because<00:31:09.240> it’s<00:31:09.360> not<00:31:09.480> a<00:31:09.600> good<00:31:09.720> way<00:31:09.840> of

something because it’s not a good way of

understanding<00:31:10.880> that<00:31:11.120> right<00:31:11.240> in<00:31:11.320> other<00:31:11.440> words

understanding that right in other words

it<00:31:11.760> might<00:31:11.880> be<00:31:12.000> one<00:31:12.159> thing<00:31:12.360> like<00:31:12.440> if<00:31:12.559> you<00:31:12.639> know

it might be one thing like if you know

on<00:31:13.039> to<00:31:13.159> this<00:31:13.360> period<00:31:13.960> so<00:31:14.080> we’ll<00:31:14.240> interpret<00:31:14.639> a

on to this period so we’ll interpret a

certain<00:31:15.000> word<00:31:15.200> according<00:31:15.440> to<00:31:15.519> the<00:31:15.600> way<00:31:15.679> it<00:31:15.760> was

certain word according to the way it was

used<00:31:16.039> in<00:31:16.159> that<00:31:16.279> period<00:31:16.519> you<00:31:16.600> know<00:31:16.720> the<00:31:16.799> Supreme

used in that period you know the Supreme

Court<00:31:17.559> uses<00:31:17.880> old<00:31:18.080> dictionaries<00:31:18.639> because<00:31:18.799> they

Court uses old dictionaries because they

have<00:31:19.000> this<00:31:19.159> originalism<00:31:19.799> Theory<00:31:20.120> and<00:31:20.720> and

have this originalism Theory and and

therefore<00:31:21.039> you<00:31:21.159> have<00:31:21.240> to<00:31:21.360> find<00:31:21.519> out<00:31:21.679> what<00:31:21.760> the

therefore you have to find out what the

word<00:31:22.120> meant<00:31:22.320> in<00:31:22.960> 1786<00:31:23.960> okay<00:31:24.159> maybe<00:31:24.440> yes<00:31:24.559> and

word meant in 1786 okay maybe yes and

maybe<00:31:24.919> not<00:31:25.600> but<00:31:26.600> very<00:31:26.799> good<00:31:26.919> but<00:31:27.039> it<00:31:27.159> doesn’t

maybe not but very good but it doesn’t

but<00:31:28.000> this<00:31:28.440> still<00:31:28.639> we’re<00:31:28.799> still<00:31:29.000> thinking<00:31:29.200> of

but this still we’re still thinking of

accidental<00:31:29.880> things<00:31:30.120> right<00:31:30.240> we’re<00:31:30.360> still

accidental things right we’re still

thinking<00:31:30.840> it’s<00:31:31.000> still<00:31:31.360> somewhat<00:31:31.720> similar<00:31:32.120> to

thinking it’s still somewhat similar to

the<00:31:32.519> case<00:31:32.799> where<00:31:33.639> uh<00:31:33.880> I<00:31:34.039> know<00:31:34.279> that<00:31:34.440> it’s<00:31:34.559> true

the case where uh I know that it’s true

because<00:31:34.960> someone<00:31:35.200> said<00:31:35.360> it<00:31:35.799> I<00:31:35.919> know<00:31:36.039> what<00:31:36.159> this

because someone said it I know what this

word<00:31:36.480> means<00:31:36.840> because<00:31:37.039> nowadays<00:31:37.360> it<00:31:37.440> we

word means because nowadays it we

something<00:31:37.840> else<00:31:38.039> so<00:31:38.159> if<00:31:38.320> I<00:31:38.399> would<00:31:38.519> know<00:31:38.639> that

something else so if I would know that

it’s<00:31:38.799> an<00:31:38.919> old<00:31:39.200> book<00:31:39.600> and<00:31:40.159> in<00:31:40.240> those<00:31:40.399> days<00:31:40.600> the

it’s an old book and in those days the

word<00:31:40.799> means<00:31:41.039> something<00:31:41.279> else<00:31:41.760> just<00:31:42.080> facts<00:31:42.360> so

word means something else just facts so

just<00:31:43.000> finding<00:31:43.320> out<00:31:43.480> certain<00:31:43.880> facts<00:31:44.279> but<00:31:44.399> it’s

just finding out certain facts but it’s

not<00:31:44.760> the<00:31:44.919> knowledge<00:31:45.320> of<00:31:45.480> the<00:31:45.639> author<00:31:45.960> that’s

not the knowledge of the author that’s

explaining<00:31:46.480> me<00:31:46.639> the<00:31:46.799> book<00:31:47.080> right<00:31:47.320> but<00:31:47.519> explain

explaining me the book right but explain

me<00:31:47.919> the<00:31:48.039> book<00:31:48.159> is<00:31:48.279> the<00:31:48.440> content<00:31:48.799> of<00:31:48.960> what<00:31:49.080> it

me the book is the content of what it

says<00:31:50.000> it’s<00:31:50.120> just<00:31:50.240> that<00:31:50.399> I<00:31:50.480> don’t<00:31:50.880> understand

says it’s just that I don’t understand

some<00:31:51.159> of<00:31:51.279> the<00:31:51.399> content<00:31:51.720> in<00:31:51.880> this<00:31:52.039> most

some of the content in this most

technical<00:31:52.559> sense<00:31:52.799> I<00:31:52.840> don’t<00:31:52.960> know<00:31:53.080> what<00:31:53.159> this

technical sense I don’t know what this

word<00:31:53.440> means<00:31:53.679> I<00:31:53.720> don’t<00:31:53.840> know<00:31:53.919> what<00:31:54.039> the<00:31:54.120> symbol

word means I don’t know what the symbol

means<00:31:54.760> I<00:31:54.840> don’t<00:31:54.960> know<00:31:55.120> what<00:31:55.279> kind<00:31:55.440> of<00:31:55.559> symbols

means I don’t know what kind of symbols

this<00:31:56.240> is<00:31:56.399> using<00:31:56.720> I<00:31:56.799> don’t<00:31:56.919> know<00:31:57.080> what<00:31:57.360> what<00:31:57.440> the

this is using I don’t know what what the

genre<00:31:58.039> is<00:31:58.240> and<00:31:58.360> so<00:31:58.639> and<00:31:58.760> so<00:31:58.880> on<00:31:59.000> and<00:31:59.120> for<00:31:59.240> that<00:31:59.360> I

genre is and so and so on and for that I

need<00:31:59.639> historical<00:32:00.120> facts<00:32:00.799> to<00:32:01.000> solve<00:32:01.320> those

need historical facts to solve those

like<00:32:01.720> basic<00:32:02.399> technical<00:32:02.840> issues<00:32:03.159> but<00:32:03.240> they’re

like basic technical issues but they’re

not<00:32:03.600> solving<00:32:04.279> understanding<00:32:04.600> issues<00:32:05.159> right

not solving understanding issues right

sometimes<00:32:06.360> they<00:32:06.519> are<00:32:07.120> for<00:32:07.279> example<00:32:07.760> like<00:32:08.000> for

sometimes they are for example like for

example<00:32:08.440> let’s<00:32:08.559> say<00:32:08.720> someone<00:32:09.080> let’s<00:32:09.240> say

example let’s say someone let’s say

let’s<00:32:09.720> say<00:32:10.279> let’s<00:32:10.399> say<00:32:10.679> the<00:32:10.799> Odyssey<00:32:11.200> was

let’s say let’s say the Odyssey was

written<00:32:11.720> by<00:32:11.880> two<00:32:12.080> different<00:32:12.360> people<00:32:12.760> two

written by two different people two

different<00:32:13.279> parts<00:32:14.039> right<00:32:14.360> and<00:32:14.519> I’m<00:32:14.679> I’m<00:32:14.840> trying

different parts right and I’m I’m trying

to<00:32:15.399> and<00:32:15.519> I<00:32:15.639> and<00:32:15.760> I<00:32:15.880> establish<00:32:16.240> a<00:32:16.320> lot<00:32:16.440> of<00:32:16.519> false

to and I and I establish a lot of false

continuity<00:32:17.320> between<00:32:17.600> the<00:32:17.720> two<00:32:18.200> parts<00:32:19.200> right

continuity between the two parts right

and<00:32:20.080> once<00:32:20.240> it’s<00:32:20.399> revealed<00:32:20.720> to<00:32:20.840> me<00:32:20.960> that

and once it’s revealed to me that

actually<00:32:21.919> on<00:32:22.120> page<00:32:22.360> 68<00:32:22.840> it<00:32:23.000> actually<00:32:23.200> breaks

actually on page 68 it actually breaks

off<00:32:23.679> into<00:32:23.880> two<00:32:24.039> separate<00:32:24.399> books<00:32:25.320> and<00:32:25.440> there’s

off into two separate books and there’s

no<00:32:26.039> but<00:32:26.159> it’s<00:32:26.440> still<00:32:27.039> could<00:32:27.320> but<00:32:28.159> well<00:32:28.240> first

no but it’s still could but well first

you’re<00:32:28.600> making<00:32:28.919> me<00:32:29.080> not<00:32:29.480> understand<00:32:29.720> things

you’re making me not understand things

that’s<00:32:30.200> just<00:32:30.360> another<00:32:30.559> way<00:32:30.639> of<00:32:30.720> saying<00:32:30.919> I’m

that’s just another way of saying I’m

don’t<00:32:31.320> make<00:32:31.480> it<00:32:31.639> not<00:32:32.279> but<00:32:32.720> no<00:32:32.960> I<00:32:33.000> don’t<00:32:33.080> want<00:32:33.159> to

don’t make it not but no I don’t want to

get<00:32:33.399> stuck<00:32:33.600> in<00:32:33.720> like<00:32:33.799> Source<00:32:34.039> crism<00:32:34.519> kind<00:32:34.679> of

get stuck in like Source crism kind of

things<00:32:35.399> but<00:32:35.559> what<00:32:35.639> I<00:32:35.760> want<00:32:35.880> to<00:32:36.120> think<00:32:36.480> is

things but what I want to think is

that<00:32:38.320> even<00:32:39.200> understand<00:32:39.600> Odyssey<00:32:39.960> Parts<00:32:40.159> one

that even understand Odyssey Parts one

and<00:32:40.440> two<00:32:40.720> but<00:32:41.080> part<00:32:41.240> one<00:32:41.720> it<00:32:41.840> doesn’t<00:32:42.559> like

and two but part one it doesn’t like

such<00:32:43.200> a<00:32:43.320> kind<00:32:43.480> of<00:32:43.919> firstly<00:32:44.559> again<00:32:45.120> that<00:32:45.279> theory

such a kind of firstly again that theory

is<00:32:45.799> still<00:32:46.080> a<00:32:46.240> technical<00:32:46.639> theory<00:32:46.880> in<00:32:47.000> other

is still a technical theory in other

words<00:32:47.720> I<00:32:47.840> made<00:32:48.000> a<00:32:48.240> mistake<00:32:48.799> a<00:32:48.960> Bas<00:32:49.480> a<00:32:49.600> mistake

words I made a mistake a Bas a mistake

about<00:32:50.240> what<00:32:50.360> the<00:32:50.519> book<00:32:50.760> is<00:32:51.000> not<00:32:51.159> about<00:32:51.399> what<00:32:51.480> it

about what the book is not about what it

means<00:32:53.159> this<00:32:53.240> is<00:32:53.919> limited<00:32:54.279> but<00:32:54.559> it<00:32:54.679> might<00:32:54.840> be

means this is limited but it might be

like<00:32:55.159> I<00:32:55.240> said<00:32:55.399> it’s<00:32:55.600> might<00:32:55.840> 2%<00:32:56.279> but<00:32:56.360> it’s<00:32:56.639> even

like I said it’s might 2% but it’s even

though<00:32:57.000> it’s<00:32:57.120> 2%<00:32:57.600> I<00:32:57.960> think<00:32:58.679> are<00:32:59.159> doing

though it’s 2% I think are doing

something<00:32:59.919> different<00:33:00.279> than<00:33:00.399> what<00:33:00.519> we’re

something different than what we’re

doing<00:33:00.840> when<00:33:01.000> we’re<00:33:01.200> actually<00:33:01.360> trying<00:33:01.600> to<00:33:01.720> read

doing when we’re actually trying to read

the<00:33:02.000> book<00:33:02.200> and<00:33:02.399> get<00:33:02.559> it<00:33:03.399> understand<00:33:03.559> it<00:33:03.760> in<00:33:04.360> in

the book and get it understand it in in

the<00:33:04.639> terms<00:33:04.840> of<00:33:05.000> its<00:33:05.200> content<00:33:05.559> or<00:33:05.799> terms<00:33:06.000> of<00:33:06.120> its

the terms of its content or terms of its

meaning<00:33:07.480> because<00:33:07.880> the<00:33:08.000> meaning<00:33:08.320> of<00:33:08.440> the<00:33:08.559> book

meaning because the meaning of the book

is<00:33:08.919> never<00:33:09.519> that<00:33:09.639> it<00:33:09.760> was<00:33:10.200> was<00:33:10.320> two<00:33:10.559> parts<00:33:11.080> the

is never that it was was two parts the

fact<00:33:11.720> the<00:33:12.000> the<00:33:12.240> the<00:33:12.440> like<00:33:12.600> the<00:33:12.720> matter<00:33:13.039> of<00:33:13.159> the

fact the the the like the matter of the

book<00:33:13.440> or<00:33:13.639> the<00:33:13.919> the<00:33:14.120> facts<00:33:14.360> of<00:33:14.480> the<00:33:14.600> book<00:33:14.799> might

book or the the facts of the book might

be<00:33:15.120> that<00:33:15.240> it’s<00:33:15.360> written<00:33:15.600> in<00:33:15.679> two<00:33:15.880> parts<00:33:16.320> and

be that it’s written in two parts and

everyone<00:33:16.720> up<00:33:16.840> to<00:33:17.000> today<00:33:17.279> made<00:33:17.399> a<00:33:17.559> mistake<00:33:18.120> and

everyone up to today made a mistake and

therefore<00:33:18.559> got<00:33:18.760> into<00:33:19.039> problems<00:33:19.440> because<00:33:19.679> they

therefore got into problems because they

didn’t<00:33:19.919> know<00:33:20.039> that<00:33:20.159> it’s<00:33:20.279> two<00:33:20.399> different

didn’t know that it’s two different

authors<00:33:21.240> that<00:33:21.360> I<00:33:21.720> understand<00:33:22.120> that<00:33:22.240> makes

authors that I understand that makes

sense<00:33:22.720> but<00:33:22.880> then<00:33:23.279> what<00:33:23.399> we’re<00:33:23.559> gaining<00:33:23.799> is<00:33:23.919> not

sense but then what we’re gaining is not

an<00:33:24.440> understanding<00:33:24.639> of<00:33:24.799> the<00:33:24.880> book<00:33:25.039> we’re

an understanding of the book we’re

actually<00:33:25.399> gaining<00:33:25.760> destroying<00:33:26.159> an

actually gaining destroying an

understanding<00:33:26.760> of<00:33:26.840> the<00:33:26.960> book<00:33:27.120> usually

understanding of the book usually

because<00:33:27.960> because<00:33:28.120> we’re<00:33:28.279> saying<00:33:28.880> well<00:33:29.039> you

because because we’re saying well you

was<00:33:29.360> understood<00:33:29.799> wrongly<00:33:30.559> you<00:33:30.720> made<00:33:30.880> a

was understood wrongly you made a

mistake<00:33:31.360> but<00:33:31.480> your<00:33:31.639> mistake<00:33:32.000> wasn’t<00:33:32.639> in<00:33:32.799> the

mistake but your mistake wasn’t in the

essence<00:33:33.240> of<00:33:33.360> what<00:33:33.480> the<00:33:33.600> book<00:33:33.760> is<00:33:33.919> about<00:33:34.200> the

essence of what the book is about the

mistake<00:33:34.799> was<00:33:35.440> in<00:33:35.760> what<00:33:35.880> the<00:33:36.039> book<00:33:36.320> Is

mistake was in what the book Is

Right<00:33:39.480> does<00:33:39.639> this<00:33:39.840> make

Right does this make

sense<00:33:42.159> someone’s<00:33:42.519> motive<00:33:43.120> could<00:33:43.279> change<00:33:43.519> what

sense someone’s motive could change what

he<00:33:43.760> means<00:33:44.120> as

he means as

Welling<00:33:45.919> I<00:33:46.039> could<00:33:46.159> say<00:33:46.360> you<00:33:46.519> look

Welling I could say you look

great

SAR<00:33:54.120> I

SAR I

don’t<00:33:56.080> no

to<00:34:00.000> me<00:34:00.200> there<00:34:00.320> are<00:34:00.639> certain<00:34:01.039> primary<00:34:01.360> flaws

to me there are certain primary flaws

that<00:34:01.840> could<00:34:02.000> be<00:34:02.159> made<00:34:02.919> for<00:34:03.039> sure<00:34:03.559> for<00:34:03.720> sure<00:34:04.000> but

that could be made for sure for sure but

all<00:34:04.240> of<00:34:04.440> those<00:34:04.639> things<00:34:04.880> are<00:34:05.000> not<00:34:05.200> related<00:34:05.480> to

all of those things are not related to

understanding<00:34:06.360> the<00:34:06.440> book<00:34:06.600> they’re<00:34:06.720> related

understanding the book they’re related

to<00:34:07.200> the<00:34:07.519> actual<00:34:07.960> book<00:34:08.320> or<00:34:08.520> related<00:34:08.760> to<00:34:08.879> whether

to the actual book or related to whether

not<00:34:09.919> understanding<00:34:10.320> yes<00:34:10.520> that<00:34:10.639> could<00:34:10.800> be<00:34:11.079> but

not understanding yes that could be but

again<00:34:11.399> that’s<00:34:11.560> like<00:34:11.720> argument<00:34:12.079> of<00:34:12.240> authority

again that’s like argument of authority

level

things<00:34:15.359> okay<00:34:15.679> I<00:34:15.760> don’t<00:34:16.359> I<00:34:16.440> didn’t<00:34:16.599> say<00:34:16.760> that

things okay I don’t I didn’t say that

it’s<00:34:17.000> that<00:34:17.280> important<00:34:18.280> in<00:34:18.440> general<00:34:18.800> you

it’s that important in general you

should<00:34:19.119> in<00:34:19.240> general<00:34:20.159> in<00:34:20.520> general<00:34:21.520> you<00:34:21.639> change

should in general in general you change

your<00:34:22.200> mind<00:34:22.560> if<00:34:22.679> you<00:34:22.879> think<00:34:23.040> it’s<00:34:23.280> true<00:34:23.480> or<00:34:23.560> not

your mind if you think it’s true or not

meaning<00:34:24.119> meaning<00:34:24.919> if<00:34:25.000> I’m<00:34:25.079> being<00:34:25.280> sarcastic

meaning meaning if I’m being sarcastic

or<00:34:25.839> not<00:34:26.000> is<00:34:26.119> a<00:34:26.320> TR<00:34:26.839> no<00:34:27.000> it’s<00:34:27.760> it’s<00:34:28.040> it’s<00:34:28.159> inher

or not is a TR no it’s it’s it’s inher

truth<00:34:28.879> a<00:34:29.119> lie

truth a lie

Li<00:34:32.720> idea<00:34:33.720> SAR<00:34:34.520> whether<00:34:34.639> or<00:34:34.800> not<00:34:34.960> I’m<00:34:35.079> being

Li idea SAR whether or not I’m being

sarcastic<00:34:35.760> is<00:34:35.879> the<00:34:36.000> truth<00:34:36.240> or

sarcastic is the truth or

not<00:34:39.040> right<00:34:39.879> okay<00:34:40.079> that<00:34:40.240> that’s<00:34:40.399> also<00:34:40.599> a

not right okay that that’s also a

question<00:34:41.079> of<00:34:41.320> of<00:34:41.599> of<00:34:41.839> of<00:34:42.040> con<00:34:42.480> it’s<00:34:42.560> a<00:34:42.800> it’s

question of of of of con it’s a it’s

still<00:34:43.119> a<00:34:43.280> question<00:34:43.839> right<00:34:43.960> there<00:34:44.159> still<00:34:44.280> a

still a question right there still a

question<00:34:44.800> of<00:34:45.200> of<00:34:45.599> the<00:34:45.800> literal<00:34:46.760> the<00:34:47.040> the<00:34:47.280> the

question of of the literal the the the

literal<00:34:48.040> level<00:34:48.280> of<00:34:48.399> the<00:34:48.480> book<00:34:48.679> in<00:34:48.760> other<00:34:48.919> words

literal level of the book in other words

you<00:34:49.480> made<00:34:49.599> a<00:34:49.760> mistake<00:34:50.119> you<00:34:50.280> thought<00:34:50.599> that<00:34:50.760> this

you made a mistake you thought that this

is<00:34:51.000> a<00:34:51.280> sincere<00:34:51.720> thing<00:34:51.879> and<00:34:52.000> it’s<00:34:52.119> sarcastic

is a sincere thing and it’s sarcastic

and<00:34:53.240> the<00:34:53.359> way<00:34:53.520> I<00:34:53.639> got<00:34:53.760> to<00:34:53.879> this<00:34:54.040> knowledge<00:34:54.359> was

and the way I got to this knowledge was

by<00:34:54.800> reading<00:34:55.159> up<00:34:55.359> or<00:34:55.520> finding<00:34:55.839> some<00:34:56.119> contextual

by reading up or finding some contextual

clues<00:34:57.000> or<00:34:57.720> whatever<00:34:58.000> all<00:34:58.200> kind<00:34:58.359> of<00:34:58.480> devices

clues or whatever all kind of devices

that<00:34:59.000> we<00:34:59.280> have<00:35:00.280> and<00:35:00.640> if<00:35:00.720> you<00:35:00.839> read<00:35:01.000> it

that we have and if you read it

sincerely<00:35:01.640> or<00:35:01.960> when<00:35:02.079> it’s<00:35:02.200> sarcastic<00:35:02.640> or<00:35:02.760> the

sincerely or when it’s sarcastic or the

opposite<00:35:03.119> you’re<00:35:03.240> making<00:35:03.480> a

opposite you’re making a

mistake

um<00:35:11.839> trying<00:35:12.119> to

think<00:35:16.480> I<00:35:16.640> still<00:35:17.119> think<00:35:18.040> that<00:35:18.359> that<00:35:18.920> is

think I still think that that is

something<00:35:20.079> in<00:35:20.200> the<00:35:20.320> sense<00:35:20.560> of<00:35:20.760> the<00:35:20.880> book

something in the sense of the book

wasn’t<00:35:21.320> encoded<00:35:21.920> properly<00:35:22.400> or<00:35:22.560> the<00:35:22.680> book

wasn’t encoded properly or the book

doesn’t<00:35:23.200> convey<00:35:23.520> itself<00:35:23.839> properly<00:35:24.160> so<00:35:24.280> we

doesn’t convey itself properly so we

need<00:35:24.520> some<00:35:24.680> outside<00:35:25.040> information<00:35:25.440> to<00:35:25.640> solve

need some outside information to solve

some<00:35:26.160> things<00:35:26.320> that<00:35:26.440> are<00:35:26.560> not<00:35:26.680> solved<00:35:27.000> within

some things that are not solved within

the<00:35:27.359> book<00:35:27.880> I<00:35:27.960> didn’t<00:35:28.200> say<00:35:28.359> that<00:35:28.560> I’m<00:35:28.640> not

the book I didn’t say that I’m not

against<00:35:29.200> that

against that

thought<00:35:31.119> right<00:35:31.400> what<00:35:31.520> I’m<00:35:31.720> against<00:35:32.079> it<00:35:32.720> is

thought right what I’m against it is

that<00:35:33.280> the<00:35:33.760> understanding<00:35:34.200> of<00:35:34.680> what’s

that the understanding of what’s

something<00:35:35.160> that’s<00:35:35.320> worth<00:35:35.920> understanding

something that’s worth understanding

this<00:35:36.280> is<00:35:36.359> a<00:35:36.520> book<00:35:36.800> about<00:35:37.680> you<00:35:37.839> know

this is a book about you know

uh<00:35:40.240> again<00:35:40.560> sometimes<00:35:40.720> I<00:35:40.800> don’t<00:35:40.880> know<00:35:41.000> what

uh again sometimes I don’t know what

this<00:35:41.280> book<00:35:41.440> is<00:35:41.560> about<00:35:41.800> is<00:35:41.880> it<00:35:42.000> about<00:35:42.160> people<00:35:42.320> in

this book is about is it about people in

18th<00:35:42.839> century<00:35:43.119> or<00:35:43.240> the<00:35:43.320> 16th<00:35:43.680> centures<00:35:44.000> so<00:35:44.079> I

18th century or the 16th centures so I

need<00:35:44.280> to<00:35:44.359> find<00:35:44.520> out<00:35:44.640> what<00:35:44.760> it’s<00:35:44.880> about<00:35:45.119> but

need to find out what it’s about but

after<00:35:45.400> I<00:35:45.480> know<00:35:45.599> what<00:35:45.720> it’s<00:35:45.880> about<00:35:46.800> and<00:35:46.920> it’s

after I know what it’s about and it’s

describing<00:35:47.720> the<00:35:47.880> conflict<00:35:48.280> of<00:35:48.400> two<00:35:48.599> kinds<00:35:48.800> of

describing the conflict of two kinds of

people<00:35:49.200> or<00:35:49.319> something<00:35:49.599> like<00:35:49.800> that<00:35:50.720> uh<00:35:50.839> knowing

people or something like that uh knowing

who<00:35:51.280> wrote<00:35:51.520> it<00:35:51.960> isn’t<00:35:52.480> part<00:35:52.720> of<00:35:53.000> that<00:35:53.359> it’s<00:35:53.520> not

who wrote it isn’t part of that it’s not

part<00:35:54.000> of<00:35:54.160> that

part of that

understanding<00:35:56.520> it<00:35:56.680> might<00:35:56.880> be<00:35:57.000> a<00:35:57.119> way<00:35:57.280> to<00:35:57.440> get

understanding it might be a way to get

to<00:35:58.400> before<00:35:58.680> I<00:35:59.040> understand<00:35:59.160> that<00:35:59.280> I<00:35:59.359> need<00:35:59.480> to

to before I understand that I need to

know<00:35:59.720> what<00:35:59.800> it<00:35:59.960> is<00:36:00.560> and<00:36:00.680> that’s<00:36:00.839> also<00:36:01.040> true<00:36:01.280> in

know what it is and that’s also true in

general<00:36:01.720> you<00:36:01.800> shouldn’t<00:36:02.319> waste<00:36:02.520> your<00:36:02.680> time

general you shouldn’t waste your time

reading<00:36:03.119> books<00:36:03.400> about<00:36:03.640> people<00:36:03.839> that<00:36:03.960> don’t

reading books about people that don’t

have<00:36:04.319> reputation<00:36:04.680> of<00:36:04.880> KN<00:36:05.160> usually<00:36:05.520> right

have reputation of KN usually right

you’re<00:36:06.119> going<00:36:06.200> to<00:36:06.480> like<00:36:06.760> take<00:36:07.280> be<00:36:07.520> like<00:36:07.760> a

you’re going to like take be like a

extremist<00:36:09.319> person<00:36:09.920> you’re<00:36:10.040> going<00:36:10.119> to<00:36:10.200> spend

extremist person you’re going to spend

your<00:36:10.480> time<00:36:10.599> reading<00:36:11.079> nonsense<00:36:12.079> because<00:36:12.319> who

your time reading nonsense because who

knows<00:36:12.839> like<00:36:13.000> that’s<00:36:13.200> not<00:36:13.400> a<00:36:13.720> smart<00:36:14.079> thing<00:36:14.200> to

knows like that’s not a smart thing to

do<00:36:15.880> but<00:36:16.079> that<00:36:16.240> doesn’t<00:36:16.560> still<00:36:16.839> doesn’t<00:36:17.400> right

do but that doesn’t still doesn’t right

so<00:36:17.680> obviously<00:36:18.040> we’re<00:36:18.160> going<00:36:18.240> to<00:36:18.440> need<00:36:18.720> to<00:36:18.880> know

so obviously we’re going to need to know

all<00:36:19.240> these<00:36:19.400> context<00:36:19.800> and<00:36:19.920> all<00:36:20.079> these

all these context and all these

historical<00:36:21.480> facts<00:36:21.920> or<00:36:22.640> in<00:36:22.800> order<00:36:23.040> to<00:36:23.200> start

historical facts or in order to start

reading<00:36:23.760> the<00:36:23.920> book<00:36:24.760> but<00:36:24.920> it’s<00:36:25.160> not<00:36:26.160> part<00:36:26.440> of

reading the book but it’s not part of

the<00:36:26.960> understanding<00:36:27.200> of<00:36:27.280> the<00:36:27.400> book

the understanding of the book

in<00:36:28.520> other

in other

words<00:36:30.319> there<00:36:30.440> is<00:36:30.599> never<00:36:30.839> a<00:36:31.040> real<00:36:31.359> question

words there is never a real question

that<00:36:31.839> I<00:36:32.079> can<00:36:32.400> ask<00:36:33.280> and<00:36:33.400> I<00:36:33.520> can<00:36:33.720> answer<00:36:33.960> I<00:36:34.040> mean

that I can ask and I can answer I mean

like<00:36:34.359> you<00:36:34.480> said<00:36:34.640> there<00:36:34.760> are<00:36:35.079> sometimes

like you said there are sometimes

there’s<00:36:35.400> a<00:36:35.560> contradiction<00:36:36.000> and<00:36:36.119> the<00:36:36.200> answer

there’s a contradiction and the answer

the<00:36:36.520> contradiction<00:36:36.880> would<00:36:37.000> be

the contradiction would be

well<00:36:38.800> those<00:36:38.880> are<00:36:38.960> two<00:36:39.119> different<00:36:39.280> authors<00:36:39.599> and

well those are two different authors and

that’s<00:36:39.920> the<00:36:40.079> answer<00:36:40.280> of<00:36:40.359> the<00:36:40.480> contradiction

that’s the answer of the contradiction

but<00:36:41.520> now<00:36:41.599> I<00:36:41.680> don’t<00:36:42.000> understand<00:36:42.160> anything<00:36:42.400> now

but now I don’t understand anything now

I<00:36:42.599> just<00:36:42.720> know<00:36:42.839> that<00:36:42.960> there’s<00:36:43.119> no<00:36:43.440> my<00:36:43.599> question

I just know that there’s no my question

was<00:36:43.880> a<00:36:44.000> mistake<00:36:44.280> in<00:36:44.359> a<00:36:44.440> certain<00:36:44.720> sense<00:36:45.119> right

was a mistake in a certain sense right

didn’t<00:36:46.000> give<00:36:46.119> me<00:36:47.000> a<00:36:47.119> book<00:36:47.319> that’s<00:36:47.560> like<00:36:47.720> that

didn’t give me a book that’s like that

is<00:36:47.960> really<00:36:48.119> wasting<00:36:48.440> everyone’s<00:36:48.880> time<00:36:49.599> and

is really wasting everyone’s time and

once<00:36:50.119> we<00:36:50.280> figured<00:36:50.560> out<00:36:50.680> that<00:36:50.839> a<00:36:50.920> contradiction

once we figured out that a contradiction

because<00:36:51.560> it’s<00:36:51.680> two<00:36:51.839> people<00:36:52.079> it<00:36:52.160> should<00:36:52.280> just

because it’s two people it should just

be<00:36:52.520> marked<00:36:52.839> someone<00:36:53.000> should<00:36:53.119> take<00:36:53.240> a<00:36:53.319> marker

be marked someone should take a marker

and

right<00:36:56.280> and<00:36:56.400> then<00:36:56.560> we<00:36:56.720> wouldn’t<00:36:56.960> have<00:36:57.079> the

right and then we wouldn’t have the

question<00:36:57.800> now<00:36:57.920> now<00:36:58.000> we<00:36:58.359> understand<00:36:58.520> something

question now now we understand something

more<00:36:58.880> that<00:36:59.000> we<00:36:59.079> didn’t<00:36:59.480> understand<00:36:59.640> yesterday

more that we didn’t understand yesterday

we<00:37:00.480> just<00:37:00.599> stopped<00:37:00.880> having<00:37:01.079> a<00:37:01.200> basic<00:37:01.440> mistake

we just stopped having a basic mistake

that<00:37:01.800> we<00:37:01.920> didn’t<00:37:02.359> it’s<00:37:02.480> not<00:37:02.560> a<00:37:02.680> knowledge

that we didn’t it’s not a knowledge

building<00:37:03.280> project<00:37:03.520> to<00:37:03.640> do<00:37:03.800> this<00:37:04.079> it’s<00:37:04.160> a

building project to do this it’s a

knowledge<00:37:04.520> destroying<00:37:04.960> project<00:37:05.160> it’s<00:37:05.240> a

knowledge destroying project it’s a

mistake<00:37:05.720> destroying<00:37:06.160> project<00:37:06.480> even<00:37:06.839> right

mistake destroying project even right

but<00:37:07.560> not<00:37:07.720> a<00:37:07.800> knowledge<00:37:08.119> creating

but not a knowledge creating

project<00:37:10.200> so<00:37:11.040> back<00:37:11.240> to<00:37:11.400> where<00:37:11.520> I

project so back to where I

am<00:37:13.800> back<00:37:13.960> to<00:37:14.119> where<00:37:14.240> I<00:37:14.359> am<00:37:14.599> it<00:37:14.760> seems<00:37:16.160> that<00:37:17.440> uh

am back to where I am it seems that uh

denying<00:37:19.359> my<00:37:19.599> own<00:37:19.960> authorship<00:37:20.480> of<00:37:20.640> things<00:37:20.839> or

denying my own authorship of things or

denying<00:37:21.280> my<00:37:21.400> own<00:37:21.560> creativity<00:37:22.119> as<00:37:22.520> making

denying my own creativity as making

things<00:37:24.560> shouldn’t<00:37:25.079> be<00:37:25.800> explained<00:37:26.800> as<00:37:27.280> giving

things shouldn’t be explained as giving

giving<00:37:27.680> the<00:37:27.839> credit<00:37:28.119> to<00:37:28.240> the<00:37:28.599> correct

person<00:37:33.440> nothing<00:37:34.040> my<00:37:34.440> authorship<00:37:34.839> or<00:37:35.000> denying

person nothing my authorship or denying

authorship<00:37:36.480> yeah<00:37:36.680> what<00:37:36.800> we<00:37:36.920> need<00:37:37.079> to<00:37:37.240> deny<00:37:37.640> or

authorship yeah what we need to deny or

what<00:37:37.920> we<00:37:38.040> need<00:37:38.160> to<00:37:38.319> know<00:37:38.880> is<00:37:39.040> if<00:37:39.480> if<00:37:39.720> um<00:37:40.400> if<00:37:40.520> it’s

what we need to know is if if um if it’s

true<00:37:41.839> or<00:37:42.040> maybe<00:37:42.280> if<00:37:42.359> it’s<00:37:42.480> interesting<00:37:42.839> and

true or maybe if it’s interesting and

useful<00:37:44.440> which<00:37:44.720> two<00:37:44.880> different<00:37:45.119> questions<00:37:45.480> I

useful which two different questions I

agree<00:37:46.560> but<00:37:46.680> in<00:37:46.839> both<00:37:47.000> of<00:37:47.160> these

agree but in both of these

cases<00:37:48.880> we<00:37:49.040> don’t<00:37:49.240> really<00:37:49.599> never<00:37:49.760> we<00:37:49.839> never

cases we don’t really never we never

need<00:37:50.160> to<00:37:50.240> know<00:37:50.359> who<00:37:50.480> wrote<00:37:50.680> a<00:37:50.800> book<00:37:50.960> in<00:37:51.040> order

need to know who wrote a book in order

to<00:37:51.599> get<00:37:51.800> anything<00:37:52.119> out<00:37:52.480> get<00:37:52.640> what<00:37:52.760> it<00:37:52.880> needs

to get anything out get what it needs

out<00:37:53.240> of

out of

it<00:37:54.920> it’s

it it’s

yeah<00:37:58.079> not<00:37:59.079> if<00:37:59.200> not<00:37:59.359> it’s<00:37:59.480> false<00:37:59.800> no<00:37:59.880> matter<00:38:00.079> who

yeah not if not it’s false no matter who

wrote

it<00:38:03.319> besid<00:38:03.640> that<00:38:03.839> before<00:38:04.359> very<00:38:04.599> good<00:38:04.839> before

it besid that before very good before

you<00:38:05.160> wrote<00:38:05.599> read<00:38:05.800> it<00:38:05.920> you<00:38:06.040> need<00:38:06.160> to<00:38:06.240> know<00:38:06.359> who

you wrote read it you need to know who

wrote<00:38:06.720> it<00:38:06.880> in<00:38:07.000> other<00:38:07.160> words<00:38:07.319> you<00:38:07.400> need<00:38:07.520> to<00:38:07.640> know

wrote it in other words you need to know

you<00:38:07.880> need<00:38:08.000> to<00:38:08.119> have<00:38:08.240> some<00:38:08.359> indication<00:38:08.839> to

you need to have some indication to

start<00:38:09.200> reading<00:38:09.520> it<00:38:09.839> okay<00:38:10.839> needs<00:38:11.079> to<00:38:11.240> advertise

start reading it okay needs to advertise

itself<00:38:12.000> somehow<00:38:12.280> to

you<00:38:18.599> all<00:38:18.680> right<00:38:18.760> but<00:38:18.880> it’s<00:38:19.040> nothing<00:38:19.240> Beyond

you all right but it’s nothing Beyond

marketing<00:38:19.800> and<00:38:20.000> page

numbers<00:38:24.599> now<00:38:24.800> there’s<00:38:25.000> also<00:38:25.200> a<00:38:25.400> marketing<00:38:25.920> the

numbers now there’s also a marketing the

Raam<00:38:26.319> seems<00:38:26.480> to<00:38:26.560> be<00:38:26.640> doing<00:38:26.839> marketing<00:38:27.200> here

Raam seems to be doing marketing here

have<00:38:27.640> to<00:38:27.720> remember<00:38:28.040> he’s<00:38:28.319> in<00:38:28.440> some<00:38:28.640> sense

have to remember he’s in some sense

doing<00:38:29.119> marketing<00:38:29.920> and<00:38:30.040> he’s<00:38:30.200> telling<00:38:30.720> he’s

doing marketing and he’s telling he’s

marketing<00:38:31.440> it<00:38:31.680> in<00:38:31.839> the<00:38:32.079> in<00:38:32.160> the<00:38:32.319> opposite<00:38:32.720> way

marketing it in the in the opposite way

right<00:38:33.079> he’s<00:38:33.240> marketing<00:38:33.640> him<00:38:33.800> saying<00:38:34.000> by

right he’s marketing him saying by

saying<00:38:34.319> I’m<00:38:34.640> this<00:38:34.720> are<00:38:34.880> not<00:38:35.079> things<00:38:35.240> that<00:38:35.400> I

saying I’m this are not things that I

made<00:38:35.800> up<00:38:36.359> because<00:38:36.520> things<00:38:36.680> that<00:38:36.800> I<00:38:36.920> made<00:38:37.119> up

made up because things that I made up

would<00:38:37.520> be<00:38:37.800> what<00:38:37.920> would<00:38:38.040> be<00:38:38.160> wrong<00:38:38.440> with<00:38:38.680> that

would be what would be wrong with that

again<00:38:39.800> one<00:38:40.800> understanding<00:38:41.000> would<00:38:41.119> be<00:38:41.240> to<00:38:41.400> say

again one understanding would be to say

it<00:38:41.800> would<00:38:41.960> just<00:38:42.040> be<00:38:42.200> that<00:38:42.440> I’m<00:38:42.560> taking<00:38:42.800> credit

it would just be that I’m taking credit

for<00:38:43.160> things<00:38:43.280> that<00:38:43.400> don’t<00:38:43.599> belong<00:38:43.839> to<00:38:44.000> him<00:38:44.760> but

for things that don’t belong to him but

that<00:38:45.240> doesn’t<00:38:45.480> seem<00:38:45.800> interesting<00:38:46.280> why<00:38:46.440> not

that doesn’t seem interesting why not

because<00:38:46.839> it<00:38:46.960> doesn’t<00:38:47.160> seem<00:38:47.319> to<00:38:47.760> deserve

because it doesn’t seem to deserve

credit<00:38:48.520> if<00:38:48.640> it’s<00:38:48.800> true<00:38:49.280> and<00:38:49.440> nobody<00:38:49.720> deserves

credit if it’s true and nobody deserves

credit<00:38:50.319> if<00:38:50.400> it’s<00:38:50.800> true<00:38:51.920> credit<00:38:52.920> not<00:38:53.119> really

credit if it’s true credit not really

though<00:38:54.079> he’s<00:38:54.280> not<00:38:54.520> actually<00:38:54.720> giving<00:38:54.960> anyone

though he’s not actually giving anyone

specific<00:38:55.680> credit<00:38:56.359> he’s<00:38:56.760> actually<00:38:57.000> doing

specific credit he’s actually doing

giving<00:38:58.319> like<00:38:58.440> a<00:38:58.560> very<00:38:58.720> general<00:38:59.079> credit<00:38:59.319> to

giving like a very general credit to

people<00:38:59.839> that<00:38:59.920> are<00:39:00.079> not<00:39:00.319> him<00:39:00.800> but<00:39:00.920> he<00:39:01.040> not

people that are not him but he not

giving<00:39:01.560> us<00:39:01.720> any<00:39:01.880> name<00:39:02.200> so<00:39:02.359> if<00:39:02.520> the<00:39:02.800> idea<00:39:03.079> was<00:39:03.200> to

giving us any name so if the idea was to

give<00:39:03.480> Co<00:39:03.800> to<00:39:03.960> anyone<00:39:04.440> we’re<00:39:04.680> not<00:39:05.520> nobody’s

give Co to anyone we’re not nobody’s

getting<00:39:06.200> that

getting that

here<00:39:08.119> uh<00:39:08.280> if<00:39:08.400> the<00:39:08.520> idea<00:39:08.839> was<00:39:09.000> to<00:39:09.280> tell<00:39:09.640> people

here uh if the idea was to tell people

where<00:39:10.119> to

where to

look<00:39:12.400> not<00:39:12.560> sure<00:39:12.839> about

look not sure about

that<00:39:15.319> it<00:39:15.400> seems<00:39:15.599> to<00:39:15.720> me<00:39:15.880> that<00:39:16.000> the<00:39:16.160> more

that it seems to me that the more

important<00:39:16.680> that’s<00:39:16.839> why<00:39:16.960> I<00:39:17.079> think<00:39:17.280> that<00:39:17.599> the

important that’s why I think that the

emphasis<00:39:18.800> on<00:39:19.000> things<00:39:19.200> that<00:39:19.319> he<00:39:19.480> didn’t<00:39:19.839> create

emphasis on things that he didn’t create

seems<00:39:20.560> to<00:39:20.680> be

seems to be

important<00:39:23.800> these<00:39:23.960> are<00:39:24.079> not<00:39:24.280> created<00:39:24.760> thoughts

important these are not created thoughts

at<00:39:25.240> all<00:39:25.960> or<00:39:26.119> at<00:39:26.240> least<00:39:26.880> not<00:39:27.000> created<00:39:27.440> by<00:39:27.880> him<00:39:28.880> or

at all or at least not created by him or

by<00:39:29.280> the<00:39:29.359> people<00:39:29.560> he<00:39:29.680> stole<00:39:29.960> them

by the people he stole them

from<00:39:31.760> if<00:39:32.000> that<00:39:32.160> makes<00:39:32.400> sense

okay<00:39:58.400> should<00:39:58.560> I

okay should I

continue

yeah<00:40:03.560> okay<00:40:03.680> so<00:40:03.960> these<00:40:04.400> now<00:40:04.839> we’re<00:40:05.040> back<00:40:05.359> we’re

yeah okay so these now we’re back we’re

back<00:40:05.720> in<00:40:05.880> the<00:40:06.119> the<00:40:06.280> text<00:40:06.960> these<00:40:07.119> things<00:40:07.319> are

back in the the text these things are

not<00:40:07.680> things<00:40:07.839> that<00:40:07.960> I<00:40:08.119> made<00:40:08.359> up<00:40:09.040> or

not things that I made up or

created<00:40:12.280> but<00:40:12.560> what<00:40:12.640> are<00:40:13.319> they<00:40:14.319> like

this<00:40:17.720> they<00:40:17.839> are<00:40:18.040> gathered<00:40:18.359> they’re

this they are gathered they’re

anthologized<00:40:19.839> from<00:40:20.839> we<00:40:21.480> in<00:40:21.640> mad<00:40:22.200> and<00:40:22.400> tal<00:40:22.839> and

anthologized from we in mad and tal and

other<00:40:23.240> books<00:40:23.480> that<00:40:23.599> they<00:40:23.720> wrote<00:40:24.079> who<00:40:24.200> knows

other books that they wrote who knows

which

ones<00:40:26.720> um

ones um

and<00:40:28.760> also<00:40:29.240> so<00:40:29.440> number<00:40:29.640> one<00:40:29.839> there’s<00:40:29.960> a<00:40:30.119> source

and also so number one there’s a source

Number

One<00:40:32.520> Source<00:40:32.839> number<00:40:33.000> two<00:40:33.160> is<00:40:33.280> from<00:40:33.440> the

One Source number two is from the

philosophers<00:40:35.280> there’s<00:40:35.480> two<00:40:35.640> kinds<00:40:35.800> of

philosophers there’s two kinds of

philosophers<00:40:36.480> old<00:40:36.640> ones<00:40:36.800> and<00:40:36.960> new<00:40:37.119> ones

philosophers old ones and new ones

ancient<00:40:37.960> and<00:40:38.119> new<00:40:38.280> ones<00:40:38.720> ancients<00:40:39.079> and<00:40:39.240> modern

ancient and new ones ancients and modern

s<00:40:40.160> was<00:40:40.760> wasn’t<00:40:41.079> like<00:40:41.200> you<00:40:41.400> saying<00:40:41.640> we<00:40:41.760> only

s was wasn’t like you saying we only

read<00:40:42.160> ancient<00:40:42.440> ones<00:40:42.680> he<00:40:42.800> actually<00:40:43.000> read<00:40:43.200> the

read ancient ones he actually read the

new<00:40:43.440> ones<00:40:43.920> too<00:40:44.920> in<00:40:45.119> those<00:40:45.319> days<00:40:45.599> they<00:40:46.560> yeah<00:40:46.920> his

new ones too in those days they yeah his

new<00:40:47.160> ones<00:40:47.359> are<00:40:47.480> old<00:40:47.760> by<00:40:47.880> now

but<00:40:52.000> who<00:40:52.119> he<00:40:52.240> means<00:40:52.520> by

but who he means by

K<00:40:55.520> Ali<00:40:56.520> Maybe

K Ali Maybe

and<00:40:59.359> third<00:40:59.760> third<00:41:00.000> Source<00:41:00.560> from<00:41:00.839> many<00:41:01.160> from

and third third Source from many from

the<00:41:01.640> books<00:41:01.880> of<00:41:02.040> many

the books of many

people<00:41:04.839> so<00:41:05.000> we’ve<00:41:05.200> got<00:41:05.359> a<00:41:05.480> lot<00:41:05.640> of<00:41:05.760> sources

people so we’ve got a lot of sources

here<00:41:08.200> which<00:41:08.440> has<00:41:08.760> three<00:41:09.000> different<00:41:09.680> parts<00:41:10.680> and

here which has three different parts and

others<00:41:12.640> philosophers<00:41:13.319> which<00:41:13.480> have<00:41:13.680> three

others philosophers which have three

different<00:41:14.200> kinds<00:41:15.040> or<00:41:15.240> two<00:41:15.400> different<00:41:15.599> kinds

different kinds or two different kinds

old<00:41:16.079> and<00:41:16.200> new<00:41:16.400> ones<00:41:17.319> and<00:41:17.480> thirdly<00:41:17.839> many

people<00:41:21.480> none<00:41:21.640> of<00:41:21.839> these<00:41:22.000> have<00:41:22.240> names<00:41:22.480> or

people none of these have names or

footnotes<00:41:23.079> to<00:41:23.200> tell<00:41:23.359> us<00:41:23.480> who<00:41:23.640> they<00:41:23.760> are

and<00:41:28.440> here<00:41:28.720> and<00:41:28.839> then<00:41:29.000> he<00:41:29.400> finishes<00:41:29.839> with<00:41:30.000> his

and here and then he finishes with his

famous

thing<00:41:38.720> hear<00:41:39.000> the<00:41:39.160> truth<00:41:39.400> from<00:41:39.599> whoever<00:41:40.000> told

thing hear the truth from whoever told

said<00:41:40.640> it

sounds<00:42:04.640> St<00:42:04.960> people<00:42:05.440> who<00:42:05.560> are<00:42:05.720> these<00:42:05.880> St<00:42:06.160> people

exactly<00:42:12.319> the<00:42:12.440> point

maybe<00:42:21.960> maybe<00:42:22.960> I<00:42:23.079> think<00:42:23.280> that<00:42:23.400> he<00:42:23.640> means<00:42:24.640> uh<00:42:24.960> I

maybe maybe I think that he means uh I

have<00:42:25.160> a<00:42:25.400> more<00:42:25.640> radical<00:42:26.040> chat<00:42:26.319> than<00:42:26.480> you<00:42:27.200> maybe

have a more radical chat than you maybe

your<00:42:27.520> is<00:42:27.640> more<00:42:27.839> radical<00:42:28.200> I<00:42:28.280> don’t<00:42:28.400> know<00:42:29.280> maybe

your is more radical I don’t know maybe

he<00:42:29.680> means<00:42:30.359> people<00:42:30.599> from<00:42:30.760> other<00:42:31.000> religions<00:42:31.440> who

he means people from other religions who

write<00:42:31.839> religious

books<00:42:38.720> who<00:42:38.880> wrote<00:42:39.480> you

books who wrote you

sure<00:42:42.280> I<00:42:42.359> don’t<00:42:42.520> know

sure I don’t know

may<00:42:45.079> can<00:42:45.200> you<00:42:45.319> think<00:42:45.440> of

may can you think of

examples<00:42:47.559> I<00:42:47.640> can’t<00:42:47.839> think<00:42:48.000> of<00:42:48.160> examples<00:42:48.720> no

examples I can’t think of examples no

and<00:42:49.920> also<00:42:50.520> I<00:42:50.599> don’t<00:42:50.800> know<00:42:51.200> I<00:42:51.280> mean<00:42:51.400> there’s

and also I don’t know I mean there’s

people<00:42:51.800> that<00:42:51.920> do<00:42:52.119> this<00:42:52.400> work<00:42:53.400> and<00:42:53.520> you<00:42:53.599> could

people that do this work and you could

read<00:42:54.079> them<00:42:54.680> like<00:42:54.920> which<00:42:55.040> is<00:42:55.240> to<00:42:55.559> like<00:42:56.160> uh

read them like which is to like uh

reveal<00:42:56.720> what<00:42:57.400> hid<00:42:58.079> and<00:42:58.319> he<00:42:58.440> says<00:42:58.640> that<00:42:58.760> he<00:42:58.839> took

reveal what hid and he says that he took

his<00:42:59.160> stuff<00:42:59.319> from<00:42:59.480> many<00:42:59.760> people<00:43:00.079> and<00:43:00.160> he

his stuff from many people and he

anthologized<00:43:01.040> it<00:43:01.920> so<00:43:02.160> let’s<00:43:02.720> what<00:43:03.119> what

anthologized it so let’s what what

should<00:43:03.359> we<00:43:03.480> do<00:43:03.680> now<00:43:04.640> so<00:43:04.839> some<00:43:05.040> people<00:43:05.400> think

should we do now so some people think

therefore<00:43:06.640> our<00:43:06.880> job<00:43:07.160> is<00:43:07.440> is<00:43:07.680> to<00:43:07.880> reveal<00:43:08.280> who

therefore our job is is to reveal who

our<00:43:08.640> sources<00:43:09.079> are<00:43:10.079> right<00:43:10.240> this<00:43:10.319> is<00:43:10.480> like<00:43:10.599> a

our sources are right this is like a

very<00:43:11.000> big<00:43:11.720> game<00:43:12.119> that<00:43:12.400> the<00:43:12.559> academy<00:43:12.960> likes<00:43:13.200> to

very big game that the academy likes to

play<00:43:14.440> at<00:43:14.559> least<00:43:14.720> with<00:43:14.880> the<00:43:15.359> historical

play at least with the historical

Academy<00:43:16.160> of<00:43:16.280> the<00:43:16.400> last<00:43:16.680> 200<00:43:16.960> years<00:43:17.640> take<00:43:17.839> any

Academy of the last 200 years take any

book<00:43:18.599> and<00:43:18.760> let’s<00:43:18.960> figure<00:43:19.200> out<00:43:19.319> who<00:43:19.440> he<00:43:19.559> stole

book and let’s figure out who he stole

everything<00:43:20.160> from<00:43:20.319> so<00:43:20.480> this<00:43:20.599> L’s<00:43:20.839> from<00:43:21.040> there

everything from so this L’s from there

and<00:43:21.280> this<00:43:21.400> line<00:43:21.559> is<00:43:21.640> from<00:43:21.839> there<00:43:21.960> and<00:43:22.079> this

and this line is from there and this

idea<00:43:22.400> is<00:43:22.480> from<00:43:22.640> here<00:43:22.720> and<00:43:22.839> this<00:43:22.960> idea<00:43:23.160> is<00:43:23.280> from

idea is from here and this idea is from

here<00:43:23.960> and<00:43:24.119> like<00:43:24.280> he<00:43:24.400> says<00:43:24.680> up<00:43:24.800> a<00:43:24.920> fetish<00:43:25.200> that

here and like he says up a fetish that

he<00:43:25.400> told<00:43:25.599> it<00:43:25.760> so<00:43:26.240> it’s<00:43:26.400> not<00:43:26.559> like<00:43:26.720> we’re<00:43:26.839> not

he told it so it’s not like we’re not

like<00:43:27.400> arguing<00:43:27.720> with<00:43:27.800> him<00:43:27.920> we<00:43:28.079> just<00:43:28.240> revealing

like arguing with him we just revealing

what<00:43:28.800> he<00:43:29.319> said<00:43:30.319> that’s<00:43:30.559> useful<00:43:31.480> in<00:43:31.640> the<00:43:31.880> 2%<00:43:32.440> way

what he said that’s useful in the 2% way

that<00:43:32.720> we<00:43:33.040> discussed<00:43:34.040> or<00:43:34.280> else<00:43:34.480> in<00:43:34.599> other<00:43:35.280> ways

that we discussed or else in other ways

or<00:43:36.400> he<00:43:36.559> didn’t<00:43:36.800> tell<00:43:37.040> you<00:43:37.280> because<00:43:37.520> he<00:43:37.680> didn’t

or he didn’t tell you because he didn’t

but<00:43:38.839> maybe<00:43:39.119> he<00:43:39.280> thought<00:43:39.760> they<00:43:40.079> right<00:43:40.520> maybe<00:43:40.720> he

but maybe he thought they right maybe he

didn’t<00:43:41.119> do<00:43:41.359> that<00:43:41.640> because<00:43:42.359> not<00:43:42.880> well<00:43:43.000> he

didn’t do that because not well he

actually<00:43:43.359> says<00:43:43.599> why<00:43:43.720> I<00:43:43.800> didn’t<00:43:44.000> do<00:43:44.079> it<00:43:44.160> so<00:43:44.280> much

actually says why I didn’t do it so much

it’s<00:43:44.480> a<00:43:44.559> little<00:43:44.680> more<00:43:45.079> complicated

it’s a little more complicated

but<00:43:48.079> maybe<00:43:49.079> maybe<00:43:49.480> that<00:43:49.640> wouldn’t<00:43:49.960> so<00:43:50.200> in

but maybe maybe that wouldn’t so in

other<00:43:50.520> words<00:43:50.839> that<00:43:51.079> seems<00:43:51.280> to<00:43:51.440> be<00:43:51.640> so<00:43:51.880> what

other words that seems to be so what

would<00:43:52.119> be<00:43:52.200> the<00:43:52.319> point<00:43:52.480> of<00:43:52.720> that<00:43:53.200> that<00:43:53.319> seems<00:43:53.520> to

would be the point of that that seems to

be<00:43:53.760> based<00:43:54.000> on<00:43:54.119> the<00:43:54.240> idea<00:43:54.520> that<00:43:54.680> Things<00:43:54.920> become

be based on the idea that Things become

we<00:43:55.839> understand<00:43:56.119> things<00:43:56.359> better<00:43:56.599> by<00:43:56.680> knowing

we understand things better by knowing

where<00:43:57.200> they<00:43:57.319> come<00:43:57.559> from<00:43:58.079> but<00:43:58.280> a<00:43:58.559> who<00:43:58.720> they<00:43:58.880> come

where they come from but a who they come

from<00:44:00.599> right<00:44:01.359> I<00:44:01.400> mean<00:44:01.880> many<00:44:02.079> people<00:44:02.280> will<00:44:02.400> say

from right I mean many people will say

well<00:44:02.720> who<00:44:02.839> is<00:44:02.920> that<00:44:03.079> I’m<00:44:03.240> talking<00:44:03.440> about<00:44:03.760> okay

well who is that I’m talking about okay

I’ve<00:44:04.079> done<00:44:04.319> a<00:44:04.400> lot<00:44:04.520> of<00:44:04.680> research<00:44:05.240> I<00:44:05.359> read<00:44:05.559> a

I’ve done a lot of research I read a

bunch<00:44:05.800> of<00:44:05.880> books<00:44:06.079> in<00:44:06.240> Arabic<00:44:06.640> and<00:44:06.760> I<00:44:06.839> had<00:44:06.960> to

bunch of books in Arabic and I had to

translate<00:44:07.559> them<00:44:07.760> and<00:44:08.040> suffer<00:44:08.440> through<00:44:08.640> them

translate them and suffer through them

and<00:44:09.160> now<00:44:09.280> I<00:44:09.359> know<00:44:09.559> he’s<00:44:09.720> talking<00:44:09.960> about<00:44:10.559> now<00:44:10.680> I

and now I know he’s talking about now I

can<00:44:10.880> give

can give

a<00:44:13.640> well<00:44:13.760> do<00:44:13.880> you<00:44:14.200> understand<00:44:14.359> the<00:44:14.480> ideas

a well do you understand the ideas

better

no<00:44:18.720> sometimes<00:44:18.960> the<00:44:19.079> answer<00:44:19.280> is<00:44:19.480> yes<00:44:19.839> sometimes

no sometimes the answer is yes sometimes

the<00:44:20.160> answer<00:44:20.359> is

the answer is

yes<00:44:22.280> I<00:44:22.440> agree<00:44:23.200> sometimes<00:44:23.359> the<00:44:23.440> answer<00:44:23.640> is<00:44:23.839> yes

yes I agree sometimes the answer is yes

but<00:44:24.200> for<00:44:24.359> a<00:44:24.839> very<00:44:25.000> specific<00:44:25.680> reason<00:44:26.680> which<00:44:26.839> is

but for a very specific reason which is

just<00:44:27.880> that<00:44:28.000> you<00:44:28.079> can<00:44:28.520> understand<00:44:29.079> sometimes

just that you can understand sometimes

let’s<00:44:30.119> especially<00:44:30.520> let’s<00:44:30.680> say<00:44:30.800> from<00:44:31.559> right

let’s especially let’s say from right

you’re<00:44:32.040> not<00:44:32.200> getting<00:44:32.440> any<00:44:32.960> philosophy<00:44:33.960> right

you’re not getting any philosophy right

you’re<00:44:34.680> you’re<00:44:35.240> you’re<00:44:35.480> being<00:44:35.680> taught

you’re you’re you’re being taught

philosophy<00:44:36.800> application<00:44:37.800> right<00:44:37.960> so<00:44:38.079> it’s

philosophy application right so it’s

helpful<00:44:38.520> them<00:44:38.640> to<00:44:39.000> understand<00:44:39.520> how<00:44:39.680> those

helpful them to understand how those

theories<00:44:40.200> ground<00:44:40.680> themselves<00:44:41.400> okay<00:44:41.559> so

theories ground themselves okay so

sometime<00:44:42.200> for<00:44:42.359> the<00:44:42.559> opposite<00:44:42.880> reason<00:44:43.400> right

sometime for the opposite reason right

sometimes<00:44:44.680> this<00:44:44.760> is<00:44:44.920> important<00:44:45.400> D<00:44:45.760> wants<00:44:45.920> you

sometimes this is important D wants you

to<00:44:46.160> do<00:44:46.359> this<00:44:47.240> he’s<00:44:47.559> I<00:44:47.640> think<00:44:47.839> that<00:44:48.240> I<00:44:48.319> can<00:44:48.400> learn

to do this he’s I think that I can learn

that<00:44:48.680> no<00:44:48.760> one<00:44:49.520> right<00:44:50.359> exactly<00:44:51.359> right<00:44:51.839> so

that no one right exactly right so

sometimes<00:44:52.720> and<00:44:52.880> I<00:44:53.000> think<00:44:53.240> I<00:44:53.640> I<00:44:53.800> I’m<00:44:54.000> Pro<00:44:54.280> this

sometimes and I think I I I’m Pro this

way<00:44:55.240> sometimes<00:44:55.599> you<00:44:55.720> need<00:44:55.880> to<00:44:56.079> read<00:44:56.520> earlier

way sometimes you need to read earlier

sources<00:44:57.559> basically<00:44:57.839> if<00:44:57.880> you<00:44:58.000> read<00:44:58.160> AR<00:44:58.520> and

sources basically if you read AR and

Plato<00:44:58.880> you<00:44:58.960> know<00:44:59.119> everything<00:44:59.760> you<00:44:59.960> don’t<00:45:00.119> have

Plato you know everything you don’t have

to<00:45:00.319> read<00:45:00.520> the<00:45:00.640> Kash<00:45:01.200> too<00:45:01.559> much<00:45:02.839> but<00:45:03.839> sometimes

to read the Kash too much but sometimes

you<00:45:04.240> need<00:45:04.400> to<00:45:04.559> read<00:45:04.760> them<00:45:05.040> be<00:45:05.520> precisely<00:45:06.119> in

you need to read them be precisely in

order<00:45:06.559> to<00:45:06.839> get<00:45:07.119> out<00:45:07.480> of<00:45:07.760> the<00:45:08.520> way<00:45:08.680> of

order to get out of the way of

understanding<00:45:09.440> things<00:45:09.599> that<00:45:09.720> are<00:45:09.880> true

understanding things that are true

because<00:45:10.400> Raam<00:45:10.680> said<00:45:10.839> it<00:45:10.960> or<00:45:11.160> because<00:45:11.480> some

because Raam said it or because some

other<00:45:11.920> guy<00:45:12.079> said<00:45:12.400> it<00:45:13.400> because<00:45:13.800> Ram<00:45:14.319> in<00:45:14.920> general

other guy said it because Ram in general

because<00:45:16.119> of<00:45:16.240> the<00:45:16.440> kind<00:45:16.599> of<00:45:16.920> teaching<00:45:17.280> that

because of the kind of teaching that

he’s<00:45:17.559> doing<00:45:17.839> and<00:45:17.960> because<00:45:18.160> of<00:45:18.240> the<00:45:18.359> kind<00:45:18.520> of

he’s doing and because of the kind of

goals<00:45:18.880> that<00:45:19.000> he<00:45:19.160> has<00:45:19.800> and<00:45:19.960> because<00:45:20.119> of<00:45:20.240> the

goals that he has and because of the

kind<00:45:20.520> of<00:45:20.640> person<00:45:20.880> that<00:45:21.040> he

kind of person that he

is<00:45:23.440> yeah<00:45:23.599> because<00:45:23.760> the<00:45:23.880> kind<00:45:24.000> of<00:45:24.119> role<00:45:24.319> he

is yeah because the kind of role he

plays<00:45:24.839> would<00:45:24.960> be<00:45:25.079> a<00:45:25.160> better<00:45:25.359> way<00:45:25.480> to<00:45:25.599> say<00:45:25.760> it<00:45:26.640> is

plays would be a better way to say it is

not<00:45:27.400> very<00:45:27.599> much<00:45:27.880> interested<00:45:28.520> in<00:45:28.720> taking<00:45:29.000> you

not very much interested in taking you

from<00:45:29.520> zero<00:45:29.760> to<00:45:29.960> one

from zero to one

ever<00:45:31.839> right<00:45:32.480> he<00:45:32.599> doesn’t<00:45:32.880> go<00:45:33.000> around<00:45:33.240> proving

ever right he doesn’t go around proving

things<00:45:35.640> in<00:45:35.800> general<00:45:36.319> there<00:45:36.520> like<00:45:36.640> three

things in general there like three

chapters<00:45:37.160> of<00:45:37.400> going<00:45:37.599> around<00:45:37.760> proving<00:45:38.079> things

chapters of going around proving things

in<00:45:38.319> all<00:45:38.440> of<00:45:38.559> his

in all of his

books<00:45:41.319> was<00:45:41.480> Pro<00:45:41.680> reason<00:45:42.000> and

books was Pro reason and

everything<00:45:44.000> most<00:45:44.240> of<00:45:44.400> his<00:45:44.599> effort<00:45:44.960> in<00:45:45.200> life

everything most of his effort in life

was<00:45:46.400> anthologizing<00:45:47.160> things<00:45:47.359> and<00:45:47.559> clarifying

was anthologizing things and clarifying

things<00:45:48.280> and<00:45:48.440> teaching<00:45:48.880> things<00:45:49.680> he<00:45:49.880> most

things and teaching things he most

mostly<00:45:50.720> did<00:45:50.960> not<00:45:51.520> do<00:45:52.520> philosophy<00:45:53.200> or<00:45:53.400> doesn’t

mostly did not do philosophy or doesn’t

write<00:45:54.359> philosophy<00:45:55.359> right<00:45:56.119> what’s<00:45:56.359> because

write philosophy right what’s because

philosophy<00:45:57.079> means<00:45:57.800> well<00:45:58.400> it<00:45:58.520> can<00:45:58.640> mean<00:45:58.839> many

philosophy means well it can mean many

things<00:45:59.760> but<00:46:00.040> at<00:46:00.160> least<00:46:00.440> has<00:46:00.599> to<00:46:00.800> mean<00:46:01.440> taking

things but at least has to mean taking

people<00:46:02.160> from<00:46:02.359> not<00:46:02.559> knowing<00:46:02.800> to<00:46:03.000> knowing<00:46:03.400> by

people from not knowing to knowing by

way<00:46:03.680> of

way of

arguments<00:46:06.480> right<00:46:07.000> there’s<00:46:07.200> different<00:46:07.400> ways

arguments right there’s different ways

of<00:46:07.720> not<00:46:07.880> knowing<00:46:08.119> and<00:46:08.280> different<00:46:08.480> ways<00:46:08.640> of<00:46:08.839> AR

of not knowing and different ways of AR

in<00:46:09.160> which<00:46:09.319> the<00:46:09.400> arguments<00:46:09.720> can<00:46:09.839> Le<00:46:10.000> do<00:46:10.119> from

in which the arguments can Le do from

one<00:46:10.359> to<00:46:10.520> the<00:46:10.640> other<00:46:11.359> and<00:46:11.480> so<00:46:11.599> on<00:46:11.760> but<00:46:11.880> that’s

one to the other and so on but that’s

like<00:46:12.200> the<00:46:12.400> most<00:46:13.280> I<00:46:13.359> think<00:46:13.559> everyone<00:46:13.839> agrees

like the most I think everyone agrees

that<00:46:14.640> something<00:46:14.839> that<00:46:14.960> doesn’t<00:46:15.160> do<00:46:15.319> that<00:46:15.440> is

that something that doesn’t do that is

not<00:46:15.720> philosophy<00:46:16.119> or<00:46:16.200> at<00:46:16.280> least<00:46:16.480> I’m<00:46:16.559> going<00:46:16.640> to

not philosophy or at least I’m going to

say<00:46:17.280> that<00:46:18.280> and<00:46:18.480> ra<00:46:18.760> never<00:46:18.960> does<00:46:19.240> this<00:46:19.720> or<00:46:19.920> or<00:46:20.160> or

say that and ra never does this or or or

almost<00:46:20.720> never<00:46:21.040> does<00:46:21.319> this<00:46:21.520> in<00:46:21.599> other<00:46:21.760> words

almost never does this in other words

he’s<00:46:22.359> told<00:46:22.599> you<00:46:22.880> right<00:46:23.000> now<00:46:23.200> what<00:46:23.319> his<00:46:23.480> book<00:46:23.640> is

he’s told you right now what his book is

for<00:46:23.960> this<00:46:24.079> book<00:46:24.240> is<00:46:24.359> to<00:46:24.440> help<00:46:24.599> you<00:46:24.720> become<00:46:24.920> a

for this book is to help you become a

nii<00:46:26.400> okay<00:46:26.720> and

it’s<00:46:31.440> not<00:46:31.640> in<00:46:31.760> order<00:46:32.000> to<00:46:32.280> prove<00:46:32.520> you<00:46:32.680> that<00:46:32.800> this

it’s not in order to prove you that this

is<00:46:32.960> the<00:46:33.040> way<00:46:33.160> to<00:46:33.240> be<00:46:33.359> a<00:46:34.200> if<00:46:34.359> someone<00:46:34.640> this

is the way to be a if someone this

answering<00:46:35.359> your<00:46:35.839> beginning<00:46:36.119> to<00:46:36.280> answer<00:46:36.480> your

answering your beginning to answer your

question<00:46:36.839> from<00:46:37.359> last<00:46:38.359> um<00:46:39.160> he’s<00:46:39.400> not<00:46:39.839> if

question from last um he’s not if

someone<00:46:40.400> by<00:46:40.520> the<00:46:40.640> way<00:46:41.119> I’m<00:46:41.240> goingon<00:46:41.319> to<00:46:41.480> get

someone by the way I’m goingon to get

this<00:46:41.960> if<00:46:42.079> someone<00:46:42.400> comes<00:46:42.640> and

this if someone comes and

says<00:46:45.240> I<00:46:45.880> heard<00:46:46.200> your<00:46:46.440> theory<00:46:46.760> about<00:46:46.960> like<00:46:47.119> who

says I heard your theory about like who

says<00:46:47.440> it’s<00:46:48.119> true<00:46:49.119> now<00:46:49.319> who<00:46:49.520> says<00:46:49.800> is<00:46:50.040> very<00:46:50.240> bad

says it’s true now who says is very bad

way<00:46:50.520> of<00:46:50.640> saying<00:46:50.960> things<00:46:51.200> because<00:46:51.359> who<00:46:51.480> says

way of saying things because who says

we’re<00:46:51.960> Jews<00:46:52.200> we<00:46:52.319> used<00:46:52.480> to<00:46:52.599> saying<00:46:52.839> who<00:46:53.000> says

we’re Jews we used to saying who says

and<00:46:54.200> if<00:46:55.200> and<00:46:55.319> if<00:46:55.440> someone<00:46:55.760> said<00:46:56.359> didn’t<00:46:56.559> be

and if and if someone said didn’t be

true<00:46:57.280> right<00:46:57.880> so<00:46:58.000> you<00:46:58.119> got<00:46:58.240> to<00:46:58.359> say<00:46:58.720> why<00:46:59.000> is<00:46:59.079> it

true right so you got to say why is it

true<00:47:00.839> right<00:47:01.079> not<00:47:01.280> who<00:47:01.400> says<00:47:01.640> it’s<00:47:01.880> true<00:47:02.880> your

true right not who says it’s true your

just<00:47:03.200> your<00:47:03.359> language<00:47:03.680> is<00:47:03.800> so<00:47:04.000> bad<00:47:04.480> right<00:47:04.680> who

just your language is so bad right who

says<00:47:06.119> nobody<00:47:06.440> says<00:47:06.680> what’s<00:47:06.800> the<00:47:07.400> difference

says nobody says what’s the difference

uh<00:47:08.640> you<00:47:08.760> have<00:47:08.880> to<00:47:09.000> ask<00:47:09.280> why<00:47:09.440> it<00:47:09.520> is<00:47:09.800> true<00:47:10.160> right

uh you have to ask why it is true right

and<00:47:11.400> why<00:47:11.559> is<00:47:11.680> it<00:47:11.800> true<00:47:12.079> is<00:47:12.240> actually<00:47:12.440> very

and why is it true is actually very

different<00:47:12.960> from<00:47:13.319> how<00:47:13.480> I<00:47:13.599> know<00:47:13.800> that<00:47:13.920> it’s<00:47:14.079> true

different from how I know that it’s true

that’s<00:47:14.480> a<00:47:14.640> third<00:47:14.880> thing<00:47:15.839> another<00:47:16.079> thing<00:47:16.160> that

that’s a third thing another thing that

people<00:47:16.520> get<00:47:16.680> confused<00:47:17.079> because<00:47:17.359> why<00:47:17.480> it’s

people get confused because why it’s

true<00:47:18.000> is<00:47:18.200> actually<00:47:18.480> the<00:47:18.680> cause<00:47:19.000> that<00:47:19.160> makes<00:47:19.440> it

true is actually the cause that makes it

true<00:47:21.200> that<00:47:21.400> might<00:47:21.559> be<00:47:21.720> the<00:47:21.880> proof<00:47:22.160> might<00:47:22.319> be

true that might be the proof might be

the<00:47:22.559> demonstration<00:47:23.359> ideally<00:47:23.880> demonstration

the demonstration ideally demonstration

should<00:47:24.559> be<00:47:24.800> that<00:47:25.440> most<00:47:25.599> of<00:47:25.760> the<00:47:25.880> time<00:47:26.040> we’re

should be that most of the time we’re

not<00:47:26.359> doing<00:47:26.599> that<00:47:26.920> even<00:47:27.079> when<00:47:27.200> we<00:47:27.280> do<00:47:27.680> so-called

not doing that even when we do so-called

philosophy<00:47:28.520> or<00:47:28.680> demonstration<00:47:29.280> so<00:47:29.480> usually

philosophy or demonstration so usually

we’re<00:47:30.160> asking<00:47:30.400> a<00:47:30.599> question<00:47:30.800> of<00:47:31.040> how<00:47:31.280> I<00:47:31.520> can

we’re asking a question of how I can

know<00:47:31.880> that<00:47:32.000> it’s<00:47:32.200> true<00:47:32.880> which<00:47:33.000> is<00:47:33.079> a<00:47:33.200> different

know that it’s true which is a different

question<00:47:33.640> of<00:47:33.880> why<00:47:34.040> it’s<00:47:34.240> true<00:47:34.599> right

question of why it’s true right

sometimes<00:47:35.440> I<00:47:35.559> can<00:47:35.680> know<00:47:35.839> that<00:47:35.960> something<00:47:36.200> is

sometimes I can know that something is

true<00:47:36.720> it’s<00:47:36.960> absolutely<00:47:37.319> not<00:47:37.440> the<00:47:37.559> reason<00:47:37.839> it’s

true it’s absolutely not the reason it’s

true<00:47:38.920> right<00:47:39.920> this<00:47:40.040> is<00:47:40.240> called<00:47:40.520> like<00:47:40.640> in<00:47:40.760> math

true right this is called like in math

it’s<00:47:41.160> called<00:47:41.480> not<00:47:41.720> a<00:47:41.839> non-constructive<00:47:42.440> proof

it’s called not a non-constructive proof

proof<00:47:43.800> right<00:47:44.800> I<00:47:44.920> can<00:47:45.040> know<00:47:45.200> that<00:47:46.119> that<00:47:46.240> things

proof right I can know that that things

need<00:47:46.920> must<00:47:47.160> be<00:47:47.400> this<00:47:47.559> way<00:47:47.960> it<00:47:48.119> can’t<00:47:48.520> be

need must be this way it can’t be

otherwise<00:47:49.359> but<00:47:49.480> I<00:47:49.599> don’t<00:47:49.800> really<00:47:50.240> understand

otherwise but I don’t really understand

why<00:47:50.640> it’s<00:47:50.800> this<00:47:51.079> way<00:47:51.599> right<00:47:52.119> different<00:47:52.480> in

why it’s this way right different in

mathematics<00:47:53.040> we<00:47:53.160> talk<00:47:53.280> about<00:47:53.480> constructive

mathematics we talk about constructive

proofs<00:47:54.559> versus<00:47:54.920> just<00:47:55.160> proofs<00:47:55.440> that<00:47:55.559> prove

proofs versus just proofs that prove

things<00:47:56.000> without<00:47:56.520> showing<00:47:56.960> you<00:47:57.079> how<00:47:57.160> we<00:47:57.319> get

things without showing you how we get

from<00:47:57.599> one<00:47:57.720> to<00:47:57.880> the<00:47:58.240> other<00:47:59.240> and<00:47:59.480> ideally

from one to the other and ideally

knowledge<00:48:00.200> should<00:48:00.359> all<00:48:00.520> be<00:48:00.640> the<00:48:00.800> kind<00:48:00.960> of<00:48:01.079> the

knowledge should all be the kind of the

kind<00:48:01.359> of<00:48:01.520> constructive<00:48:01.960> proof<00:48:02.280> but<00:48:02.400> of<00:48:02.520> course

kind of constructive proof but of course

very<00:48:03.200> little<00:48:03.440> such<00:48:03.680> knowledge<00:48:04.480> but<00:48:04.720> any

very little such knowledge but any

case<00:48:06.960> most<00:48:07.119> of<00:48:07.240> the<00:48:07.400> time<00:48:07.720> or<00:48:08.280> as<00:48:08.400> far<00:48:08.520> as<00:48:08.599> I

case most of the time or as far as I

could<00:48:08.839> tell<00:48:09.040> all<00:48:09.160> of<00:48:09.280> the<00:48:09.800> time<00:48:10.800> do<00:48:10.880> you<00:48:11.000> know

could tell all of the time do you know

any<00:48:11.760> exceptions<00:48:12.640> I<00:48:12.800> was<00:48:12.920> thinking<00:48:13.079> of<00:48:13.200> the

any exceptions I was thinking of the

beginning<00:48:13.480> of<00:48:14.079> but<00:48:14.160> it<00:48:14.200> says<00:48:14.400> explicitly<00:48:14.839> that

beginning of but it says explicitly that

it<00:48:15.040> doesn’t<00:48:15.240> give<00:48:15.359> you<00:48:15.440> the<00:48:15.559> proofs<00:48:16.160> for<00:48:16.400> why

it doesn’t give you the proofs for why

the<00:48:16.680> think<00:48:16.920> that<00:48:17.160> way<00:48:17.960> so<00:48:18.960> the<00:48:19.640> never<00:48:19.920> does<00:48:20.559> Pro

the think that way so the never does Pro

constructive

proof<00:48:23.359> he<00:48:23.480> speaks<00:48:23.839> very<00:48:24.040> rationally<00:48:24.480> and

proof he speaks very rationally and

everything<00:48:25.359> but<00:48:25.480> he<00:48:25.599> never<00:48:25.960> actually<00:48:26.280> gets

everything but he never actually gets

if<00:48:27.480> someone<00:48:27.920> in<00:48:28.000> other<00:48:28.160> words<00:48:28.359> if<00:48:28.440> someone

if someone in other words if someone

tells<00:48:28.920> you<00:48:29.280> we<00:48:29.400> should<00:48:29.559> believe<00:48:29.760> in<00:48:29.880> the<00:48:30.040> to

tells you we should believe in the to

and<00:48:30.359> the<00:48:30.480> God<00:48:30.640> because<00:48:31.079> already<00:48:31.280> proves<00:48:31.680> that

and the God because already proves that

he<00:48:32.480> never<00:48:32.720> read<00:48:32.920> R<00:48:33.359> because<00:48:33.559> ra<00:48:33.839> doesn’t

he never read R because ra doesn’t

actually<00:48:34.319> do

actually do

that<00:48:36.240> he<00:48:36.400> didn’t<00:48:36.640> prove<00:48:37.200> anything<00:48:38.200> I<00:48:38.280> mean<00:48:38.640> he

that he didn’t prove anything I mean he

believed<00:48:39.160> Things<00:48:39.359> based<00:48:39.640> on<00:48:39.839> proof<00:48:40.119> but<00:48:40.240> he

believed Things based on proof but he

didn’t<00:48:40.680> write<00:48:40.960> those<00:48:41.160> proofs<00:48:41.440> down<00:48:41.720> this

didn’t write those proofs down this

Pro<00:48:44.040> that’s<00:48:44.160> also<00:48:44.319> a<00:48:44.440> very<00:48:44.599> dialectical

Pro that’s also a very dialectical

argument<00:48:45.599> right<00:48:45.760> he<00:48:45.920> proves<00:48:46.200> that<00:48:46.280> you<00:48:46.359> don’t

argument right he proves that you don’t

have<00:48:46.680> such<00:48:46.839> a<00:48:46.960> good<00:48:47.119> proof<00:48:48.040> that<00:48:48.200> even<00:48:48.440> that

have such a good proof that even that

proof<00:48:48.880> is<00:48:49.720> is<00:48:50.280> is<00:48:50.440> not<00:48:51.119> right<00:48:51.240> it’s<00:48:51.440> very<00:48:51.680> far

proof is is is not right it’s very far

from<00:48:52.520> I’m<00:48:52.640> not<00:48:52.880> no<00:48:53.040> I’m<00:48:53.160> not<00:48:53.240> saying<00:48:53.400> that<00:48:53.480> it’s

from I’m not no I’m not saying that it’s

a<00:48:53.680> bad<00:48:53.799> argument<00:48:54.079> I’m<00:48:54.240> saying<00:48:54.400> it’s<00:48:54.559> very<00:48:54.760> far

a bad argument I’m saying it’s very far

from<00:48:55.400> from<00:48:55.559> like<00:48:55.720> proving<00:48:56.119> anything<00:48:56.760> in<00:48:56.839> the

from from like proving anything in the

way<00:48:57.119> that<00:48:57.440> philosophically<00:48:58.040> SS<00:48:58.280> it’s<00:48:58.400> true

way that philosophically SS it’s true

that’s<00:48:58.760> the<00:48:58.839> most<00:48:59.000> philosophical<00:48:59.520> part<00:48:59.640> of

that’s the most philosophical part of

his<00:49:00.240> of<00:49:00.359> his<00:49:00.520> work<00:49:00.799> but<00:49:01.599> it’s<00:49:02.079> like<00:49:02.280> arguing<00:49:02.839> on

his of his work but it’s like arguing on

the<00:49:03.079> base<00:49:03.280> of<00:49:03.359> a<00:49:03.440> whole<00:49:03.559> bunch<00:49:03.720> of<00:49:03.880> assumptions

the base of a whole bunch of assumptions

that<00:49:04.559> your<00:49:05.119> don’t<00:49:05.400> lead<00:49:05.640> to<00:49:05.839> the<00:49:06.040> amount<00:49:06.240> of

that your don’t lead to the amount of

certainty<00:49:06.720> you<00:49:06.839> claim<00:49:07.040> it<00:49:07.200> those<00:49:07.520> that’s

certainty you claim it those that’s

whatever<00:49:08.839> yeah<00:49:09.200> have<00:49:09.319> to<00:49:09.440> think<00:49:09.599> about<00:49:09.799> that

whatever yeah have to think about that

example<00:49:10.799> in<00:49:10.880> general<00:49:11.240> but<00:49:11.960> and<00:49:12.119> anyways<00:49:12.400> if

example in general but and anyways if

someone

wants<00:49:15.920> that’s

wants that’s

not<00:49:17.680> usually<00:49:18.000> not<00:49:18.160> what<00:49:18.280> we’re<00:49:18.480> talking<00:49:19.119> about

not usually not what we’re talking about

um<00:49:22.720> anyway<00:49:23.799> um<00:49:24.799> this<00:49:24.920> is<00:49:25.200> the<00:49:25.880> the<00:49:26.160> the<00:49:26.319> so<00:49:26.880> it’s

um anyway um this is the the the so it’s

very<00:49:27.160> interesting<00:49:27.520> by<00:49:27.599> the<00:49:27.680> way<00:49:27.799> people<00:49:27.960> don’t

very interesting by the way people don’t

know<00:49:28.359> this<00:49:28.520> that<00:49:28.680> amam<00:49:29.200> almost<00:49:29.440> never<00:49:29.640> does

know this that amam almost never does

philosophy<00:49:30.400> or<00:49:30.559> probably<00:49:30.839> never<00:49:31.079> does

philosophy or probably never does

philosophy<00:49:31.640> not<00:49:31.760> in<00:49:31.839> his<00:49:32.000> books<00:49:32.240> he<00:49:32.319> was<00:49:32.440> a

philosophy not in his books he was a

philosopher<00:49:33.400> privately<00:49:33.880> he<00:49:34.079> read<00:49:34.680> the

philosopher privately he read the

philosophical<00:49:35.760> books<00:49:35.960> and<00:49:36.119> he<00:49:36.400> must<00:49:36.559> have

philosophical books and he must have

done<00:49:36.839> some<00:49:37.000> of<00:49:37.119> that<00:49:37.319> work<00:49:38.040> in<00:49:38.200> his<00:49:38.319> own<00:49:38.559> mind

done some of that work in his own mind

in<00:49:39.000> order<00:49:39.200> to<00:49:39.280> know<00:49:39.440> what<00:49:39.520> he’s<00:49:39.720> talking<00:49:39.960> about

in order to know what he’s talking about

I<00:49:40.640> believe<00:49:41.559> I<00:49:41.680> would<00:49:41.880> hope<00:49:42.599> but<00:49:42.720> he<00:49:42.839> doesn’t<00:49:43.079> do

I believe I would hope but he doesn’t do

it<00:49:46.079> how<00:49:46.200> did<00:49:46.359> I<00:49:46.480> get<00:49:46.559> to<00:49:46.720> this<00:49:46.920> discussion<00:49:47.400> it’s

it how did I get to this discussion it’s

very<00:49:47.799> important<00:49:48.480> and<00:49:48.599> anyways<00:49:49.119> that’s<00:49:49.680> why

very important and anyways that’s why

that’s<00:49:50.920> why<00:49:51.079> people<00:49:51.280> that<00:49:51.400> only<00:49:51.559> read<00:49:51.799> Ram

that’s why people that only read Ram

never<00:49:52.400> become<00:49:52.680> philosophers<00:49:53.359> and<00:49:53.559> they<00:49:54.440> write

never become philosophers and they write

entire<00:49:55.119> interpretations<00:49:55.640> of<00:49:56.200> that<00:49:56.240> are<00:49:56.319> all

entire interpretations of that are all

sense<00:49:58.200> and<00:49:58.319> you<00:49:58.440> could<00:49:58.559> look<00:49:58.720> at<00:49:58.960> Burton’s

sense and you could look at Burton’s

threat<00:49:59.960> to<00:50:00.160> find<00:50:00.359> out<00:50:00.520> in<00:50:00.680> which<00:50:00.880> ways

threat to find out in which ways

anyways<00:50:03.720> um<00:50:04.720> because<00:50:04.839> you<00:50:04.920> don’t<00:50:05.079> know<00:50:05.280> why<00:50:05.440> n

anyways um because you don’t know why n

if<00:50:05.839> things<00:50:06.160> are<00:50:06.319> true<00:50:06.599> and<00:50:06.720> you<00:50:06.839> think<00:50:07.040> that

if things are true and you think that

they’re<00:50:07.319> true<00:50:07.559> not<00:50:07.720> true<00:50:07.920> and<00:50:08.079> like<00:50:08.319> whatever

they’re true not true and like whatever

I’m<00:50:09.200> going<00:50:09.319> to<00:50:09.400> stop<00:50:09.599> with<00:50:09.720> this<00:50:09.839> stupid<00:50:10.119> rent

I’m going to stop with this stupid rent

point

is<00:50:13.079> he<00:50:13.200> doesn’t<00:50:13.440> do<00:50:13.640> this<00:50:13.839> and<00:50:14.000> therefore<00:50:14.480> back

is he doesn’t do this and therefore back

to<00:50:14.720> where<00:50:14.839> I<00:50:14.960> am<00:50:15.160> therefore<00:50:15.559> it’s<00:50:15.720> extremely

to where I am therefore it’s extremely

useful<00:50:16.359> and<00:50:16.480> ra<00:50:16.720> says<00:50:16.880> this<00:50:17.000> explicitly<00:50:17.640> right

useful and ra says this explicitly right

like<00:50:17.960> there’s<00:50:18.240> preface<00:50:18.559> to<00:50:18.839> not<00:50:18.960> to<00:50:19.160> this<00:50:19.359> this

like there’s preface to not to this this

not<00:50:19.839> this<00:50:20.000> book<00:50:20.240> but<00:50:20.760> in<00:50:20.880> the<00:50:21.040> guard

not this book but in the guard

like<00:50:23.119> is<00:50:23.240> for<00:50:23.480> philosophers<00:50:24.079> right<00:50:24.200> that’s

like is for philosophers right that’s

what<00:50:24.400> it<00:50:24.480> says<00:50:24.599> in<00:50:24.680> the<00:50:24.760> beginning<00:50:25.000> of<00:50:25.079> the

what it says in the beginning of the

Guard<00:50:25.480> this<00:50:25.640> book<00:50:25.799> is<00:50:25.960> not<00:50:26.119> for<00:50:26.240> people<00:50:26.400> that

Guard this book is not for people that

read<00:50:26.960> philosophy<00:50:27.720> so<00:50:27.920> all<00:50:28.079> the<00:50:28.200> people<00:50:28.400> didn’t

read philosophy so all the people didn’t

read<00:50:28.720> philosophy<00:50:29.079> before<00:50:29.280> reading<00:50:29.520> the<00:50:29.640> book

read philosophy before reading the book

it’s<00:50:30.240> not<00:50:30.359> for<00:50:30.599> them<00:50:31.160> can<00:50:31.319> they<00:50:31.440> get<00:50:31.559> something

it’s not for them can they get something

out<00:50:31.880> of<00:50:32.000> it<00:50:32.119> yeah<00:50:33.000> and<00:50:33.119> get<00:50:33.240> something<00:50:33.440> out<00:50:33.520> of

out of it yeah and get something out of

it<00:50:34.000> but<00:50:34.119> it’s<00:50:34.240> not<00:50:34.359> really<00:50:34.559> for<00:50:34.760> you

it but it’s not really for you

why<00:50:37.240> because<00:50:38.079> well<00:50:38.280> what<00:50:38.359> I’m<00:50:38.480> saying<00:50:38.720> now

why because well what I’m saying now

he’s<00:50:39.079> mean<00:50:39.319> something<00:50:39.559> else<00:50:39.799> there<00:50:40.119> what<00:50:40.240> I’m

he’s mean something else there what I’m

saying<00:50:40.599> now<00:50:40.839> is<00:50:41.280> that<00:50:41.760> because<00:50:42.480> you<00:50:42.680> don’t

saying now is that because you don’t

know<00:50:43.119> why<00:50:43.319> any<00:50:43.440> of<00:50:43.559> the<00:50:43.640> things<00:50:43.760> he<00:50:43.880> says<00:50:44.000> are

true<00:50:50.720> nothing<00:50:50.920> going<00:50:51.119> on<00:50:51.400> here<00:50:52.160> no<00:50:52.400> philosophy

true nothing going on here no philosophy

going<00:50:53.040> on<00:50:53.200> no<00:50:53.839> contribution<00:50:54.760> is<00:50:54.880> not

going on no contribution is not

understanding<00:50:55.440> of<00:50:55.559> philosophy<00:50:56.000> and<00:50:56.119> most<00:50:56.200> of

understanding of philosophy and most of

the<00:50:56.400> time<00:50:56.680> people<00:50:56.839> are<00:50:57.000> happy<00:50:57.240> that<00:50:57.960> said

the time people are happy that said

there’s<00:50:58.240> no<00:50:58.760> because<00:50:58.920> they<00:50:59.000> think<00:50:59.160> that<00:50:59.280> it’s

there’s no because they think that it’s

stupid<00:50:59.640> to<00:50:59.760> believe<00:50:59.920> in<00:51:00.440> primitive<00:51:01.400> was

stupid to believe in primitive was

primitive<00:51:02.359> but<00:51:02.599> primitive<00:51:02.880> is<00:51:03.000> not<00:51:03.079> an

primitive but primitive is not an

argument

either<00:51:06.960> wasn’t<00:51:07.160> one<00:51:07.240> of<00:51:07.400> this<00:51:07.920> I<00:51:08.040> believe<00:51:08.200> in

either wasn’t one of this I believe in

all<00:51:08.400> this

all this

nonsense<00:51:10.680> okay<00:51:11.359> that’s<00:51:11.520> not

why

so<00:51:18.440> and<00:51:18.640> so<00:51:18.839> if<00:51:18.920> you<00:51:19.040> do<00:51:19.160> want<00:51:19.280> to<00:51:19.400> know<00:51:19.640> like

so and so if you do want to know like

what’s<00:51:20.079> the<00:51:20.200> even<00:51:20.400> what’s<00:51:20.599> the<00:51:20.720> motivations

what’s the even what’s the motivations

from<00:51:21.400> many<00:51:21.559> of<00:51:21.720> these<00:51:21.880> things<00:51:22.119> like<00:51:22.240> where<00:51:22.359> did

from many of these things like where did

they<00:51:22.680> come<00:51:22.920> from<00:51:23.240> like<00:51:23.520> why<00:51:23.599> do<00:51:23.720> we<00:51:23.839> even<00:51:24.000> get

they come from like why do we even get

into<00:51:24.359> these<00:51:24.559> discussions<00:51:25.200> like<00:51:25.960> then<00:51:26.119> you

into these discussions like then you

have<00:51:26.359> to<00:51:26.640> read<00:51:26.799> the<00:51:26.839> books<00:51:27.040> that<00:51:27.160> he<00:51:27.319> read<00:51:27.920> and

have to read the books that he read and

honestly<00:51:28.440> you<00:51:28.559> have<00:51:28.680> to<00:51:28.799> read<00:51:28.960> the<00:51:29.079> original

honestly you have to read the original

Greeks<00:51:29.839> books<00:51:30.079> not<00:51:30.200> even<00:51:30.359> the<00:51:30.480> Muslim<00:51:30.799> books

Greeks books not even the Muslim books

because<00:51:31.119> the<00:51:31.200> Muslims<00:51:31.520> are<00:51:31.640> for<00:51:31.799> the<00:51:31.880> most

because the Muslims are for the most

part<00:51:32.200> also<00:51:32.400> not<00:51:32.520> doing<00:51:32.760> philosophy<00:51:33.400> they’re

part also not doing philosophy they’re

doing<00:51:33.920> theology<00:51:34.920> for<00:51:35.079> the<00:51:35.240> most<00:51:35.440> part<00:51:35.880> they

doing theology for the most part they

they<00:51:36.160> do<00:51:36.359> notice<00:51:36.640> the<00:51:36.760> difference<00:51:37.040> in

they do notice the difference in

Theology<00:51:37.559> and<00:51:37.680> philosophy<00:51:38.359> and

Theology and philosophy and

get<00:51:40.880> sometimes<00:51:41.720> yeah<00:51:42.720> I’m

get sometimes yeah I’m

asking<00:51:45.000> point<00:51:45.319> is<00:51:46.280> but<00:51:46.440> he<00:51:46.559> just<00:51:46.640> steals<00:51:46.920> a

asking point is but he just steals a

bunch<00:51:47.160> of<00:51:47.280> play<00:51:47.680> ideas<00:51:47.960> and<00:51:48.119> says<00:51:48.400> them<00:51:48.520> and

bunch of play ideas and says them and

made<00:51:49.040> them<00:51:49.160> up<00:51:49.319> so<00:51:49.440> what’s<00:51:49.640> the<00:51:50.640> I<00:51:50.720> don’t<00:51:50.839> know

made them up so what’s the I don’t know

I’m<00:51:51.240> just<00:51:51.359> saying’s<00:51:52.240> creative<00:51:52.559> application

I’m just saying’s creative application

yeah<00:51:53.720> 100%<00:51:54.599> okay<00:51:55.119> Mas<00:51:55.599> point<00:51:55.920> is<00:51:56.599> you<00:51:56.720> have<00:51:56.839> to

yeah 100% okay Mas point is you have to

read<00:51:57.240> philosophical<00:51:57.799> books<00:51:58.079> whose<00:51:58.319> job<00:51:58.480> is<00:51:58.599> to

read philosophical books whose job is to

philosophy<00:52:00.640> and<00:52:00.880> who<00:52:01.040> are<00:52:01.480> and<00:52:01.680> who<00:52:01.799> are

philosophy and who are and who are

interested<00:52:02.559> in<00:52:02.720> telling<00:52:03.000> you<00:52:03.319> why<00:52:03.520> things<00:52:03.720> are

interested in telling you why things are

true<00:52:04.880> of<00:52:05.000> course<00:52:05.160> nobody<00:52:05.400> can<00:52:05.480> tell<00:52:05.599> you<00:52:05.720> that

true of course nobody can tell you that

you<00:52:05.960> have<00:52:06.040> to<00:52:06.119> do<00:52:06.280> that<00:52:06.440> work<00:52:06.760> but<00:52:07.559> that’s<00:52:08.040> a

you have to do that work but that’s a

whole<00:52:08.280> different<00:52:08.480> kind<00:52:08.599> of<00:52:08.720> thing<00:52:08.839> and<00:52:09.000> in

whole different kind of thing and in

that<00:52:09.359> sense<00:52:10.079> that<00:52:10.200> is<00:52:10.319> the<00:52:10.400> only<00:52:10.599> reason

that sense that is the only reason

people<00:52:11.000> should<00:52:11.160> read<00:52:11.319> theam<00:52:11.760> sources<00:52:12.400> like

people should read theam sources like

himself<00:52:12.960> says<00:52:13.200> this<00:52:13.280> is<00:52:13.400> what<00:52:13.520> he<00:52:13.640> says<00:52:14.000> right

himself says this is what he says right

anyone<00:52:15.079> that<00:52:15.200> reads<00:52:15.400> it<00:52:15.599> because<00:52:15.920> you<00:52:16.000> want<00:52:16.119> to

anyone that reads it because you want to

do<00:52:16.440> history<00:52:16.720> and<00:52:16.880> tell<00:52:17.040> us<00:52:17.200> where<00:52:17.319> he<00:52:17.440> stole

do history and tell us where he stole

his<00:52:17.839> ideas<00:52:18.160> from<00:52:18.640> and<00:52:18.760> then<00:52:18.880> we<00:52:19.000> can<00:52:19.200> be<00:52:19.319> a

his ideas from and then we can be a

big<00:52:21.000> really<00:52:21.280> got<00:52:21.480> from<00:52:21.599> all<00:52:21.760> these<00:52:22.200> and<00:52:22.599> should

big really got from all these and should

or<00:52:23.280> something<00:52:24.160> that<00:52:24.559> is<00:52:25.559> understand<00:52:26.799> and<00:52:26.960> only

or something that is understand and only

in<00:52:27.280> that<00:52:27.400> sense<00:52:27.599> is<00:52:27.680> it<00:52:27.839> interesting<00:52:28.640> but<00:52:28.760> for

in that sense is it interesting but for

the<00:52:29.839> at<00:52:29.960> least<00:52:30.680> this<00:52:30.760> is<00:52:30.920> not<00:52:31.119> this<00:52:31.240> book<00:52:31.359> is

the at least this is not this book is

not<00:52:31.920> for

not for

philosophers<00:52:34.559> and<00:52:35.079> for<00:52:35.599> even<00:52:35.799> that<00:52:35.920> is<00:52:36.040> not

philosophers and for even that is not

interesting<00:52:37.000> here<00:52:38.000> why

not<00:52:42.720> in<00:52:42.839> other<00:52:43.040> words<00:52:43.599> he<00:52:43.720> is<00:52:43.839> saying<00:52:44.319> he

not in other words he is saying he

didn’t<00:52:44.680> make<00:52:44.839> any<00:52:45.000> of<00:52:45.119> this<00:52:45.280> up<00:52:45.520> it’s<00:52:45.640> all

didn’t make any of this up it’s all

stuff<00:52:46.240> that<00:52:46.400> he<00:52:46.880> was<00:52:47.119> M<00:52:47.599> by<00:52:47.680> the<00:52:47.760> way<00:52:47.880> I<00:52:47.960> think

stuff that he was M by the way I think

that<00:52:48.160> that’s<00:52:48.280> a<00:52:48.440> very<00:52:48.680> important<00:52:49.559> term<00:52:50.559> um

that that’s a very important term um

because<00:52:52.160> he’s<00:52:52.319> not<00:52:52.440> saying<00:52:52.680> that<00:52:52.799> he<00:52:52.920> copy

because he’s not saying that he copy

pasted<00:52:53.599> everything

pasted everything

that<00:52:56.640> he<00:52:56.760> organize<00:52:57.119> it<00:52:57.240> according<00:52:57.520> to<00:52:57.640> a

that he organize it according to a

certain<00:52:57.960> way<00:52:58.079> of<00:52:58.200> thinking<00:52:58.680> right<00:52:58.920> which

certain way of thinking right which

means<00:52:59.480> something<00:52:59.720> very<00:52:59.880> interesting<00:53:00.240> which

means something very interesting which

means<00:53:00.520> that<00:53:01.079> actually<00:53:01.359> is<00:53:01.520> being<00:53:01.760> a<00:53:01.960> doing

means that actually is being a doing

being

aades<00:53:04.599> at<00:53:04.680> least<00:53:04.839> in<00:53:04.960> your<00:53:05.280> fourth<00:53:05.640> way<00:53:06.440> right

aades at least in your fourth way right

not<00:53:07.040> only<00:53:07.359> organizationally<00:53:08.359> also<00:53:08.799> by

not only organizationally also by

omission<00:53:10.000> and<00:53:10.440> and<00:53:11.200> also<00:53:11.440> by<00:53:11.720> including

omission and and also by including

things<00:53:12.480> and<00:53:12.760> excluding<00:53:13.319> things<00:53:13.760> right<00:53:13.880> he

things and excluding things right he

doesn’t<00:53:14.359> just<00:53:14.559> copy<00:53:14.839> paste<00:53:15.040> the<00:53:15.119> whole<00:53:15.359> book

doesn’t just copy paste the whole book

then<00:53:15.880> he<00:53:15.960> could<00:53:16.119> just<00:53:16.280> say<00:53:16.640> you<00:53:16.760> know<00:53:16.920> read

then he could just say you know read

that<00:53:17.240> book<00:53:17.359> you<00:53:17.440> know<00:53:17.559> what<00:53:17.640> I’ll<00:53:17.760> translate

that book you know what I’ll translate

it<00:53:18.200> from<00:53:18.359> Arabic<00:53:18.760> that’s<00:53:18.880> not<00:53:19.040> what<00:53:19.119> he’s

it from Arabic that’s not what he’s

doing<00:53:20.160> right<00:53:20.319> he’s<00:53:20.520> rewriting<00:53:21.160> something<00:53:22.160> and

doing right he’s rewriting something and

reorganizing<00:53:22.880> it<00:53:23.000> not<00:53:23.119> only<00:53:23.240> just

reorganizing it not only just

reorganizing<00:53:23.880> it<00:53:23.960> is<00:53:24.119> also<00:53:24.400> cutting<00:53:24.680> out<00:53:24.880> some

reorganizing it is also cutting out some

pieces<00:53:25.359> and<00:53:25.559> putting<00:53:25.799> in<00:53:25.920> some<00:53:26.079> pieces

pieces and putting in some pieces

giving<00:53:27.200> it<00:53:27.319> his<00:53:27.440> own<00:53:27.640> order<00:53:28.559> in<00:53:28.720> some<00:53:28.960> sense<00:53:29.319> a

giving it his own order in some sense a

lot<00:53:29.520> of<00:53:29.599> the<00:53:29.680> order<00:53:29.880> is<00:53:30.000> actually<00:53:30.319> his<00:53:30.480> Stone

lot of the order is actually his Stone

but<00:53:30.880> in<00:53:31.000> some<00:53:31.319> sense<00:53:32.319> um<00:53:33.160> so<00:53:33.440> that<00:53:33.559> seems<00:53:33.760> to<00:53:33.880> be

but in some sense um so that seems to be

an<00:53:34.119> important<00:53:34.480> thing<00:53:34.640> in<00:53:34.760> other<00:53:34.920> words<00:53:35.359> in

an important thing in other words in

some<00:53:35.680> sense<00:53:35.880> when<00:53:35.960> you<00:53:36.079> read<00:53:36.200> the<00:53:36.280> ram<00:53:36.640> you<00:53:36.720> are

some sense when you read the ram you are

relying<00:53:37.280> on<00:53:37.400> the

relying on the

Ram’s<00:53:39.359> uh<00:53:39.599> thought<00:53:40.520> because<00:53:40.760> he’s<00:53:40.920> the<00:53:41.000> one

Ram’s uh thought because he’s the one

that<00:53:41.200> chose<00:53:41.400> to<00:53:41.520> tell<00:53:41.680> it<00:53:41.799> to<00:53:41.880> you<00:53:42.119> this<00:53:42.280> way<00:53:42.480> at

that chose to tell it to you this way at

least<00:53:44.640> but<00:53:44.799> he<00:53:44.920> would<00:53:45.119> tell<00:53:45.319> you<00:53:45.520> and<00:53:45.640> he

least but he would tell you and he

definitely<00:53:46.079> would<00:53:46.520> hope<00:53:47.119> would<00:53:47.319> believe<00:53:47.599> and

definitely would hope would believe and

hope<00:53:48.440> that<00:53:48.640> that’s<00:53:48.960> not<00:53:49.559> him<00:53:49.839> inserting<00:53:50.319> any

hope that that’s not him inserting any

of<00:53:50.680> his

of his

own<00:53:53.079> to<00:53:53.240> the<00:53:53.480> story<00:53:54.480> right<00:53:55.440> he’s<00:53:55.599> not

own to the story right he’s not

interested<00:53:56.040> in<00:53:56.119> being<00:53:56.520> radical<00:53:56.799> he’s<00:53:56.920> not

interested in being radical he’s not

interested<00:53:57.319> in<00:53:57.400> being<00:53:57.799> mes<00:53:58.799> he’s<00:53:59.040> interested

interested in being mes he’s interested

in<00:53:59.599> being<00:53:59.760> a<00:53:59.920> teacher<00:54:00.400> a<00:54:00.559> successful<00:54:01.000> teacher

in being a teacher a successful teacher

is<00:54:01.440> interested<00:54:01.720> in<00:54:01.880> teaching<00:54:02.200> you<00:54:02.400> certain

is interested in teaching you certain

things<00:54:04.480> and<00:54:04.599> he’s<00:54:04.799> even<00:54:05.280> not<00:54:05.480> interested<00:54:06.079> in

things and he’s even not interested in

teaching<00:54:06.480> you<00:54:06.640> to<00:54:06.720> be<00:54:06.799> a<00:54:06.920> philosopher<00:54:07.440> at

teaching you to be a philosopher at

least<00:54:07.720> not<00:54:07.880> in<00:54:08.079> this<00:54:08.480> in<00:54:08.640> this<00:54:08.799> case<00:54:09.040> so<00:54:09.200> when

least not in this in this case so when

he<00:54:09.440> says<00:54:09.960> it’s<00:54:10.200> mik<00:54:10.640> from<00:54:10.799> philosophers<00:54:11.240> it

he says it’s mik from philosophers it

doesn’t<00:54:11.480> mean<00:54:11.599> that<00:54:11.640> you<00:54:11.720> should<00:54:11.839> read<00:54:12.000> the

doesn’t mean that you should read the

philosophers<00:54:13.200> this<00:54:13.400> true<00:54:14.359> that<00:54:14.520> there<00:54:14.680> is

philosophers this true that there is

something<00:54:15.280> here<00:54:15.480> I<00:54:15.640> think<00:54:16.240> there<00:54:16.359> is

something here I think there is

something<00:54:16.799> here<00:54:16.920> where<00:54:17.040> it’s<00:54:17.160> saying<00:54:17.400> if<00:54:17.520> you

something here where it’s saying if you

want<00:54:17.720> to<00:54:17.880> know<00:54:18.119> why<00:54:18.359> these<00:54:18.480> things<00:54:18.640> are<00:54:18.799> true

want to know why these things are true

you’re<00:54:19.079> going<00:54:19.160> to<00:54:19.200> have<00:54:19.280> to<00:54:19.359> read<00:54:19.520> the

you’re going to have to read the

philosophers<00:54:21.680> but<00:54:21.799> it<00:54:21.960> seems<00:54:22.240> to<00:54:22.440> be<00:54:23.240> that<00:54:23.599> at

philosophers but it seems to be that at

least<00:54:24.319> become<00:54:24.520> AI<00:54:25.160> at<00:54:25.240> least<00:54:25.400> not<00:54:25.640> for<00:54:25.799> the

least become AI at least not for the

malice<00:54:26.760> that<00:54:26.880> are<00:54:27.160> necessary<00:54:27.480> to<00:54:27.599> become<00:54:27.760> a

malice that are necessary to become a

you<00:54:28.200> don’t<00:54:28.280> need<00:54:28.400> to<00:54:28.520> know<00:54:28.720> why<00:54:28.960> why<00:54:29.119> these

you don’t need to know why why these

things<00:54:29.400> are

true<00:54:32.680> at<00:54:32.799> least<00:54:32.920> it<00:54:33.040> doesn’t<00:54:33.319> say<00:54:33.559> here<00:54:34.040> that

true at least it doesn’t say here that

if<00:54:34.359> you<00:54:34.520> don’t<00:54:34.720> know<00:54:35.280> the<00:54:35.480> V<00:54:35.799> the

if you don’t know the V the

sources<00:54:38.000> you<00:54:38.400> will<00:54:38.559> not<00:54:38.720> be<00:54:38.799> able<00:54:38.960> to<00:54:39.040> be<00:54:39.119> a

sources you will not be able to be a

good<00:54:39.599> person<00:54:40.599> which<00:54:40.720> is<00:54:40.839> what<00:54:40.920> we’re<00:54:41.119> talking

good person which is what we’re talking

about<00:54:43.440> it<00:54:43.599> does<00:54:43.880> say<00:54:44.119> that<00:54:44.240> you<00:54:44.319> should<00:54:44.599> hear

about it does say that you should hear

these<00:54:45.040> things<00:54:45.280> because<00:54:45.520> they’re<00:54:45.720> true<00:54:46.319> and

these things because they’re true and

not<00:54:46.799> because<00:54:47.440> of<00:54:47.599> who<00:54:47.799> said

them<00:54:51.680> which<00:54:51.839> is<00:54:51.960> a<00:54:52.119> slightly<00:54:52.559> comp<00:54:52.920> weird

them which is a slightly comp weird

thing<00:54:53.359> to<00:54:53.559> say<00:54:54.119> because<00:54:54.359> what<00:54:54.480> kind<00:54:54.599> of<00:54:54.760> Truth

thing to say because what kind of Truth

are<00:54:55.119> we<00:54:55.280> talking<00:54:55.559> about<00:54:55.839> here

there’s<00:55:01.119> even<00:55:01.359> some<00:55:01.559> kind<00:55:01.720> of<00:55:01.880> tension<00:55:02.359> where

there’s even some kind of tension where

and<00:55:02.760> on<00:55:02.920> one<00:55:03.079> hand<00:55:03.200> you<00:55:03.319> say<00:55:03.599> well<00:55:03.760> this<00:55:03.839> is

and on one hand you say well this is

from<00:55:04.200> those<00:55:04.520> books<00:55:05.480> and<00:55:05.599> a<00:55:05.760> whole<00:55:05.920> list<00:55:06.119> of

from those books and a whole list of

books<00:55:07.240> and<00:55:07.359> the<00:55:07.480> other<00:55:07.640> hand<00:55:07.760> they<00:55:07.880> say<00:55:08.079> well

books and the other hand they say well

just<00:55:08.440> listen<00:55:08.799> leave<00:55:09.000> it<00:55:09.200> because<00:55:09.359> it’s<00:55:09.480> true

just listen leave it because it’s true

in<00:55:10.520> order<00:55:10.680> to<00:55:10.799> believe<00:55:11.040> something<00:55:11.280> because

in order to believe something because

it’s<00:55:11.680> true<00:55:12.599> you<00:55:12.760> can’t<00:55:12.960> read<00:55:13.200> anthologies<00:55:13.839> you

it’s true you can’t read anthologies you

got<00:55:14.040> to<00:55:14.200> do<00:55:14.400> be<00:55:14.520> a<00:55:14.640> philosopher<00:55:15.640> you<00:55:15.760> got<00:55:15.880> to

got to do be a philosopher you got to

know

that<00:55:18.119> can<00:55:18.240> only<00:55:18.559> really<00:55:18.839> be<00:55:19.000> done<00:55:19.400> by<00:55:19.520> someone

that can only really be done by someone

who<00:55:19.880> knows<00:55:20.119> how<00:55:20.240> to<00:55:20.839> how<00:55:20.920> to<00:55:21.119> deduce<00:55:21.480> truths

who knows how to how to deduce truths

how<00:55:21.960> to<00:55:22.119> create<00:55:22.440> truths<00:55:23.319> out<00:55:23.480> of<00:55:24.119> not<00:55:24.319> knowing

how to create truths out of not knowing

somehow

can’t<00:55:26.760> be<00:55:26.960> be<00:55:27.079> you<00:55:27.160> can’t

can’t be be you can’t

be<00:55:28.920> by<00:55:29.039> believing<00:55:29.680> a<00:55:30.039> book<00:55:31.039> without<00:55:31.319> caring

be by believing a book without caring

who<00:55:31.799> wrote<00:55:32.039> it<00:55:32.640> just<00:55:32.799> because<00:55:33.039> that<00:55:34.039> said<00:55:35.039> if

who wrote it just because that said if

you<00:55:35.480> know<00:55:35.880> true<00:55:36.400> but<00:55:36.720> nobody’s<00:55:37.119> going<00:55:37.200> to<00:55:37.280> read

you know true but nobody’s going to read

this<00:55:37.559> book<00:55:37.680> I<00:55:37.839> know<00:55:38.200> I<00:55:38.319> know<00:55:38.480> why<00:55:38.599> it’s<00:55:38.720> true

this book I know I know why it’s true

that’s<00:55:39.119> what<00:55:39.200> I<00:55:39.359> just<00:55:39.480> told<00:55:39.720> you<00:55:40.000> a<00:55:40.119> secret

that’s what I just told you a secret

that<00:55:40.559> doesn’t<00:55:40.760> say<00:55:41.520> most<00:55:41.680> people<00:55:41.839> that<00:55:41.920> read

that doesn’t say most people that read

it<00:55:42.400> don’t<00:55:42.520> know<00:55:42.680> this<00:55:42.839> they<00:55:42.920> think<00:55:43.119> that

it don’t know this they think that

things<00:55:43.640> you<00:55:43.720> can<00:55:43.839> know<00:55:44.079> things<00:55:44.200> are<00:55:44.319> true<00:55:44.720> say

things you can know things are true say

ra<00:55:45.799> but<00:55:45.920> I’m<00:55:46.039> telling<00:55:46.240> you<00:55:46.400> the<00:55:46.720> himself<00:55:47.079> knows

ra but I’m telling you the himself knows

that<00:55:47.799> you<00:55:47.920> can’t<00:55:48.119> know<00:55:48.240> that<00:55:48.400> anything<00:55:48.599> is

that you can’t know that anything is

true<00:55:48.839> from<00:55:49.000> Reading<00:55:49.280> ra<00:55:49.760> any<00:55:49.920> of<00:55:50.039> the<00:55:50.160> Ra’s

true from Reading ra any of the Ra’s

books<00:55:52.559> so<00:55:52.880> how<00:55:53.000> could<00:55:53.119> the<00:55:53.240> ra<00:55:53.720> ask<00:55:53.920> us<00:55:54.079> to

books so how could the ra ask us to

believe<00:55:54.440> it<00:55:54.640> because<00:55:54.839> it’s<00:55:55.039> true

M<00:56:00.880> I’m<00:56:01.039> not<00:56:01.200> asking<00:56:01.440> a<00:56:01.599> question<00:56:01.799> that<00:56:01.960> makes

M I’m not asking a question that makes

sense<00:56:04.200> how<00:56:04.400> can<00:56:04.720> how<00:56:05.400> why<00:56:05.480> does<00:56:05.599> that<00:56:05.720> mean

sense how can how why does that mean

it’s<00:56:06.079> not

it’s not

true<00:56:08.799> meaning<00:56:09.119> nothing<00:56:09.359> in<00:56:09.480> this<00:56:09.640> book

true meaning nothing in this book

reveals<00:56:10.480> I<00:56:10.599> have<00:56:10.839> no<00:56:11.039> way<00:56:11.240> of<00:56:11.400> knowing<00:56:11.720> that

reveals I have no way of knowing that

it’s<00:56:12.000> true<00:56:12.880> I<00:56:12.960> could<00:56:13.119> read<00:56:13.240> the<00:56:13.359> whole<00:56:14.200> and<00:56:14.240> I

it’s true I could read the whole and I

have<00:56:14.520> no<00:56:14.680> way<00:56:14.839> of<00:56:15.079> knowing<00:56:15.359> that<00:56:15.480> it’s<00:56:16.000> true<00:56:17.000> he

have no way of knowing that it’s true he

doesn’t<00:56:17.680> provide<00:56:18.000> me<00:56:18.240> that<00:56:18.599> that<00:56:18.839> to<00:56:19.240> that

doesn’t provide me that that to that

service<00:56:20.400> a<00:56:20.559> little<00:56:20.839> more<00:56:21.160> than<00:56:21.760> just<00:56:22.920> not<00:56:23.920> no

service a little more than just not no

meaning<00:56:24.520> the<00:56:24.599> arguments<00:56:25.119> go<00:56:25.319> back<00:56:25.480> to

meaning the arguments go back to

now<00:56:28.039> you<00:56:28.160> might<00:56:28.319> not<00:56:28.559> have<00:56:28.720> the<00:56:28.880> perfect<00:56:29.280> path

now you might not have the perfect path

because<00:56:29.599> you’re<00:56:29.720> not<00:56:29.880> going<00:56:30.119> deep<00:56:30.319> into<00:56:30.480> the

because you’re not going deep into the

sources<00:56:31.000> of<00:56:31.960> come

sources of come

from<00:56:33.680> but<00:56:33.799> what<00:56:33.920> are<00:56:34.000> you<00:56:34.359> you<00:56:34.440> need<00:56:34.520> to<00:56:34.640> know

from but what are you you need to know

the<00:56:34.839> ethics<00:56:35.079> in<00:56:35.200> the<00:56:35.280> metaphysics<00:56:35.960> right<00:56:36.400> why

the ethics in the metaphysics right why

why<00:56:37.480> is<00:56:37.680> this<00:56:37.839> the<00:56:37.960> way<00:56:38.119> to<00:56:38.280> become<00:56:38.480> a<00:56:38.599> better

why is this the way to become a better

person<00:56:39.079> and<00:56:39.240> not<00:56:39.440> that<00:56:39.640> way<00:56:39.920> what<00:56:40.160> what<00:56:40.280> is

person and not that way what what is

what<00:56:40.839> is<00:56:41.200> human<00:56:41.480> Perfection<00:56:41.880> aimed<00:56:42.160> that<00:56:42.440> I

what is human Perfection aimed that I

agree<00:56:42.920> with<00:56:43.039> you<00:56:43.119> you<00:56:43.240> have<00:56:43.440> some<00:56:43.599> level

agree with you you have some level

understanding<00:56:46.559> you’re<00:56:46.680> not<00:56:46.960> I

mean<00:56:50.280> which<00:56:50.400> means<00:56:51.119> makes<00:56:51.280> sense<00:56:51.480> to<00:56:51.599> you

mean which means makes sense to you

means<00:56:51.960> you<00:56:52.119> have<00:56:52.280> some<00:56:52.440> sort<00:56:53.160> the

means you have some sort the

demonstrations<00:56:53.880> aren’t<00:56:54.119> in<00:56:54.240> this<00:56:55.039> yeah<00:56:55.359> of

demonstrations aren’t in this yeah of

course

might<00:56:58.160> it<00:56:58.280> might<00:56:58.440> seem<00:56:58.640> sensible<00:56:59.079> enough<00:56:59.240> to

might it might seem sensible enough to

the<00:56:59.480> extent<00:56:59.720> that<00:56:59.799> I<00:56:59.880> would<00:57:00.160> SE<00:57:01.160> that’s<00:57:01.280> what

the extent that I would SE that’s what

you’re<00:57:01.480> saying<00:57:01.839> many<00:57:02.039> people<00:57:02.200> are<00:57:02.400> talking

you’re saying many people are talking

list<00:57:04.640> demonstrations<00:57:05.640> got<00:57:06.359> decide<00:57:07.839> all<00:57:08.839> no

list demonstrations got decide all no

there’s<00:57:09.079> no

there’s no

demonstrations<00:57:11.880> no

demonstrations no

but<00:57:14.359> so<00:57:14.640> what<00:57:14.920> so<00:57:15.200> so<00:57:15.440> wait<00:57:15.599> so<00:57:15.839> wait<00:57:15.960> so<00:57:16.160> wait

but so what so so wait so wait so wait

so<00:57:16.480> wait<00:57:16.760> but<00:57:16.960> wait<00:57:17.160> but<00:57:17.359> but<00:57:17.760> I’m<00:57:17.880> you’re

so wait but wait but but I’m you’re

getting<00:57:18.240> at<00:57:18.359> something<00:57:18.720> this<00:57:18.799> is<00:57:18.839> a<00:57:18.960> basic

getting at something this is a basic

educational<00:57:19.799> problem<00:57:20.200> how<00:57:20.400> you<00:57:20.720> get<00:57:20.880> to<00:57:21.319> to

educational problem how you get to to

yes<00:57:22.520> very<00:57:22.720> good<00:57:22.880> so<00:57:23.039> if<00:57:23.119> you%<00:57:23.760> what<00:57:23.880> you’re

yes very good so if you% what you’re

demonstrating<00:57:24.520> before<00:57:24.680> you<00:57:24.799> demon<00:57:25.359> right

demonstrating before you demon right

exactly<00:57:26.720> so<00:57:26.920> now<00:57:27.559> usually<00:57:28.079> we<00:57:28.240> say<00:57:28.559> that

exactly so now usually we say that

education<00:57:29.359> Begins<00:57:29.720> by<00:57:29.920> believing<00:57:30.359> things<00:57:31.119> MRA

education Begins by believing things MRA

usually<00:57:32.440> we<00:57:32.520> say<00:57:32.680> that<00:57:32.839> education

usually we say that education

necessarily<00:57:34.480> must<00:57:34.799> begin<00:57:35.280> from<00:57:36.200> from<00:57:36.680> what<00:57:36.799> we

necessarily must begin from from what we

call<00:57:37.520> from<00:57:37.680> believing<00:57:38.200> things<00:57:39.200> because

call from believing things because

someone<00:57:39.920> that<00:57:40.039> you<00:57:40.160> trust<00:57:40.559> told<00:57:40.799> you<00:57:40.960> of

someone that you trust told you of

course<00:57:41.200> where<00:57:41.319> does<00:57:41.480> that<00:57:41.640> TR<00:57:41.920> start

course where does that TR start

somehow<00:57:44.280> whatever<00:57:44.760> somehow<00:57:45.039> we<00:57:45.200> trust

somehow whatever somehow we trust

someone<00:57:46.160> and<00:57:46.280> you’re<00:57:46.440> going<00:57:46.520> to<00:57:46.680> believe

someone and you’re going to believe

him<00:57:48.559> right<00:57:48.960> now<00:57:49.319> that<00:57:49.640> someone<00:57:50.160> can’t<00:57:50.400> come

him right now that someone can’t come

and<00:57:50.880> speak<00:57:51.119> in<00:57:51.200> the<00:57:51.319> name<00:57:51.520> of<00:57:51.680> an<00:57:52.440> unnamable

and speak in the name of an unnamable

truth<00:57:54.039> that<00:57:54.200> seems<00:57:54.520> self-contradictory<00:57:55.079> you

truth that seems self-contradictory you

could<00:57:55.599> say<00:57:55.839> the<00:57:56.440> me<00:57:56.720> I’m<00:57:56.839> a<00:57:56.960> smart<00:57:57.319> guy<00:57:57.480> I’ve

could say the me I’m a smart guy I’ve

started<00:57:57.960> in<00:57:58.079> the<00:57:58.160> correct<00:57:58.440> universities<00:57:59.400> I’ve

started in the correct universities I’ve

got<00:57:59.640> the<00:57:59.799> right<00:58:00.039> credentials<00:58:00.799> claim<00:58:01.160> that

got the right credentials claim that

you’re<00:58:01.400> saying<00:58:01.760> the

you’re saying the

truth<00:58:04.039> saying<00:58:04.319> I’m<00:58:04.440> not<00:58:04.640> saying<00:58:04.920> anything

truth saying I’m not saying anything

that’s<00:58:05.319> true<00:58:05.720> that<00:58:05.960> to<00:58:06.119> be<00:58:06.240> why<00:58:06.359> you<00:58:06.480> read<00:58:06.640> the

that’s true that to be why you read the

book<00:58:07.240> not

book not

why<00:58:10.440> tag<00:58:10.640> on<00:58:10.920> that<00:58:11.039> this<00:58:11.160> is<00:58:11.240> the<00:58:11.319> truth<00:58:11.799> again

why tag on that this is the truth again

if<00:58:12.160> there’s<00:58:12.280> a<00:58:12.359> book<00:58:12.520> that<00:58:12.680> doesn’t<00:58:12.920> do<00:58:13.039> any

if there’s a book that doesn’t do any

explaining<00:58:14.160> doesn’t<00:58:14.359> do<00:58:14.480> any<00:58:14.640> proving<00:58:15.520> he

explaining doesn’t do any proving he

does<00:58:15.839> a<00:58:16.079> great<00:58:16.880> dactic<00:58:17.520> explanation<00:58:18.160> of<00:58:18.319> the

does a great dactic explanation of the

basics<00:58:18.960> of<00:58:19.160> you<00:58:19.240> know<00:58:19.640> the<00:58:20.000> theory<00:58:20.359> of<00:58:20.440> the

basics of you know the theory of the

soul<00:58:20.960> and<00:58:21.079> the<00:58:21.200> theory<00:58:21.480> of<00:58:21.680> the<00:58:21.839> of<00:58:21.960> the

soul and the theory of the of the

virtues<00:58:22.640> and<00:58:22.920> how<00:58:23.079> you<00:58:23.200> become<00:58:23.400> a<00:58:23.520> PR<00:58:23.960> this<00:58:24.079> he

virtues and how you become a PR this he

does<00:58:24.280> a<00:58:24.400> very<00:58:24.559> nice<00:58:24.720> explanation<00:58:25.160> of<00:58:25.319> that<00:58:25.760> but

does a very nice explanation of that but

you<00:58:26.000> could<00:58:26.119> could<00:58:26.240> read<00:58:26.440> it<00:58:26.720> I<00:58:26.839> know<00:58:27.000> people

you could could read it I know people

that<00:58:27.319> read<00:58:27.440> it<00:58:27.559> and<00:58:27.760> like<00:58:28.160> seems<00:58:28.480> wrong<00:58:29.000> bye<00:58:29.920> he

that read it and like seems wrong bye he

doesn’t<00:58:30.520> even<00:58:30.680> try<00:58:30.880> to<00:58:31.039> convin<00:58:31.440> of<00:58:31.559> its<00:58:31.839> truth

doesn’t even try to convin of its truth

he<00:58:32.960> does<00:58:33.119> a<00:58:33.280> very<00:58:33.440> good<00:58:33.599> job<00:58:33.760> of<00:58:33.920> explaining

he does a very good job of explaining

you<00:58:34.480> the<00:58:34.680> ideas<00:58:35.599> or<00:58:35.760> at<00:58:35.839> least<00:58:36.119> someone<00:58:36.480> that

you the ideas or at least someone that

wasn’t<00:58:36.920> didn’t<00:58:37.119> meet<00:58:37.319> these<00:58:37.440> ideas<00:58:37.720> at<00:58:37.880> all<00:58:38.319> is

wasn’t didn’t meet these ideas at all is

a<00:58:38.839> very<00:58:39.039> clear<00:58:39.319> explanation<00:58:40.319> but<00:58:40.520> he<00:58:40.680> doesn’t

a very clear explanation but he doesn’t

even<00:58:41.319> try<00:58:41.640> to<00:58:41.920> tell<00:58:42.160> you<00:58:42.280> the<00:58:42.400> truth<00:58:42.640> on<00:58:43.160> them

even try to tell you the truth on them

isn’t<00:58:44.280> he<00:58:44.440> just<00:58:44.599> giving<00:58:44.799> a<00:58:45.200> general<00:58:46.200> Max<00:58:46.720> here

isn’t he just giving a general Max here

that<00:58:47.280> that<00:58:47.400> you<00:58:47.480> shouldn’t<00:58:48.039> judge<00:58:48.960> what

that that you shouldn’t judge what

people<00:58:49.359> say<00:58:49.599> basically<00:58:49.960> they<00:58:50.079> are<00:58:50.319> yeah

people say basically they are yeah

that’s<00:58:50.559> a<00:58:50.720> very<00:58:50.880> nice<00:58:51.079> Maxim<00:58:51.559> if<00:58:51.839> for<00:58:52.000> the

that’s a very nice Maxim if for the

beginning<00:58:52.400> of<00:58:52.480> a<00:58:52.640> philosophical

beginning of a philosophical

bir<00:58:54.799> it’s<00:58:54.920> a<00:58:55.119> would<00:58:55.240> be<00:58:55.359> a<00:58:55.480> great<00:58:55.680> Maxim<00:58:56.119> for

bir it’s a would be a great Maxim for

theart<00:58:57.680> who<00:58:58.000> like<00:58:58.280> Stop<00:58:58.559> Believing<00:58:58.960> everyone

theart who like Stop Believing everyone

start<00:58:59.760> with<00:58:59.920> from<00:59:00.400> zero<00:59:01.400> very<00:59:01.599> good<00:59:01.839> but<00:59:02.160> it

start with from zero very good but it

doesn’t<00:59:02.640> seem<00:59:02.799> to<00:59:02.920> be<00:59:03.000> a<00:59:03.119> great<00:59:03.319> Maxim<00:59:03.680> for<00:59:03.799> a

doesn’t seem to be a great Maxim for a

book<00:59:04.200> that<00:59:04.280> is<00:59:04.520> actually<00:59:04.839> doing<00:59:05.119> the<00:59:05.280> precise

book that is actually doing the precise

opposite<00:59:06.000> it’s<00:59:06.079> giving<00:59:06.280> you<00:59:06.400> a<00:59:06.559> summary<00:59:06.920> of

opposite it’s giving you a summary of

things<00:59:07.240> that<00:59:07.359> a<00:59:07.440> lot<00:59:07.559> of<00:59:07.680> people<00:59:07.839> said<00:59:08.119> of

things that a lot of people said of

course<00:59:08.359> what<00:59:08.480> he<00:59:08.559> thinks<00:59:08.799> is<00:59:09.000> true<00:59:09.400> and<00:59:09.520> he

course what he thinks is true and he

might<00:59:09.839> know<00:59:10.079> himself<00:59:10.599> why<00:59:10.720> it’s<00:59:10.960> true<00:59:11.359> but

might know himself why it’s true but

he’s<00:59:11.599> not<00:59:11.680> telling<00:59:11.920> you<00:59:12.079> why<00:59:12.240> it’s

true<00:59:16.520> and<00:59:17.200> I’m<00:59:17.359> making<00:59:17.559> up<00:59:17.680> a<00:59:17.839> problem<00:59:18.079> that

true and I’m making up a problem that

doesn’t<00:59:18.440> exist<00:59:18.720> shouldn’t<00:59:18.920> you<00:59:19.480> call<00:59:20.480> I<00:59:20.559> think

doesn’t exist shouldn’t you call I think

this

ideaal<00:59:24.960> is<00:59:25.200> important<00:59:25.440> for<00:59:25.559> him<00:59:25.640> to<00:59:25.799> say<00:59:26.400> I’m

ideaal is important for him to say I’m

telling<00:59:26.760> you<00:59:26.839> that<00:59:26.960> I’m<00:59:27.079> getting<00:59:27.319> out<00:59:27.480> the

telling you that I’m getting out the

truth<00:59:27.920> now<00:59:28.640> you<00:59:28.760> won’t<00:59:29.000> know<00:59:29.160> it<00:59:29.319> as<00:59:29.839> you<00:59:30.000> read

truth now you won’t know it as you read

this<00:59:30.400> book<00:59:30.720> doesn’t<00:59:31.039> everyone<00:59:31.400> think<00:59:31.720> that

this book doesn’t everyone think that

are<00:59:32.799> you<00:59:32.960> asking<00:59:33.200> a<00:59:33.359> question<00:59:33.720> on<00:59:33.920> on<00:59:34.640> his<00:59:35.640> what

are you asking a question on on his what

he’s<00:59:35.839> saying<00:59:36.200> here<00:59:36.520> I<00:59:36.599> mean<00:59:36.920> sounds<00:59:37.119> like

he’s saying here I mean sounds like

you’re<00:59:37.359> just<00:59:37.799> with<00:59:37.880> his<00:59:38.000> approach<00:59:38.280> in<00:59:38.359> general

you’re just with his approach in general

well<00:59:38.839> my<00:59:38.960> question<00:59:39.240> is<00:59:39.440> that<00:59:39.920> over<00:59:40.119> here<00:59:40.240> and

well my question is that over here and

also<00:59:40.599> and<00:59:40.720> everywhere<00:59:40.960> else<00:59:41.200> but<00:59:41.319> over<00:59:41.520> here

also and everywhere else but over here

he’s<00:59:42.400> doing<00:59:42.720> something<00:59:43.640> he’s<00:59:43.799> doing<00:59:44.000> rhetoric

he’s doing something he’s doing rhetoric

here<00:59:44.640> obviously<00:59:44.920> he’s<00:59:45.079> not<00:59:45.480> doing<00:59:45.720> philosophy

here obviously he’s not doing philosophy

even<00:59:46.280> in<00:59:46.440> this<00:59:46.599> part<00:59:46.960> this<00:59:47.039> is<00:59:47.200> part<00:59:47.359> of<00:59:47.480> his

even in this part this is part of his

advertisement<00:59:48.119> for<00:59:48.240> his<00:59:48.400> book<00:59:49.079> but<00:59:49.359> his

advertisement for his book but his

advertisement<00:59:50.160> is<00:59:50.280> self-contradictory

advertisement is self-contradictory

what<00:59:52.559> would<00:59:52.640> be<00:59:53.119> because<00:59:53.400> by

what would be because by

definition<00:59:55.319> again<00:59:55.640> for<00:59:55.839> this

definition again for this

book<00:59:57.680> my<00:59:57.839> name<00:59:58.039> is<00:59:58.200> Moses<00:59:58.559> my<00:59:58.680> manes<00:59:59.280> I<00:59:59.359> am<00:59:59.640> the

book my name is Moses my manes I am the

why<01:00:00.280> do<01:00:00.559> why<01:00:00.640> are<01:00:00.799> reading<01:00:01.079> the<01:00:01.160> book<01:00:01.359> right

why do why are reading the book right

we’re<01:00:01.559> not<01:00:01.640> reading<01:00:01.839> the<01:00:01.960> book<01:00:02.119> because

we’re not reading the book because

anyone<01:00:03.359> that<01:00:03.440> tells<01:00:03.599> you<01:00:03.720> they’re<01:00:04.119> reading<01:00:05.119> is

anyone that tells you they’re reading is

a<01:00:05.720> liar<01:00:07.160> right<01:00:08.160> nobody

a liar right nobody

reads<01:00:10.760> or<01:00:11.039> whoever<01:00:12.039> nobody<01:00:12.280> even<01:00:12.400> reads<01:00:12.599> the

reads or whoever nobody even reads the

people<01:00:12.839> that

people that

read<01:00:15.079> for<01:00:15.200> the<01:00:15.359> most<01:00:15.640> part<01:00:16.359> nobody’s

read for the most part nobody’s

interested<01:00:17.000> in<01:00:17.079> the

interested in the

MS<01:00:18.920> you’re<01:00:19.160> interested<01:00:19.440> in<01:00:19.520> the<01:00:20.440> right<01:00:20.839> or<01:00:21.000> the

MS you’re interested in the right or the

genius<01:00:21.960> ra<01:00:22.640> started<01:00:23.039> with<01:00:23.960> right<01:00:24.280> to<01:00:24.440> get<01:00:24.920> the

genius ra started with right to get the

next<01:00:25.200> stage<01:00:26.200> from<01:00:26.359> there<01:00:26.680> who<01:00:26.960> started<01:00:27.960> at<01:00:28.039> a

next stage from there who started at a

certain<01:00:28.400> point<01:00:28.559> the<01:00:29.000> wasn’t<01:00:29.160> the<01:00:29.319> house<01:00:29.480> of

certain point the wasn’t the house of

them

okay<01:00:33.079> firstly<01:00:33.599> that’s<01:00:34.039> only<01:00:34.240> halfway<01:00:34.520> is

okay firstly that’s only halfway is

correct<01:00:35.000> but<01:00:35.200> yeah<01:00:35.960> okay<01:00:36.640> let’s<01:00:36.920> say<01:00:37.720> but<01:00:38.079> we

correct but yeah okay let’s say but we

said<01:00:39.000> that<01:00:39.119> I’m<01:00:39.200> not<01:00:39.280> saying<01:00:39.440> that<01:00:39.559> they

said that I’m not saying that they

doesn’t<01:00:39.920> deserve<01:00:40.280> his<01:00:40.520> credit<01:00:40.920> but<01:00:41.000> I’m

doesn’t deserve his credit but I’m

saying<01:00:41.280> that<01:00:41.400> nobody<01:00:41.640> reads<01:00:41.920> it<01:00:42.280> without

saying that nobody reads it without

credit<01:00:43.000> you’re<01:00:43.160> all<01:00:43.319> reading<01:00:43.680> it<01:00:44.039> especially

credit you’re all reading it especially

nowadays<01:00:44.920> when<01:00:45.520> we<01:00:45.680> all<01:00:46.079> you<01:00:46.160> know<01:00:46.400> the<01:00:46.599> the

nowadays when we all you know the the

general<01:00:47.000> assumptions<01:00:47.480> that<01:00:47.599> is<01:00:47.720> all<01:00:47.920> based<01:00:48.160> on

general assumptions that is all based on

outdated<01:00:49.079> theories<01:00:49.400> and<01:00:49.520> so<01:00:49.640> on<01:00:50.160> nobody<01:00:50.440> reads

outdated theories and so on nobody reads

it<01:00:51.240> because<01:00:51.480> of<01:00:51.640> the<01:00:51.760> MS<01:00:52.039> m<01:00:52.559> the<01:00:52.680> people<01:00:52.839> going

it because of the MS m the people going

around<01:00:53.359> the<01:00:53.480> most<01:00:53.640> with<01:00:53.760> it<01:00:53.880> are<01:00:54.039> the<01:00:54.160> worst

around the most with it are the worst

because<01:00:54.839> they’re<01:00:55.119> absolutely<01:00:55.520> only<01:00:55.680> using

because they’re absolutely only using

Authority<01:00:57.000> for

haing<01:01:02.880> and<01:01:03.119> like<01:01:03.240> the<01:01:03.960> means<01:01:04.160> like<01:01:04.359> ah<01:01:04.520> I<01:01:04.599> knew

haing and like the means like ah I knew

that<01:01:04.960> my<01:01:05.079> teacher<01:01:05.359> when<01:01:05.480> he<01:01:05.559> talks<01:01:05.760> about<01:01:05.920> Chim

that my teacher when he talks about Chim

was<01:01:06.520> lying<01:01:06.880> how<01:01:07.000> did<01:01:07.119> I<01:01:07.280> know<01:01:07.480> I<01:01:07.559> don’t<01:01:07.680> know

was lying how did I know I don’t know

because<01:01:08.000> the<01:01:08.079> newspapers<01:01:08.520> don’t<01:01:08.720> talk<01:01:08.920> about

because the newspapers don’t talk about

it<01:01:09.400> so

um<01:01:15.200> so<01:01:15.520> what<01:01:15.640> I’m<01:01:15.760> saying<01:01:16.039> is<01:01:16.160> that<01:01:16.280> nobody

um so what I’m saying is that nobody

reads<01:01:16.760> it<01:01:16.880> now<01:01:17.039> and<01:01:17.160> nobody<01:01:17.480> read<01:01:17.599> it<01:01:17.720> then

reads it now and nobody read it then

that<01:01:18.200> knew<01:01:18.359> that<01:01:18.440> he’s<01:01:18.559> writing<01:01:18.760> a<01:01:18.880> book<01:01:19.000> that

that knew that he’s writing a book that

people<01:01:19.240> are<01:01:19.319> going<01:01:19.440> to<01:01:19.520> read<01:01:19.760> why<01:01:20.119> obviously

people are going to read why obviously

he<01:01:20.520> showed<01:01:20.799> you<01:01:21.160> he<01:01:21.280> wrote<01:01:21.559> this<01:01:21.640> is<01:01:21.839> like<01:01:21.960> a

he showed you he wrote this is like a

book<01:01:22.160> on<01:01:22.240> the<01:01:22.359> home<01:01:22.520> mishna<01:01:22.839> obviously<01:01:23.119> the

book on the home mishna obviously the

guy<01:01:23.280> that<01:01:23.359> wrote<01:01:23.520> it<01:01:23.640> knows<01:01:23.880> mishna<01:01:24.440> at<01:01:24.559> least

guy that wrote it knows mishna at least

I<01:01:25.359> mean<01:01:25.680> he’s

I mean he’s

and<01:01:27.079> he’s<01:01:27.240> obviously<01:01:27.520> using<01:01:27.799> his<01:01:27.920> authority

and he’s obviously using his authority

but<01:01:28.960> and<01:01:29.039> that’s<01:01:29.160> why<01:01:29.240> I’m<01:01:29.359> saying<01:01:29.520> it’s<01:01:29.640> not

but and that’s why I’m saying it’s not

even<01:01:30.039> what<01:01:30.160> you’re<01:01:30.319> saying<01:01:30.559> is<01:01:30.839> true<01:01:31.039> for<01:01:31.200> us

even what you’re saying is true for us

of<01:01:31.520> course<01:01:31.799> we<01:01:31.960> take<01:01:32.119> that<01:01:32.480> much<01:01:32.599> more

of course we take that much more

seriously<01:01:33.160> because<01:01:33.319> of<01:01:33.400> all<01:01:33.480> the<01:01:33.559> credit<01:01:33.880> that

seriously because of all the credit that

he<01:01:34.200> got<01:01:34.520> but<01:01:34.640> he<01:01:34.720> wrote<01:01:35.000> in<01:01:35.160> his<01:01:35.319> generation

he got but he wrote in his generation

also<01:01:36.079> based<01:01:36.280> on<01:01:36.319> a<01:01:36.400> certain<01:01:36.640> crit<01:01:36.920> that<01:01:37.039> he<01:01:37.160> had

also based on a certain crit that he had

then<01:01:37.960> which<01:01:38.160> was<01:01:38.520> he<01:01:38.599> was<01:01:38.760> known<01:01:38.960> as<01:01:39.720> I<01:01:39.799> mean

then which was he was known as I mean

things<01:01:40.400> that<01:01:40.520> we<01:01:40.680> know<01:01:40.960> and<01:01:41.359> he<01:01:41.520> was<01:01:41.720> he<01:01:41.880> also

things that we know and he was he also

had<01:01:42.240> and<01:01:42.359> later<01:01:42.559> he<01:01:42.680> had<01:01:42.799> a<01:01:42.920> position<01:01:43.200> actually

had and later he had a position actually

in<01:01:43.520> the<01:01:43.599> community<01:01:44.079> it’s<01:01:44.200> not<01:01:44.400> like<01:01:44.799> just<01:01:44.960> a

in the community it’s not like just a

random<01:01:45.559> guy<01:01:46.000> he<01:01:46.119> was<01:01:46.359> never<01:01:46.760> dama<01:01:47.119> was<01:01:47.240> never<01:01:47.440> a

random guy he was never dama was never a

random<01:01:47.920> guy<01:01:48.119> writing<01:01:48.520> writing<01:01:49.319> books<01:01:50.319> that

random guy writing writing books that

like<01:01:50.839> nowadays<01:01:51.240> that’s<01:01:51.480> cing<01:01:51.720> him<01:01:51.839> on<01:01:51.960> the

like nowadays that’s cing him on the

rights<01:01:52.200> of<01:01:52.279> mamad<01:01:52.640> he<01:01:52.760> wants<01:01:52.920> you<01:01:53.000> to<01:01:53.160> accept

rights of mamad he wants you to accept

it<01:01:53.520> because<01:01:53.839> has<01:01:54.000> good<01:01:54.160> arguments<01:01:55.039> D<01:01:55.359> was

it because has good arguments D was

never<01:01:55.599> in<01:01:55.680> that<01:01:55.960> situation<01:01:56.960> and<01:01:57.079> that

never in that situation and that

situation<01:01:57.520> is<01:01:57.640> a<01:01:57.720> sort<01:01:57.839> of<01:01:57.960> Na<01:01:58.119> if<01:01:58.279> situation

situation is a sort of Na if situation

of<01:01:58.799> you<01:01:58.880> know<01:01:59.039> how<01:01:59.200> humans<01:01:59.559> work<01:02:00.559> not<01:02:00.760> actually

of you know how humans work not actually

he<01:02:01.559> wrote<01:02:01.720> this<01:02:01.839> book<01:02:01.960> in<01:02:02.079> on<01:02:02.319> another<01:02:02.640> one<01:02:03.440> if

he wrote this book in on another one if

you<01:02:03.720> might<01:02:04.160> it<01:02:04.279> was<01:02:04.400> a<01:02:04.520> k<01:02:05.079> he<01:02:05.200> might<01:02:05.279> have

you might it was a k he might have

actually<01:02:05.640> written<01:02:05.920> philosophy<01:02:06.559> know<01:02:07.039> this<01:02:07.119> is

actually written philosophy know this is

a<01:02:07.480> book<01:02:07.720> that

a book that

that<01:02:09.680> educ<01:02:10.760> social<01:02:11.760> movement<01:02:12.359> based<01:02:12.640> on

that educ social movement based on

social<01:02:13.640> movement<01:02:13.920> is<01:02:14.039> L<01:02:14.559> A<01:02:14.799> at<01:02:14.960> educating

social movement is L A at educating

course<01:02:15.640> not<01:02:15.799> movement<01:02:16.119> in<01:02:16.279> the<01:02:16.480> cultural

course not movement in the cultural

sense<01:02:17.720> he<01:02:17.799> actually<01:02:18.000> was<01:02:18.119> aing<01:02:18.760> at<01:02:18.880> that<01:02:19.039> stage

sense he actually was aing at that stage

but<01:02:19.480> like<01:02:19.640> he<01:02:20.359> in<01:02:20.520> those<01:02:20.680> days<01:02:20.799> were<01:02:20.960> Lessing

but like he in those days were Lessing

aot<01:02:21.720> than<01:02:21.880> they<01:02:22.000> were<01:02:22.440> was<01:02:22.640> different<01:02:23.359> but<01:02:24.119> uh

aot than they were was different but uh

side

that<01:02:27.200> was

that was

later<01:02:29.520> medical<01:02:29.920> Advance<01:02:30.680> okay<01:02:30.960> the<01:02:31.079> point<01:02:31.319> is

later medical Advance okay the point is

that<01:02:31.599> he’s<01:02:31.720> writing<01:02:32.000> it<01:02:32.119> as<01:02:32.240> a<01:02:32.359> someone<01:02:32.640> that

that he’s writing it as a someone that

has<01:02:32.920> some<01:02:33.119> kind<01:02:33.240> of<01:02:33.359> Authority<01:02:33.680> or<01:02:33.799> is

has some kind of Authority or is

expecting<01:02:34.279> to<01:02:34.359> be<01:02:34.480> read<01:02:34.720> with<01:02:34.880> authority<01:02:35.200> he’s

expecting to be read with authority he’s

expecting<01:02:35.680> you<01:02:35.799> to<01:02:36.000> assume<01:02:36.319> it<01:02:36.480> and<01:02:36.599> he’s<01:02:36.799> even

expecting you to assume it and he’s even

using<01:02:37.680> he’s<01:02:38.119> it’s<01:02:38.240> even<01:02:38.400> the<01:02:38.520> opposite<01:02:38.880> right

using he’s it’s even the opposite right

he’s<01:02:39.119> saying<01:02:39.680> he’s<01:02:39.880> even<01:02:40.039> using<01:02:40.440> saying<01:02:40.680> it’s

he’s saying he’s even using saying it’s

not<01:02:40.920> my<01:02:41.039> own<01:02:41.240> authority<01:02:41.920> maybe<01:02:42.079> you<01:02:42.160> don’t

not my own authority maybe you don’t

trust<01:02:42.520> me<01:02:42.640> so<01:02:42.799> trust<01:02:43.039> all<01:02:43.160> this<01:02:44.000> that<01:02:44.079> I<01:02:44.160> was

trust me so trust all this that I was

from<01:02:46.640> and<01:02:46.839> then<01:02:47.640> and<01:02:47.799> the<01:02:47.920> way<01:02:48.000> it’s<01:02:48.200> read

from and then and the way it’s read

usually<01:02:48.760> I’m<01:02:48.839> pretty<01:02:49.000> sure<01:02:49.240> that<01:02:49.480> I<01:02:49.559> mean<01:02:49.680> it’s

usually I’m pretty sure that I mean it’s

clear<01:02:50.039> that<01:02:50.200> that’s<01:02:50.319> also<01:02:50.520> what<01:02:50.599> he<01:02:50.680> meant

clear that that’s also what he meant

it’s<01:02:51.079> like<01:02:51.440> someone<01:02:51.760> say<01:02:52.000> well<01:02:52.119> you’re<01:02:52.359> recing

it’s like someone say well you’re recing

Muslim<01:02:54.760> what<01:02:54.839> do<01:02:54.920> you<01:02:55.039> mean<01:02:55.279> truth<01:02:55.480> is<01:02:55.599> truth

and<01:02:58.039> that’s<01:02:58.240> very<01:02:58.480> cute<01:02:58.760> but<01:02:59.000> really<01:02:59.200> what’s

and that’s very cute but really what’s

going<01:02:59.599> on<01:02:59.760> is

according<01:03:04.240> there’s<01:03:04.480> something<01:03:04.839> very<01:03:05.119> tricky

according there’s something very tricky

in<01:03:06.039> this<01:03:06.200> whole<01:03:06.400> rhetoric<01:03:07.119> of<01:03:08.119> it’s<01:03:08.240> also<01:03:08.520> the

in this whole rhetoric of it’s also the

way<01:03:08.680> it’s<01:03:08.760> used<01:03:09.240> but<01:03:09.319> even<01:03:09.440> the<01:03:09.520> way<01:03:10.000> himself

way it’s used but even the way himself

is<01:03:10.359> using<01:03:10.960> it<01:03:11.960> I<01:03:12.000> think<01:03:12.160> there’s<01:03:12.279> a<01:03:12.599> there’s<01:03:12.720> an

is using it I think there’s a there’s an

answer<01:03:13.039> to<01:03:13.200> this<01:03:13.359> this<01:03:13.520> riddle<01:03:13.839> I<01:03:13.920> think

answer to this this riddle I think

there’s<01:03:14.200> a<01:03:14.319> way<01:03:14.440> to<01:03:14.559> get<01:03:14.680> out<01:03:14.799> of<01:03:14.960> this

there’s a way to get out of this

problem<01:03:16.839> to

get<01:03:20.240> to<01:03:20.599> why<01:03:20.920> he’s<01:03:21.160> framing<01:03:21.599> it<01:03:21.760> in<01:03:21.920> this<01:03:22.359> way

get to why he’s framing it in this way

right<01:03:23.760> I<01:03:23.839> want<01:03:23.920> to<01:03:24.599> I<01:03:24.640> don’t<01:03:24.760> think<01:03:24.880> you’re

right I want to I don’t think you’re

convinced<01:03:25.319> that<01:03:25.400> there’s<01:03:25.520> a<01:03:25.920> but<01:03:26.039> the<01:03:26.160> the

convinced that there’s a but the the

framework<01:03:26.680> the<01:03:26.760> framework<01:03:27.079> of<01:03:28.039> right<01:03:28.240> is<01:03:28.520> one

framework the framework of right is one

that<01:03:31.160> I’m<01:03:31.319> saying<01:03:31.520> to<01:03:31.680> get<01:03:32.119> me<01:03:33.119> no<01:03:33.240> but<01:03:33.319> I’m

that I’m saying to get me no but I’m

saying

think<01:03:36.440> let’s<01:03:36.559> say<01:03:36.760> this<01:03:36.880> is<01:03:37.880> let’s<01:03:38.000> say<01:03:38.200> this

think let’s say this is let’s say this

is<01:03:40.359> it’s<01:03:40.520> not<01:03:41.200> a<01:03:41.359> random<01:03:42.039> on<01:03:42.200> something<01:03:42.760> right

is it’s not a random on something right

it<01:03:44.039> does

it does

Orient<01:03:46.559> um<01:03:47.200> others<01:03:47.640> towards<01:03:48.000> something

Orient um others towards something

specific<01:03:48.960> right<01:03:49.720> yes<01:03:50.480> that<01:03:50.680> specific<01:03:51.039> thing

specific right yes that specific thing

is<01:03:51.520> the<01:03:51.640> next<01:03:52.279> step<01:03:53.200> is<01:03:53.319> to<01:03:53.520> ask<01:03:53.720> yourself<01:03:54.240> why

is the next step is to ask yourself why

oriented<01:03:55.039> in<01:03:55.200> this<01:03:55.400> way

oriented in this way

what’s<01:03:57.079> the<01:03:57.200> answer<01:03:57.839> invation<01:03:58.359> I<01:03:58.480> think<01:03:58.640> to<01:03:58.880> go

what’s the answer invation I think to go

past<01:04:00.119> to<01:04:00.319> go<01:04:00.559> past<01:04:00.760> this<01:04:01.359> of<01:04:01.520> course<01:04:01.920> I<01:04:02.319> 100%

past to go past this of course I 100%

agree<01:04:03.000> that<01:04:03.160> Mr<01:04:03.920> himself<01:04:04.440> or<01:04:04.880> Mr<01:04:05.160> whoever<01:04:05.440> he

agree that Mr himself or Mr whoever he

quoting<01:04:06.640> hopefully<01:04:07.079> actually<01:04:07.319> I<01:04:07.400> don’t<01:04:07.599> agree

quoting hopefully actually I don’t agree

with<01:04:07.880> that<01:04:08.000> even<01:04:08.160> that<01:04:08.279> is<01:04:08.400> more<01:04:08.599> complicated

with that even that is more complicated

we’ll<01:04:09.160> get<01:04:09.279> to<01:04:09.440> that<01:04:09.640> I<01:04:09.720> think<01:04:09.880> that’s<01:04:10.079> part<01:04:10.200> of

we’ll get to that I think that’s part of

the<01:04:10.480> answer<01:04:11.400> or<01:04:11.520> at<01:04:11.599> least<01:04:11.920> I’m<01:04:12.039> thinking<01:04:12.599> now

the answer or at least I’m thinking now

um<01:04:14.319> but<01:04:14.559> assuming<01:04:14.920> that<01:04:15.359> ra<01:04:15.680> himself<01:04:16.000> knew

um but assuming that ra himself knew

that<01:04:16.319> these<01:04:16.440> things<01:04:16.559> are<01:04:16.680> true<01:04:16.880> because

that these things are true because

they’re<01:04:17.240> true<01:04:17.520> and<01:04:17.720> maybe<01:04:17.920> he<01:04:18.039> even<01:04:18.200> wants<01:04:18.400> you

they’re true and maybe he even wants you

to<01:04:18.680> know<01:04:18.960> that<01:04:19.400> it<01:04:19.520> seems<01:04:19.880> Me<01:04:20.079> Maybe<01:04:20.279> it’s

to know that it seems Me Maybe it’s

important<01:04:20.960> for<01:04:21.119> him<01:04:21.559> to<01:04:21.760> orient<01:04:22.119> you<01:04:22.240> towards

important for him to orient you towards

truth<01:04:22.839> and<01:04:22.960> not<01:04:23.079> towards<01:04:23.359> that<01:04:23.920> said

truth and not towards that said

right<01:04:26.599> you<01:04:26.760> have<01:04:26.839> to<01:04:27.000> go<01:04:27.680> saying<01:04:27.920> there<01:04:28.000> are

right you have to go saying there are

plenty<01:04:28.440> of<01:04:28.599> writers<01:04:29.400> who<01:04:29.640> don’t<01:04:30.160> don’t<01:04:30.440> claim

plenty of writers who don’t don’t claim

to<01:04:30.839> be<01:04:30.960> saying<01:04:31.240> the<01:04:31.359> truth<01:04:32.319> yeah<01:04:33.520> who<01:04:34.520> they

to be saying the truth yeah who they

they<01:04:34.799> call<01:04:35.039> the<01:04:35.119> truth<01:04:35.319> but<01:04:35.440> it’s<01:04:35.559> not<01:04:36.119> they’ll

they call the truth but it’s not they’ll

say<01:04:36.559> for<01:04:36.720> example<01:04:37.440> someone<01:04:38.000> will<01:04:38.160> bring<01:04:38.359> down

say for example someone will bring down

the<01:04:38.680> round<01:04:39.559> set<01:04:39.920> that’s<01:04:40.240> literally<01:04:40.599> thinks

the round set that’s literally thinks

that’s<01:04:41.079> the<01:04:41.200> source<01:04:41.880> why<01:04:42.000> it’s<01:04:42.200> true<01:04:42.799> it’s

that’s the source why it’s true it’s

not<01:04:45.160> saying<01:04:45.400> I’m<01:04:45.520> telling<01:04:45.799> I’m<01:04:45.880> saying<01:04:46.160> the

not saying I’m telling I’m saying the

truth<01:04:46.520> I’m<01:04:46.640> not<01:04:46.799> giving<01:04:47.039> you<01:04:47.319> all<01:04:47.680> my

truth I’m not giving you all my

example<01:04:50.119> these<01:04:50.319> claims<01:04:51.000> are<01:04:51.200> meant<01:04:51.359> to<01:04:51.480> be

example these claims are meant to be

true<01:04:52.680> everyone<01:04:53.520> know<01:04:54.520> that’s<01:04:55.760> example<01:04:56.480> I’m

true everyone know that’s example I’m

not<01:04:56.799> coming<01:04:57.000> for<01:04:57.240> those<01:04:57.400> people’s<01:04:57.839> Authority

not coming for those people’s Authority

coming<01:04:59.079> from<01:04:59.200> the<01:04:59.319> fact<01:04:59.440> that<01:04:59.520> it’s<01:04:59.640> true<01:04:59.880> from

coming from the fact that it’s true from

their<01:05:00.240> arguments<01:05:01.240> I<01:05:01.400> think<01:05:01.680> it’s<01:05:01.839> just<01:05:01.920> an

their arguments I think it’s just an

invitation<01:05:02.559> to<01:05:02.720> go<01:05:03.520> does<01:05:04.520> to<01:05:04.720> to<01:05:05.240> understand

invitation to go does to to understand

why<01:05:07.960> don’t<01:05:08.160> trust<01:05:08.559> yourself<01:05:09.480> don’t<01:05:09.720> trust

why don’t trust yourself don’t trust

yourself<01:05:11.520> I<01:05:11.720> can

truth<01:05:15.960> okay<01:05:16.160> that’s<01:05:16.480> that’s<01:05:16.880> that’s<01:05:17.079> very

truth okay that’s that’s that’s very

rational<01:05:18.440> nothing<01:05:18.720> against<01:05:19.000> that<01:05:19.720> I’m<01:05:19.799> not

rational nothing against that I’m not

against<01:05:20.200> that<01:05:20.359> but<01:05:20.480> that’s<01:05:20.599> not<01:05:20.720> what<01:05:20.799> he’s

against that but that’s not what he’s

saying<01:05:21.200> here<01:05:21.480> and<01:05:21.599> I’m<01:05:21.720> asking<01:05:22.119> with<01:05:22.279> what

saying here and I’m asking with what

you’re<01:05:22.640> saying<01:05:23.039> that<01:05:23.520> that<01:05:24.520> that<01:05:24.839> this<01:05:25.079> itself

you’re saying that that that this itself

is<01:05:25.720> certain<01:05:25.960> educational<01:05:26.559> value<01:05:27.400> that

is certain educational value that

telling<01:05:28.079> you<01:05:29.079> although<01:05:29.440> it’s<01:05:29.599> a<01:05:29.680> little<01:05:29.880> weird

telling you although it’s a little weird

because<01:05:30.400> I’m<01:05:30.599> I’m<01:05:30.720> assuming<01:05:31.000> that<01:05:31.160> everyone

because I’m I’m assuming that everyone

else<01:05:31.559> also<01:05:31.760> thinks<01:05:31.960> that<01:05:32.039> they’re<01:05:32.200> saying<01:05:32.400> the

else also thinks that they’re saying the

truth<01:05:33.240> but<01:05:33.440> they<01:05:33.920> sometimes<01:05:34.119> you<01:05:34.279> make<01:05:34.480> them

truth but they sometimes you make them

it<01:05:35.440> seems<01:05:35.680> like<01:05:35.839> many<01:05:36.079> people<01:05:36.400> really<01:05:36.599> think

it seems like many people really think

that<01:05:36.960> whoever<01:05:37.240> says<01:05:37.440> it<01:05:37.599> makes<01:05:37.839> things<01:05:38.079> true

that whoever says it makes things true

yeah<01:05:38.960> I<01:05:39.039> don’t<01:05:39.160> know<01:05:39.279> how<01:05:39.440> they<01:05:39.559> think<01:05:39.799> that

yeah I don’t know how they think that

but<01:05:40.160> that’s<01:05:40.319> how<01:05:40.440> they<01:05:40.599> act<01:05:40.839> at<01:05:41.000> least<01:05:41.720> nobody

but that’s how they act at least nobody

really<01:05:42.240> think<01:05:43.200> yeah<01:05:44.200> it’s<01:05:44.359> not<01:05:44.480> true<01:05:44.680> it’s

really think yeah it’s not true it’s

impossible<01:05:45.240> to<01:05:45.559> nail<01:05:45.799> someone<01:05:46.119> down<01:05:46.839> doesn’t

impossible to nail someone down doesn’t

make<01:05:47.200> sense<01:05:48.000> doesn’t

make sense doesn’t

work

that’s<01:05:51.880> I<01:05:52.039> agree<01:05:52.319> with<01:05:52.599> that<01:05:53.599> is<01:05:54.000> in<01:05:54.079> other

that’s I agree with that is in other

words<01:05:54.559> in<01:05:54.680> other<01:05:54.839> words<01:05:55.039> if<01:05:55.160> this<01:05:55.240> is<01:05:55.319> a<01:05:55.680> to<01:05:55.760> be

words in other words if this is a to be

a<01:05:55.960> statement<01:05:56.240> of<01:05:56.440> principle<01:05:57.000> in<01:05:57.400> principle<01:05:58.400> we

a statement of principle in principle we

should<01:05:58.960> accept<01:05:59.319> truths<01:05:59.960> even<01:06:00.160> from<01:06:00.400> go

should accept truths even from go

philosopher<01:06:01.440> or<01:06:01.599> go<01:06:02.200> Bal<01:06:03.039> which<01:06:03.160> is<01:06:03.400> I<01:06:03.480> think

philosopher or go Bal which is I think

important<01:06:05.160> um<01:06:06.160> because<01:06:06.440> they’re<01:06:06.640> true<01:06:07.119> then

important um because they’re true then

then<01:06:07.480> it’s<01:06:07.720> accessible<01:06:08.400> yes<01:06:08.839> but<01:06:09.000> if<01:06:09.119> it’s

then it’s accessible yes but if it’s

trying<01:06:09.520> to<01:06:09.640> get<01:06:09.760> me<01:06:09.880> to<01:06:10.079> read<01:06:10.359> these<01:06:10.640> specific

trying to get me to read these specific

go<01:06:11.359> that<01:06:11.799> is<01:06:11.960> quoting<01:06:12.359> here<01:06:13.000> or<01:06:13.160> to<01:06:13.359> make<01:06:13.520> me

go that is quoting here or to make me

believe<01:06:14.440> this<01:06:14.720> things<01:06:14.920> that<01:06:15.039> he’s<01:06:15.200> telling<01:06:15.400> me

believe this things that he’s telling me

without<01:06:16.000> proof<01:06:16.279> then<01:06:16.400> it’s<01:06:16.599> very<01:06:16.839> bad<01:06:17.359> in<01:06:17.480> its

without proof then it’s very bad in its

context<01:06:18.359> it’s<01:06:18.680> actually<01:06:19.680> it’s<01:06:19.839> playing<01:06:20.160> a<01:06:20.359> a

context it’s actually it’s playing a a

tricky<01:06:20.760> game<01:06:21.079> if<01:06:21.200> he’s<01:06:21.319> saying<01:06:21.559> I’m<01:06:21.760> giving

tricky game if he’s saying I’m giving

you<01:06:22.240> and<01:06:22.400> this<01:06:22.480> is<01:06:22.640> how<01:06:22.799> you’ll<01:06:23.039> know<01:06:23.279> it’s

you and this is how you’ll know it’s

true<01:06:24.160> that’s<01:06:24.799> say<01:06:25.799> not<01:06:25.920> true<01:06:26.400> there’s

true that’s say not true there’s

actually<01:06:26.760> an<01:06:26.880> even<01:06:27.039> bigger<01:06:27.559> just<01:06:27.680> a<01:06:27.760> general

actually an even bigger just a general

principle<01:06:28.559> that<01:06:28.799> this

principle that this

is<01:06:31.240> I’m<01:06:31.400> claiming<01:06:31.839> that<01:06:31.960> this<01:06:32.079> is<01:06:32.559> true<01:06:33.559> that’s

is I’m claiming that this is true that’s

that<01:06:41.920> and<01:06:42.039> that’s<01:06:42.240> the<01:06:42.400> point<01:06:42.640> the<01:06:42.760> point<01:06:42.920> of

that and that’s the point the point of

reading<01:06:43.319> such<01:06:43.480> a<01:06:43.599> thing<01:06:43.799> is<01:06:44.039> that<01:06:44.599> you<01:06:45.079> might

reading such a thing is that you might

because<01:06:46.240> you<01:06:46.359> start<01:06:46.680> on<01:06:46.799> the<01:06:47.000> path<01:06:47.279> like<01:06:47.400> you

because you start on the path like you

said<01:06:47.599> you<01:06:47.720> first<01:06:48.079> present<01:06:48.400> the<01:06:48.599> theory<01:06:48.920> and

said you first present the theory and

then<01:06:49.119> you<01:06:49.240> start<01:06:49.480> on<01:06:49.599> the<01:06:49.760> path<01:06:49.920> of<01:06:50.079> Truth<01:06:50.680> you

then you start on the path of Truth you

you<01:06:51.079> you<01:06:51.160> don’t<01:06:51.279> even<01:06:51.480> have<01:06:51.599> to<01:06:51.760> read<01:06:52.760> the

you you don’t even have to read the

source<01:06:53.880> to<01:06:54.359> know<01:06:54.640> some<01:06:54.920> level<01:06:55.160> of<01:06:55.839> of

source to know some level of of

this

MH<01:07:01.440> that’s<01:07:01.599> another<01:07:01.920> but<01:07:02.119> now<01:07:02.319> now<01:07:02.440> you’re

MH that’s another but now now you’re

saying<01:07:02.880> now<01:07:03.000> you’re<01:07:03.119> saying<01:07:03.400> another<01:07:03.839> another

saying now you’re saying another another

thing<01:07:04.359> that<01:07:04.520> I<01:07:04.599> don’t<01:07:04.760> know<01:07:04.960> how<01:07:05.279> that<01:07:05.440> we<01:07:05.720> I

thing that I don’t know how that we I

could<01:07:05.960> try<01:07:06.200> to<01:07:06.319> solve<01:07:06.640> but<01:07:06.760> I<01:07:06.839> don’t<01:07:06.960> know<01:07:07.160> how

could try to solve but I don’t know how

I<01:07:07.599> don’t<01:07:07.720> mean<01:07:07.839> I<01:07:07.960> think<01:07:08.079> there’s<01:07:08.240> a<01:07:08.960> problem

I don’t mean I think there’s a problem

here

because<01:07:11.400> what<01:07:12.000> do<01:07:12.200> you<01:07:12.440> get<01:07:12.680> out<01:07:12.839> of<01:07:13.000> knowing<01:07:13.279> a

because what do you get out of knowing a

story<01:07:13.799> without<01:07:14.039> knowing<01:07:14.440> that<01:07:14.559> it’s<01:07:15.200> true

story without knowing that it’s true

especially<01:07:16.640> if<01:07:16.760> the<01:07:16.920> claim<01:07:17.240> of<01:07:17.400> that<01:07:17.599> story<01:07:17.839> is

especially if the claim of that story is

to<01:07:18.039> be<01:07:18.200> true<01:07:18.400> because<01:07:18.599> it’s<01:07:18.799> true<01:07:19.119> I<01:07:19.200> don’t

to be true because it’s true I don’t

think<01:07:19.440> they<01:07:19.559> feel<01:07:19.720> wored<01:07:19.960> I<01:07:20.039> think<01:07:20.160> they<01:07:20.279> do

think they feel wored I think they do

know<01:07:20.559> the<01:07:20.720> truth<01:07:21.000> from<01:07:21.200> based<01:07:21.400> on<01:07:21.599> some<01:07:21.880> level

know the truth from based on some level

of<01:07:22.279> the<01:07:22.440> truth<01:07:23.319> before<01:07:23.559> they<01:07:23.880> out<01:07:24.039> for<01:07:24.799> yeah<01:07:25.799> it

of the truth before they out for yeah it

knowing<01:07:26.319> why<01:07:27.079> and<01:07:27.359> secondly<01:07:27.839> and<01:07:27.960> one<01:07:28.119> more

knowing why and secondly and one more

question<01:07:28.640> one<01:07:28.760> more<01:07:28.920> question<01:07:29.119> I’m<01:07:29.240> going<01:07:29.319> to

question one more question I’m going to

stop<01:07:29.960> one<01:07:30.119> more<01:07:30.400> question<01:07:31.400> are<01:07:31.640> these<01:07:31.799> things

stop one more question are these things

true<01:07:35.079> is<01:07:35.200> there<01:07:35.400> truth<01:07:35.720> in<01:07:35.839> the<01:07:35.960> realm<01:07:36.240> of

Midas<01:07:40.279> sure<01:07:41.279> is<01:07:41.400> there<01:07:41.559> enough<01:07:41.920> truth<01:07:42.240> to

Midas sure is there enough truth to

justify<01:07:44.319> this<01:07:44.400> is<01:07:44.440> a<01:07:44.559> more<01:07:44.720> serious<01:07:45.480> question

justify this is a more serious question

everyone<01:07:46.799> agrees<01:07:47.240> even<01:07:47.400> the<01:07:47.480> biggest<01:07:48.400> guy

everyone agrees even the biggest guy

that<01:07:48.960> thinks<01:07:49.279> that<01:07:49.559> Things<01:07:49.760> become<01:07:50.000> true

that thinks that Things become true

because<01:07:50.599> Cutler<01:07:50.920> said<01:07:51.200> them<01:07:51.640> agrees<01:07:51.960> that

because Cutler said them agrees that

math<01:07:52.359> isn’t<01:07:52.720> that<01:07:52.880> way<01:07:53.520> right<01:07:54.520> everyone

math isn’t that way right everyone

agrees

there<01:07:57.400> are<01:07:57.839> those<01:07:57.960> who<01:07:58.079> claim<01:07:58.359> not<01:07:59.079> okay

even<01:08:03.640> that<01:08:03.760> kind<01:08:03.920> of<01:08:04.079> the<01:08:04.160> people<01:08:04.279> that<01:08:04.400> go<01:08:04.520> to

even that kind of the people that go to

Iran<01:08:04.880> they<01:08:05.000> also<01:08:05.160> don’t<01:08:05.359> believe<01:08:05.599> that<01:08:05.720> but<01:08:05.839> in

Iran they also don’t believe that but in

general<01:08:06.920> like<01:08:07.039> the<01:08:07.200> kind<01:08:07.319> of<01:08:07.480> people<01:08:07.920> I<01:08:08.000> know

general like the kind of people I know

who<01:08:08.240> you<01:08:08.359> mean<01:08:08.880> but<01:08:09.160> now

who you mean but now

uh<01:08:11.599> but<01:08:11.839> most<01:08:12.079> of<01:08:12.319> those

uh but most of those

people<01:08:14.400> very<01:08:14.640> few<01:08:14.920> people<01:08:15.239> believe<01:08:16.239> that<01:08:16.560> for

people very few people believe that for

example<01:08:18.640> uh<01:08:19.319> has<01:08:20.319> how<01:08:20.400> do<01:08:20.520> you

example uh has how do you

say<01:08:23.000> more

say more

complicated<01:08:25.159> um<01:08:25.719> ethics<01:08:26.440> extremely

complicated um ethics extremely

complicated<01:08:28.719> many<01:08:29.000> people<01:08:29.239> extremely<01:08:29.640> a<01:08:29.719> lot

complicated many people extremely a lot

of<01:08:29.960> people<01:08:30.159> say<01:08:30.440> like<01:08:30.560> it

of people say like it

says<01:08:32.960> they<01:08:33.080> interpret<01:08:33.480> this<01:08:33.600> to<01:08:33.759> mean<01:08:34.480> you

says they interpret this to mean you

could<01:08:34.799> learn<01:08:35.159> math<01:08:35.400> and<01:08:35.600> science<01:08:35.839> from<01:08:36.000> a<01:08:36.319> but

could learn math and science from a but

you<01:08:36.520> cannot<01:08:36.759> learn<01:08:36.960> how<01:08:37.040> to<01:08:37.199> live<01:08:37.359> from<01:08:37.960> ay<01:08:38.960> and

you cannot learn how to live from ay and

there’s<01:08:39.199> a<01:08:39.319> reason<01:08:39.560> for<01:08:39.679> this<01:08:39.839> it’s<01:08:40.000> not<01:08:40.199> just

there’s a reason for this it’s not just

because<01:08:40.600> they<01:08:40.719> believe<01:08:41.000> that<01:08:41.120> the<01:08:41.239> to<01:08:41.480> is<01:08:41.640> more

because they believe that the to is more

primarily<01:08:42.679> about<01:08:42.880> how<01:08:43.000> to<01:08:43.159> live<01:08:43.319> and<01:08:43.440> less

primarily about how to live and less

about<01:08:44.000> truth<01:08:44.920> they<01:08:45.000> don’t<01:08:45.239> really<01:08:45.440> believe

about truth they don’t really believe

some<01:08:46.640> the<01:08:46.759> matter<01:08:47.080> Orthodox<01:08:47.440> people<01:08:47.600> believe

some the matter Orthodox people believe

that<01:08:48.080> but<01:08:49.040> other<01:08:49.159> people<01:08:49.359> don’t<01:08:49.520> believe<01:08:49.759> that

that but other people don’t believe that

what<01:08:50.679> they<01:08:50.799> would<01:08:50.960> tell<01:08:51.159> you<01:08:51.359> is<01:08:52.040> what’s

what they would tell you is what’s

behind<01:08:52.600> this<01:08:52.839> is<01:08:53.080> that<01:08:53.359> of<01:08:53.520> course<01:08:53.960> math<01:08:54.199> is

behind this is that of course math is

the<01:08:54.480> kind<01:08:54.640> of<01:08:54.799> thing<01:08:54.920> that<01:08:55.040> doesn’t<01:08:55.239> kill<01:08:55.440> care

the kind of thing that doesn’t kill care

who<01:08:55.759> said<01:08:56.080> it<01:08:57.080> but<01:08:57.279> ethics<01:08:57.600> is<01:08:57.839> I<01:08:58.239> definitely

who said it but ethics is I definitely

is<01:08:58.799> the<01:08:58.920> kind<01:08:59.080> of<01:08:59.159> thing<01:08:59.319> that<01:08:59.480> cares<01:08:59.719> who<01:08:59.880> said

is the kind of thing that cares who said

it<01:09:01.359> or<01:09:01.560> definitely<01:09:01.960> is<01:09:02.159> the<01:09:02.279> kind<01:09:02.480> of<01:09:02.679> thing

it or definitely is the kind of thing

that<01:09:03.400> doesn’t<01:09:03.880> is<01:09:04.080> doesn’t<01:09:04.480> play<01:09:04.839> in<01:09:05.040> the<01:09:05.600> in

that doesn’t is doesn’t play in the in

the<01:09:05.920> field<01:09:06.199> of<01:09:06.359> Truth<01:09:06.880> or<01:09:07.040> the<01:09:07.159> field<01:09:07.400> of

the field of Truth or the field of

demonstrable<01:09:08.640> Truth<01:09:09.199> nobody<01:09:09.520> ever<01:09:09.679> found<01:09:09.880> a

demonstrable Truth nobody ever found a

good<01:09:10.159> proof<01:09:10.359> for<01:09:10.480> why<01:09:10.640> to<01:09:10.719> be<01:09:10.839> a<01:09:10.920> good<01:09:11.319> person

good proof for why to be a good person

did<01:09:13.000> anyone<01:09:14.000> good<01:09:14.319> question<01:09:15.319> less<01:09:15.520> people

did anyone good question less people

than<01:09:15.960> found<01:09:16.199> than<01:09:16.319> the<01:09:16.480> people<01:09:16.679> that<01:09:16.799> figured

than found than the people that figured

out<01:09:17.239> why<01:09:17.400> one<01:09:17.520> And1<01:09:17.799> is<01:09:18.199> two<01:09:19.199> and<01:09:19.440> it’s<01:09:19.520> a<01:09:19.640> much

out why one And1 is two and it’s a much

more<01:09:19.880> fuzzy<01:09:20.400> subject<01:09:21.400> and<01:09:21.600> therefore

more fuzzy subject and therefore

probably<01:09:22.319> at<01:09:22.440> least<01:09:22.679> much<01:09:22.839> more<01:09:23.120> prone<01:09:23.400> to

probably at least much more prone to

biasp<01:09:25.400> corupted<01:09:25.920> by<01:09:26.319> by<01:09:26.679> by<01:09:26.880> many<01:09:27.279> much<01:09:27.440> more

biasp corupted by by by many much more

easily<01:09:27.880> corrupted<01:09:28.319> and<01:09:28.480> much<01:09:28.640> more<01:09:29.480> and<01:09:29.679> and

easily corrupted and much more and and

not<01:09:30.040> only<01:09:30.319> that<01:09:30.440> I<01:09:30.520> mean<01:09:30.880> you<01:09:30.960> can<01:09:31.120> read<01:09:31.279> the

not only that I mean you can read the

philosophers<01:09:32.440> that<01:09:33.440> what<01:09:33.560> they<01:09:33.679> say<01:09:33.839> about

philosophers that what they say about

ethics<01:09:34.319> a<01:09:34.400> lot<01:09:34.520> of<01:09:34.600> the<01:09:34.719> time<01:09:34.920> they’re<01:09:35.120> just

ethics a lot of the time they’re just

like<01:09:35.520> saying<01:09:35.839> things<01:09:36.839> even<01:09:37.040> the<01:09:37.159> great<01:09:37.359> philos

like saying things even the great philos

even<01:09:37.880> Aristotle<01:09:38.279> Aristotle<01:09:38.640> explicitly<01:09:39.040> says

even Aristotle Aristotle explicitly says

this<01:09:40.600> Aristotle<01:09:41.080> doesn’t<01:09:41.440> pretend<01:09:41.719> to<01:09:41.839> have<01:09:41.920> a

this Aristotle doesn’t pretend to have a

pro<01:09:43.080> introduction<01:09:43.679> already<01:09:44.080> that<01:09:44.719> you<01:09:44.839> know

pro introduction already that you know

you<01:09:45.159> shouldn’t<01:09:45.480> Che<01:09:45.799> Aristotle<01:09:46.279> who<01:09:46.480> who<01:09:46.600> is

you shouldn’t Che Aristotle who who is

the’s<01:09:47.480> teacher<01:09:47.799> in<01:09:48.000> Ethics<01:09:48.239> in<01:09:48.400> general

the’s teacher in Ethics in general

doesn’t<01:09:49.199> claim<01:09:49.520> to<01:09:49.600> have<01:09:49.679> a<01:09:49.759> proof<01:09:50.000> for<01:09:50.159> ethics

doesn’t claim to have a proof for ethics

Plato<01:09:51.600> might<01:09:52.000> sometimes<01:09:52.199> claim<01:09:52.440> that<01:09:52.480> he<01:09:52.560> has

Plato might sometimes claim that he has

a<01:09:52.759> proof<01:09:52.960> and<01:09:53.199> sometimes<01:09:53.400> not<01:09:54.159> so<01:09:54.960> this<01:09:55.760> and

a proof and sometimes not so this and

and<01:09:56.199> by<01:09:56.320> the<01:09:56.480> and<01:09:56.600> this<01:09:56.679> is<01:09:56.800> something<01:09:57.080> that

and by the and this is something that

you<01:09:57.320> know<01:09:57.679> people<01:09:58.000> we<01:09:58.280> think<01:09:58.480> I<01:09:58.560> want<01:09:58.760> discuss

you know people we think I want discuss

this<01:10:00.400> that’s

this that’s

why<01:10:02.679> is<01:10:03.520> triple<01:10:04.159> problematic<01:10:04.960> here<01:10:05.960> has<01:10:06.120> the

why is triple problematic here has the

first<01:10:06.480> problem<01:10:06.719> of<01:10:06.840> being<01:10:06.960> in<01:10:07.040> the<01:10:07.159> wrong

first problem of being in the wrong

place<01:10:07.840> because<01:10:08.040> he’s<01:10:08.239> not<01:10:08.360> teaching<01:10:08.679> us

place because he’s not teaching us

things<01:10:09.480> it<01:10:09.640> has<01:10:09.800> another<01:10:10.199> problem<01:10:10.560> of<01:10:10.840> what

things it has another problem of what

did<01:10:11.040> I<01:10:11.400> say<01:10:12.400> of<01:10:12.560> nobody<01:10:12.880> actually<01:10:13.120> reading

did I say of nobody actually reading

this<01:10:13.520> book<01:10:13.719> because<01:10:13.880> it’s<01:10:14.080> true<01:10:14.800> and<01:10:14.880> that<01:10:15.040> has

this book because it’s true and that has

a<01:10:15.400> much<01:10:15.600> more<01:10:15.880> specific<01:10:16.320> problem<01:10:16.679> which<01:10:16.880> is

a much more specific problem which is

that<01:10:17.679> it’s<01:10:18.400> very<01:10:18.760> sounds<01:10:19.040> like<01:10:19.159> a<01:10:19.360> very

that it’s very sounds like a very

far-fetched<01:10:20.520> thing<01:10:21.520> to<01:10:21.800> claim<01:10:22.400> that<01:10:22.600> these

far-fetched thing to claim that these

things<01:10:22.920> are<01:10:23.080> just<01:10:23.199> simply<01:10:23.480> true<01:10:23.880> it’s<01:10:24.000> like

things are just simply true it’s like

Beauty<01:10:24.320> I<01:10:24.440> I<01:10:24.600> just<01:10:24.719> haven’t<01:10:24.920> tried<01:10:25.120> hard<01:10:25.480> oh

Beauty I I just haven’t tried hard oh

yeah<01:10:25.840> maybe<01:10:26.360> I’m<01:10:26.600> I’m<01:10:26.760> with<01:10:26.920> you<01:10:27.840> or<01:10:28.000> maybe<01:10:28.239> not

yeah maybe I’m I’m with you or maybe not

then<01:10:28.719> there’s<01:10:29.120> a<01:10:29.239> way<01:10:29.400> in<01:10:29.520> the<01:10:29.679> MS<01:10:30.280> maybe<01:10:30.719> I<01:10:30.800> am

then there’s a way in the MS maybe I am

thinking<01:10:31.199> something<01:10:31.440> else<01:10:31.679> I’m<01:10:31.840> thinking

thinking something else I’m thinking

that<01:10:32.280> maybe<01:10:32.840> the<01:10:32.960> problem<01:10:33.280> that<01:10:33.360> I’m<01:10:33.480> having

that maybe the problem that I’m having

with<01:10:33.840> what<01:10:33.960> he’s<01:10:34.120> saying<01:10:34.640> which<01:10:34.760> is<01:10:35.000> how

with what he’s saying which is how

anyone<01:10:36.080> can<01:10:36.280> get<01:10:36.440> any<01:10:36.600> truth<01:10:36.880> out<01:10:36.960> of<01:10:37.120> just

anyone can get any truth out of just

reading<01:10:37.440> a<01:10:37.600> nice<01:10:37.800> summary<01:10:38.239> which<01:10:38.440> which<01:10:38.600> this

reading a nice summary which which this

book<01:10:39.040> is<01:10:39.960> can<01:10:40.199> solve<01:10:40.520> the<01:10:40.760> problem<01:10:41.320> of<01:10:41.480> how<01:10:41.600> we

book is can solve the problem of how we

can<01:10:41.880> call<01:10:42.120> truth<01:10:42.760> something<01:10:43.040> that<01:10:43.199> doesn’t

can call truth something that doesn’t

play<01:10:43.880> in<01:10:44.000> the<01:10:44.120> realm<01:10:44.320> of<01:10:44.440> deductive

play in the realm of deductive

proof<01:10:47.280> it<01:10:47.440> does<01:10:47.640> to<01:10:47.800> some<01:10:48.000> degree<01:10:48.480> that’s<01:10:48.719> my

proof it does to some degree that’s my

my<01:10:49.600> my<01:10:49.840> my<01:10:50.320> of<01:10:50.440> an<01:10:50.600> answer<01:10:50.960> there’s<01:10:51.120> no

my my my of an answer there’s no

deductive<01:10:51.719> proof<01:10:51.960> for<01:10:52.120> certain<01:10:52.400> correct

deductive proof for certain correct

kinds<01:10:52.840> of<01:10:52.960> human<01:10:53.239> behav<01:10:54.120> um<01:10:54.719> yeah<01:10:54.840> if<01:10:54.920> you<01:10:55.040> have

kinds of human behav um yeah if you have

certain<01:10:55.520> assumptions<01:10:56.040> then<01:10:56.239> you<01:10:56.400> could<01:10:56.560> you

certain assumptions then you could you

could<01:10:56.760> make<01:10:56.880> up<01:10:57.000> your<01:10:57.159> assumptions<01:10:58.159> could

could make up your assumptions could

provide<01:10:58.560> the<01:10:58.640> assumptions<01:10:59.080> I<01:10:59.120> mean

provide the assumptions I mean

metaphysical

deductions<01:11:01.400> at<01:11:01.480> least<01:11:01.640> arell<01:11:02.120> doesn’t<01:11:02.320> do

deductions at least arell doesn’t do

that<01:11:02.840> doesn’t<01:11:03.040> do<01:11:03.159> metaphysical<01:11:03.880> doctrines

that doesn’t do metaphysical doctrines

for<01:11:04.440> that<01:11:05.239> Dr<01:11:05.679> might<01:11:06.000> yes<01:11:06.239> because<01:11:06.640> D<01:11:07.640> has<01:11:07.760> a

for that Dr might yes because D has a

has<01:11:08.440> I<01:11:08.520> mean<01:11:08.640> he<01:11:08.760> has<01:11:08.840> a<01:11:09.000> certain<01:11:09.280> argument

has I mean he has a certain argument

that<01:11:10.159> D<01:11:10.480> likes<01:11:10.760> very<01:11:10.920> much<01:11:11.080> and<01:11:11.280> takes<01:11:11.480> very

that D likes very much and takes very

seriously<01:11:12.719> for<01:11:12.920> a<01:11:13.320> certain<01:11:14.320> part<01:11:14.840> it’s

seriously for a certain part it’s

actually<01:11:15.280> more<01:11:15.480> comp<01:11:15.760> very

actually more comp very

complicated<01:11:17.719> uh<01:11:17.960> very<01:11:18.199> complicated

complicated uh very complicated

question<01:11:20.400> but<01:11:20.560> at<01:11:20.640> least<01:11:20.800> a<01:11:20.920> lot<01:11:21.040> of<01:11:21.159> what<01:11:21.880> is

question but at least a lot of what is

about<01:11:22.679> is<01:11:22.920> actually<01:11:23.159> not<01:11:23.440> things<01:11:23.679> that<01:11:23.880> have

about is actually not things that have

the<01:11:24.440> kind<01:11:24.600> of<01:11:24.760> proof<01:11:25.080> that

the kind of proof that

that<01:11:26.040> would<01:11:26.239> be<01:11:26.800> easy<01:11:27.080> to<01:11:27.199> say<01:11:27.440> well<01:11:27.600> this<01:11:27.719> is

that would be easy to say well this is

just<01:11:28.040> true<01:11:28.239> who<01:11:28.400> cares<01:11:28.679> if<01:11:28.840> who<01:11:29.000> said<01:11:29.199> it<01:11:29.840> I

just true who cares if who said it I

mean<01:11:30.040> for<01:11:30.239> astronomy<01:11:31.159> where<01:11:32.159> astronomy<01:11:32.560> is

mean for astronomy where astronomy is

true<01:11:32.840> no<01:11:32.960> matter<01:11:33.159> who<01:11:33.280> said<01:11:33.520> it<01:11:33.920> is<01:11:34.120> much

true no matter who said it is much

easier<01:11:34.600> to

easier to

accept<01:11:37.159> and<01:11:37.320> he<01:11:37.520> actually<01:11:37.760> says<01:11:38.280> this<01:11:39.280> says<01:11:39.440> it

accept and he actually says this says it

in<01:11:39.639> astronomy<01:11:40.040> also<01:11:40.199> but<01:11:40.320> he<01:11:40.400> says<01:11:40.520> it

in astronomy also but he says it

precisely<01:11:41.080> for<01:11:41.679> ethics<01:11:42.120> which<01:11:42.239> is<01:11:42.480> like<01:11:43.440> at

precisely for ethics which is like at

least<01:11:43.719> he<01:11:43.840> should<01:11:44.040> try<01:11:44.320> to<01:11:44.480> tell<01:11:44.679> us<01:11:44.960> why<01:11:45.159> he

least he should try to tell us why he

believes<01:11:45.639> this<01:11:45.760> I<01:11:45.840> mean<01:11:45.920> you<01:11:46.040> know<01:11:46.159> there’s<01:11:46.280> a

believes this I mean you know there’s a

whole<01:11:46.600> chapter<01:11:47.040> right<01:11:47.199> you<01:11:47.280> know<01:11:47.400> in<01:11:48.440> where

whole chapter right you know in where

per<01:11:50.120> right<01:11:51.080> is<01:11:51.400> it<01:11:52.400> explicitly<01:11:52.920> says<01:11:53.320> there’s

per right is it explicitly says there’s

a<01:11:53.560> contradiction<01:11:54.360> the<01:11:54.520> philosopher<01:11:54.960> say

a contradiction the philosopher say

something<01:11:55.520> and<01:11:55.639> the<01:11:55.840> tell<01:11:56.120> say<01:11:56.280> something

something and the tell say something

else<01:11:56.600> what<01:11:56.719> we<01:11:56.840> going<01:11:56.920> to<01:11:57.080> do<01:11:57.679> and<01:11:57.760> he<01:11:57.880> doesn’t

else what we going to do and he doesn’t

even<01:11:58.480> try<01:11:58.679> to<01:11:58.920> convince<01:11:59.280> us<01:11:59.639> why<01:11:59.840> we<01:11:59.920> should

even try to convince us why we should

take<01:12:00.320> this<01:12:00.520> what<01:12:00.600> these<01:12:00.760> philosophers<01:12:01.159> say

take this what these philosophers say

seriously<01:12:02.040> there<01:12:02.120> is<01:12:02.239> a<01:12:02.639> reason<01:12:03.639> I’m<01:12:03.719> not

seriously there is a reason I’m not

saying<01:12:04.040> there<01:12:04.120> isn’t<01:12:04.360> the<01:12:04.520> reason<01:12:05.120> but<01:12:05.239> he

saying there isn’t the reason but he

just<01:12:05.520> says<01:12:05.800> it<01:12:06.159> like<01:12:06.320> and<01:12:06.440> it’s<01:12:06.600> very<01:12:06.840> weird<01:12:07.400> as

just says it like and it’s very weird as

a<01:12:07.639> presentation<01:12:08.040> for<01:12:08.159> a<01:12:08.280> normal<01:12:08.600> person<01:12:09.320> like

a presentation for a normal person like

okay<01:12:10.040> aryle<01:12:10.560> said<01:12:10.880> this<01:12:11.040> and<01:12:11.880> said<01:12:12.120> that<01:12:12.360> so

okay aryle said this and said that so

why<01:12:13.440> you<01:12:13.760> bothered<01:12:14.199> by<01:12:14.360> this<01:12:15.080> he<01:12:15.239> doesn’t<01:12:15.840> give

why you bothered by this he doesn’t give

us<01:12:16.239> to<01:12:16.639> let<01:12:16.760> us<01:12:17.199> understand<01:12:17.639> why<01:12:18.639> he’s<01:12:18.800> just

us to let us understand why he’s just

telling<01:12:19.159> us<01:12:19.719> on<01:12:19.840> the<01:12:19.960> authority<01:12:20.280> of

telling us on the authority of

Aristotle<01:12:22.560> or<01:12:23.239> again<01:12:23.400> on<01:12:23.520> theor<01:12:23.880> of<01:12:24.320> that

Aristotle or again on theor of that

understood<01:12:24.760> the<01:12:24.840> whole<01:12:24.960> Theory<01:12:25.280> and<01:12:25.400> thinks

understood the whole Theory and thinks

that<01:12:25.679> this<01:12:25.760> is<01:12:26.000> true<01:12:27.000> but<01:12:27.760> as<01:12:27.880> a<01:12:28.080> as<01:12:28.239> something

that this is true but as a as something

even<01:12:28.760> as<01:12:28.880> an<01:12:29.040> educational<01:12:29.560> tool<01:12:29.760> to<01:12:29.840> show<01:12:30.000> you

even as an educational tool to show you

that<01:12:30.320> proof<01:12:31.159> must<01:12:31.320> be<01:12:31.480> reckoned<01:12:31.920> with<01:12:32.280> it’s<01:12:32.440> a

that proof must be reckoned with it’s a

very<01:12:32.760> bad<01:12:32.920> tool<01:12:33.159> because<01:12:33.400> do<01:12:33.560> not<01:12:33.719> even<01:12:33.920> doing

very bad tool because do not even doing

that<01:12:35.120> if<01:12:35.239> he<01:12:35.360> would<01:12:35.480> go<01:12:35.639> and<01:12:35.800> say<01:12:36.639> say<01:12:37.639> it’s

that if he would go and say say it’s

better<01:12:38.040> to<01:12:38.159> be

better to be

a<01:12:39.920> but<01:12:40.080> AR<01:12:40.520> has<01:12:40.760> argument<01:12:41.199> the<01:12:41.320> opposite<01:12:41.760> how

a but AR has argument the opposite how

we’re<01:12:41.960> going<01:12:42.080> to<01:12:42.159> answer<01:12:42.400> this<01:12:42.560> argument<01:12:43.080> then

we’re going to answer this argument then

it<01:12:43.280> would<01:12:43.400> be<01:12:43.520> interesting<01:12:43.840> but<01:12:43.920> it<01:12:44.000> doesn’t

it would be interesting but it doesn’t

even<01:12:44.400> do<01:12:44.600> that<01:12:45.239> so<01:12:45.400> there’s<01:12:45.560> something<01:12:45.800> very

even do that so there’s something very

interesting<01:12:46.320> going<01:12:46.520> on<01:12:46.719> in<01:12:47.000> this<01:12:48.000> in<01:12:48.199> this

interesting going on in this in this

situation<01:12:50.199> or<01:12:50.480> something<01:12:50.800> to<01:12:51.159> to<01:12:51.320> worry

situation or something to to worry

about<01:12:54.360> that’s<01:12:54.679> what<01:12:54.920> I<01:12:55.239> can<01:12:55.440> tell<01:12:55.679> you<01:12:56.239> about

this<01:12:59.639> I’ll<01:12:59.880> go<01:13:00.040> on<01:13:00.239> go<01:13:00.320> on<01:13:00.440> and<01:13:00.600> figure<01:13:00.880> out

English, Shmone Prakim Preface - English, Youtube, בית המדרש עיון למחשבה, סוגיות, שמונה פרקים

וּכְשֵׁם שֶׁאֲנִי

Either it’s a chidush and a lie or it’s not a chidush and old – either way you don’t get credit.

Contents

Transcript